1887
Volume 35, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a treebank-based study of the effect the text form (prose vs. verse) has on the course of two grammatical changes in Medieval French: the loss of null subjects and the loss of OV word order. By means of statistical analysis, we demonstrate that naive estimates of the spread of overt subjects and VO orders give the impression that there is a significant difference between the rates of development in prose vs. verse. By contrast, estimates based on an abstract grammar competition model which distinguishes between grammar-ambiguous surface forms (overt personal subjects, null subjects in coordination contexts) and grammar-unambiguous surface forms (overt expletive subjects, null subjects in non-coordination contexts) show prose-verse parallelism, prose having an earlier change onset, in line with traditional intuitions. At a more general level, these results suggest that the product of the interaction of a particular grammar with universal pragmatic laws is constant, which can be observed if the factors responsible for variation in grammatical choices are controlled for.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.00008.sim
2018-11-05
2019-03-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abeillé, Anne, Danièle Godard & Frédéric Sabio
    2008 Deux constructions à SN antéposé en français. InJacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks (eds.), Congrès mondial de linguistique française (CMLF08), 2361–2376. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.10.1051/cmlf08210
    https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf08210 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, Marianne
    1987 From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory5(1). 1–32. 10.1007/BF00161866
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161866 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agresti, Alan
    2002Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/0471249688
    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471249688 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
    1998 Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory16(3). 491–539. 10.1023/A:1006090432389
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbosa, Pilar
    1995 Null subjects. University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
  6. Bettens, Olivier
    2015 Chantez-vous français ? Remarques curieuses sur le français chanté de Moyen Âge à la période baroque (accessed12 july, 2018). virga.org/cvf/.
  7. Buridant, Claude
    2000Nouvelle grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dees, Anthonij, Steintje Meilink, Karin van Reenen-Stein & Pieter van Reenen
    1980 Un cas d’analogie: l’introduction de -e à la première personne du singulier de l’indicatif présent des verbes en -er en ancien français. Rapport/Het Franse Boek50. 105–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Du Bois, John W.
    2003 Argument structure: Grammar in use. InJ. W. Du Bois (ed.), Preferred argument structure. Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.14.04dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.04dub [Google Scholar]
  10. Dufter, Andreas
    2010 Subordination et expression du sujet en ancien français. InActes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes (Innsbruck, 3–8 septembre 2007), vol.2, 443–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1992 Discourse and diachrony: The rise and fall of Old French SI. InMarinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 433–73. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886047.433
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886047.433 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fontaine, Carmen
    1985 Application de méthodes quantitatives en diachronie: L’inversion du sujet en français. Université du Québec à Montréal MA thesis.
  13. Foulet, Lucien
    1928Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion, troisième édition revue. Réédition 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1935 L’extension de la forme oblique du pronom personnel en ancien français. Romania61–62. 257–315. 10.3406/roma.1935.3758
    https://doi.org/10.3406/roma.1935.3758 [Google Scholar]
  15. Franzén, Torsten
    1939 Étude sur la syntaxe des pronoms personnels sujets en ancien français. Uppsala University dissertation.
  16. Frascarelli, Mara
    2007 Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory25(4). 691–734. 10.1007/s11049‑007‑9025‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x [Google Scholar]
  17. Glikman, Julie & Nicolas Mazziotta
    2013 Répresentation de l’oral et syntaxe dans la prose du Queste del saint Graal (1225–1230). InDominique Lagorgette & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), Représentations du sens linguistique 5, 69–90. Université de Savoie.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guillot-Barbance, Céline, Bénédicte Pincemin & Alexei Lavrentiev
    2017 Représentation de l’oral en français médiéval et genres textuels. InAutour du clivage langue parlée/langue écrite du latin au français, Clermont-Ferrand, France.10.3917/lang.208.0053
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.208.0053 [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, Martin
    1978The evolution of French syntax: A comparative approach. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirschbühler, Paul
    1992 L’omission du sujet dans les subordonnées V1: les CNN de Vigneulles et les CNN anonymes. Travaux de Linguistique24. 25–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jelinek, Eloise
    1984 Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory2(1). 39–76. 10.1007/BF00233713
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233713 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel
    2016 When discourse met null subjects. Borealis-An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics5(2). 173–189. 10.7557/1.5.2.3727
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.5.2.3727 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jong, Thera de
    2006La prononciation des consonnes dans le français de Paris aux 13ème et 14ème siècles. Utrecht: LOT/Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaiser, Georg A.
