1887
Volume 34, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Auxiliary verbs are known to grammaticalize from lexical verbs, but how do lexical verbs acquire verbal complements to begin with? This article provides an account of the semantic and pragmatic basis of grammaticalization of the Spanish anterior (‘perfect’) [ +  + infinitive] from a lexical source construction meaning . Based on a description of in terms of its qualia structure, we argue that verbs meaning are lexically unsaturated, with an event variable that must be assigned a value, whether implicitly by inference or explicitly by a verbal complement. We show on the basis of historical corpus data from the 13th–18th centuries that overt lexical verb complements are initially motivated by informativity: the infinitive is used to describe the event when the type of event is unexpected. However, this original constructional meaning is eventually lost due to the process of , which has not been discussed in the literature on language change. Writers started using the infinitive in contexts in which the finished event is not unexpected. The subsequent development of the temporal meaning is motivated by the failure of listeners to accommodate too-costly presuppositions in a particular syntactic context, leading to the reanalysis of the constructional meaning. Consequently, overtification was a necessary condition for the subsequent temporalization of the construction. These findings shed light on possible reasons for the grammaticalization of auxiliary verb constructions, at both early and later stages in their developmental histories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16024.ros
2018-02-09
2019-08-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Gregory D. S.
    2006Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, Mira
    2008Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791314 [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Martin
    2010 Die Ingredienzen des romanischen Imperfekts. Linguistische Berichte221. 79–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolinger, Dwight
    1980 Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung. Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, 292–299. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burgos, Daniel
    2003 <Acabar de + infinitive> and <recién + Past> : Free variation or complementary distribution?In Claus Pusch & Andreas Wesch (eds.), Verbalperiphrasen in den (ibero-)romanischen Sprachen = Perífrasis verbals en les llengües (ibero-)romàniques = Perífrasis verbales en las lenguas (ibero-)románicas, 105–112. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, Mark
    2002Corpus del español (100 million words, 1200s–1900s). www.corpusdelespanol.org (22December 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015–2016Corpus del español, web/dialects. www.corpusdelespanol.org/ (8March 2017.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
    2002 Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21(2). 151–195. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckardt, Regine
    2009 APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jaqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 21–41. Bingley: Emerald. doi: 10.1163/9789004253216_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernández de Castro, Félix
    1999Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
    2006 La Historiografía medieval como fuente de datos lingüísticos. Tradiciones consolidadas y rupturas necesarias. In José Jesus Bustos Tovar & José Luis Girón Alchonchel (eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, vol.11, 1779–1807. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. García Fernández, Luis , Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez , Bruno Camus Bergareche , María Martínez Atienza & María Ángeles García Serrano
    (eds.) 2006Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gil, David & Eitan Grossman
    2014Allative-future syncretism in Malayic languages and beyond. Paper presented atSyntax of the World’s Languages6, Pavia.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grossman, Eitan & Ira Noveck
    2015 What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other?Linguistic Vanguard1. 145–153. doi: 10.1515/lingvan‑2015‑1005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-1005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
    2014 On the pragmatics of subjectification: The grammaticalization of verbless allative futures (with a case study in Ancient Egyptian). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia46(1). 1–40. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2014.956007
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.956007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2008Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. A study with special reference to the French phasal adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Richard Waltereit
    2006 GCI theory and language change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia38(1). 235–268. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heine, Bernd
    1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, Bernd , Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuteva, Tania
    2004Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ohala, John L.
    1993 The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Olbertz, Hella
    1991 Acabar y no acabar. In Henk Haverkate , Kees Hengeveld , Gijs Mulder & Hella Olbertz (eds.), Exploraciones semánticas y pragmáticas del español, 29–41. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1998Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110820881
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820881 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pustejovsky, James
    1991 The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics17. 409–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team 2015R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org (26December 2015)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2010Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Manual. Madrid: Escasa Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Recanati, François
    2004Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012 Pragmatic enrichment. In Gillian Russel & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge companian to the philosophy of language, 67–78. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reichenbach, Hans
    1947Elements of symbolic logic. London: Collier-MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ripley, Brian , William Venables & R Development Core Team
    2015nnet. Software for feed-forward neural networks with a single hidden layer, and for multinomial log-linear models, R package version 7-3-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rivas, Elena
    1996 Esquemas sintácticos y valores semánticos de acabar en castellano medieval. In Manuel Casado Velarde , Antonio Freire Lamas , José E. López Pereira & José Ignacio Pérez Pascual (eds.), Scripta philologica in memoriam Manuel Taboada Cid, vol.2, 621–634. La Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit
    2009 Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Hubert Cuyckens , Kristin Davidse & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B Dasher
    2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Vet, Co
    2005 L’imparfait: emploi anaphorique et emplois non anaphoriques. In Emmanuelle Labeau & Pierre Larrivée (eds.), Nouveaux développements de l’imparfait, 33–44. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Veyrat Rigat, Montserrat
    1994 La perífrasis verbal acabar de + infinitivo y la resolución de su ambigüedad. Vox Romanica53. 238–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Weinrich, Harald
    2001 [1964]Tempus: besprochene und erzählte Welt. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yllera, Alicia
    1980Sintaxis histórica del verbo español: Las perífrasis medievales. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16024.ros
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16024.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error