1887
image of An information structure scenario for V2 loss in Medieval French
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses word order change in Medieval French. Verb-second (V2) configurations are generally understood as having an initial XP and the verb in the left periphery. How has this configuration been lost in French? Under an Information Structure scenario, the XP is in initial position because of its characterized (discourse-old) informational value, which motivates the left-peripheral position of the verb. The decline of the characterized informational value of the XP thus accounts for the gradual loss of V2. The informational behaviour of XPs was examined in unambiguous V2 configurations with an overt post-verbal subject in Medieval French. This detailed quantitative study of a calibrated corpus shows that XPs with a characterized informational value were predominant with productive V2 configurations, that they gradually declined as productive V2 was lost, and that they increasingly failed to attract the verb to the left periphery. These observations can be accounted for if V2 in Medieval French was driven by informational values and if it disappeared along with the informational cues provided by the XPs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19040.lar
2021-02-01
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Leis Will, 1150
  2. Patronage, 1205
    Patronage, 1205 Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrêt de l’échiquier de Normandie, 1207–1211
    Arrêt de l’échiquier de Normandie, 1207–1211 Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Très ancien coutumier de Normandie, 1250
    Très ancien coutumier de Normandie, 1250 Edited by Ange-Ignace Marnier 1839Établissements et coutumes, assises et arrêts de l’Échiquier de Normandie. Paris: Techener.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grand coutumier de Normandie, 1300
    Grand coutumier de Normandie, 1300. MS Harvard, HLS MS 91. https://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:11589675$9i
  6. Adams, Marianne P.
    1987 From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory5(1). 1–32. 10.1007/BF00161866
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161866 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alboiu, Gabriela , Virginia Hill & Ioanna Sitaridou
    2015 Discourse-driven V-to-C in Early Modern Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33(4). 1057–1088. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9270‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9270-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. Andrade, Aroldo Leal De & Charlotte Galves
    2019 Contrast and word order: A case study on the history of Portuguese. Glossa4(1). 1–29. 10.5334/gjgl.897
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.897 [Google Scholar]
  9. Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
    2004 Topic, focus, and V2. The structure of CP and IP: Defining the CP sublayers. Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Besten, Hans den
    1982 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Werner Abrahams (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.3.03bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.3.03bes [Google Scholar]
  11. Dupuis, Fernande , Daniel Gosselin , Benoît Habert , Sonia Lafond & Monique Dupuis
    1993 Methodological Aspects of the categorization of a Middle French corpus with a computer-assisted text analysis software (SATO). Reinhard Köhler and Burghard B. Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 183–193. Trier: QUALICO. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1769‑2_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1769-2_12 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1992 Discourse and diachrony: The rise and fall of Old French SI. Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 433–473. Berlin and New York: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110886047.433
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886047.433 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fodor, Janet D.
    1998 Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry29. 1–36. 10.1162/002438998553644
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553644 [Google Scholar]
  14. Foulet, Lucien
    1919Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuß, Eric
    2008V2/V3 in Old High German: Multiple projections vs. multiple specifiers. MS, Universität Frankfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Guimier, Claude
    1997 La place du sujet nominal dans les phrases à adverbe initial. Catherine Fuchs (ed.), La place du sujet en français contemporain, 43–96. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
    2016 Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory34. 497–542. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9312‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9312-x [Google Scholar]
  18. Haiman, John
    1974Targets and syntactic change. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110882889
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882889 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova
    2010 From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua120. 315–328. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Holmberg, Anders
    2015 Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol.1, 242–283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ingham, Richard
    2018 Topic, Focus and null subjects in Old French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics63(2). 242–263. 10.1017/cnj.2017.48
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.48 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaiser, Georg
    2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110911640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911640 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaiser, Georg A. & Michael Zimmermann
    2011 On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in French declaratives. Esther Rinke & Tanja Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change: In honour of Jürgen M. Meisel, 355–381. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.11.19kai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.11.19kai [Google Scholar]
  24. Kemenade, Ans van
    2012 Rethinking the loss of V2. Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 1182–1199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kroch, Anthony
    1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change1. 199–244. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kroch, Anthony , Ann Taylor & Don Ringe
    2000The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. Herring, P. van Reenen & L. Schoesler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.195.17kro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.195.17kro [Google Scholar]
