Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper addresses the emergence and development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction (CrCC) from the perspective of constructionalization. Most previous historical studies of the CrCC take a grammaticalization approach (e.g., Long 2013), focusing mainly on morphosyntax alone rather than investigating syntax and semantics in an integrated way. However, the architecture of construction grammar requires approaching linguistic analysis with both form and meaning equally in mind. This approach suggests that what have sometimes been considered to be merely different formal expressions of the CrCC are in fact two different constructions, one correlative, and the other a simple incremental. We identify the critical contexts (see Diewald & Smirnova 2010) that by hypothesis enabled the constructionalization of the CrCC, and point to the importance of considering network reorganization and multiple sources in the development of the simple incremental construction (see e.g., Boas 2008Van de Velde et al. 2013).


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Curt
    2013 Inherent and coerced gradability across categories: Manipulating pragmatic halos with sorta. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference23, 81–96. 10.3765/salt.v23i0.2667
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2667 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ansaldo, Umberto
    2010 Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics48(4). 919–950. 10.1515/ling.2010.029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.029 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Valgerður Bjarnadóttir, Serena Danesi, Tonya Kim Dewey, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Chiara Fedriani & Thomas Smitherman
    2013 The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of European Studies41(3). 321–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, Sigrid
    1997 On the semantics of the comparative conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy. 20(3). 229–271. 10.1023/A:1005361901518
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005361901518 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice Julie
    2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110294002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boas, Hans C.
    2008 Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics6. 113–144. 10.1075/arcl.6.06boa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.06boa [Google Scholar]
  7. Booij, Geert
    2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walden
    2015 On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society113(3). 363–382. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12068
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12068 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, G., & Yule, G.
    1983Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan
    2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cappelle, Bert
    2006 Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. InDoris Schönefeld (ed.), Constructions all over: Case studies and theoretical implications, special issue of Constructions. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, William
    2000Explaining language change. Harlow, Essex: Longman, Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
    2005Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Smet, Hendrik
    2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 Does innovation need reanalysis?InEvie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 23–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change28(1). 83–102. 10.1017/S0954394515000186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel van Goethem
    2018 The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics29(2). 197–234. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0025 [Google Scholar]
  21. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. InIlse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  22. 2006 Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. ConstructionsSV1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova
    2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110241037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241037 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fried, Mirjam
    2008 Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. InAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(5). 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2013 Constructionist approaches. InHoffmann and Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–33. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
    2016 Constructional change vs. grammaticalization: From compounding to derivation. Studies in Language40(1). 137–175. 10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei [Google Scholar]
  30. Hilpert, Martin
    2008Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. InKathryn Allan & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 133–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2018 Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. InEvie Coussé, Joel Olofsson & Peter Andersson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 22–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2014 Comparing English comparative correlatives. Postdoctoral dissertation, Osnabrück University.
  36. Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
    (eds.) 2013The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij
    2014 From compounding to derivation: The rise of derivational affixes through constructionalization. InFerdinand von Mengden & Horst Simon (eds.), Refining grammaticalization. Special issue of Folia Linguistica48(2). 579–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Israel, Michael
    1996 The way constructions grow. InAdele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Xiao & Carlos A. Fasola
    2010 The semantics of yue…yue in Mandarin Chinese. InLauren Eby Clemens & Chi-Ming Louis Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL 20), 36–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin, Jo-Wang
    2007 On the semantics of comparative correlatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Semantics24(2). 169–213. 10.1093/jos/ffm001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Shizhen & Yunxia Ji
    2007 A tentative analysis of the origin of Middle Chinese grammar and its historical position. Macrolinguistics1. 141–156. 10.26478/ja2007.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.26478/ja2007.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Long, Guofu
    2013 [Yuelaiyue…] goushi de yufahua [The grammaticalization of the [yuelaiyue …] construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 1. 25–33.
  43. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [The eight hundred words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  44. 1985Jindai Hanyu zhidaici [Demonstratives and pronouns in Early Mandarin]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
  45. McCawley, James D.
    1988 The comparative conditional construction in English, German and Chinese. Berkeley Linguistics Society14, 176–187. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Paradis, Carita
    2001 Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics12. 47–65. 10.1515/cogl.12.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  47. Perek, Florent
    2015Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  48. Petré, Peter
    2014Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2019 The dynamic of assemblies and constructions. InBeatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept, 155–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Peyraube, Alain
    1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. InC.-T. J. Huang & Audrey Li Yen Hui (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6 [Google Scholar]
  51. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
    1988 Variation and historical linguistics. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen89(2). 136–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sag, Ivan A.
    2010 English filler-gap constructions. Language86(3). 486–45. 10.1353/lan.2010.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1983 [1916]Course in general linguistics. Translated byRoy Harris. Chicago: Open Court (first published in French in 1916).
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
    2015 Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profile. Anglia133(4). 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schuessler, Alex
    2015 New Old Chinese. Diachronica32(4). 571–598. 10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch [Google Scholar]
  57. Smirnova, Elena
    2015 Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. InBarðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.03smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi [Google Scholar]
  58. Stassen, Leon
    1985Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sun, Chaofen
    1996Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Torrent, Tiago Timponi
    2015 On the relation between inheritance and change: The Constructional convergence and construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. InBarðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.06tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor [Google Scholar]
  61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2014 Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies1(1). 3–21. Slightly modified reprint inSylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization – Theory and data, 87–105. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
    2013 On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language37(3). 473–488. 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.01int [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang, Cui
    2016 “Hongtao yue lingluan” gai ruhe lijie? [How to interpret “hongtao yue linglun”?], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 5. 615–616.
  65. Wold, Dag
    1991 A few properties of the…the… comparative constructions, InMatt Alexander & Monica Dressler (eds), Second Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistic Society of Midamerica (FLSM2)272–281. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Zehentner, Eva
    2018 Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialization and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics22(1). 149–175. 10.1017/S1360674316000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000447 [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhan, Fangqiong
    2017 The constructionalization of a set of Chinese connectives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics46(1). 104–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2019 The development of the shì copula construction: A constructional perspective. Functions of Language26(2). 139–176. 10.1075/fol.16001.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16001.zha [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo & Yirong Chen
    2003 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present, ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus
  70. Zhang, Jiahe
    2010 Chengdu fuci yue, yuefa de yufahua ji xiangguan wenti [The grammaticalization of the degree adverbs yue and yuefa], Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Learning] 5. 69–75.
  71. Zhu, Qizhi
    2010 Suizhe A he yuelaiyue A de tongxian yanjiu jiqi lishi kaocha [A diachronic study on the co-occurrence of suizhe A and yuelaiyue A], Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Global Chinese Teaching] 1. 66–72.

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error