1887
Volume 36, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The languages of the Dene (aka Athapaskan) family in North America almost universally employ two copular verbs. In several languages of this family, copular forms are also employed as verbal auxiliaries: forms of one copula mark clausal focus while forms of the other mark TAM (tense/aspect/mode) categories. With reference to two Dene languages in particular, Tłı̨chǫ Yatıì and Tsúùt’ínà, I explain this difference by positing distinct grammaticalization paths and motivations for each copula: both focus and TAM markers originate in a uniclausal reanalysis of biclausal constructions, the former from constructions where the matrix clause asserts the truth of the embedded clause, and the latter from those where the matrix clause supplies extra TAM information to the embedded clause. Both grammaticalizations involve an upward reanalysis of copulas as functional heads.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.15031.wel
2019-07-22
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackroyd, Lynda
    1982Dogrib grammar. MS, University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arche, María J.
    2006Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.94 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bommelyn, Loren and Talmy Givon
    1998 Internal reconstruction in the Tolowa Athabaskan verb. InCuarto encuentro internacional de linguística en el noroeste, 269–310. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2000 The evolution of de-transitive voice in Tolowa Athabaskan. Studies in Language24(1). 41–76. 10.1075/sl.24.1.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.1.03giv [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowers, John
    1993 The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry24. 591–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson, Greg N.
    1977 Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts.
  7. Chomsky, Noam
    1995The Minimalist program, vol.28. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook, Eung-Do
    1978 The verb ‘be’ in Sarcee. Amerindia3. 105–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1984A Sarcee grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2004A grammar of Dëne Sųhné (Chipewyan). Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013A Tsilhqút’in grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Demirdache, Hamida and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria
    2000 The primitives of temporal relations. InRoger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 157–186. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2007 The syntax of time arguments. Lingua117. 330–366. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. den Dikken, Marcel
    2006Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dogrib Translation Committee
    Dogrib Translation Committee 2003Nǫ̀htsı̨ nı̨htl’è: Zezı̀ wegǫ̀hłı̨ tł’axǫǫ̀ [Dogrib New Testament]. Toronto: Canadian Bible Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elford, Leon W. and Marjorie Elford
    1998Dene (Chipewyan) dictionary. Prince Albert, Saskatchewan: Northern Canada Mission Distributors.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. van Gelderen, Elly
    2011a The pronominal copula cycle. InE. van Gelderen (ed.), The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty, 128–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2011b The tense, mood, and aspect (TMA) cycles. InE. van Gelderen (ed.), The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty, 247–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2015 The copula cycle. Lingue e linguaggio2. 287–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Golla, Victor Karl
    1970 Hupa grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California Berkeley.
  21. Green, Lisa
    2014 Force, focus and negation in African American English. InRaffaella Zanuttini and Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Micro-syntactic variation in North American English, 114–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367221.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367221.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gyuris, Béata
    2009 Quantificational contrastive topics with verum focus. Lingua119(4). 625–649. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ha, Seungwan
    2008 Contrastive focus: Licensor for right node raising. InProceedings of the North East Linguistics Society37, 247–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hargus, Sharon
    2007Witsuwit’en grammar: Phonetics, phonology, morphology. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hargus, Sharon and Siri G. Tuttle
    1997 Augmentation as affixation in Athabaskan languages. Phonology14(02). 177–220. 10.1017/S0952675797003394
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675797003394 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harley, Heidi
    2013 External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua125. 34–57. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hucklebridge, Sherry
    2016 Internally-headed relative clauses in Tłı̨chǫ Yatıì. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto.
  29. Höhle, Tilman N.
    1992 Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. InJ. Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und grammatik, 112–141. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑12176‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaker, Alessandro, Nicholas Welch & Keren Rice
    2019 Na-Dene languages. InDaniel Siddiqi, Michael Barrie, Carrie Gillon, Jason Haugen and Éric Mathieu (eds.), The Routledge handbook of North American languages. New York; Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaker, Alessandro
    2012 Prosodic reversal in Dogrib (Weledeh dialect). Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
  32. Jetté, Jules, Eliza Jones and James M. Kari
    2000Koyukon Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Native Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kari, James M.
