1887
Volume 39, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the relatedness and history of the Austronesian languages of Borneo, which is the third largest island in the world and home to significant linguistic diversity. We apply Bayesian phylogenetic dating methods to lexical cognate data based on four historical calibration points to infer a dated phylogeny of 87 languages. The inferred tree topology agrees with the mid and lower-level subgrouping proposals based on the classical comparative method, but suggests a different higher-level organization. The root age of the dated tree is shallower than the archaeological estimates but agrees with a hypothesis of a past linguistic leveling event. The inferred homelands of the major linguistic subgroups from a Bayesian phylogeographic analysis agree with the homeland proposals from archaeology and linguistics. The inferred homelands for four of the eight subgroups support the riverine homeland hypothesis whereby the major linguistic subgroups developed initially in communities situated along Borneo’s major rivers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.20024.smi
2022-01-19
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adelaar, K. Alexander
    1989 Malay influence on Malagasy: Linguistic and cultural-historical implications. Oceanic Linguistics28. 1–46. 10.2307/3622973
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622973 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1992Proto-Malayic: The reconstruction of its phonology and parts of its lexicon and morphology. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2005 Malayo-Sumbawan. Oceanic Linguistics44(2). 357–388. 10.1353/ol.2005.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0027 [Google Scholar]
  4. Amigó, Enrique, Julio Gonzalo, Javier Artiles & Felisa Verdejo
    2009 A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints. Information Retrieval12(4). 461–486. 10.1007/s10791‑008‑9066‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-008-9066-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Axelsen, Jacob Bock & Susanna Manrubia
    2014 River density and landscape roughness are universal determinants of linguistic diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences281(1784). 20133029.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellwood, Peter
    1995 Austronesian prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland, expansion and transformation. InPeter Bellwood, James J. Fox & Darrell Tryon (eds.), The Austronesians: History and comparative perspectives, 103–118. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago: Revised edition. Canberra: Australian National University E-Press. 10.22459/PIMA.03.2007
    https://doi.org/10.22459/PIMA.03.2007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bellwood, Peter & Eusebio Dizon
    2005 The Batanes archaeological project and the “Out of Taiwan” hypothesis for Austronesian dispersal. Journal of Austronesian Studies1(1). 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bentz, Christian, Dan Dediu, Annemarie Verkerk & Gerhard Jäger
    2018 The evolution of language families is shaped by the environment beyond neutral drift. Nature Human Behaviour2. 816–821. 10.1038/s41562‑018‑0457‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0457-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blust, Robert
    1974 A Murik vocabulary, with a note on the linguistic position of Murik. InJerome Rousseau (ed.), The peoples of Central Borneo22(43). 153–189. Special issue of the Sarawak Museum Journal.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1985–1986 The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives26. 45–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2005 The linguistic macrohistory of the Philippines: Some speculations. InHsiu Chuan Liao & Carl R. Galves Rubino (eds.), Current issues in Philippine linguistics and anthropology: Parangal kay Lawrence A. Reid, 31–68. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2010 The Greater North Borneo hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics49. 44–118. 10.1353/ol.0.0060
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0060 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014 Some recent proposals concerning the classification of the Austronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics53. 300–391. 10.1353/ol.2014.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0025 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019a The Austronesian homeland and dispersal. Annual Review of Linguistics5. 417–434. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012440
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012440 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2019b The resurrection of Proto-Philippines. Oceanic Linguistics58(2). 153–256. 10.1353/ol.2019.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2019.0008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2012 Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science337(6097). 957–960. 10.1126/science.1219669
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219669 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bouckaert, Remco R., Claire Bowern & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2018 The origin and expansion of Pama-Nyungan languages across Australia. Nature Ecology & Evolution2(4). 741. 10.1038/s41559‑018‑0489‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0489-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowern, Claire & Quentin Atkinson
    2012 Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language, 817–845. 10.1353/lan.2012.0081
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0081 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
    2015 Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language91(1). 194–244. 10.1353/lan.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Coedès, G.
