The semantic development of borrowed derivational morphology

References

1. Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Ingo Plag
   (eds.) 2015 Special issue: Semantics of derivational morphology. Morphology25(4). 349–496. 10.1007/s11525‑015‑9272‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9272-1 [Google Scholar]
2. Baayen, Harald & Rochelle Lieber
   1991 Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics29(5). 801–843. 10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801 [Google Scholar]
3. Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag
   2013 The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Beard, Robert
   1995 Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coetsem, Frans van
   1995 Outlining a model of the transmission phenomenon in language contact. Leuvense Bijdragen84. 63–85.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dictionnaire du Moyen Français
   Dictionnaire du Moyen Français. www.atilf.fr/dmf/. (6April 2016.)
7. Douglas, David
   (ed.) 1975 English historical documents, vol3. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fisiak, Jacek
   1970 The semantics of English loanwords in Polish. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia2. 41–49.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gardani, Francesco
   . Forthcoming. Morphology and contact-induced language change. InAnthony Grant ed. The Oxford handbook of language contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze
    2015 Borrowed morphology: An overview. InFrancesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 1–23. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gramley, Stephan
    2012 The history of English: An introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Haselow, Alexander
    2011 Typological changes in the lexicon. Analytic tendencies in English noun formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238211
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238211 [Google Scholar]
13. Hay, Jennifer
    2003 Causes and consequences of word structure. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ingham, Richard
    2018 Medieval bilingualism in England: On the rarity of vernacular code-switching. InPäivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 319–337. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kawaletz, Lea & Ingo Plag
    2015 Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of -ment suffixation. InLaurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 289–319. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lehrer, Adrienne
    2003 Polysemy in derivational affixes. InBrigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 217–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895698.217
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895698.217 [Google Scholar]
17. Lieber, Rochelle
    2004 Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486296
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486296 [Google Scholar]
18. Lieber, Rochelle
    2012 Semantics of derivational morphology. InClaudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, 2098–2119. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Matras, Yaron
    2007 The borrowability of structural categories. InYaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199192.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199192.31 [Google Scholar]
20. Matras, Yaron
    2009 Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809873
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809873 [Google Scholar]
21. Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
    2007 Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199192
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199192 [Google Scholar]
22. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. www.oed.com. (12Dec 2013.)
23. Plag, Ingo
    1999 Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802863
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802863 [Google Scholar]
24. Plag, Ingo
    2006 Productivity. InBas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 537–556. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch23
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch23 [Google Scholar]
25. Sakel, Jeanette
    2007 Types of loan: matter and pattern. InYaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Schröder, Anne
    2011 On the productivity of verbal prefixation in English: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schulte, Marion
    2015a The semantics of derivational morphology: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the suffixes -age and -ery in English. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schulte, Marion
    2015b Polysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation – A case study of the English suffixes -age and -ery. Morphology25(4). 371–390. 10.1007/s11525‑015‑9271‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9271-2 [Google Scholar]
29. Schulte, Marion
    2016 Language contact in the history of English. InMarcus Hartner & Marion Schulte (eds.), Migration in context: literature, culture and language, 21–36. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schulte, Marion
    2017 Investigating semantic change in derivational morphology. InElise Louviot & Catherine Delesse (eds.), Studies in language variation and change 2: Shifts and turns in the history of English, 41–60. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Seifart, Frank
    2013 AfBo: A world-wide survey of affix borrowing. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. afbo.info. (11July 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
32. Seifart, Frank
    2015 Direct and indirect affix borrowing. Language91(3). 511–532. 10.1353/lan.2015.0044
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0044 [Google Scholar]
33. Siemund, Peter
    2008 Language contact. Constraints and common paths of contact-induced language change. InPeter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages, 3–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.7.01sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.7.01sie [Google Scholar]
34. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Trips, Carola
    2009 Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. The development of -hood, dom, and -ship in the history of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783484971318
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971318 [Google Scholar]
36. Uth, Melanie
    2011 Französische Ereignisnominalisierungen. Abstrakte Bedeutung und regelhafte Wortbildung. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110259742
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110259742 [Google Scholar]
37. Vanhove, Martine, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka
    (eds.) 2012 Morphologies in contact. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050057699
    https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050057699 [Google Scholar]
38. Winford, Donald
    2003 An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wohlgemuth, Jan
    2009 A typology of verbal borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219340
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219340 [Google Scholar]
40. Wright, Laura
    2018 A multilingual approach to the history of Standard English. InPäivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 339–358. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]