Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese

References

1. Akatsuka, Noriko
   1992 Japanese modals are conditionals. InDiane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.55.02aka
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.55.02aka [Google Scholar]
2. Akatsuka, Noriko & Patricia M. Clancy
   1993 Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean. InPatricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol.2, 177–192. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderl, Christoph
   2004 Studies in the language of Zu-tang ji. PhD dissertation, The University of Oslo.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian
   1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bergs, Alexander
   2017 The myth of the complete sentence – a response to Traugott. English Language and Linguistics21(2). 311–316. 10.1017/S1360674317000156
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000156 [Google Scholar]
6. Biq, Yung-O.
   1988 From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: Cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics16(1). 72–108.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bisang, Walter
   2010 Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. InElizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.13bis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.13bis [Google Scholar]
8. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper
   (eds.) 1989 Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Booij, Geert
   2010 Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent
    2011 Grammaticalization and directionality. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968 A grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss
    1997 Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. InAkio Kamio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.36.05cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.36.05cla [Google Scholar]
13. Croft, William
    2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Dancygier, Barbara
    1998 Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    2005 Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
16. Denison, David
    2010 Category change in English with and without structural change. InElizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.07den
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.07den [Google Scholar]
17. Denison, David
    2017 Ambiguity and vagueness in historical change. InMarianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.013 [Google Scholar]
18. Denison, David
    2018 Why would anyone take long? Word classes and Construction Grammar in the history of long. InKristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective, 119–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.20.05den
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.05den [Google Scholar]
19. Diessel, Holger
    2019 The grammar network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
20. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. InIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
21. Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
    2010 Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110241037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241037 [Google Scholar]
22. Eifring, Halvor
    1995 Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Evans, Nicholas
    2007 Insubordination and its uses. InIrina Nicholaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
    (eds.) 2016 Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115 [Google Scholar]
25. Fintel, Kai von
    1991 Exceptive conditionals: The meaning of unless. North East Linguistics Society (NELS)22. 135–148.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fischer, Olga
    2018 Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and constructionalization. InSylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds.), New trends in grammaticalization and language change, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.202.04fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.04fis [Google Scholar]
27. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Bill Jirsa
    2006 The principle of indirect means in language use and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics38. 513–542. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.010 [Google Scholar]
28. Fujii, Seiko
    2004 Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. InMirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 121–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.2.04fuj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.04fuj [Google Scholar]
29. Gisborne, Nikolas
    2010 The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577798.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577798.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten
    2011 Grammaticalization and Construction Grammar. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. He, Leshi, Jinghao Ao, Kezhong Wang, Meiqiao, Mai & Haifen Wang
    (eds.) 1985 Gǔdài hànyǔ xūcí tōng shì [A dictionary of function words in Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Chubanshe.
33. Herforth, Derek
    1994 Conditional sentences in Old Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hong, Bo & Dong Zhengcun
    2004 “Fēi X bùkě” géshì de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the expression “fei X bu ke”]. Zhongguo Yuwen3. 253–261.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Huang, Chu-Ren & Keh-Jiann Chen
    1998 Zhōngyāng yán jiù yuàn hàn yǔliàokù de nèiróng yǔ shuōmíng [Sinica Corpus User Manual], asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw/images/98-04.pdf (18February 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kaltenböck, Gunther
    2016 On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. InGunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds.), Outside the clause, 341–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.178.12kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.12kal [Google Scholar]
37. Kawalya, Deo, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen
    2018 From conditionality to modality in Luganda (Bantu, JE15): A synchronic and diachronic corpus analysis of the verbal prefix -andi-. Journal of Pragmatics127. 84–106. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.011 [Google Scholar]
38. Kratzer, Angelika
    2012 Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kuo, Yueh Hsin
    2020a Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kuo, Yueh Hsin
    2020b Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar: The case of classifier xiē in Mandarin Chinese. Constructions and Frames12(2). 206–238. 10.1075/cf.00040.kuo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00040.kuo [Google Scholar]
41. Kuo, Yueh Hsin
    . Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into bì in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics22(2).