    2009 Losing the null subject. A contrastive study of (Brazilian) Portuguese and (Medieval) French. InG. A. Kaiser & E. -M. Remberger (eds.), Null-subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance, 131–156. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kauhanen, Henri & George Walkden
    2018 Deriving the Constant Rate Effect. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory36(2). 483–521. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9380‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9380-1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kroch, Anthony
    1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change1(3). 199–244. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kroch, Anthony & Beatrice Santorini
    2014 On the word order of Early Old French. Handout for a talk at the 7th Conference on Syntax, Phonology and Language Analysis (SinFonIJA 7), Graz, Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Labelle, Marie
    2007 Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua117(1). 289–316. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Labelle, Marie & Paul Hirschbühler
    2005 Changes in clausal organization and the position of clitics in Old French. InMontserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 60–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lafond, Larry
    2003 Historical changes in verb-second and null subjects from Old to Modern French. InD. Eric Holt (ed.), Optimality Theory and language change, 387–412. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0195‑3_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3_14 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lagorgette, Dominique & Pierre Larrivée
    2013Représentations du sens linguistique 5. Université de Savoie.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    1992Histoire de la langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles. Paris: Dunod.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1995L’évolution du français. Ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012 L’oral représenté: un accès construit à une face cadrée des langues ‘mortes’. InBernard Combettes, Céline Guillot, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux, Sophie Prévost & Amalia Rodrígez Samolinos (eds.), Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique, 247–264. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018 De S0 à SV: Vers le sujet obligatoire et antéposé en français, les dernières phases d’un changement. Journal of French Language Studies28(1). 1–19. 10.1017/S0959269517000023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269517000023 [Google Scholar]
  36. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane & Magali Rouquier
    2012 De (S)OV à SVO en français: où et quand? L’ordre des constituants propositionnels dans la Passion de Clermont et la Vie de saint Alexis. InMonique Dufresne (ed.), Constructions en changement. Hommage à Paul Hirschbühler, 111–155. Presses de l’Université de Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mathieu, Éric
    2006 Stylistic Fronting in Old French. Probus18(2). 219–266. 10.1515/PROBUS.2006.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2006.008 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2009 From local blocking to cyclic agree. InJila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul & Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variations, vol.147, 123–158. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.147.04mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.147.04mat [Google Scholar]
  39. MCVF
    MCVF 2010 Corpus MCVF annoté syntaxiquement, (2005–2010), dirigé par France Martineau, avec Paul Hirschbühler, Anthony Kroch et Yves Charles Morin.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mitchell, Bruce
    1985Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Morin, Yves Charles
    2001 La troncation des radicaux verbaux en français depuis le Moyen Age. Études diachroniques. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes (30). 63–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Passarotti, Marco, Barbara McGillivray & David Bamman
    2015 A treebank-based study on Latin Word Order. InGerd Haverling (ed.), Latin Linguistics in the Early 21st Century. Acts of the 16th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 338–350. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Penn Supplement to MCVF
    Penn Supplement to MCVF 2010 Penn Supplement to the MCVF Corpus by Anthony Kroch and Beatrice Santorini.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pintzuk, Susan
    2004 Variationist approaches to syntactic change. InBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 509–528. Wiley Online Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Prévost, Sophie
    2018 Increase of pronominal subjects in Old French: Evidence for a starting-point in Late Latin. InAnne Carlier & Céline Guillot (eds.), Latin tardif -français ancien: Continuités et ruptures Coll. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 169–198. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110551716‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551716-009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rainsford, Thomas Michael
    2011 The emergence of group stress in medieval French. University of Cambridge dissertation.
  47. Roberts, Ian
    1993Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2014 Taraldsen’s Generalization and language change: Two ways to lose null subjects. InPeter Svenonius (ed.), Functional Structure from Top to Toe, vol.9The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 115–148. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rouveret, Alain
    2004 Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en ancien français. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris99(1). 181–237. 10.2143/BSL.99.1.541914
    https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.99.1.541914 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schøsler, Lene
    2002 La variation linguistique: Le cas de l’expression du sujet. InRodney Sampson & Wendy Ayres-Bennett (eds.), Interpreting the history of French, A festschrift for Peter Rickard on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, 187–208. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Simonenko, Alexandra
    2017 Determiners as a probe into diachronic information structure & the Definiteness cycle. Handout for a talk atFormal diachronic semantics2, Saarland University, Saabrücken, November20–21 (accessed12 July, 2018). https://www.academia.edu/35249405/Determiners_as_a_probe_into_diachronic_information_structure_and_the_Definiteness_cycle.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Simonenko, Alexandra & Anne Carlier
    2016 The evolution of the French definite article: from strong to weak. Handout for a talk atGoing Romance. Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt. 08–10/12/2016 (accessedJuly 12, 2018). https://www.academia.edu/28473104/The_evolution_of_the_French_definite_article_from_strong_to_weak.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Simonenko, Alexandra, Benoît Crabbé & Sophie Prévost
    2018 Agreement syncretisation and the loss of null subjects: Quantificational models for Medieval French. accepted forLanguage Variation and Change (accessedJuly 12, 2018). ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003491.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Simonenko, Alexandra & Paul Hirschbühler
    2012 Placement de clitiques dans les propositions V1 et évolution de la structure de la proposition en ancien français. InMonique Dufresne (ed.), Constructions en changementLes voies du français, 11–53. Sainte-Foye: Presses de l’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Vance, Barbara
    1997Syntactic change in Medieval FrenchStudies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8843‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8843-0 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vennemann, Theo
    1974 Topics, subjects and word order. InJ. M. Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics: Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics, vol.1, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Walkden, George & Kristian Rusten
    2017 Null subjects in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics21(3). 439–473. 10.1017/S1360674316000204
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000204 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zaring, Laurie
    2011 On the nature of OV and VO order in early Old French. Lingua121. 1831–1852. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zimmermann, Michael
    2014Expletive and referential subject pronouns in Medieval French. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110367478
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110367478 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.00008.sim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.00008.sim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error