    1968The Indianized states of Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Translated bySusan Brown Cowing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Currie, Thomas E., Andrew Meade, Myrtille Guillon & Ruth Mace
    2013 Cultural phylo-geography of the Bantu languages of Sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences280(1762). 20130695.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahl, Otto Chr
    1951Malgache et Maanjan: Une comparaison linguistique (Studies of the Egede Institute 3). Oslo: Egede Instituttet.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein, Joseph
    1992 Phylogenies from restriction sites: A maximum-likelihood approach. Evolution46(1). 159–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gavin, Michael C., Carlos A. Botero, Claire Bowern, Robert K. Colwell, Michael Dunn, Robert R. Dunn & Gregor Yanega
    2013 Toward a mechanistic understanding of linguistic diversity. BioScience63(7). 524–535. 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.6
    https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gelman, Andrew, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, David B. Dunson, Aki Vehtari & Donald B. Rubin
    2013Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/b16018
    https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gray, Russell D., David Bryant & Simon J. Greenhill
    2010 On the shape and fabric of human history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences365(1559). 3923–3933. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0162
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0162 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gray, Russell D., Alexei J. Drummond & Simon J. Greenhill
    2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science323(5913). 479–483. 10.1126/science.1166858
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166858 [Google Scholar]
  29. Greenhill, Simon J.
    2014 Demographic correlates of language diversity. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 557–578. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Grollemund, Rebecca, Simon Branford, Koen Bostoen, Andrew Meade, Chris Venditti & Mark Pagel
    2015 Bantu expansion shows that habitat alters the route and pace of human dispersals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(43). 13296–13301. 10.1073/pnas.1503793112
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503793112 [Google Scholar]
  31. Holland, Barbara R., Katharina T. Huber, Andreas Dress & Vincent Moulton
    2002 δ plots: A tool for analyzing phylogenetic distance data. Molecular Biology and Evolution19(12). 2051–2059. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004030 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hua, Xia, Simon J. Greenhill, Marcel Cardillo, Hilde Schneemann & Lindell Bromham
    2019 The ecological drivers of variation in global language diversity. Nature Communications10(1). 1–10. 10.1038/s41467‑019‑09842‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09842-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant
    2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution23(2). 254–267. 10.1093/molbev/msj030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jäger, Gerhard
    2013 Phylogenetic inference from word lists using weighted alignment with empirically determined weights. Language Dynamics and Change3(2). 245–291. 10.1163/22105832‑13030204
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-13030204 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaboy, Tuton
    1974 The Penan Aput. InJérôme Rousseau (ed.), The peoples of Central Borneo22(43). 287–293. Sarawak Museum Journal Special Issue.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kass, Robert E. & Adrian E. Raftery
    1995 Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association90(430). 773–795. 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lepage, Thomas, David Bryant, Hervé Philippe & Nicolas Lartillot
    2007 A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Molecular Biology and Evolution24(12). 2669–2680. 10.1093/molbev/msm193
    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm193 [Google Scholar]
  38. List, Johann-Mattis
    2012 SCA: Phonetic alignment based on sound classes. InD. Lassiter & M. Slavkovik (eds.), New Directions in Logic, Language and Computation. ESSLLI 2010, ESSLLI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol7415. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑31467‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  39. List, Johann-Mattis, Simon J. Greenhill & Russell D. Gray
    2017 The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PloS One12(1). e0170046. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170046
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170046 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lobel, Jason William
    2016North Borneo sourcebook: Vocabularies and functors, PALI Language Texts. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mace, Ruth & Mark Pagel
    1995 A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences261(1360). 117–121. 10.1098/rspb.1995.0125
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0125 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nettle, Daniel
    1998 Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology17(4). 354–374. 10.1006/jaar.1998.0328
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1998.0328 [Google Scholar]
  43. 1999Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow
    2008 Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass2(5). 760–820. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00082.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00082.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Pigeaud, Theodore G.
