1887
image of The diachrony of participles in the (pre)history of Greek and Hittite
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article discusses two case studies of diachronic “voice flipping” in which the syntax of a participle appears to change from active or “subject-oriented” to passive (Ancient Greek ‑ to Modern Greek ‑) and from resultative/stative to active (Proto-Indo-European *-nt-; Hittite ‑‑ vs. Ancient Greek ‑‑). While the first type of change is the result of a diachronic reanalysis by which a functional projection (VoiceP) is lost, the second type in fact adds an active Voice head. Both changes are the result of the simultaneous availability of a stative and an eventive reading in deverbal adjectival forms and could belong to a larger “participle cycle”. However, unlike in other changes usually discussed under the label “cycle”, unidirectional economy principles do not apply in these cases. Rather, these cases provide evidence that some types of morphosyntactic change, especially those related to event and argument structure, are driven by reanalysis of the feature content of functional heads under local structural ambiguity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.18040.gre
2020-05-25
2020-07-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AiG II,2 = Debrunner, Albert
    1954Altindische Grammatik, vol.II,2: Die Nominalsuffixe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2013 Where is non-active morphology?InStefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 244–262. CSLI publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2018 ‑able adjectives and the syntax of psych verbs. Glossa3(1): 74, 1–27. 10.5334/gjgl.498
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.498 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
    2008 Structuring participles. InCharles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
    2015External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
    2012 The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics48: 1–34. 10.1017/S0022226711000338
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000338 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou
    2007Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207491
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  8. Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia
    2014 The psych causative alternation. Lingua148: 53–79. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Allan, Rutger J.
    2003The middle voice in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben. 10.1163/9789004409064
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409064 [Google Scholar]
  10. Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    2003 Participles and voice. InArtemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902358.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Anthony, David W. & Don Ringe
    2015 The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archaeological perspectives. Annual Review of Linguistics 2015(1): 199–219. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑124812
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124812 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley
    (eds.) 2007Deponency and morphological mismatches. Proceedings of the British Academy 145. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Baker, Mark & Nadya Vinokurova
    2009 On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language85(3): 517–556. 10.1353/lan.0.0144
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0144 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bakker, Egbert
    1994 Voice, aspect and Aktionsart: Middle and passive in Ancient Greek. InBarbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 23–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.27.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.04bak [Google Scholar]
  15. Bentein, Klaas
    2012 Perfect periphrases in Post-Classical and Early Byzantine Greek: An ecological-evolutionary account. Journal of Greek Linguistics12: 205–275. 10.1163/15699846‑00000002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-00000002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bjorkman, Bronwyn
    2011BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bobaljik, Jonathan D.
    2017Distributed morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. doi:  10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.131
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.131 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruening, Benjamin
    2013 By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax16(1): 1–41. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2012.00171.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00171.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Chantraine, Pierre
    1926Histoire du parfait grec. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. CHD = Güterbock, Hans G. and Harry A. Hoffner
    1989The Hittite dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, vol. L-N. Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts
    1993 A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry24(2): 299–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cotticelli-Kurras, Paola & Velizar Sadovski
    (eds.) 2017“In participle we predicate”: Con-tributions of the comparative and historical linguistics to grammar and semantics of participle. Wien: Holzhausen.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cournane, Ailís
    2017 In defense of the child innovator. InEric Mathieu & Robert Truswell (eds.), Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax, 10–24. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Embick, David
    1997aVoice and the interfaces of syntax. University of Pennsylvania dis-sertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1997b Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface. InHeidi Harley (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, 41–72. MITWPL 32.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2000 Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry31(2): 185–230. 10.1162/002438900554343
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554343 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2004a Unaccusative syntax and verbal alternations. InArtemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 137–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004b On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry35(3): 355–392. 10.1162/0024389041402634
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015The morpheme. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501502569
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502569 [Google Scholar]
  30. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
    2007 Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. InGillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fellner, Hannes A.
    2014 Tocharian special agents: The nt-participle. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies15: 53–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fellner, Hannes A. & Laura Grestenberger
    2018 Die Reflexe der *-nt‑ und *-mh1no‑Partizipien im Hethitischen und Tocharischen. InElisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 23. September 2015 in Marburg, 63–82. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Francez, Itamar & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
    2015 Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language91(3): 533–563. 10.1353/lan.2015.0047
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0047 [Google Scholar]
  34. Frotscher, Michael
    2013Das hethitische ‑ant-Partizip und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen: Semantik, Morphologie, Syntax. Università degli Studi di Verona dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Garcia Ramón, José Luis
    2017 Heterogenous correspondences and reconstruction: The ‘gerundive’ in ‑mi-na in Hieroglyphic Luvian. InClaire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 85–103. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Garrett, Andrew
    1996 Wackernagel’s Law and unaccusativity in Hittite. InAaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 85–134. Stanford: CSLI publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. van Gelderen, Elly
    2008 Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology12: 195–243. 10.1515/LITY.2008.037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.037 [Google Scholar]
  38. (ed.) 2009Cyclical change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2011The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. (ed.) 2016aCyclical change continued. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2016b Cyclical change continued: Introduction. InElly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change continued, 3–17. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227.01gel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227.01gel [Google Scholar]
  42. 2018The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180335
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180335 [Google Scholar]
