1887
Volume 35, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates the pragmatic function of new negative markers during incipient renewal of negation in ‘Jespersen’s cycle’. We outline a typology of these markers, suggesting a pathway by which they begin as specialized for use with discourse-old propositions and later expand to inferred propositions before finally becoming possible with discourse-new propositions. This framework is applied to an overlooked case of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic: replacement of early Norwegian () “not” by (originally “nothing”) from 1250 to 1550. We document a sharp rise in frequency of around 1425, suggesting that, until then, had been restricted to negating discourse-old propositions. Once this constraint was lifted, () and competed directly, resulting in rapid replacement of () by . This typologically unusual direct replacement of a negator with no intervening doubling stage can be attributed to the new negator’s origin as a negative indefinite and the lack of negative concord in early Norwegian.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16040.bla
2019-01-17
2019-08-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dokumentasjonsprosjektet
    Dokumentasjonsprosjektet 1997 Ein kort introduksjon til Dokumentasjonsprojektet. www.dokpro.uio.no/organisasjon/Infobrosjyre.html
  2. Diplomatarium Norvegicum
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum 1901–1903 ed.H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, vol.16. Oslo: Christiania.
  3. Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Romerske oldbreve
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Romerske oldbreve 1902–1919 eds.H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, Gustav Storm, Alexander Bugge, Christian Brinchmann & Oluf Kolsrud, vols.17–18. Oslo: Christiania.
  4. Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Aktstykker vedrørende Norges forbindelse med De britiske øer
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum. Aktstykker vedrørende Norges forbindelse med De britiske øer 1910–1915 eds.H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, Gustav Storm, Alexander Bugge, Christian Brinchmann & Oluf Kolsrud, vols.19–20. Oslo: Christiania.
  5. Diplomatarium Norvegicum
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum 1847–1861 eds.Christian C. A. Langer & Carl R. Unger, vols.1–5. Oslo: Christiania.
  6. Diplomatarium Norvegicum
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum 1970–1976 ed.Hallvard Magerøy, vol.21. Oslo: Christiania.
  7. Diplomatarium Norvegicum
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum 1990–95 ed.Ferdinand Linthoe Næshagen, vol.22. Oslo: Christiania.
  8. Diplomatarium Norvegicum
    Diplomatarium Norvegicum 1863–1900 eds.Carl R. Unger & H. J. Huitfeldt-Kaas, vols.6–15. Oslo: Christiania.
  9. Hávamál
    Hávamál. InJónsson, Guðni 1949Eddukvæði (Sæmundar-Edda). Reykjavík: Kostnaðarmaður: Sigurður Kristjánsson.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vǫluspá
    Vǫluspá. InDronke, Ursula 1997The Poetic Edda. Volume II: Mythological Poems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Auwera, Johan van der
    2010 On the diachrony of negation. InLaurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 73–109. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ayres-Bennett, Wendy
    1994 Negative evidence: Or another look at the non-use of ne in seventeenth-century French. French Studies48. 63–85. 10.1093/fs/48.1.63
    https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/48.1.63 [Google Scholar]
  13. Birner, Betty J.
    2006 Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia38. 14–32. 10.1080/03740463.2006.10412201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412201 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blaxter, Tam
    2015 Gender and language change in Old Norse sentential negatives. Language Variation and Change27. 349–375. doi:  10.1017/S0954394515000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000125 [Google Scholar]
  15. Blaxter, Tam T.
    2017 Speech in space and time: Contact, change and diffusion in medieval Norway. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.
  16. Breitbarth, Anne
    2009 A hybrid approach to Jespersen’s cycle in West Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics12. 81–114. doi:  10.1007/s10828‑009‑9027‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9027-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2014The history of Low German negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687282.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687282.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Breitbarth, Anne, Christopher Lucas & David Willis
    2013 Incipient Jespersen’s cycle: The (non-)grammaticalization of new negative markers. InJürg Fleischer & Horst J. Simon (eds.), Sprachwandelvergleich – Comparing diachronies, 143–164. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110313468.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110313468.141 [Google Scholar]
  19. Christensen, Kirsti Koch
    1985 Subject clitics and Ā-bound traces. Nordic Journal of Linguistics8. 1–23. 10.1017/S0332586500001232
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500001232 [Google Scholar]
  20. Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
    2003 On the synchronic and diachronic status of the negative adverbial ikke / not. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax72. 1–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005 Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Aarhus: Aarhus University dissertation.
  22. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1976 Mica. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Padova1. 101–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahl, Östen
    1979 Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics17. 79–106. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1‑2.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79 [Google Scholar]
  24. Detges, Ulrich
    2003 La grammaticalisation des constructions de négation dans une perspective onomasiologique, ou: la déconstruction d’une illusion d’optique. InPeter Koch & Andreas Blank (eds.), Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie, 213–33. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110911626.213
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911626.213 [Google Scholar]
  25. Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
    2002 Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21. 151–95. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1996 Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics26. 475–523. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00059‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00059-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Eckardt, Regine
    2006Meaning change in grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012 The many careers of negative polarity items. InKristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 299–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.12eck
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.12eck [Google Scholar]
  29. Espinal, M. Teresa
    1999 The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics19. 353–69. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90093‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90093-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Eythórsson, Thórhallur
    2002 Negation in C: The syntax of negated verbs in Old Norse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics25. 190–224. 10.1080/033258602321093364
    https://doi.org/10.1080/033258602321093364 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language64. 501–38. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale
    2007 The emergence of emphatic ne in conversational Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies17. 249–275. 10.1017/S0959269507002992
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507002992 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardiner, Alan H.
