1887
image of Economical to elaborate and back again?

Abstract

This study investigates how L2-Chinese proficiency influences speakers’ sequential organization of requests. Fifty-four L2 Chinese speakers at four proficiency levels and 12 L1 speakers completed two dyadic roleplays about the social action of requesting. Data were analyzed by using Conversation Analysis. We noted that beginner-proficiency L2 speakers adopted an economical approach by placing a request in the sequence-initial position without preliminary moves. Lower-intermediate speakers adopted a more elaborate approach to formatting requests, using prefatory moves such as pauses, hesitation markers, availability checks, pre-pres and more elaborate backgrounds. The upper-intermediate speakers shaped requests more economically by moving much of the background information out of the request. This pattern continued with advanced L2 speakers and L1 speakers by which their requests became increasingly economical, although this was supplemented with context-fitting syntactic structures and mitigation devices. The study concludes with (1) high-level synthesis of interactional evidence of how human prosociality is managed at the interactional level and (2) on-the-ground practical suggestions for the teaching and assessment of requests in Chinese.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25016.wu
2026-05-29
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/csl.25016.wu/csl.25016.wu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25016.wu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, S.
    (2010) Requests made by L2 learners of Arabic: Pragmatic development, methodological comparison, and politeness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
  2. (2022) The development of L2 interactional competence in Arabic: The case of multiple requests. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12603
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12603 [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
    (2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/amr031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2014) Preference structure in L2 Arabic requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, , –. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0027 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015) Multiple requests in Arabic as a second language Multilingua, (), –. 10.1515/multi‑2014‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0056 [Google Scholar]
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics
    Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) Cultural diversity — Census. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people-and-communities/cultural-diversity-census/2021
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barron, A.
    (2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bella, S.
    (2012) Pragmatic development in a foreign language: A study of Greek FL requests. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
    (Eds.) (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, P., Levinson, S. D.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  11. Curl, T. S., & Drew, P.
    (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810802028613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dai, D. W.
    (2024a) Assessing interactional competence: Principles, test development and validation through an L2 Chinese IC test. Peter Lang. 10.3726/b21295
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b21295 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2024b) Interactional Competence for professional communication in intercultural contexts: Epistemology, analytic framework and pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2024.2349781
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2349781 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2026) What do second language speakers really need for real-world interaction? A needs analysis of L2 Chinese interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688221144836
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221144836 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, D. W., & Roever, C.
    (2026) Assessing digital Interactional Competence for second-language and first-language Chinese speakers: Effects of proficiency, mode, and setting. Language Learning, –. 10.1111/lang.70032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.70032 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ewald, J. D.
    (2012) “Can you tell me how to get here?”: Natural occurring versus role-play data in direction giving. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.22.1.03ewa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.1.03ewa [Google Scholar]
  17. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
    (2019) Speech acts in interaction: Negotiating joint action in a second language. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hassall, T.
    (2020) Preference structure in request sequences: What about role-play?Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.020 [Google Scholar]
  20. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. InR. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  21. Huth, T.
    (2010) Intercultural competence in conversation: Teaching German request. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, (), –. 10.1111/j.1756‑1221.2010.00077.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2010.00077.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasper, G.
    (2004) Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑18‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
    (2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
    (2011) A conversation analytic approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0267190514000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, S. H.
    (2009) Extended requesting: Interaction and collaboration in the production and specification of requests. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.013 [Google Scholar]
  28. Levinson, S. C.
    (2025) The interaction engine: Language in social life and human evolution. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009570343
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009570343 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, S.
    (2014) The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, Y. H., Pan, W. Y., Gu, W.
    (2019) 实用现代汉语语法 (第三版) [Chinese Grammar in practice (3rd Ed.)]. Commercial Press 商务印书馆.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ortega, L.
    (2009) Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2019) On the nature and the development of L2 interactional competence: State of the art and implications for praxis. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2021) Toward a coherent understanding of L2 interactional competence: Epistemologies of language learning and teaching. InS. Kunitz, N. Markee & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_21
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_21 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-012 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second language development: processability theory. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  36. Roever, C.
    (2022) Teaching and testing second language pragmatics and interaction: A practical guide. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429260766
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429260766 [Google Scholar]
  37. Roever, C., & Ikeda, N.
    (2022) What scores from monologic speaking tests can (not) tell us about interactional competence. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/02655322211003332
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211003332 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roever, C. & Kasper, G.
    (2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532218758128
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (). –. 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stokoe, E.
    (2013) The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: Comparing role-played and actual interaction and the implications for communication training. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.780341
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.780341 [Google Scholar]
  43. Su, Y., & Ren, W.
    (2017) Developing L2 pragmatic competence in Mandarin Chinese: Sequential realization of requests. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12263
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12263 [Google Scholar]
  44. Taguchi, N.
    (2015) Pragmatics in Chinese as a second/foreign language. Studies in Chinese Learning and Teaching, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
    (2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
    (2006) Request sequences: The intersection of grammar, interaction and social context. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.19 [Google Scholar]
  47. Taleghani-Nikazm, C., & Huth, T.
    (2010) L2 requests: Preference structure in talk-in-interaction. Multilingua, , –. 10.1515/mult.2010.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2010.008 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tinsley, T., & Board, K.
    (2013) Language learning in primary and secondary schools in England: Findings from the 2012 Language Trends survey. Education Trust.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2017) Language Trends 2016/17. Language Teaching in primary and secondary schools in England. British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodfield, H.
    (2012) “I think maybe I want to lend the notes from you”: Development of request modification in graduate learners. InM. Economidou-Kogetsidis, & H. Woodfield (Eds.), Interlanguage request modification (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.217.02woo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.217.02woo [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, J.
    (2023) The development of L2 interactional competence in Mandarin Chinese: Comparing role plays and elicited conversation. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
  52. Wu, J., & Roever, C.
    (2021) Proficiency and preference organization in second language Mandarin Chinese refusals. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12736
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12736 [Google Scholar]
  53. Xiao, F.
    (2017) Development in the use of Chinese mitigation in interaction. Chinese as a Second Language Research, , –. 10.1515/caslar‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25016.wu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.25016.wu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error