  43. George, Coulter H.
    2005Expressions of agency in Ancient Greek. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511482984
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482984 [Google Scholar]
  44. Grestenberger, Laura
    2014Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. Harvard University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2016 More span-conditioned allomorphy: Voice morphology in Classical Greek. InChristopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 46, vol.2, 1–10. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2017 On the syntax of the participles of Indo-European deponent verbs. InClaire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 105–117. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2018 Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language94(3): 487–526. 10.1353/lan.2018.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0034 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2019Deponency in morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. doi:  10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.553
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.553 [Google Scholar]
  49. . Forthcoming a. The ín-group: Indo-Iranian in-stems and their Indo-European relatives. Ina forthcoming Festschrift, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave.
  50. . Forthcoming b. Two types of passive? Voice morphology and “low passives” in Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek. InKleanthes K. Grohmann, Akemi Matsuya & Eva-Maria Remberger eds. Passives cross-linguistically: Theoretical and experimental approaches, Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hajnal, Ivo
    1994 Die lykischen a-stämme. Zum Werdegang einer Nominalklasse. InJens Elmegård Rasmussen & Benedikte Nielsen (eds.), In honorem Holger Pedersen. Kol-loquium der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Kopenhagen 1993, 307–330. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hale, Mark
    2007Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKenneth L. Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Harley, Heidi
    2009 The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. InMonika Rathert & Anastasia Giannadikou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
    1999 State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology. GLOT International4: 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  57. Haspelmath, Martin
    1994 Passive participles across languages. InBarbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 151–177. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.27.08has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.08has [Google Scholar]
  58. Hearn, Ryan
    . Forthcoming. Disharmonic headedness in Homeric Greek and Tocharian and implications for Proto-Indo-European reconstruction. Proceedings of DiGS 20, University of York, June18–21 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoffner, Harry A. Jr. & H. Craig Melchert
    2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Part I: Reference grammar. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Holton, David, Peter Mackridge & Irene Philippaki-Warburton
    1997Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Holton, David & Io Manolessou
    2010 Medieval and Early Modern Greek. InEgbert J. Bakker (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language, 539–563. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444317398.ch36
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317398.ch36 [Google Scholar]
  62. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2018The Hittite middle voice. University of Bergamo dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Israel, Michael, Christopher Johnson & Patricia J. Brooks
    2000 From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics11(1–2): 1003–1029.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton
    2014The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, vol. I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Jankuhn, Harald
    1969Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Jasanoff, Jay H.
    2003Hittite and the Indo-European verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249053.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249053.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2017 The impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the 20th Century and beyond. InJared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Hand‑ book of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbucher zur Sprach‑ und Kommunikationswissenschaft 41(1)), 220–238. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261288‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-018 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kallulli, Dalina
    2013 (Non-)canonical passives and reflexives: Deponents and their like. InArtemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 337–358. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.205.16kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.205.16kal [Google Scholar]
  69. Koeneman, Olaf & Hedde Zeijlstra
    2014 The Rich Agreement Hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry45(4): 571–615. 10.1162/LING_a_00167
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00167 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kratzer, Angelika
    2001 Building statives. InProceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on aspect (2000), 385–399. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lavidas, Nikolaos
    2012 Passive in the history of Greek: Evidence for the role of the passive suffix. Folia Linguistica Historica33: 87–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Le Feuvre, Claire, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault
    (eds.) 2017Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Leumann, Manu
    1977Lateinische Laut‑ und Formenlehre. Lateinische Grammatik, vol.I. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lightfoot, David
    2006How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616204
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616204 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lowe, John J.
    2014 Indo-European Caland adjectives in *-nt‑ and participles in Sanskrit. Historische Sprachforschung127: 166–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 2015Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit: The syntax and semantics of adjectival verb forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701361.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701361.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2017Transitive nouns and adjectives: Evidence from early Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198793571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  79. Luraghi, Silvia
    2003On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.67
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.67 [Google Scholar]
  80. Manolessou, Io
    2005 From participles to gerunds. InMelitta Stavrou & Arhonto Terzi (eds.), Advances in Greek generative syntax: In honor of Dimitra Theophanopoulou-Kontou, 241–283. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.76.10man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.76.10man [Google Scholar]
  81. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. InAlexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol.4(2), 201–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Melchert, H. Craig
    1998 The dialectal position of Anatolian within Indo-European. InBenjamin K. Bergen, Madelaine C. Plauché & Ashlee C. Bailey (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, special session on Indo-European subgrouping and internal relations, 24–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 2014 Anatolian nominal stems in *-(C)o-. InNorbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds.), Das Nomen im Indogermanischen. Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 14. bis 16. September 2011 in Erlangen, 205–214. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 2017a The source(s) of Indo-European participles in *-e/ont. InClaire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 217–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 2017b “Western affinities” of Anatolian. InBjarne Simmelkjaer Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Annette Olsen (eds.), Etymology and the European lexikon. Akten der 14. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Kopenhagen, 17.-22. Sept., 2012, 297–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 2018 Hittite and Indo-European: Revolution and counter-revolution. InElisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Arbeitstagung der lndogermanischen Gesellschaft, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 21. bis 23. September 2015, 289–294. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. . To appear. The position of Anatolian. InAndrew Garrett & Michael Weiss eds. Handbook of Indo-European studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Müller, Gereon
    2013 Approaches to deponency. Language and Linguistics Compass7(6): 351–369. 10.1111/lnc3.12029
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12029 [Google Scholar]
  89. Napoli, Maria
    2017 To what extent does the Greek participle participate in the passive voice system?InPaola Cotticelli-Kurras & Velizar Sadovski (eds.), “In participle we predicate”: Contributions of the comparative and historical linguistics to grammar and semantics of participle, 109–127. Wien: Holzhausen.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Nussbaum, Alan J.
