1887
Volume 52, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2451-828x
  • E-ISSN: 2451-8298
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

本文以美国学生初、中、高级阶段所使用的因果连接标记为样本,经过统计调查表明,英语母语学习者习得汉语因果连接标记过程呈非线性路径,两种语言中的共有义较早为学习者掌握;初级阶段较多受到母语语序影响,学生多使用因标后置式;中级阶段出现了多个词项,即母语和目的语标记词一对多或多对一情况增多,学习者容易将母语词的某个义位相对宽广的语义范围错误地推移到目的语的对应词上;高级阶段中介语因果连接标记模式的使用类型虽然越来越接近母语者,但化石化现象严重,高级阶段学习者除单用和搭配使用因果连接标记外,还出现了连用和套用模式。

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.52.3.04cao
2017-12-14
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, R.
    (1983) Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Altenberg, B. & Tapper, M.
    (1998) The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In S. Granger (Ed.) Learner English on computer, (pp. 80–93). London and New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chu, Z. & Tao, F.
    (2008) “Hànyǔ yīnguǒfùjù de gūanliánbiāojì móshì yú “liánxìxiàng jūzhōng yúanzé”” 汉语因果复句的关联标记模式与“联系项居中原则” [The Conjunction Distributional Patterns of Chinese Causal Comples]. Chinese Language中国语文326 (5), 410–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook, V.
    (1993) Linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑22853‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22853-9 [Google Scholar]
  5. Corder, S. P.
    (1992) A role for the mother tongue. In S. Gass , & L. Selinker , (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp.18–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.5.04cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.5.04cor [Google Scholar]
  6. Deng, S.
    (2003) Duìwàihànyǔ yǔfǎdiǎn nányìdù de píngdìng对外汉语语法点难易度的评定 [The assessment of difficulty of grammar points in Chinese as a foreign language]. In Guójiā Hànbàn Jiàoxuéchù (Eds.), Duìwàihànyǔ jiàoxué yǔfǎ tànsuǒ: Shǒujiè guòjì duìwài Hànyǔ jiàoxué yántǎohuì lúnwénjí对外汉语教学语法探索———首届国际对外汉语教学语法研讨会论文集 [Explorations in TCFL grammar: Proceedings from the First International Conference on TCFL Grammar.] (pp.102–111). Beijing: China Social Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, R.
    (1994) Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input: A review essay. Applied Language Learning, 5 (1), 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford, C. E.
    (1984) The influence of speech variety on teachers’ evaluation of students with comparable academic ability. TESOL Quarterly 18 , 25–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser, B.
    (1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14 , 383–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang, S. , & Yang, Z.
    (2016) Hánguóxúeshēng kǒuyǔ duōchóngyīnguǒ zhuánzhé yúpiān shǐyòngqíngkuàngfēnxī韩国学生口语多重因果转折语篇使用情况分析 [A study of multiple causal and transitional discourse in Korean students’ spoken Chinese]. Chinese Teaching in the World世界汉语教学, 30 (3), 356–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liao, Q.
    (1992) Liào Qiūzhōng wénjí廖秋忠文集 [The collection of Liao Qiuzhong]. Beijing: Běijīng Yúyán Xúeyuàn Chūbǎnshè.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, L-Y.
    (2005) Kǒuyǚ jiāojìzhōngde huàyǚ biāojì口语交际中的话语标记 [Discourse Markers in Chinese oral communication]. Ph.D. dissertation, Zhejiang University.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, J.
    (2011) Zàilùn gòushì yǔkuài fēnxīfǎ再论构式语块分析法 [More on the construction-chunk approach]. Studies in Language and Linguistics语言研究, 31 (2), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  15. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith-Christmas, C.
    (2016) Regression on the fused lect continuum? Discourse markers in Scottish Gaelic – English speech. Journal of Pragmatics 94 , 64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Song, Z. , & Tao, H.
    (2009) A unified account of causal clause sequences in Mandarin Chinese and its implications. Studies in Language, 33 (1): 69–102. doi: 10.1075/sl.33.1.04son
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.1.04son [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanghe, S.
    (2016) Position and polyfunctionality of discourse markers: The case of Spanish markers derived from motion verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 93 , 16–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wagner-Gough, J.
    (1975) Comparative studies in second language learning. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse, Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, J.
    (1994) Zhōngjièyǔ chǎnshēng de zhūyīnsù jí xiānghùguānxì中介语产生的诸因素及相互关系 [The Factors and Mutual Relations of Interlanguage]. Language Teaching and Research语言教学与研究 4 , 105–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  22. Xing, F.
    (2001) Hànyǔ fùjù yánjiū汉语复句研究 [Research on Chinese clauses]. Beijing [Shāngwù Yìnshūguǎn].
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Xing, Z.
    (2011) Guóbiéhuà; duìyīnghànyǔ jiàoxuéfǎ国别化:对英汉语教学法 [A Contrastive Model of Teaching Chinese to Native English Speakers]. Beijing: Běijīng Dàxué Chūbǎnshè.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu, M-Z.
    (1988) Xīnglǐ yúyánxúe心理语言学 [Psycholinguistics]. Shanghai: Huádōng Shīfàn Dàxúe Chūbǎnshè.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/csl.52.3.04cao
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.52.3.04cao
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error