    1904 The word iwn3. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde41. 130–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gelderen, Elly van
    2008 Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology12. 195–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Giannakidou, Anastasia
    2001 The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy24. 659–735. 10.1023/A:1012758115458
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012758115458 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2009 The grammaticalization of negation markers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. InMaj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic pragmatics and semantics, 227–251. Bingley: Emerald . 10.1163/9789004253216_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_013 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2012 On the evolution of temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences34. 76–91. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014 The grammaticalization of negative indefinites: The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French. InMaj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), The diachrony of negation, 185–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Jacqueline Visconti
    2009 On the diachrony of ‘reinforced’ negation in French and Italian. InCorinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds.), Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, 137–71. Bingley: Emerald. 10.1163/9789004253193_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253193_009 [Google Scholar]
  40. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Haviland, Susan E. & Herbert H. Clark
    1974 What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13. 512–521. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(74)80003‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hellquist, Elof
    1922Svensk etymologisk ordbok. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Horn, Laurence R.
    1989A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2000 Pick a theory (not just any theory): Indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite. InLaurence R. Horn & Yatsuhiko Kato (eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 147–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Indrebø, Gustav
    1951Norsk målsoga. Bergen: J. Grieg.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Israel, Michael
    1996 Polarity sensitivity and lexical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy19. 619–666. 10.1007/BF00632710
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632710 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2001 Minimizers, maximizers and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning. Journal of Semantics18. 297–331. 10.1093/jos/18.4.297
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.4.297 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2011The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975288
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975288 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jäger, Agnes
    2010Anything is nothing is something: On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory28. 787–822. 10.1007/s11049‑010‑9113‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9113-1 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and other languages. (Det Kgl. Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-Filologiske Meddelser I 5). Copenhagen: Høst & Søn.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel Priestly, Kristin Hagen, Tor Anders Åfarli & Øystein Alexander Vangsnes
    2009 The Nordic Dialect Corpus. Online at: tekstlab.uio.no/nota/scandiasyn/ (accessed23 March 2018).
  52. Kiparsky, Paul & Cleo Condoravdi
    2006 Tracking Jespersen’s cycle. InMark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 172–197. Mytilene: Doukas.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Labelle, Marie & Maria Teresa Espinal
    2014 Diachronic changes in negative expressions. Lingua145. 194–225. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ladusaw, William A.
    1993 Negation, indefinites, and the Jespersen cycle. InJoshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser & Cheryl C. Zoll (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–446. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Larrivée, Pierre
    2010 The pragmatic motifs of the Jespersen cycle: Default, activation and the history of negation in French. Lingua120. 2240–2258. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2014 The syntax of pragmatics: The case of presuppositional negatives. Syntaxe et Sémantique15. 115–137. 10.3917/ss.015.0115
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ss.015.0115 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2016 The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French. Journal of Pragmatics95. 34–49. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  58. Magnússon, Ásgeir Blondal
    1989Íslensk orðsifjabók. Reykjavík: Orðabók Háskólans: Mál og menning.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Meillet, Antoine
    1912 L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia12. 384–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Munch, Christine B. Østbø
    2013 North Germanic negation: A microcomparative perspective. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
  61. Mørck, Endre
    1980 Passiv i mellomnorsk diplom. M.A. thesis. Universitetet i Oslo.
  62. 1999 Sociolinguistic studies on the basis of medieval Norwegian charters. InErnst Håkon Jahr (ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics, 263–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110807653.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110807653.263 [Google Scholar]
  63. Mæhlum, Brit & Unn Røyneland
    2012Det norske dialektlandskapet: innføring i studiet av dialekter. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Piñón, Christopher J.
    1991 Presupposition and the syntax of negation in Hungarian. InLise M. Dobrin, Lynn Nichols & Rossa M. Rodriguez (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 1991, Part two: The parasession on negation, 246–62. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Price, Glanville
    1978 L’interrogation négative sans ne. Studii şi Cercetări Lingvistice29. 599–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 1993Pas (point) without ne in interrogative clauses. French Language Studies3. 191–195. 10.1017/S0959269500001745
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269500001745 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schwegler, Armin
    1983 Predicate negation and word-order change: A problem of multiple causation. Lingua61. 297–334. 10.1016/0024‑3841(83)90001‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90001-3 [Google Scholar]
  68. 1988 Word-order changes in predicate negation strategies in Romance languages. Diachronica5. 21–58. 10.1075/dia.5.1‑2.03sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.5.1-2.03sch [Google Scholar]
  69. Schwenter, Scott
    2005 The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua115. 1427–1456. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2006 Fine-tuning Jespersen’s Cycle. InBetty J. Birner & G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in honour of Laurence R. Horn, 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.80.19sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80.19sch [Google Scholar]
  71. Wallage, Phillip
    2013 Functional differentiation and grammatical competition in the English Jespersen Cycle. Journal of Historical Syntax2. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 2017Negation in early English: Grammatical and functional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316335185
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335185 [Google Scholar]
  73. Willis, David
    2010 Motivating the emergence of new markers of sentential negation: The case of Welsh ddim. Diachronica27. 110–156. doi:  10.1075/dia.27.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  74. 2012 Negative polarity and the quantifier cycle: Comparative perspectives from European languages. InPierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds.), The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen cycle, 313–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2016 Incipient Jespersen’s cycle in Old English negation. InSten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen & Elly van Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt us: Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L. Wood, 465–491. Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Willis, David, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth
    2013 Comparing diachronies of negation. InDavid Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, volume 1: Case studies, 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Wouden, Ton van der
    1997Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1997Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Zeijlstra, Hedde H.
    2004 Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16040.bla
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16040.bla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error