Volume 37, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



For Japanese verbal suffixes sensitive to the C/V status of the stem-final segment, C-stem alternants are underlying, and regular V-stem alternants result from intervocalic epenthesis of at stem boundary (de Chene 2016). This “Analysis A” entails that any V-stem suffix not consisting of plus its C-stem counterpart is irregular and subject to replacement. While the Epenthesis rule of Analysis A is naturally understood as a generalization of the zero alternation of three suffixes that have shown it since the eighth century, however, the innovative initial suffixes of other categories do not appear until the eighteenth. This lag is illuminated by the dialects of Kyūshū, where adoption of Analysis A is blocked by the “bigrade” stem alternation, which in most dialects was leveled in the seventeenth century. Building on a discussion of leveling that treats that phenomenon as a subtype of regularization, it is proposed in explanation of this “bigrade blocking” effect that the order in which alternations become subject to regularization is constrained by the phonological distance between alternants. Investigation of the possibility that the bigrade alternation and Analysis A are related by a triggering effect as well as by a blocking effect then leads to an account of the adoption of Analysis A that, similarly, relies crucially on the concept of phonological distance. Throughout, the focus is on the role of language-internal factors in determining the timing of analogical change.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albright, Adam
    2002 The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  2. 2008 Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. InJeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 144–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkire, Ti & Carol Rosen
    2010Romance languages: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845192
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845192 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, Henning
    1973 Abductive and deductive change. Language49. 765–793. 10.2307/412063
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412063 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloch, Bernard
    1970 [1946] Studies in colloquial Japanese I. Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society66. 97–109. Reprinted inRoy Andrew Miller (ed.) 1970 Bernard Bloch on Japanese, 1–24. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Casali, Roderic F.
    1997 Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes?Language73. 493–533. 10.2307/415882
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415882 [Google Scholar]
  8. 1998Resolving hiatus. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, A.
    1961Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chitoran, Ioana
    2002The phonology of Romanian: A constraint-based approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889185 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, Noam
    1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dawkins, R. M.
    1916Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. de Chene, Brent
    1985r-Epenthesis and the Japanese verb. Papers in Japanese Linguistics10. 172–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 Description and explanation in morphophonology: The case of Japanese verb inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics25. 37–80. 10.1007/s10831‑015‑9137‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-015-9137-y [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019r-Epenthesis and Ryukyuan. Gengo Kenkyu155. 101–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . Forthcoming. On the (ir)regularity of Dunan verbal morphophonology. Journal of Japanese Linguistics. Available atwww.f.waseda.jp/dechene/RP-IDVM.pdf (accessed14 Feb 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. . MS. ð-Epenthesis as a default in Modern Greek nominal inflection. www.f.waseda.jp/dechene/RP-dEDMGI.pdf (accessed14 Feb 2020).
  18. de Lacy, Paul
    2006Markedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486388
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486388 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fertig, David
    2000Morphological change up close. Two and a half centuries of verbal inflection in Nuremberg. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110929904
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929904 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2015 Two conceptions of analogical innovation/change. InPeter Auer and Robert W. Murray (eds.), Hermann Paul’s Principles of language history revisited: Translations and reflections, 209–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016 Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change. Diachronica33. 423–460. 10.1075/dia.33.4.01fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.4.01fer [Google Scholar]
  22. Frellesvig, Bjarke
    2010A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511778322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778322 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fukushima, Kunimichi
    1969 “myū” to “myō” no kōtai [Variation between “myū” and “myō”]. InMasayoshi Ōki, Yasuo Kitahara, Hideo Komatsu, Norio Nakada, Kazuo Mabuchi & Muneaki Morino (eds.), Saeki Umetomo hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronshū [Papers in Japanese linguistics offered to Dr. Umetomo Saeki on his 70th birthday], 533–551. Tōkyō: Hyōgensha.
  24. GAJ (Grammar Atlas of Japanese Dialects) = Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo
    GAJ (Grammar Atlas of Japanese Dialects) = Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo 1989–2006
  25. Garrett, Andrew
    2008 Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. InJeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 125–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes, Bruce, & James White
    2015 Saltation and the P-map. Phonology32. 267–302. 10.1017/S0952675715000159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675715000159 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hikosaka, Yoshinobu
    1999 Kyūshū ni okeru ichi/nidan katsuyō no godanka – “Kōgohō” kara GAJ e [The assimilation of unigrade and bigrade inflection to consonant-stem inflection in Kyūshū—from the Spoken Language Survey Report to the Grammar Atlas of Japanese dialects]. InTakeyoshi Satō (ed.), Goi/gohō no shinkenkyū [New research on lexicon and grammar], 277–292. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.
  28. Hirayama, Teruo & Ichirō Ōshima
    1969 Gotō Rettō no hōgen [The dialects of the Gotō archipelago]. Tōkyō Toritsu Daigaku Toshi Kenkyū Iinkai [Tokyo Metropolitan University Urban Research Committee].
  29. Hock, Hans Henrich
    1991Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219135 [Google Scholar]
  30. Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
    Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 1998 Lexikó tis koinís neoellenikís (Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek). www.greek-language.gr/greekLang/modern_greek/tools/lexica/triantafyllides/index.html (accessed14 Feb 2020).
