1887
Volume 37, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the Proto-Quechuan lexicon, many two-segment phonetic substrings recur in semantically related roots, even though they are not independent morphemes. Such elements may have been morphemes before the Proto-Quechuan stage (i.e., in Pre-Proto-Quechuan). On the other hand, this may simply be due to chance, or to phonesthesia. In this paper, we introduce the Crosslinguistic Colexification Network Clustering (CCNC) algorithm, as well as an accompanying test statistic, which allow us to evaluate our claims against a neutral standard of semantic relatedness (the CLICS2 database; List et al. 2018). We obtain very strong statistical evidence that there are hitherto unexplained recurrent elements within Proto-Quechuan roots, but not within roots reconstructed for Proto-Aymaran, the proto-language of a neighboring language family whose members are otherwise structurally very similar to Proto-Quechuan, and which has therefore long been considered an obvious candidate for deep shared ancestry. Some of these elements are explainable as phonesthemes, but most appear to reflect archaic Quechuan morphology. These findings are consistent with an emerging picture of the early Quechuan-Aymaran contact relationship in which Quechuan structure was reformatted on the Aymaran template.

Abstract

In the Proto-Quechuan lexicon, many two-segment phonetic substrings recur in semantically related roots, even though they are not independent morphemes. Such elements may have been morphemes before the Proto-Quechuan stage. On the other hand, this may simply be due to chance, or to phonesthesia. In this paper, we introduce a methodology which allows us to evaluate our claims against a neutral standard of semantic relatedness. We obtain very strong statistical evidence that there are hitherto unexplained recurrent elements within Proto-Quechuan roots, but not within Proto-Aymaran roots. Most appear to reflect archaic Quechuan morphology, which has implications for the early Quechuan-Aymaran relationship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16041.eml
2020-08-05
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Academia Mayor de La Lengua Quechua
    Academia Mayor de La Lengua Quechua 2005Diccionario: Quechua-Español-Quechua, Qheswa-Español-Qheswa: Simi Taqe. Cuzco: Academia Mayor de La Lengua Quechua.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adelaar, Willem F. H.
    1986 La relación Quechua-Aru: Perspectivas para la separación del léxico. Revista Andina4(2). 379–426.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1987 Comentarios a Martha Hardman y Bruce Mannheim. Revista Andina5(2). 83–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2006 The vicissitudes of directional affixes in Tarma (Northern Junin) Quechua. InGrażyna J. Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, 121–141. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 Inverse markers in Andean languages: A comparative view. InLeo Wetzels (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages. Contributions to morphology and morpho-syntax, 171–185. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2010 Trayectoria histórica de la familia lingüística quechua y sus relaciones con la familia lingüística aimara. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP14. 239–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2011 Reconstruyendo el paradigma verbal quechua: El caso de la transición de primera a segunda persona. InWillem F. H. Adelaar, Valenzuela Pilar & Roberto Zariquiey (eds.), Estudios sobre lenguas andinas y amazónicas. Homenaje a Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino, 21–31. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2012a Languages of the Middle Andes in areal-typological perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran. InLyle Campbell & Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 575–624. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110258035.575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110258035.575 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2012b Modeling convergence: Towards a reconstruction of the history of Quechuan-Aymaran interaction. Lingua122(5). 461–469. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2013a Quechua I y Quechua II: En defensa de una distinción establecida. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Antropológica5(1). 45–65. 10.26512/rbla.v5i1.16542
    https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v5i1.16542 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013b Searching for Undetected Genetic Links between the Languages of South America. InRitsuko Kikusawa & Reid, Lawrence A. (eds.), Historical linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011, 115–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.326.10ade
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.326.10ade [Google Scholar]
  12. 2017 A typological overview of Aymaran and Quechuan language structure. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 651–682. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316135716.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316135716.021 [Google Scholar]
  13. Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Pieter Muysken
    2004The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486852 [Google Scholar]
  14. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2012Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593569.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593569.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Blake, Barry J.