    1962Java in the 14th century: A study in cultural history. The Nāgara-Kěrtāgama by Rakawi Prapanca of Majapahit, 1365 AD, vol.3. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for International Cultural Relations, 3rd edn.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rama, Taraka
    2018 Similarity dependent Chinese Restaurant Process for cognate identification in multilingual wordlists. InProceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 271–281. 10.18653/v1/K18‑1027
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K18-1027 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rama, Taraka, Johann-Mattis List, Johannes Wahle & Gerhard Jäger
    2018 Are automatic methods for cognate detection good enough for phylogenetic reconstruction in historical linguistics?InProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human language technologies, volume 2 (short papers), 393–400. 10.18653/v1/N18‑2063
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2063 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rambaut, Andrew
    2012 Figtree v1. 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ritchie, Andrew M. & Simon Y W. Ho
    2019 Influence of the tree prior and sampling scale on Bayesian phylogenetic estimates of the origin times of language families. Journal of Language Evolution4(2). 108–123.  10.1093/jole/lzz005. URL   10.1093/jole/lzz005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzz005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ronquist, Fredrik, Maxim Teslenko, Paul Van Der Mark, Daniel L. Ayres, Aaron Darling, Sebastian Höhna, Bret Larget, Liang Liu, Marc A. Suchard & John P. Huelsenbeck
    2012 Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology61(3). 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ross, Malcolm
    1988Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(21). 10317–10322. 10.1073/pnas.1817972116
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sandin, Benedict
    1994Sources of Iban traditional history (Sarawak Museum Journal Special Monograph 7). Kuching: Sarawak Museum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sellato, Bernard
    1994Nomads of the Bornean rainforest: The economics, politics, and ideology of settling down. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Translated byStephanie Morgan.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2001Forest, resources and people in Bulungan. Elements for a history of settlement, trade, and social dynamics in Borneo, 1880–2000. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith, Alexander D.
    2015a On the classification of Kenyah and Kayanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics53(2). 333–357. 10.1353/ol.2015.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2015.0016 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2015b Sebop, Penan, and Kenyah internal linguistic classification. Borneo Research Bulletin46. 172–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2017aThe languages of Borneo: A comprehensive classification. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2017b The Western Malayo-Polynesian problem. Oceanic Linguistics56(2). 435–490. 10.1353/ol.2017.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0021 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2018 The Barito linkage hypothesis with a note on the position of Basap. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society11. 13–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2019a A reconstruction of Proto-Segai-Modang. Oceanic Linguistics58(2). 353–385. 10.1353/ol.2019.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2019.0012 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2019b A second look at Proto-Land Dayak vowels. Oceanic Linguistics58(1). 110–142. 10.1353/ol.2019.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2019.0005 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wichmann, Søren & Taraka Rama
    2020 Testing methods of homeland detection using synthetic data. bioRxiv10.1101/2020.09.03.280826. URLhttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.03.280826
    https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.03.280826 [Google Scholar]
  64. Xie, Wangang, Paul O. Lewis, Yu Fan, Lynn Kuo & Ming-Hui Chen
    2011 Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Systematic Biology60(2). 150–160. 10.1093/sysbio/syq085
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq085 [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, Ziheng
    1994 Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution39(1). 105–111. 10.1007/BF00178256
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178256 [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, Chi, Tanja Stadler, Seraina Klopfstein, Tracy A. Heath & Fredrik Ronquist
    2015 Total-evidence dating under the fossilized birth-death process. Systematic Biology65(2). 228–249. 10.1093/sysbio/syv080
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syv080 [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
    2019 Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature569(7754). 112. 10.1038/s41586‑019‑1153‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.20024.smi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.20024.smi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Austronesian; Bayesian phylogenetics; Borneo; homeland
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error