Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bakker, Dik, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai, Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Pamela Brown, Dmitry Egorov, Robert Mailhammer, Anthony Grant, & Eric W. Holman
    2009 Adding typology to lexicostatistics: A combined approach to language classification. Linguistic Typology13(1). 169–181. doi:  10.1515/LITY.2009.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2009.009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Black, Paul
    1976 Multidimensional scaling applied to linguistic relationships. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain3. 43–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Čejka, Mirek & Arnošt Lamprecht
    1963 K otázce vzniku a diferenciace slovanských jazyků. Sborník prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské University, A, Řada jazykovědná12, 5–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Čejka, Mirek
    1972 Lexicostatistic dating and Slavonic languages. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské University, A, Řada jazykovědná21. 39–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolgopol’sky, Aaron B.
    1986 A probabilistic hypothesis concerning the oldest relationships among the language families of Northern Eurasia. InV. Shevoroshkin & T. L. Markey (eds.), Typology, relationship and time: A collection of papers on language change and relationship by Soviet linguists, 27–50. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunn, Michael
    2014 Language phylogenies. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 190–211. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dyen, Isidore
    1962 The lexicostatistical classification of the Malayopolynesian languages. Language, 38(1). 38–46. 10.2307/411187
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411187 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dyen, Isidore, Joseph B. Kruskal & Paul Black
    1992An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Embleton, Sheila M.
    1986Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fields, Edda L.
    2004 Before “Baga”: Settlement chronologies of the coastal Rio Nunez region, earliest times to C.1000 CE. The International Journal of African Historical Studies37(2). 229–53. doi:  10.2307/4129008
    https://doi.org/10.2307/4129008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fodor, István
    1961 The validity of glottochronology on the basis of the Slavonic languages. Studia Slavica7. 295–346. (Hungarianå version published as: A glottochronologia ervenyessege a szlav nyelvek anyaga alapjan. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények63(2). 308–344.)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature426. 435–439. 10.1038/nature02029
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grimes, Charles E., & Barbara D. Grimes
    1987Languages of South Sulawesi. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australia National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gudschinsky, Sarah C.
    1956 The ABC’S of lexicostatistics (Glottochronology). WORD, 12(2). 175–210. doi:  10.1080/00437956.1956.11659599
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1956.11659599 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heggarty, Paul
    2010 Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of “Word List” comparisons. Diachronica27(2). 301–324. doi:  10.1075/dia.27.2.07heg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.07heg [Google Scholar]
  16. Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller, & Dik Bakker
    2008 Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica42(3–4). 331–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kessler, Brett
    2001The significance of word lists. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kessler, Brett & Annukka Lehtonen
    2006 Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. InColin Renfew, Peter Forster (eds.), Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, 33–42. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kroeber, Alfred L.
    1958 Romance history and glottochronology. Language, 34(4). 454–457. 10.2307/410692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410692 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lees, Robert B.
    1953 The basis of glottochronology. Language, 29(2). 113–127. doi:  10.2307/410164
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410164 [Google Scholar]
  21. Levenshtein, Vladimir I.
    1965 Dvoichnye kody s ispravleniem vypadenij, vstavok i zameshhenij simvolov. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR163(4), 845–848;
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1966 Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady10(8). 707–710. doi: citeulike‑article‑id:311174
    https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:311174 [Google Scholar]
  23. Maguire, Warren & April McMahon, A.
    2011 Quantifying relations between dialects. InWarren Maguire & April McMahon (eds.), Analysing variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511976360.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976360.006 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mańczak, Witold
    2009 The original homeland of the Slavs. Studia Mythologica Slavica12. 135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marris, Emma
    2008 Language: The language barrier. Nature453(7194). 446–448. 10.1038/453446a
    https://doi.org/10.1038/453446a [Google Scholar]
  26. Mchugh, Mary L.
    2013 The Chi-square test of independence: Lessons in biostatistics. Biochemia Medica23(2), 143–9. doi:  10.11613/BM.2013.018
    https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018 [Google Scholar]
  27. McMahon, April, & Robert McMahon
    2005Language classification by numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mead, David & Melanie Mead
    1991 Survey of the Pamona dialects of Kecamatan Bungku Tengah. Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures11. 121–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe, & Tandy Warnow
    2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language81(2). 382–420. doi:  10.1353/lan.2005.0078
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0078 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nicholls, Geoff K., & Russell D. Gray
    2006 Quantifying uncertainty in a stochastic model of vocabulary evolution. InPeter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of language, 161–171. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Novotná, Petra & Václav Blažek
    2005 Glottochronologie a její aplikace pro slovanské jazyky. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské university, A, Řada jazykovědná54. 51–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Olmsted, David
    1957 Three tests of glottochronological theory. American Anthropologist59(5). 839–842. 10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  33. Oswalt, Robert L.
    1971 Towards the construction of a standard lexicostatistic list. Anthropological Linguistics13(9). 421–434. Retrieved fromwww.jstor.org/stable/30029088
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pereltsvaig, Asya & Martin W. Lewis
    2015The Indo-European controversy: Facts and fallacies in historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107294332
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107294332 [Google Scholar]
  35. Serva, Maurizio & Filippo Petroni
    2008 Indo-European languages tree by Levenshtein distance. EPL (Europhysics Letters)81(6). 68005. doi:  10.1209/0295‑5075/81/68005
    https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/81/68005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sheskin, David J.
    2003Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall Crc. doi:  10.1198/tech.2004.s209
    https://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2004.s209 [Google Scholar]
  37. Simons, Gary
    1977 Tables of significance for lexicostatistics. InRichard Loving, Gary Simons (eds.), Language variation and survey techniques: Workpapers in Papua New Guinea languages21. 75–106. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Starostin, Sergei A.
    1992 Methodology of Long-Range Comparison. InVitalii Shevoroshkin (ed.), Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind, 75–59. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004 Data cited from Novotná and Blažek (2005), as described in the text on page 108.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Swadesh, Morris
    1952 Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society96(4). 452–463. doi: 10.2307/3143802
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3143802 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1955 Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistics dating. International Journal of American Linguistics21(2). 121–137. Retrieved fromwww.jstor.org/stable/1263939
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tadmor, Uri
    2009 Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. InMartin Haspelmath, Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 55–75. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218442.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.55 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
    2010 Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica27(2). 226–246. 10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.04tad [Google Scholar]
  44. Tischler, Johann
    1973Glottochronologie und Lexikostatistik. Innsbruck: Kowatch.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, Zhao, Xuezheng Sun & James W. Hardin
    2010 A note on the tests for clustered matched-pair binary data. Biometrical Journal52(5). 638–652. doi:  10.1002/bimj.201000035
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201000035 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...


Supplementary materials

  • Article Type: In Brief
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error