1887
Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper is a corpus-based study of the Voice Cycle in Hungarian. Based on data from the Old Hungarian Corpus and the Hungarian Historical Corpus, I will argue that while in Old Hungarian, middle voice was encoded through a separate inflectional paradigm (contextual allomorphy in the subject agreement suffix conditional on the feature content of a silent Voice head), in Modern Hungarian, middle voice is encoded through dedicated middle voice suffixes (i.e., the Voice head is spelled out overtly). I will claim that the underlying grammaticalization process involved the reanalysis of frequentative suffixes (v heads) as middle voice suffixes (Voice heads). I will show that this reinterpretation was not based on shared abstract features, but rather, on a principled correlation between middle voice and frequentative aspect: since some types of middles (antipassives and dispositional middles) were more likely to be associated with a frequentative or habitual reading than actives, frequentative suffixes were susceptible to reanalysis as middle suffixes in the course of language acquisition. I will thus claim that in addition to Feature Economy (van Gelderen 2011), reinterpretation based on correlation between featurally independent grammatical markers should also be regarded as a mechanism of grammaticalization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19008.hal
2020-04-07
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
    2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica34(4). 437–469. 10.1075/dia.16037.ahn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16037.ahn [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2014 Roots in transitivity alternations: afto/auto reflexives. InArtemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
    2012 The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics48. 1–34. 10.1017/S0022226711000338
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000338 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
    2015External arguments in alternations: A layering approach. Vol.55. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
    2012Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3889‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3889-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Austin, Peter
    1981A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, Mark
    1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry16. 373–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bárány, András
    2017Person, case, and agreement: The morphosyntax of inverse agreement and global case splits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartos, Huba
    1999 Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció. A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere. [Morphosyntax and interpretation. The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena in Hungarian.] PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.
  11. Benkő, Loránd
    1967A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. [A Historical-Etymological Dictionary of Hungarian.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath
    2008The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology & Department of Linguistics of the University of Leipzig. RetrievedJanuary, 28, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bobaljik, Jonathan
    2000 The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. InKleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.), University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol.10. 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012Universals in comparative morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bobaljik, Jonathan & Heidi Harley
    2017 Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. InHeather Newell, Maire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.), The structure of words at the interfaces, 141–159. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bok-Bennema, Reineke
    1991Case and agreement in Inuit. Berlin and New York: Foris. 10.1515/9783110869156
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869156 [Google Scholar]
  17. Budenz, József
    1884 Az ugor nyelvek összehasonlító alaktana. [The comparative morphology of Uralic Languages.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (18)2. 161–319.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chomsky, Noam
    1995The Minimalist program. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts
    1993 A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry24(2). 299–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Comrie, Bernard
    1979 Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. InFrans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 219–240. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cooreman, Anne
    1988 The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16.19coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.19coo [Google Scholar]
  23. 1994 A functional typology of antipassives. InBarbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.27.05coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.05coo [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Bartha, Katalin
    1991 Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] InLoránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana – A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei. [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and before.], 60–103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1992 Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] InLoránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 55–119. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Deme, László & Samu Imre
    1968–77A magyar nyelvjárások atlasza I-VI. [Dialect atlas of Hungarian I-VI.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dékány, Éva
    2011 A profile of the Hungarian DP. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  28. Déprez, Viviane
    2000 Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory18. 253–342. 10.1023/A:1006449808181
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006449808181 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dikken, Marcel den
    1999 On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series4. 137–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1972The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084987 [Google Scholar]
  31. 1977A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139085045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139085045 [Google Scholar]
  32. Dömötör, Adrienne
    2013Az ó- és középmagyar kori magánéleti nyelvhasználat morfológiailag elemzett adatbázisa. [A morphologically annotated database of vernacular language use in Old and Middle Hungarian.] InFazakas, Emese, Dezső Juhász, Csilla T. Szabó, Erika Terbe & Borbála Zsemlyei (eds.), Tér, idő és kultúra metszéspontjai a magyar nyelvben. [The intersection of space, time and culture in Hungarian], 11–12. Budapest-Cluj. Nemzetközi Magyarságtudományi Társaság – ELTE Magyar Nyelvtörténeti, Szociolingvisztikai és Dialektológiai Tanszék.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Embick, David
    2010Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. E. Abaffy, Erzsébet
    1978 A mediális igékről. [On middle verbs.] Magyar Nyelv74, 280–293.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1992 Az igei személyragozás. [Verbal conjugation.] InLoránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 184–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. É. Kiss, Katalin
    2002The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755088
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755088 [Google Scholar]
  37. Faarlund, Jan Terje
    2008 A mentalist interpretation of grammaticalization theory. InThórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.113.08faa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.113.08faa [Google Scholar]
  38. Fortescue, Michael D.
    1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Foulet, Lucien
    1990Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Geenhoven, Veerle van
    2004 For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics12:2, 135–190. 10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.af
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.af [Google Scholar]
  41. Gelderen, Elly van
    2004Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2011The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2018The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180335
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180335 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E.
