Volume 34, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Evaluation of hypotheses on genetic relationships depends on two factors: database size and criteria on correspondence quality. For hypotheses on remote relationships, databases are often small. Therefore, detailed consideration of criteria on correspondence quality is important. Hypotheses on remote relationships commonly involve greater geographical and temporal ranges. Consequently, we propose that there are two factors which are likely to play a greater role in comparing hypotheses of chance, contact and inheritance for remote relationships: (i) spatial distribution of corresponding forms; and (ii) language specific unpredictability in related paradigms. Concentrated spatial distributions disfavour hypotheses of chance, and discontinuous distributions disfavour contact hypotheses, whereas hypotheses of inheritance may accommodate both. Higher levels of language-specific unpredictability favour remote over recent transmission. We consider a remote relationship hypothesis, the Proto-Australian hypothesis. We take noun class prefixation as a test dataset for evaluating this hypothesis against these two criteria, and we show that inheritance is favoured over chance and contact.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alpher, Barry , Nicholas Evans & Mark Harvey
    2003 Proto-Gunwinyguan verbal suffixes. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), 305–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Brett
    2004 Stem forms and paradigm reshaping in Gunwinyguan. In Claire Bowern & Harold Koch (eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method, 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.249.18bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.249.18bak [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008 The interpretation of complex nominal expressions in Southeast Arnhem Land languages. In Brett Baker & Ilana Mushin (eds.), Discourse and grammar in Australian languages, 135–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.104.09bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.104.09bak [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014 Word structure in Australian languages. In Harold Koch & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Australia: A comprehensive guide, 139–213. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Brett & Mark Harvey
    . Grammaticalization of complex constituents: Nominal prefixation in northern Australia. Manuscript: University of Melbourne & University of Newcastle.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baxter, William
    1998 Response to Oswalt and Ringe. In Joseph Salmons & Brian Joseph (eds.), Nostratic: Sifting the evidence, 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.142.12bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.142.12bax [Google Scholar]
  7. Baxter, William & Alexis Manaster Ramer
    1996 Review of Ringe (1992). Diachronica13(2). 371–384. doi: 10.1075/dia.13.2.11bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.2.11bax [Google Scholar]
  8. Black, Paul
    1997 Lexicostatistics and Australian languages: Problems and prospects. In Darrell Tryon & Michael Walsh (eds.), Boundary rider: Essays in honour of Geoffrey O’Grady, 51–69. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blevins, Juliette
    2001 Where have all the onsets gone? Initial consonant loss in Australian Aboriginal languages. In Jane Simpson , David Nash , Mary Laughren , Peter Austin & Barry Alpher (eds.), Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages, 481–492. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blevins, Juliette & Doug Marmion
    1994 Nhanta historical phonology. Australian Journal of Linguistics14. 193–216. doi: 10.1080/07268609408599509
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609408599509 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1935Language. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonfante, Giuliano
    1947 The Neolinguistic position: A reply to Hall’s criticism of neolinguistics. Language23. 344–375. doi: 10.2307/410296
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410296 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowern, Claire
    2006 Another look at Australia as a linguistic area. In Yaron Matras , April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective, 244–265. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230287617_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287617_10 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowern, Claire & Quentin Atkinson
    2012 Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language88. 817–845. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0081
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0081 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowern, Claire , Patience Epps , Russell Gray , Jane Hill , Keith Hunley , Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz
    2011 Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?PLoS ONE6. journals.plos.org/plosone/ (4April 2017.) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025195
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025195 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bradley, John
    1988 Yanyuwa: ‘Men speak one way, women speak another’. Aboriginal Linguistics1. 126–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Breen, Gavan
    2011 A new approach to Australian lexicostatistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics31. 233–268. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2011.560830
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2011.560830 [Google Scholar]
  18. Callaghan, Catherine
    1980 An “Indo-European” type paradigm in Proto-Eastern Miwok. In Katherine Klar , Margaret Langdon & Shirley Silver (eds.), American Indian and Indo-European studies: Papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler, 331–338. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110808681.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808681.31 [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell, Lyle
    2006Historical linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell, Lyle & William Poser
    2008Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486906
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486906 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chambers, Jack & Peter Trudgill
    1998Dialectology, 2nd edn. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805103 [Google Scholar]
  22. Clendon, Mark
    2014Worrorra: A language of the north-west Kimberley coast. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Crowley, Terry & Claire Bowern
    2010An introduction to historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2002Australian languages: Their nature and development (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486869
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486869 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eather, Bronwyn
    2011A grammar of Nakkara: Central Arnhem Land coast (Outstanding Grammars from Australia 7). Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellison, T. Mark
    2007 Bayesian Identification of cognates and correspondences. Paper presented at theNinth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Morphology and Phonology, Prague, June 28. doi: 10.3115/1626516.1626519
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1626516.1626519 [Google Scholar]
  27. Evans, Nicholas
    2000 Iwaidjan, a very un-Australian language family. Linguistic Typology4. 91–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2003aBininj Gunwok: A pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003b Comparative non-Pama-Nyungan and Australian historical linguistics. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (ed.) 2003cThe non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia: Comparative studies of the continent’s most linguistically complex region. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2005 Australian languages reconsidered: A review of Dixon (2002). Oceanic Linguistics44. 242–286. doi: 10.1353/ol.2005.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0020 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009 Doubled up all over again: Borrowing, sound change and reduplication in Iwaidjan. Morphology19. 159–176. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑009‑9139‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9139-4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fletcher, Janet & Andrew Butcher
    2014 Sound patterns of Australian languages. In Harold Koch & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Australia: A comprehensive guide, 91–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gasser, Emily & Claire Bowern
    2014 Revisiting phonotactic generalizations in Australian languages. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology. journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/ (4April 2017.) doi: 10.3765/amp.v1i1.17