  27. Labelle, Marie
    2007 Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua117(1). 289–316. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  28. Larrivée, Pierre
    2019 To be or not to be informational: Preverbal complements in Medieval French V2 configurations. Glossa4(1). 1–19. 10.5334/gjgl.851
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.851 [Google Scholar]
  29. . In press. La diachronie longue du sujet postposé dans un corpus homogène. Studia Linguistica Romanica.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Le Coultre, Julien
    1875De l’ordre des mots dans Crestien de Troye. Dresden: B.G. Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lightfoot, David
    1999The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Los, Bettelou
    2009 The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics13. 197–125. 10.1017/S1360674308002876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002876 [Google Scholar]
  33. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    1985Dire le vrai: l’adverbe ‘si’ en français médiéval: essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000 Le décumul du “thème” dans l’évolution du français. Le Français moderne68(1). 31–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018 De S0 à SV: Vers le sujet obligatoire et antéposé en français, les dernières phases d’un changement. Journal of French Language Studies28. 1–19. 10.1017/S0959269517000023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269517000023 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mathieu, Eric
    2012 The left periphery in Old French. Deborah Arteaga (ed.), Research in Old French: The state of the art, 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Meisel, Jürgen M. , Martin Elsig & Esther Rinke
    2013Language acquisition and change: A morphosyntactic perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748642250.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748642250.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Poletto, Cecilia
    2014Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Prévost, Sophie
    2006 Topicalisation, focalisation et constructions syntaxiques en français médiéval: des relations complexes. Denis Apothéloz , Bernard Combettes & Franck Neveu (eds.), Les linguistiques du détachement: actes du colloque international de Nancy, 427–439. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2015 Diachronie du français et linguistique de corpus: une approche quantitative renouvelée. Langages197(1). 23–45. 10.3917/lang.197.0023
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.197.0023 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rinke, Esther & Jürgen M. Meisel
    2009 Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. Georg A. Kaiser & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null Subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance”. Arbeitspapier Nr.123. 93–130. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, Ian
    2012Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Samo, Giuseppe
    2018 Towards a criterial V2. PhD Dissertation, Université de Genève.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schøsler, Lene & Pieter van Reenen
    2000 The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles AINZ, APRES, DONC, LORS, OR, PUIS, and SI. Susan C. Herring , Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters and older languages, 59–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.195.05ree
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.195.05ree [Google Scholar]
  45. Skårup, Povl
    1975Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Essai de syntaxe de position. Etudes romanes de l’université de Copenhague.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Steiner, Brittany D. J.
    2014 The evolution of information structure and verb second in the history of French. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Thiersch, Craig
    1978 Topics in German syntax. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Thurneysen, Rudolf
    1892 Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie16. 289–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Vance, Barbara
    1993 Verb-first declaratives introduced by et and the position of pro in Old and Middle French. Lingua89, 281–314. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90055‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90055-2 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1997Syntactic change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8843‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8843-0 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vanelli, Laura , Lorenzo Renzi & Paola Benincà
    1985 Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes. Actes du XIIe Congrès de Linguistique et Philologie, volume3, 163–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Venneman, Theo
    1974 Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. John M. Anderson & C. Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics, volume1, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiese, Heike & Hans G. Müller
    2019 The hidden life of V3: An overlooked word order variant on verb-second. Mailin Antomo & Sonja Müller (eds.), Non-canonical verb positioning in main clauses, 201–224. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Willis, David
    1997 Clausal coordination and the loss of verb-second in Welsh. Oxford Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics2. 151–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 1998Syntactic change in Welsh: A study of the loss of Verb-Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wolfe, Sam
    2018aVerb second in medieval Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198804673.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804673.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2018b Probing the syntax of a problematic particle: Old French ‘si’ revisited. Transactions of the Philological Society116(3). 332–362. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12123 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zimmermann, Michael & Georg Kaiser
    2010 Much ado about nothing? On the categorial status of et and ne in Medieval French. Corpus9. 265–290. 10.4000/corpus.1941
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.1941 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19040.lar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.19040.lar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: word order change; left periphery; V2; information structure; Medieval French
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error