1887
Volume 35, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Word prosody and sentence-level intonation undergo complex interactions through time. In this study, I focus on the effects of intonation on the development of word prosody in two closely related Papuan languages, Makalero and Fataluku. Though both are very similar segmentally, Makalero’s prosodic system is based on trochaic stress, while Fataluku is characterized primarily by phrase-level intonational contours. On the basis of internal comparative evidence, I demonstrate that the trochaic stress system of Makalero is older, and that a series of well-motivated sound changes has led to a dissociation of stress and intonation in Fataluku. A disassociation between stress and intonation is typologically unexpected, and analysis of the historical development of Fataluku’s system sheds light on how such a dissociation may have taken place.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.17019.hes
2019-01-17
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arvaniti, Amalia & Mary Baltazani
    2005 Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. InSun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 84–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Campagnolo, Henri
    1973 La langue des Fataluku de Lórehe (Timor Portugais). Paris: Université René Descartes PhD Thesis.
  3. Chong, Adam J. & James Sneed German
    2015 Prosodic phrasing and F0 in Singapore English. InThe Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–5. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2017 The Accentual Phrase in Singapore English. Phonetica74(2). 63–80. 10.1159/000447429
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000447429 [Google Scholar]
  5. Correia, Adérito José Guterres
    2011 Describing Makasae: A Trans-New Guinea language of East Timor. University of Western Sydney PhD Thesis.
  6. van Engelenhoven, Aone
    2009a On derivational processes in Fataluku, a non-Austronesian language in East Timor. InW. Leo Wetzels (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages: Contributions to morphology and morphosyntax, 333–362. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2009b The position of Makuva among the Austronesian languages of Southwest Maluku and East Timor. InAlexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Bob Blust, 425–442. (Pacific Linguistics 601). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2010 The Makuva enigma: Locating a hidden language in East Timor. Revue roumaine de linguistique80(2). 161–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fogaça, Jessé Silveira
    2011 Fonética e fonologia da língua Makasae. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília Master’s Thesis.
  10. Hajek, John
    2006 Language contact and convergence in East Timor: The case of Tetun Dili. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 163–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayes, Bruce
    1995Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heston, Tyler M.
    2014a The nature and underlying representations of long vowels and diphthongs in Fataluku. Oceanic Linguistics53(2). 467–479. 10.1353/ol.2014.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0018 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2014b Prosodic differences between declaratives and polar questions in Fataluku. Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing, 395–403. Phuket, Thailand: Department of Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2015a The segmental and suprasegmental phonology of Fataluku. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Mānoa PhD dissertation.
  15. 2015b Fataluku word-level prosody. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–5. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016a Stress in Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics55(1). 278–289. 10.1353/ol.2016.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0012 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2016b The role of rhythm in intonational melody: A case study from Fataluku. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, vol.1, 14:1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017 A first reconstruction of vowels in Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics56(1). 73–89. 10.1353/ol.2017.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heston, Tyler M. & Stephanie Locke
    2019 Fataluku. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. Forthcoming.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2010 Notes on Waima'a intonational structure. InMichael C. Ewing & Marian Klamer (eds.), East Nusantara: Typological and areal analyses, 47–70. (Pacific Linguistics 618). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Himmelmann, Nikolaus & John Hajek
    2001 A report on the current sociolinguistic situation in Lautém (East Timor). Estudos de línguas e culturas de Timor Leste [Studies in Languages and Cultures of East Timor] 4. 88–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & D. Robert Ladd
    2008 Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation2(2). 244–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper
    2012 The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics51(1). 86–122. 10.1353/ol.2012.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2012.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Holton, Gary & Laura C. Robinson
    2014a The internal history of the Alor-Pantar language family. InMarian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages, 55–97. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2014b The linguistic position of the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. InMarian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages, 155–198. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hualde, José Ignacio
    2003 Remarks on the diachronic reconstruction of intonational patterns in Romance with special attention to Occitan as a bridge language. Catalan Journal of Linguistics2. 181–205. 10.5565/rev/catjl.49
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.49 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2007 Historical convergence and divergence in Basque accentuation. InCarlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes, vol.1, 291–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huber, Juliette
    2011A grammar of Makalero: A Papuan language of East Timor. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. . In preparation. Proto-Eastern-Timor.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hull, Geoffrey
    2004 The Papuan languages of Timor. Estudos de línguas e culturas de Timor Leste [Studies in languages and cultures of East Timor] 6. 23–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2005Fataluku. Dili: Instituto Nacional de Linguistica Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. de Josselin de Jong, J. P. B.