    https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v1i1.17 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hale, Mark
    2014 The comparative method: Theoretical issues. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 146–160. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Harrison, Sheldon
    2003 On the limits of the comparative method. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 214–243. Maldon, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Harvey, Mark
    1997 Head and agreement classes: An areal perspective. In Mark Harvey & Nicholas Reid (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, 147–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.37.09har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.37.09har [Google Scholar]
  38. 2001A grammar of Limilngan: A language of the Mary River region, Northern Territory, Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2003a An initial reconstruction of Proto-Gunwinyguan phonology. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), 205–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2003b Reconstruction of pronominals among the non-Pama-Nyungan languages. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), 475–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2008Proto Mirndi: A discontinuous language family in northern Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2009 The genetic status of Garrwan. Australian Journal of Linguistics29. 195–244. doi: 10.1080/07268600902823102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600902823102 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2011 Lexical change in pre-colonial Australia. Diachronica28(3). 345–381. doi: 10.1075/dia.28.3.03har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.3.03har [Google Scholar]
  44. 2012 Warndarrang and Marra: A diffusional or genetic relationship?Australian Journal of Linguistics32. 327–360. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2012.705578
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.705578 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2013 Reconstructing long-term limits on diffusion in Australia. Anthropological Linguistics55. 158–183. doi: 10.1353/anl.2013.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2013.0007 [Google Scholar]
  46. Harvey, Mark , Ian Green & Rachel Nordlinger
    2006 From prefixes to suffixes: Typological change in northern Australia. Diachronica23(2). 289–311. doi: 10.1075/dia.23.2.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.04har [Google Scholar]
  47. Harvey, Mark & Nicholas Reid
    (eds.) 1997Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia (Studies in Language Companion Series 37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.37 [Google Scholar]
  48. Haynie, Hannah
    2014 Geography and spatial analysis in historical linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass8. 344–357. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12087
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12087 [Google Scholar]
  49. Heath, Jeffrey
    1978aLinguistic diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1978bNgandi grammar, texts, and dictionary. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 1980Basic materials in Warndarang: Grammar, texts and dictionary (Series B 72). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 1981 A case of intensive lexical diffusion: Arnhem Land, Australia. Language57. 335–367. doi: 10.2307/413694
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413694 [Google Scholar]
  53. 1984A functional grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 1987 Story of *-n-: *CV- vs. CV-n- noun-class prefixes in Australian languages. In Donald Laycock & Werner Winter (eds.), A world of language: Papers presented to Professor S.A. Wurm on his 65th birthday, 233–243. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kessler, Brett
    2001The significance of word lists (Dissertations in Linguistics 20). Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015 Computational and quantitative approaches to historical phonology. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 133–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kirton, Jean
    1971a Complexities of Yanyula nouns: Interrelationship of linguistics and anthropology. Papers in Australian Linguistics No. 5 (Pacific Linguistics Series A 27), 15–169. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 1971b Yanyula noun modifiers. Papers in Australian Linguistics No. 5 (Pacific Linguistics Series A 27), 1–14. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 1988 Men’s and women’s dialects. Aboriginal Linguistics1. 111–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Koch, Harold
    2014 Historical relations among the Australian languages. In Harold Koch & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Australia: A comprehensive guide, 23–89. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Koch, Harold & Luise Hercus
    2013 Obscure vs. transparent cognates in linguistic reconstruction. In Robert Mailhammer (ed.), Lexical and structural etymology: Beyond word histories, 33–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614510581.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510581.33 [Google Scholar]
  62. Krahe, Hans
    1967Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kümmel, Martin
    2007Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Riechert.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mailhammer, Robert
    2014 Etymology. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 423–441. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Mallory, James & Douglas Adams
    2006The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. McConvell, Patrick
    2009 Loanwords in Gurindji: A Pama-Nyungan language of Australia. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 790–822. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110218442.790
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.790 [Google Scholar]
  67. McGregor, William
    2008 The origin of noun classes in Worrorran languages. In Claire Bowern , Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.298.17mcg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.298.17mcg [Google Scholar]
  68. McGregor, William & Alan Rumsey
    2009Worrorran revisited: The case for genetic relations among languages of the Northern Kimberley region of Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Merlan, Francesca
    1994A grammar of Wardaman: A language of the Northern Territory of Australia (Mouton Grammar Library 11). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110871371
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871371 [Google Scholar]
  70. Nichols, Johanna
    1986 Head-marking and dependent-marking. Language62. 56–119. doi: 10.1353/lan.1986.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0014 [Google Scholar]
  71. 1996 The comparative method as heuristic. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 39–71. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Ringe, Donald
    1992 On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society82(1). 1–110. doi: 10.2307/1006563
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1006563 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2003 Internal reconstruction. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 244–261. Maldon, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  74. Ringe, Donald & Joseph Eska
    2013Historical linguistics: Towards a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511980183
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183 [Google Scholar]
  75. Sands, Kristina
    1995 Nominal classification in Australia. Anthropological Linguistics37. 247–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Seebold, Elmar
    1975 Archaic patterns in the word formation of early Germanic languages. Transactions of the Philological Society74. 157–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1975.tb01170.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1975.tb01170.x [Google Scholar]
  77. Seifart, Frank
    2012 The principle of morphosyntactic subsystem integrity in language contact: Evidence from morphological borrowing in Resígaro (Arawakan). Diachronica29(4). 471–504. doi: 10.1075/dia.29.4.03sei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.03sei [Google Scholar]
  78. Singer, Ruth
    2006Agreement in Mawng: Productive and lexicalised uses of agreement in an Australian language. Melbourne: University of Melbourne doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Tadmor, Uri , Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
    2010 Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica27. 226–246. doi: 10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...


Online appendices 1-8

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error