    1976Caland’s “Law” and the Caland-System. Harvard University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 2017 Agentive and other derivatives of ‘τóμος-type’ nouns. InClaire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 233–266. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Oettinger, Norbert
    1986“Indo-Hittite”-Hypothese und Wortbildung. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 2001 Neue Gedanken über das ‑nt-Suffix. InOnofrio Carruba & Wolfgang Meid (eds.), Anatolisch und Indogermanisch/Anatolico e Indoeuropeo. Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Pavia, 22.-25. September 1998, 301–315. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 2017 Der Ursprung des indogermanischen Caland-Systems und die nt‑Stämme. InClaire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 267–275. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Oltra-Massuet, Isabel
    1999 On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology MA thesis.
  96. Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Karlos Arregi
    2005 Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry16(1): 43–84. 10.1162/0024389052993637
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993637 [Google Scholar]
  97. Panagiotidis, Phoevos, Vassilios Spyropoulos & Anthi Revithiadou
    2017 Little v as a categorizing verbal head: Evidence from Greek. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Papangeli, Dimitra & Nikolaos Lavidas
    2009 Deponents and non-finite constructions in Greek. InClaire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman & David Hill (eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MIT. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics57, 197–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Rau, Jeremy
    2009Indo-European nominal morphology: The decads and the Caland systemInnsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Rieken, Elisabeth
    2009 Der Archaismus des Hethitischen – eine Bestandsaufnahme. Incontri Linguistici32: 37–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Ringe, Don
    1988–1990[1991] Evidence for the position of Tocharian in the Indo-European family?Die Sprache34: 59–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Ringe, Don & Joseph F. Eska
    2013Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511980183
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183 [Google Scholar]
  103. Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor
    2002 Indo-European and computational cladis-tics. Transactions of the Philological Society100(1): 59–129. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00091
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00091 [Google Scholar]
  104. Roberts, Ian
    2007Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammat-icalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  106. Rothmayr, Antonia
    2009The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.143
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.143 [Google Scholar]
  107. Schäfer, Florian
    2008The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.126
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126 [Google Scholar]
  108. 2017 Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 129–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Schmidt, Klaus T.
    1992 Archaismen des Tocharischen und ihre Bedeutung für Fragen der Rekonstruktion und der Ausgliederung. InRobert Beekes, Alexander Lubotsky & Jos Weitenberg (eds.), Rekonstruktion und relative Chronologie. Akten der VIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Leiden, 31. Aug.-4. Sept. 1987, 101–112. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Schwyzer, Eduard
    1939Griechische Grammatik, vol.I: Allgemeiner Teil, Lautlehre, Wort-bildung, Flexion. Munich: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 1943Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechischen. Berlin: Abh. d. preuß. Akad. d. Wissensch., Jahrg 1942.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner
    1950Griechische Grammatik, vol.II: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Munich: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Spencer, Andrew
    2016 How are words related?InDaniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 1–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.229.01spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.01spe [Google Scholar]
  114. Taylor, Ann
    1994 The change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change6: 1–37. 10.1017/S0954394500001563
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001563 [Google Scholar]
  115. Walkden, George
    2014Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712299.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712299.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  116. Willis, David
    2011 Reconstructing last week’s weather: Syntactic reconstruction and Brythonic free relatives. Journal of Linguistics47: 407–466. 10.1017/S0022226710000381
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000381 [Google Scholar]
  117. Winter, Werner
    1998 Lexical archaisms in the Tocharian languages. InVictor H. Mair (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of Western Central Asia. Vol. I, Archeology, migration and nomadism, linguistics, 347–357. Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Wodtko, Dagmar S., Britta Irslinger & Carolin Schneider
    (eds.) 2008Nomina im Indoger-manischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Zombolou, Katerina
    2004Verbal alternations in Greek: A semantic analysis. University of Reading dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou
    2014 The canonical function of the deponent verbs in Modern Greek. InFranz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012, 331–344. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.327.23zom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.23zom [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.18040.gre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.18040.gre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error