Alignment change in Chukotkan

References

1. Anderson, Steven R.
   1977 On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 317–363. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arrieta, Kutz, Brian D. Joseph & Jane Smirniotopoulos
   1986 How ergative is Basque?Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL)3. 25–36.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mark & Jonathan David Bobaljik
   2017 On inherent and dependent theories of ergative case. InJessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 114–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benveniste, Émile
   1970 Definition d’un parfait en paleo-sibérien oriental. InRoman Jakobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds.), Studies in general and oriental linguistics (American Anthropologist 73(6)), 6–9. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bergsland, Knut
   1989 Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja/Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne82. 7–80.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bickel, Balthasar, Giorgio Iemmolo, Taras Zakharko & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
   2013 Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. InDik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110331127.15
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.15 [Google Scholar]
7. Bobaljik, Jonathan David
   1998 Pseudo-ergativity in Chukotko-Kamchatkan agreement systems. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes27. 21–44.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bogoras, Waldemar G.
   1922 Chukchee. InFranz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages, part2 (BAE-Bulletin 40), 631–903. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coghill, Eleanor
   2016 The rise and fall of ergativity in Aramaic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723806.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723806.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Comrie, Bernard
    1979 Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. InFrans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 219–240. London & New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Comrie, Bernard
    1980 Inverse verb forms in Siberia: Evidence from Chukchee, Koryak, and Kamchadal. Folia Linguistica1(1). 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Comrie, Bernard
    1981 The languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Comrie, Bernard
    1996 Language contact in northeastern Siberia (Chukotka and Kamchatka). InErnst Håkon Jahr & Ingvild Broch (eds.), Language contact in the Arctic, 33–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110813302.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813302.33 [Google Scholar]
14. Comrie, Bernard
    2013 Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/98, Accessed on2019-04-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Smet, Hendrik, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde
    (eds.) 2015 On multiple source constructions in language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.79
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.79 [Google Scholar]
16. Dikov, N. N.
    1979 Drevnie kultury severo-vostočnoj Azii. Moskow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1979 Ergativity. Language55(1). 59–138. 10.2307/412519
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412519 [Google Scholar]
18. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1994 Ergativity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
19. Dunn, Michael
    1994 A sketch grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University BA thesis.
20. Dunn, Michael
    1999 A grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
21. Forsyth, James
    1992 A history of the peoples of Siberia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fortescue, Michael
    1995 The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Ètudes/Inuit/Studies19(2). 61–75.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fortescue, Michael
    1997 Eskimo influence on the formation of the Chukotkan ergative clause. Studies in Language21(2). 369–409. 10.1075/sl.21.2.05for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.2.05for [Google Scholar]
24. Fortescue, Michael
    1998 Language relations across the Bering Strait: Reappraising the archaeological and linguistic evidence. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fortescue, Michael
    2003 Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Linguistic Typology7(1). 51–88. 10.1515/lity.2003.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
26. Fortescue, Michael
    2005 Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan dictionary. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110925388
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925388 [Google Scholar]
27. Garrett, Andrew
    1990 The origin of NP split ergativity. Language66(2). 261–296. 10.2307/414887
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414887 [Google Scholar]
28. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
29. Johns, Alana
    2001 Ergative to accusative: Comparing evidence from Inuktitut. InJan Terje Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change, 205–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.56.09joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.09joh [Google Scholar]
30. Joseph, Brian D.
    2013 Multiple sources and multiple cases multiply explored. Studies in Language27(3). 675–691.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Krupnik, Igor & Michael Chlenov
    2013 Yupik transitions: Change and survival at Bering Strait, 1900–1960. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Levin, M. G.
    1963 Ethnic origins of the peoples of northeastern Asia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Malkiel, Yakov
    1967 Multiple versus simple causation in linguistic change. InTo honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 1228–1246. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mithun, Marianne
    2008 The emergence of agentive systems. InMark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment systems, 297–333. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
35. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
    1979 Degrees of ergativity in Chukchee. InFrans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 241–262. London & New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reuse, Willem J. de
    1994 Siberian Yupik Eskimo: The language and its contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Reuse, Willem J. de
    1996 Chukchi, English, and Eskimo: A survey of jargons in the Chukotka Peninsula area. InErnst Håkon Jahr & Ingvild Broch (eds.), Language contact in the Arctic, 47–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110813302.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813302.47 [Google Scholar]
38. Siewierska, Anna
    2013 Alignment of verbal person marking. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/100, Accessed on2019-04-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
39. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. InR.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Skorik, Petr Ja
    1961/1977 Grammatika Chukotskogo jazyka [The grammar of Chukchi]. Moscow & Leningrad: Akademija Nauk USSR.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Trask, Robert L.
    1979 On the origins of ergativity. InFrans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 385–404. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tuite, Kevin
    1999 The myth of the Caucasian Sprachbund: The case of ergativity. Lingua108. 1–26. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(98)00037‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00037-0 [Google Scholar]
44. Vakhtin, Nikolai
    1998 Endangered languages in northeast Siberia: Siberian Yupik and other languages of Chukotka. InErich Kasten (ed.), Bicultural education in the north: Ways of preserving and enhancing indigenous peoples’ languages and traditional knowledge, 159–173. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vdovin, I. S.
    1961 Eskimosskie elementy v kul’ture čukčej i korjakov. Sibirskij Ètnografičeskij Sbornik3. 27–63.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Volodin, Aleksandr P.
    1976 Itel’menskyj jazyk. Leningrad: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Volodin, Aleksandr P.
    1992 Chukotsko-KamCatskie jazyki. InAleksandr P. Volodin, Nikolai B. Vakhtin & Andrej A. Kibrik (eds.), Jazyki mira: Paleoaziatskie jazyki, 12–22. Moscow: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk Institut Jazykoznanija.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Whitman, John & Yuko Yanagida
    2012 The formal syntax of alignment change. InCharlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change, 177–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
49. Zhukova, Alevtina N.
    1978 Dialektologicheskoe i lingvogeograficheskoe issledovanie chukotsko-kamchatskikh jazykov. InM. A. Borodina (ed.), Narody i jazyki Sibiri, 78–83. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]