    1937Studies in Indonesian Culture I: Oirata, a Timorese settlement on Kisar. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam Afdeeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks 39. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers- Maatschappij.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jun, Sun-Ah
    2005 Korean Intonational Phonology. InSun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 201–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jun, Sun-Ah & Janet Fletcher
    2014 Methodology of studying intonation: From data collection to data analysis. InSun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 493–519. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron
    2000 A phonological model of French intonation. InAntonis Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology, 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4317‑2_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  36. Keane, Elinor
    2007 Distribution and alignment of F0 contours in Tamil. InJürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 993–996. Saarbrücken, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ladd, D. Robert
    1996Intonational Phonology. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2008Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lynch, John
    2000 Reconstructing Proto-Oceanic stress. Oceanic Linguistics39(1). 53–82. 10.1353/ol.2000.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2000.0007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven
    2016 No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology33(2). 353–389. 10.1017/S0952675716000154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675716000154 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nácher, P. Alfonso
    2003 Fataluco-Português: Primeira Parte (Introdução e edição de Geoffrey Hull). Estudos de Línguas e Culturas de Timor-Leste5. 135–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2004 Fataluco-Português: Secunda Parte. Estudos de Línguas e Culturas de Timor-Leste6. 119–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Boston: MIT PhD dissertation.
  44. Riad, Tomas
    2003 Diachrony of the Scandinavian accent typology. InPaula Fikkert & Heike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 91–144. (Studies in Generative Grammar 58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894530.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894530.91 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ross, Malcolm
    2005 Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. InAndrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schapper, Antoinette
    2017 Stress and gemination in Alor-Pantar languages: Revising Heston (2016). Oceanic Linguistics56(1). 257–266. 10.1353/ol.2017.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0011 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schapper, Antoinette, Juliette Huber & Aone van Engelenhoven
    2012 The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Timor and Kisar. InHarald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), Language & Linguistics in Melanesia, 194–242. Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schapper, Antoinette, Juliette Huber, Aone van Engelenhoven & Marian Klamer
    2014 The relatedness of Timor-Kisar and Alor-Pantar languages: A preliminary demonstration. The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology, 99–154. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2018Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 21st ed.Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.com/ (8September 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stoel, Ruben
    2008 Fataluku as a tone language. InPaul Sidwell & Uri Tadmor (eds.), SEALS XVI: Papers from the 16th annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 75–84. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams-van Klinken, Catharina, John Hajek & Rachel Nordlinger
    2002Tetun Dili: A grammar of an East Timorese language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Veilleux, Nanette, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Alejna Brugos
    20066.911 Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI, January IAP 2006. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare. ocw.mit.edu/ (1September 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Venditti, Jennifer J.
    2005 The J_ToBI Model of Japanese Intonation. InSun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 172–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vigário, Marina & Sónia Frota
    2003 The intonation of Standard and Northern European Portuguese: A comparative intonational phonology approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics2(2). 115–137. 10.5334/jpl.31
    https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.31 [Google Scholar]
  55. van Zanten, Ellen, Rob Goedemans & Jos Pacilly
    2003 The status of word stress in Indonesian. InJeroen Maarten van de Weijer, Vincent van Heuven & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The Phonological Spectrum: Suprasegmental structure, vol.2. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.234.11zan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.234.11zan [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.17019.hes
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.17019.hes
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error