    2005 Multiple antipassives in Halkomelem Salish. InKratzer, A., Conathan, L. J., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A., & Alan, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society26. 51–62. 10.3765/bls.v26i2.3414
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i2.3414 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gerdts, Donna B., & Hukari, Thomas E.
    2006 The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics, 44–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Grestenberger, Laura
    2014 Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
  47. 2018 Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language94(3). 487–526. 10.1353/lan.2018.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0034 [Google Scholar]
  48. Halle, Morris
    1990 An approach to morphology. InJuli Carter, Rose-Marie Déchaine, Bill Philip & Tim Sherer (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 150–184. Amherst (MA): Graduate Linguistic Student Association of the University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Harley, Heidi
    1995 Subjects, events, and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  51. Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
    2000 Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. InBert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon/encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
  54. Klaiman, M. H.
    1991Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Komlósy, András
    2000 A műveltetés [Causativization]. InFerenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 3: Morphology], 215–292. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kozinsky, Isaac, Vladimir Nedjalkov & Maria Polinskaja
    1988 Antipassive in Chukchee. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16.21koz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.21koz [Google Scholar]
  57. Kroch, Anthony
    1990 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change1. 199–244. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lasersohn, Peter
    1995Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8581‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8581-1 [Google Scholar]
  59. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. InA. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics4(2). 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Márkus, Andrea
    2015 Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. Undiagnosed species and a complete derivation of the morphosyntactic patterns. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  61. Merchant, Jason
    2015 How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry46. 273–303. 10.1162/LING_a_00182
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00182 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mondloch, James L.
    1982 Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State UniversityofNew York.
  63. Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
    2007 Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry384. 671–714. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  64. Newson, Mark
    2010 Syntax first, words after: A possible consequence of doing Alignment Syntax without a lexicon. InVarga, László (ed.), The even yearbook 9. School of English and American studies working papers in linguistics, 1–46. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Niyogi, Partha & Robert C. Berwick
    1997 Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy20. 697–719. 10.1023/A:1005319718167
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005319718167 [Google Scholar]
  66. Novák, Attila, György Orosz & Nóra Wenszky
    2013 Morphological annotation of Old and Middle Hungarian corpora. InPiroska Lendvai and Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences and Humanities, 43–48. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Noyer, Rolf
    1992 Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  68. 1997Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Polinskaja, Maria & Vladimir Nedjalkov
    1987 Contrasting the absolutive in Chukchee: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. Lingua71. 239–270. 10.1016/0024‑3841(87)90074‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(87)90074-X [Google Scholar]
  70. Polinsky, Maria
    2013 Antipassive. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 2017 Antipassive. InJessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Rákosi, György
    2008 The inherently reflexive and the inherently reciprocal predicate in Hungarian: Each to their own argument structure. InEkkehard König and Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 411–450. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Ramchand, Gillian
    2008 Lexical items in complex predications: Selection and underassociation. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics35. 115–141. 10.7557/12.139
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.139 [Google Scholar]
  74. R. Hutás, Magdolna
    1972Az ikes ragozás állapota Révai Miklós korában. [The status of the ik verbal paradigm in the times of Miklós Révai.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
    2015 Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics41(1–2). 1–61. 10.1515/tl‑2015‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2015-0001 [Google Scholar]
  76. Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ruda, Marta
    2017On the syntax of missing objects: A study with special reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.244
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.244 [Google Scholar]
  78. Schäfer, Florian
    2008The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.126
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sells, Peter, Zaenen, Annie and Zec, Draga
    1987 Reflexivization variation: Relations between syntax, semantics, and lexical structure. InMasayo Iida, Stephen Wechsler & Draga Zec (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Volume I: Interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse, 169–238. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Simonyi, Zsigmond
    1878 A visszaható igének egy különös haszálata. [On a peculiar usage of the reflexive verb.] Magyar Nyelvőr7. 481–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 1880 A magyar gyakorító és mozzanatos igék képzése. [The derivation of frequentative and semelfactive verbs in Hungarian.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények18. 237–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 1905 Az ikes ragozás története. [The history of the -ik conjugation.] Magyar Nyelvőr34. 1–11, 113–119, 337–349, 393–401, 444–454, 495–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Simon, Eszter
    2014 Corpus building from Old Hungarian codices. InKatalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass
    2012 Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből. [Language technology and cultural heritage: Building corpora from Old Hungarian Codices.] Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok24. 243–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Spreng, Bettina
    2012 Viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut: The syntax and semantics of antipassives. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
  86. Svenonius, Peter
    2012 Look both ways: Outward-looking allomorphy in Icelandic participles. LingBuzz. Available online atling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001519 (accessedApril 11, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Terrill, Angela
    1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics17. 71–88. 10.1080/07268609708599545
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609708599545 [Google Scholar]
  88. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1988 Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 595–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16.20tsu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.20tsu [Google Scholar]
  89. Watkins, Laurel
    1984A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Weerman, Fred and Jacquelina Evers-Vermeul
    2002 Pronouns and case. Lingua112. 301–338. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(01)00049‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00049-3 [Google Scholar]
  91. Williams, Edwin
    2003Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19008.hal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19008.hal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cycles , grammaticalization , Hungarian , middles , morphology , syntax and voice
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error