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kuo, Yueh Hsin
    . Forthcoming b. From dynamic modal to conditional protasis connective: Evidence from Chinese néng ‘be able to’. Functions of Language. doi:  10.1075/fol.20030.kuo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20030.kuo [Google Scholar]
43. Lehmann, Christian
    1995 [1982] Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Li, Ming
    2016 Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu [A study of the historical development of Chinese auxiliary verbs]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
47. Li, Renzhi
    2004 Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansó
    2011 How directive constructions emerge: grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics43(14). 3489–3521. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001 [Google Scholar]
49. Narrog, Heiko
    2012 Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
50. Narrog, Heiko
    2016 Insubordination in Japanese diachronically. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), Insubordination, 247–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.115.10nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.10nar [Google Scholar]
51. Norde, Muriel
    2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
52. Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
    2016 Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. InMuriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Exaptation, 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.336.06nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.06nor [Google Scholar]
53. Ōta, Tatsuo
    1958 Chugokugo Rekishi Bunpō [A historical grammar of Modern Chinese]. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Peng, Rui
    2017 Pivotal constructions in Chinese: Diachronic, synchronic, and constructional perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.8 [Google Scholar]
55. Petré, Peter
    2019 How constructions are born. The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. InBeatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept, 157–192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110596656‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110596656-007 [Google Scholar]
56. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1995 Outline of Classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Rentzsch, Julian
    2012 Scope hierarchies and modality in Manchu. Studies in Language36(4). 848–881. 10.1075/sl.36.4.04ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.4.04ren [Google Scholar]
58. Roberts, Craige
    1989 Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy12(6). 683–721. 10.1007/BF00632602
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632602 [Google Scholar]
59. Searle, John R.
    1979 Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
60. Smirnova, Elena
    2015 When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences47. 215–228. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.009 [Google Scholar]
61. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2003 A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. InKlaus-Uwe Panther & Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.09ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.09ste [Google Scholar]
62. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(2). 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
63. Struckmeier, Volker & Sebastian Kaiser
    2019 When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), Insubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues, 320–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110638288‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-011 [Google Scholar]
64. Sun, Chaofen
    1996 Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sweetser, Eve
    1990 From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
66. Tanno, Koji
    2017 Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte. Language Sciences64. 34–53. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
67. Torrent, Tiago Timponi
    2015 On the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and the construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. InJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.06tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor [Google Scholar]
68. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1985 Conditional markers. InJohn Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.14clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.14clo [Google Scholar]
69. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1997 Unless and but conditionals. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On conditionals again, 145–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.09clo [Google Scholar]
70. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2003 From subjectification to intersubjectification. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
71. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2017a Low salience as an enabling factor in morphosyntactic change. InMarianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English Language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 93–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.005 [Google Scholar]
72. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2017b Insubordination in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language & Linguistics21(2). 289–310. 10.1017/S1360674317000144
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000144 [Google Scholar]
73. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2018 Rethinking the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of interactional texts. Open Linguistics4. 19–34. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
74. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
76. Trousdale, Graeme
    2014 On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica48(2). 557–577. 10.1515/flin.2014.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.018 [Google Scholar]
77. Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde
    2013 Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences36. 32–46. 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018 [Google Scholar]
78. Tuggy, David
    1993 Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics4(3). 273–290. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.273 [Google Scholar]
79. Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
    2017 Imperatives and directive strategies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.184
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184 [Google Scholar]
80. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2001 Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics33(10). 1505–1528. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00029‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7 [Google Scholar]
81. Wang, Canlong
    2008 “Fēi VP bùkě” jù shì zhōng “bùkě” de yǐnxiàn: Jiān tán “fēi” de xū huà [On the occurrence and non-occurrence of buke (不可) and the grammaticalization of fei (非) in the construction “fei + VP + buke”]. Zhongguo Yuwen2. 109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wen, Zhengxing
    2010 Táng sòng “shǐ dé” jù de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the “shide” (始得) sentence in the Tang and Song Dynasties]. Yǔwén Yánjiū116(3). 45–52.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Wiedenhof, Jeroen
    2015 A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.197
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.197 [Google Scholar]
84. Wu, Hsueh-ju
    2018 Xiānqín qíngtài dòngcí yánjiū [A Study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese]. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.
85. Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cídiǎn
    Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cídiǎn, 7th edn. 2016 Beijing: Commercial Press.
86. Yang, Fan-Pei
    2007 A cognitive approach to Mandarin conditionals. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2015 The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language39(2). 459–491. 10.1075/sl.39.2.06zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.06zha [Google Scholar]
88. Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2020 A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica37(1). 83–126. 10.1075/dia.18025.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18025.zha [Google Scholar]