  31. Ito, Chiyuki
    2010 Analogy and lexical restructuring in the development of nominal stem inflection from Middle to Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics19. 357–383. 10.1007/s10831‑010‑9066‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9066-8 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ito, Junko & Armin Mester
    2004 Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics20. 1–18. Also in the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-711. 10.1515/jjl‑2004‑0103
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2004-0103 [Google Scholar]
  33. Itoi, Kan’ichi
    1961 Ōita/Miyazaki hokubu [Ōita and northern Miyazaki]. InMisao Tōjō (ed.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyūshū/Ryūkyū dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 239–267. Tōkyō: Tōkyōdō.
  34. Kamimura, Takaji
    1983 Kyūshū hōgen no gaisetsu [An outline of Kyūshū dialects]. InKiichi Iitoyo, Sukezumi Hino & Ryōichi Satō (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyūshū region] (Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 1–28. Tōkyō: Kokusho Kankōkai.
  35. Kiparsky, Paul
    1973 Productivity in phonology. InMichael J. Kenstowicz and Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Issues in phonological theory, 169–176. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted inKiparsky, Paul 1982 Explanation in phonology, 165–173. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110905137.169
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905137.169 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kokugo Gakkai [Society for Japanese Linguistics] 1980 Kokugogaku daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese linguistics]. Tōkyō: Tōkyōdō.
  37. Kokugo Chōsa Iinkai [Japanese Language Survey Committee] 1906 Kōgohō chōsa hōkokusho [Report on the survey of spoken usage], 2vols. Tōkyō: Monbushō [Ministry of Education].
  38. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo [National Language Research Institute] 1989–2006 Hōgen bunpō zenkoku chizu [Grammar atlas of Japanese dialects], 6vols. Tōkyō: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo.
  39. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1945–1949 La nature des procès dits «analogiques». Acta LinguisticaV. 15–37. Reprinted inEric P. Hamp, Fred W. Householder, and Robert Austerlitz (eds.) 1966 Readings in linguisticsII, 158–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kyūshū Hōgen Gakkai [Kyūshū Dialect Society] 1991 Kyūshū hōgen no kisoteki kenkyū [Basic research on Kyūshū dialects], revised edn. Tōkyō: Kazama Shobō.
  41. Lombard, Alf
    1954Le verbe Roumain: Étude morphologique, TomeI. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mańczak, Witold
    1958 Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua7. 298–325, 387–420. 10.1016/0024‑3841(57)90101‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(57)90101-8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu and Harald Clahsen
    1992 Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development57.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.2307/1166115
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115 [Google Scholar]
  44. Melissaropoulou, Dimitra
    2013 Gradualness in analogical change as a complexification stage in a language simplification process: A case study from Modern Greek dialects. InAnna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 125–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.133.06mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.133.06mel [Google Scholar]
  45. Nishio, Minoru, Etsutarō Iwabuchi & Shizuo Mizutani
    (eds.) 2000 Iwanami kokugo jiten [Iwanami dictionary of the Japanese language], 6th edn. Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten.
  46. Omodaka, Hisataka, Tōru Asami, Teizō Ikegami, Itaru Ide, Haku Itō, Yoshiaki Kawabata, Masatoshi Kinoshita, Noriyuki Kojima, Atsuyoshi Sakakura, Akihiro Satake, Kazutami Nishimiya & Shirō Hashimoto
    (eds.) 1967 Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten: Jōdaihen [Great historical dictionary of Japanese: Nara period]. Tōkyō: Sanseidō.
  47. Ōnishi, Takuichirō
    2006 Gengo chirigaku no saikidō [A new start for linguistic geography]. InSeiichi Nakai, Daniel Long & Kenjirō Matsuda (eds.), Nihon no fiirudo gengogaku [Field linguistics in Japan], 80–93. Toyama: Katsura Shobō.
  48. 2016 okiru [get up]. InTakuichirō Ōnishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 150–151. Tōkyō: Asakura Shoten.
  49. Paul, Hermann
    1886Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1920Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ringe, Don
    2006From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A linguistic history of English, vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rodriguez, Ioão
    1955 [1604-1608]Arte da lingoa de Iapam. Nagasaki: Collegio de Iapão. Japanese translation by Doi Tadao published asRodriguez, Ioão 1955 Nihon daibunten [Great Japanese grammar]. Tōkyō: Sanseidō.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sakanashi, Ryūzō
    1982 Kindai no bunpō II (Kamigata-hen) [Grammar of the early modern period II (Kyōto-Ōsaka)]. InHiroshi Tsukishima, (ed.), Bunpō-shi [Grammatical history] (Kōza kokugo-shi [Course in the history of Japanese] 4), 467–536. Tōkyō: Taishūkan.
  54. Skoruppa, Katrin, Anna Lambrechts & Sharon Peperkamp
    2011 The role of phonetic distance in the acquisition of phonological alternations. North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS)39(2). 717–729.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tiersma, Peter
    1978 Bidirectional leveling as evidence for relational rules. Lingua45. 67–77. 10.1016/0024‑3841(78)90021‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(78)90021-9 [Google Scholar]
  56. 1982 Local and general markedness. Language58. 832–849. 10.2307/413959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413959 [Google Scholar]
  57. Yamaguchi, Akiho & Morihide Akimoto
    (eds.) 2001 Nihongo bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.
  58. Yoshikawa, Toshiaki & Yukihiro Yamaguchi
    1972 Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region]. Toyohashi: Toyohashi Bunka Kyōkai.

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error