1887
image of Locating Chinese L2 interactional competence and intercultural communicative competence in turn
management
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the interactional competence (IC) and intercultural communicative competence (ICC) of beginner Chinese L2 learners through interactional engagement. Through conversation analysis (CA) of oral assessment transcripts and video recordings of two high-scoring (HS) and two low-scoring (LS) students, the study identifies key differences. HS students collaborate more effectively with the interlocutor, completing conversational sequences and employing a variety of repair strategies. LS students, by contrast, display more delayed or misaligned next actions and rely more on other-initiated repairs. Both groups experience overlaps, but HS students use them for collaborative engagement, while LS students’ overlaps more often result from delayed turn-taking. Clarification sequences appear only among HS students. ICC-related behaviors emerge when participants orient to culturally relevant practices, such as address terms or role-appropriate responses. These findings demonstrate that communicative competence extends beyond grammar and pronunciation. Turn and sequence management reflect participants’ moment-by-moment orientations to both interactional and intercultural contingencies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25004.wan
2026-01-19
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Byram, M.
    (2020) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H.
    (1996) The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00036‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai, D. W.
    (2024) Assessing interactional competence: Principles, test development and validation through an L2 Chinese IC test. Peter Lang. 10.3726/b21295
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b21295 [Google Scholar]
  4. Diao, W., & Chen, C.
    (2022) L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2020‑0148
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0148 [Google Scholar]
  5. Diao, W., Wang, Y., Donovan, A., & Malone, M.
    (2018) Interactional development through dinnertime talk: The case of American students in Chinese homestays. InSanz, C., & Meroles-Front, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315639970‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639970-20 [Google Scholar]
  6. Doehler, S. P.
    (2019) On the nature and the development of L2 interactional competence: State of the art and implications for praxis. InSalaberry, M. R., & Kunitz, S. (Eds), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Doehler, S. P., & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2011) Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional competence and development, –. Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.29308505.13
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29308505.13 [Google Scholar]
  8. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2019) Learning behaviors in the wild: How people achieve L2 learning outside of class. InJ. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (Vol.), –. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22165‑2_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G.
    (2017) Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amv010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Filipi, A., & Barraja-Rohan, A. M.
    (2015) An interaction-focused pedagogy based on conversation analysis for developing L2 pragmatic competence. InTeaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices, –. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P.
    (1985) Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/6.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  12. González-Lloret, M.
    (2015) Conversation analysis in computer-assisted language learning. Calico Journal, (), –. 10.1558/cj.v32i3.27568
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.27568 [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffith, R. L., Wolfeld, L., Armon, B. K., Rios, J., & Liu, O. L.
    (2016) Assessing intercultural competence in higher education: Existing research and future directions. ETS Research Report Series, (), –. 10.1002/ets2.12112
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12112 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hadley, G.
    (2017) Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315758671
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758671 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Doehler, S. P.
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development (Vol.). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072 [Google Scholar]
  16. He, A. W.
    (2004) CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑19‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x [Google Scholar]
  17. (2018) A non-linear view on interactional competence: Speaking Chinese as a heritage language. InThe Routledge handbook of Chinese second language acquisition, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315670706‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670706-15 [Google Scholar]
  18. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, , –. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  19. Hellermann, J.
    (2009) Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, (), –. 10.1080/00313830902757550
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757550 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2011) Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.29308505.11
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29308505.11 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hwang, J., Sato, E., & He, A. W.
    (2024) From intercultural engagement to intercultural communicative competence: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12738
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12738 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hymes, D.
    (1972) On communicative competence. InJ. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasper, G.
    (2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, , –. 10.1075/aila.19.07kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
    (2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0267190514000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014 [Google Scholar]
  25. Keevallik, L.
    (2010) Social action of syntactic reduplication. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kramsch, C.
    (1986) From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05291.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Lantolf, J. P.
    (2011) The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. InAlternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1989) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lynch, M.
    (2000) The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, (). 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.517
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.517 [Google Scholar]
  30. Markee, N.
    (2000) Conversation analysis. Routledge. 10.4324/9781410606471
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606471 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2008) Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amm052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2019) Some theoretical reflections on the construct of interactional competence. Inteaching and testing L2 interactional competence, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-3 [Google Scholar]
  33. Markee, N., & Kunitz, S.
    (2015) CA-for-SLA studies of classroom interaction: Quo vadis?InN. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (1st ed), –. Wiley. 10.1002/9781118531242.ch25
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242.ch25 [Google Scholar]
  34. Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E.
    (2003) Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic. (pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mori, J.
    (2004) Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑17‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2018) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amw021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2022) Emergent L2 grammars in and for social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12759
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12759 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, –. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378528‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-012 [Google Scholar]
  39. Robinson, J. D., Clift, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2024) The Cambridge handbook of methods in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108936583
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936583 [Google Scholar]
  40. Roever, C., & Dai, D. W.
    (2021) Reconceptualizing interactional competence for language testing. Assessing speaking in context: Expanding the construct and its applications. United Kingdom: Channel View Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Romagnoli, C., & Tao, H.
    (2022) Discourse markers in Mandarin L1 and Italian L2 monologue production and their pedagogical implications. InPedagogical grammar and grammar pedagogy in Chinese as a second language, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003161646‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161646-13 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rylander, J.
    (2004) Interaction in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: A conversation analysis approach. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/40666
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1978) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. InStudies in the organization of conversational interaction, –. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2000) Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, (), –. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  47. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00268.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00268.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
    (2012) The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Simpson, R., Eisenchlas, S., & Haugh, M.
    (2013) The functions of self-initiated self-repair in the second language Chinese classroom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2012.00323.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00323.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J.
    (2011) Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. The morality of knowledge in conversation, , –. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
  51. Su, Y.
    (2021) Accepting invitations and offers in second language Chinese: Effect of proficiency on pragmatic competence in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.033
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.033 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2022) Refusing invitations and offers in second language Chinese: Effect of proficiency at the actional and interactional levels. Journal of Politeness Research, (), –. 10.1515/pr‑2019‑0041
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0041 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, X.
    (2014) Self-repair practices in a Chinese as a second language classroom. Taiwan Journal of Chinese as a Second Language, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tao, H.
    (1996) Units in Mandarin conversation. Units in Mandarin conversation, –. 10.1075/sidag.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  55. (1999) The grammar of demonstratives in Mandarin conversational discourse: A case study. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, (), –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23756744
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tao, H., Salaberry, M. R., Yeh, M., & Burch, A. R.
    (2018) Using authentic spoken language across all levels of language teaching: Developing discourse and interactional competence. Chinese as a Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1515/caslar‑2018‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2018-0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, W.
    (2021) The question-response system in Mandarin conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), (), –. 10.1075/prag.20019.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20019.wan [Google Scholar]
  58. Young, R.
    (2008) Language and interaction. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Young, R. F.
    (2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R.
    (2004) Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑16‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25004.wan
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error