    1990Ahtna Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Native Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kari, James M. and Ben A. Potter
    (eds.) 2010The Dene-Yeniseian connection. Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Native Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Klein, Wolfgang
    2009 How time is encoded. InWolfgang Klein and Ping Li (eds.), The expression of time, 39–82. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199031.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199031.39 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 On times and arguments. Linguistics48(6). 1221–1253. 10.1515/ling.2010.040
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.040 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kratzer, Angelika
    1989 Stage-level and individual-level predicates. InEmmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer and Barbara Partee (eds.), Papers on quantification. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1995 Stage-level and individual-level predicates. InGreg N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 125–175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. InJohan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  40. Krauss, Michael
  41. Leer, Jeff
    2000 Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit morphs sorted by language number and morph, identified by cognate set in AET comparative lexicon database. URLwww.uafanlc.arsc.edu/data/Online/CA965L1996c/AETBinder_Leer.pdf
  42. Li, Fang-Kuei
    1930Mattole, an Athabaskan language. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lohndal, Terje
    2006 The phrase structure of the copula. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax78. 37–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2009 The copula cycle. InElly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change, 209–242. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146.13loh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146.13loh [Google Scholar]
  45. Lohnstein, Horst
    2005 Verum focus and phases. Linguistic Analysis35(1). 109–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2016 Verum focus. InCaroline Féry and Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 290–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Luján, Marta
    1981 The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua54. 165–210. 10.1016/0024‑3841(81)90068‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90068-1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Moore, Patrick
    1999Dene gudeji. Kaska Tribal Council, Integraphics.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2002 Point of view in Kaska historical narratives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Indiana.
  50. Morice, Adrien Gabriel
    1932The Carrier language (Déné family): A grammar and dictionary combined, vol.1. Vienna: Anthropos.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Petitot, Émile
    1876Dictionnaire de la langue dènè-dindjié: dialectes montagnais ou chippewayan, peaux de lièvre et loucheux. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. de Reuse, Willem J. and Phillip Goode
    2006A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. München: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rice, Keren
    1989A grammar of Slave. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110861822
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861822 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2000Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663659
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663659 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2008 On incorporation in Athapaskan languages: Aspects of language change. InThôrhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 375–410. Johns Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.113.15ric
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.113.15ric [Google Scholar]
  56. Rice, Keren and Leslie Saxon
    2005 Comparative Athapaskan morphosyntax: Arguments and projections. InGuglielmo Cinque and Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 698–774. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Rice, Sally
    2014 Corporeal incorporation and extension in Denë Sųłıné (Athapaskan) lexicalization. InMatthias Brenzinger and Iwona Kraska-Szlenk (eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment, 71–97. BRILL. 10.1163/9789004274297_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274297_006 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InL. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  59. Roldán, Mercedes
    1974 On the so-called auxiliaries “ser” and “estar”. Hispania57(2). 292–295. 10.2307/339830
    https://doi.org/10.2307/339830 [Google Scholar]
  60. Saxon, Leslie
    2000 Head-internal relative clauses in Dogrib (Athapaskan). InAndrew Carnie, Eloise Jelinek and Mary A. Willie (eds.), Papers in honour of Ken Hale, 93–108. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2015The Tłı̨chǫ syntactic causative and non-nominal CPs. University of Toronto. Presented atDog Days Syntax Workshop, August 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Saxon, Leslie and Andrea Wilhelm
    2016 The “possessed noun suffix” and possession in two Northern Dene (Athabaskan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics82(1). 35–70. 10.1086/684423
    https://doi.org/10.1086/684423 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmitt, Cristina
    1992 Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. InProceedings of the North East Linguistic Society22, vol.22, 411–426.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Stowell, Timothy
    1996 The phrase structure of tense. InJohan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 277–291. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tenenbaum, Joan M.
    1978 Morphology and semantics of the Tanaina verb. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
  66. Turtle, Siri and Sharon Hargus
    2004 Explaining variability in affix order: The Athabaskan areal and third person prefixes. Working papers in Athabaskan languages. Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers4. 70–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Tłı̨chǫ Community Services Agency
    Tłı̨chǫ Community Services Agency 2007Tłı̨chǫ yatıı̀ multimedia dictionary. Behchokǫ̀, Northwest Territories: Tłı̨chǫ Community Services Agency. URLtlicho.ling.uvic.ca
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Welch, Nicholas
    2008 Northwest passage: Northern Athabaskan copulas and auxiliaries. Master’s thesis, University of Victoria.
  69. 2012 The bearable lightness of being: The encoding of coincidence in two-copula languages. Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary.
  70. 2015a Deducing clause structure from the right periphery in Tłı̨chǫ Yatıı̀. International Journal of American Linguistics81(2). 261–291. 10.1086/680311
    https://doi.org/10.1086/680311 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2015b Obligatory future in a Dene language. International Journal of American Linguistics81(1). 41–81. 10.1086/679042
    https://doi.org/10.1086/679042 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2018Structures et interprétations des phrases copulaires en langues dénées. MS, McMaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Young, Robert W., William Morgan and Sally Midgette
    1992Analytical lexicon of Navajo. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1st edn.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Zagona, Karen
    2012 Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. InChiyo Nishida and Cinzia Russi (eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, (Cahiers Chronos 25), 303–327. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.15031.wel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.15031.wel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): copula , Dene , focus , grammaticalization and temporal
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error