    2017 Sound symbolism in English: Weighing the evidence. Australian Journal of Linguistics37(3). 286–313. 10.1080/07268602.2017.1298394
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2017.1298394 [Google Scholar]
  16. Blasi, Damián E., Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen
    2016 Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113(39). 10818–10823. 10.1073/pnas.1605782113
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113 [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell, Lyle
    1995 The Quechumaran hypothesis and lessons for distant genetic comparison. Diachronica12(2). 157–200. 10.1075/dia.12.2.02cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.12.2.02cam [Google Scholar]
  18. Campbell, Lyle & William J. Poser
    2008Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486906
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486906 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo
    1987Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos Bartolome de las Casas.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1989Lengua y sociedad en el valle del Mantaro. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1994Quechumara. Estructuras paralelas de las lenguas Quechua y Aymara. La Paz: CIPCA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2000Lingüística Aimara. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. . Forthcoming. Lingüística histórica y filología en el área andina: Encuentros y desencuentros. Revista Andina56. 101–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cobo, Bernabé
    1890 [1653]Historia del nuevo mundo. Sevilla: Imp. de E. Rasco.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Coler, Matt
    2014A grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara: Aymara as spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004284005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004284005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Coler, Matt, Nicholas Q. Emlen & Edwin Banegas-Flores
    2020 Vowel deletion in two Aymara varieties. Italian Journal of Linguistics32(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunn, Michael, & Angela Terrill
    2012 Assessing the lexical evidence for a Central Solomons Papuan family using the Oswalt Monte Carlo Test. Diachronica29(1). 1–27. 10.1075/dia.29.1.01dun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.1.01dun [Google Scholar]
  28. Emlen, Nicholas Q.
    2017 Perspectives on the Quechua-Aymara contact relationship and the lexicon and phonology of Pre-Proto-Aymara. International Journal of American Linguistics83(2). 307–340. 10.1086/689911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/689911 [Google Scholar]
  29. Emlen, Nicholas Q. & Willem F. H. Adelaar
    2017 Proto-Quechua and Proto-Aymara agropastoral terms: Reconstruction and contact patterns. InMartine Robbeets & Alexander Savelyev (eds.), Language dispersal beyond farming, 25–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.215.02eml
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.02eml [Google Scholar]
  30. Firth, John R.
    1930Speech. London: Ernest Benn.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. François, Alexandre
    2008 Semantic maps and the typology of colexification. InVanhove Martine (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.106.09fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.106.09fra [Google Scholar]
  32. Gentner, Dedre
    1981 Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs. Cognition and Brain Theory4(2). 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. González Holguín, Diego
    1607Gramática y arte nueva de la lengua general de todo el Perú llamada lengua qquichua o lengua del Inca. Lima: Francisco del Canto (1842 edition, Genoa: Pagano).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hardman, Martha J.
    1983Jaqaru: Compendio de estructura fonológica y morfológica. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haynie, Hannah J.
    2014 Deep relationships among California languages. Diachronica31(3). 407–447. 10.1075/dia.31.3.04hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.3.04hay [Google Scholar]
  36. Heggarty, Paul & David Beresford-Jones
    2010 Agriculture and language dispersals: Limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception?Current Anthropology51(2). 163–191. 10.1086/650533
    https://doi.org/10.1086/650533 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kessler, Brett
    2001The significance of word lists: Statistical tests for investigating historical connections between languages. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round
    2015 Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology25(1). 1–27. 10.1007/s11525‑014‑9250‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9250-z [Google Scholar]
  39. Laime Ajacopa, Teofilo, Efraín Cazazola, Félix Layme Pairumani & Pedro Plaza Martínez
    2007Diccionario bilingüe, Iskay Simipi Yuyayk’ancha: Quechua-Castellano, Castellano-Quechua. Unpublished manuscript. La Paz, Bolivia.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Landerman, Peter
    1994 Glottalization and aspiration in Quechua and Aymara reconsidered. InPeter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & Mario Daniel Martín (eds.), Language in the Andes, 332–378. Newark: Latin American Studies Program, University of Delaware.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1998 Internal reconstruction in Aymara and Quechua. InJane H. Hill, P. J. Mistry, Lyle Campbell (eds.), The life of language: Papers in linguistics in honor of William Bright, 35–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110811155.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811155.35 [Google Scholar]
  42. List, Johann-Mattis, Simon J. Greenhill, Cormac Anderson, Thomas Mayer, Tiago Tresoldi & Robert Forkel
