1887
image of Interrogatives as relativization markers in Indo-European

Abstract

Abstract

The use of interrogative pronouns as relative clause markers is often mentioned as a typical feature of European languages. This study presents an empirical approach to the distribution of interrogative pronouns as relative clause markers in time and space in the Indo-European language family. Based on a comprehensive sample of ancient and modern Indo-European languages, it is shown that interrogative-marked relative clauses are present in all stages of Indo-European within and outside of Europe. An analysis by branch suggests that this constitutes a case of parallel innovations subsequently spreading via language contact. The study also shows that interrogatives are used as relative clause markers independently of whether they are inflected pronouns or invariable markers.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19030.aud
2020-10-27
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/dia.19030.aud/dia.19030.aud.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19030.aud&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alster, Bendt
    2002 Relative clauses and case relations in Sumerian. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes92: 7–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Comrie, Bernard
    1989 Relative clauses. InLanguage universals and linguistic typology138–164. 2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2006 Syntactic typology: Just how exotic ARE European-type relative clauses. InRicardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic universals, 130–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618215.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618215.007 [Google Scholar]
  4. Deutscher, Guy
    2002 The Akkadian relative clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie92(1): 86–105. 10.1515/zava.2002.92.1.86
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zava.2002.92.1.86 [Google Scholar]
  5. Diessel, Holger
    2003 The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language27(3): 635–655. 10.1075/sl.27.3.06die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die [Google Scholar]
  6. Eska, Joseph F.
    2009 The emergence of the Celtic languages. InThe Celtic languages, 36–41. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fiorentino, Giuliana
    2007 European relative clauses and the uniqueness of the relative pronoun type. Italian Journal of Linguistics19(2): 263–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fortson IV, Benjamin W.
    2010Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. 2nd edn.Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. & Vyacheslav V. Ivanov
    1990 The early history of Indo-European languages. Scientific American262(3): 110–117. 10.1038/scientificamerican0390‑110
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and proto-culture part i: The text. part ii: Bibliography, indexes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hackstein, Olav
    2012 The evolution of finite complementation in Tocharian. InGeorges-Jean Pinault, Michael Peyrot, Jens Elmegård Rasmussen & Thomas Olander (eds.), Tocharian and Indo-European studies, vol.13, 117–148. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath
    2019Glottolog 4.1. Available online atglottolog.org
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001a The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. InMartin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 1492–1510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2001bIndefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2006 From question to subordination. InThe changing languages of Europe, 204–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendery, Rachel
    2012Relative clauses in time and space: A case study in the methods of diachronic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.101
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.101 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoffner, Harold & H. Craig Melchert
    2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake, ID: Eisenbrauns.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Igla, Birgit
    1996Das Romani von Ajia Varvara: Deskriptive und historisch-vergleichende Darstellung eines Zigeunerdialekts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jasanoff, Jay H.
    1999 Some relative forms of the verb in Old Irish. InCompositiones Indogermanicae in memoriam Jochem Schindler, 205–222. Prague: Enigma.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kahle, David & Hadley Wickham
    2013 ggmap: Spatial visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal5(1): 144–161. 10.32614/RJ‑2013‑014
    https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2013-014 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, Ronald
    1999 Observations on the absolute and relative chronology of Tocharian loanwords and sound changes. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies8: 111–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lehmann, Christian
    1984Der Relativsatz. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leiwo, Martti
    2002 From contact to mixture: Bilingual inscriptions from Italy. InJ. N. Adams, Mark Janse & Swain Simon (eds.), Bilingualism in ancient society, 168–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Luján, Eugenio R.
    2009 Relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European. InVit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages, 221–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.305.22luj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.305.22luj [Google Scholar]
  25. Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
    2014 From Latin to Romance: Case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus26(2): 217–248. 10.1515/probus‑2014‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2014-0008 [Google Scholar]
  26. Matras, Yaron
    2004Romani – a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Melchert, H. Craig
    2012 Genitive case and possessive adjective in Anatolian. InVincenzo Orioles (ed.), Per Roberto Gusmani. Studi in ricordo. Linguistica storica e teoretica, vol.2, 273–286. Udine: Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meyer, Robin
    2017 Iranian-Armenian language contact in and before the 5th century CE. Oxford Wolfson College, University of Oxforddissertation.
  29. Morgenstierne, Georg, Josef Elfenbein, D. N. MacKenzie & Nicholas Sims-Williams
    2003A new etymological vocabulary of Pashto. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nadkarni, Mangesh V.
    1975 Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language51(3): 672–683. 10.2307/412892
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412892 [Google Scholar]
  31. Neukom, Lukas & Manideepa Patnaik
    2003A grammar of Oriya (ASAS 17). Universität Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Orel, Vladimir Ė.
    2000A concise historical grammar of the Albanian language: Reconstruction of Proto-Albanian. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Paudyal, Netra
    2009 The syntax of three-argument verbs in Nepali. Qualifying paper.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Penney, John
    2011 Archaic and old Latin. InJames Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 220–235. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Perder, Emil
    2013 A grammatical description of Dameli. Stockholm Universitydissertation.
  36. Ringe, Don
    2017 Indo-European dialectology. InJared Klein, Brian D. Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, vol.1, 62–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261288‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-006 [Google Scholar]
  37. Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel
    2017 NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language93(4): 799–826. 10.1353/lan.2017.0058
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0058 [Google Scholar]
  38. Yakubovich, Ilya
    2008 The origin of Luwian possessive adjectives. InKarlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, November 3–4, 2007, vol.54JIES Monograph, 193–217.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19030.aud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19030.aud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error