    2018 CLICS2: An improved database of cross-linguistic colexifications assembling lexical data with the help of cross-linguistic data formats. Linguistic Typology22(2). 277–306. 10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
  43. List, Johann-Mattis, Anselm Terhalle & Matthias Urban
    2013 Using network approaches to enhance the analysis of cross-linguistic polysemies. InProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics – Short Papers, 347–353. Potsdam: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mannheim, Bruce
    1991The Language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2018 Three axes of variability in Quechua: Regional diversification, contact with other indigenous languages, and social enregisterment. InLinda J. Seligmann & Kathleen Fine-Dare (eds.), The Andean world, 507–523. Milton Park: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315621715‑33
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621715-33 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mason, John Alden
    1950 The languages of South American Indians. InJulian Steward (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, volume 6, 157–317. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mossel, Arjan, Nicholas Q. Emlen, Simon van de Kerke & Willem F. H. Adelaar
    2020 Puquina kin terms. InAstrid Alexander Bakkerus, Rebeca Fernández Rodríguez, Liesbeth Zack & Otto Zwartjes (eds.), Missionary linguistic studies from Mesoamerica to Patagonia, 277–298. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Münch, Alla & Johannes Dellert
    2015 Evaluating the potential of a large-scale polysemy network as a model of plausible semantic shifts. InWahle, Johannes, Marisa Köllner, Harald Baayen, Gerhard Jäger & Ttineke Baayen-Oudshoorn (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics. [www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~jdellert/pubs/amuench-jdellert-2015-polysemy-semantic-shifts.pdf, accessed25 April, 2020].
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Muysken, Pieter
    2012 Modelling the Quechua-Aymara relationship: Structural features, sociolinguistic scenarios, and possible archeological evidence. InPaul Heggarty & David Beresford-Jones (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, 85–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.5871/bacad/9780197265031.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265031.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  50. Oré, Luís Jerónimo de
    1607Rituale seu Manuale Peruanum et forma brevis administrandi apud Indos sacramenta per Ludovicum Hieronymum Orerium. Napoli: Apud Io. Iacobum Carlinum & Constantinum Vitalem.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Orr, Carolyn & Robert E. Longacre
    1968 Proto-Quechumaran. Language44(3). 528–555. 10.2307/411720
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411720 [Google Scholar]
  52. Parker, Gary J.
    1963 La clasificación genética de los dialectos Quechuas. Revista del Museo Nacional32. 241–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 1969a Comparative Quechua phonology and grammar I: Classification. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics1(1). 65–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 1969b Comparative Quechua phonology and grammar III: Proto-Quechua lexicon. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics1(4). 1–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 1973Derivacion verbal en el quechua de Ancash. Lima: Universidad Nacional de San Marcos, Centro de Investigación de Lingüística Aplicada.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ringe, Donald A.
    1992 On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society82(1). 1–110. 10.2307/1006563
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1006563 [Google Scholar]
  57. Salmons, Joseph C. & Brian D. Joseph
    1998Nostratic: Sifting the evidence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.142
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.142 [Google Scholar]
  58. Stark, Louisa R.
    1975 A reconsideration of Proto-Quechua phonology. Lingüística e indigenismo moderno de América. Trabajos presentados al XXXIX CIA, 209–219. Lima: IEP.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Steiner, Lydia, Michael Cysouw & Peter Stadler
    2011 A pipeline for computational historical linguistics. Language Dynamics and Change1(1). 89–127. 10.1163/221058211X570358
    https://doi.org/10.1163/221058211X570358 [Google Scholar]
  60. Szabó, Lili & Çağrı Çöltekin
    2013 A linear model for exploring types of vowel harmony. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal3. 174–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Torero, Alfredo
    1964 Los dialectos Quechuas. Anales Científicos2(4). 446–478.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Uhle, Max
    [1910] 1969Estudios sobre historia incaica. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Urban, Matthias
    2018 Quechuan terms for internal organs of the torso: Synchronic, diachronic, and typological perspectives. Studies in Language. 42(3). 505–528. 10.1075/sl.16081.urb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16081.urb [Google Scholar]
  64. Weber, David John
    1987Estudios quechua: Planificacion, historia y gramática. Lima: Ministerio de Educación, Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1996Una gramática del quechua del Huallaga (Huánuco). Lima, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Zalizniak, Anna A., Maria Bulakh, Dmitrij Ganenkov, Ilya Gruntov, Timur Maisak & Maxim Russo
    2012 The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. Linguistics. 50(3). 633–669. 10.1515/ling‑2012‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16041.eml
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.16041.eml
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error