oa The rise of middle voice systems

References

1. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
   2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica34(4). 437–469. 10.1075/dia.16037.ahn
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16037.ahn [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, Rutger
   2003 The middle voice in Ancient Greek: A study of polysemy. Amsterdam: Gieben. 10.1163/9789004409064
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409064 [Google Scholar]
3. Allan, Rutger
   2014 Media tantum. InGeorgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics, 440–441. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alpher, Barry, Nicholas Evans & Mark Harvey
   2003 Proto-Gunwinyguan verb suffixes. InNicholas Evans (ed.), The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Northern Australia, 305–352. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Authier, Gilles
   2012 The detransitive voice in Kryz. InGilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 133–164. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110227734.133
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227734.133 [Google Scholar]
6. Bahrt, Nicklas
   2021 Voice syncretism. Berlin: Language Science Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bashir, Elena
   2006 Le préfixe D- en Bourouchaski: deixis et point de référence. Bourouchaskiana1131. 17–62.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beck, David
   2000 Unitariness of participant and event in the Bella Coola (Nuxalk) middle voice. International Journal of American Linguistics66(2). 218–256. 10.1086/466418
   https://doi.org/10.1086/466418 [Google Scholar]
9. Benito Moreno, Carlota de
   . Forthcoming. From (semi-)oppositional to non-oppositional middles: The case of Spanish reír(se). STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bostoen, Koen & Yolande Nzang-Bie
    2010 On how “middle” plus “associative/reciprocal” became “passive” in the Bantu A70 languages. Linguistics48(6). 1255–1307. 10.1515/ling.2010.041
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.041 [Google Scholar]
11. Bowern, Claire
    2012 A grammar of Bardi. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110278187
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110278187 [Google Scholar]
12. Breban, Tine
    2014 What is secondary grammaticalization? Trying to see the wood for the trees in a confusion of interpretations. Folia Linguistica48(2). 469–502. 10.1515/flin.2014.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.016 [Google Scholar]
13. Bril, Isabelle
    2005 Semantic and functional diversification of reciprocal and middle prefixes in New Caledonian and other Austronesian languages. Linguistic Typology9(1). 25–76. 10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.25 [Google Scholar]
14. Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2005 Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615962
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962 [Google Scholar]
15. Bubeník, Vit
    2013 On the remaking of the middle voice in Indo-Iranian. https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/bitstream/handle/11222.digilib/123189/SpisyFF_336-2001-1_8.pdf (accessed22/07/2021).
16. Callaghan, Catherine
    2013 Proto Utian grammar and dictionary. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110276770
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110276770 [Google Scholar]
17. Cennamo, Michela
    1993 The reanalysis of reflexives: A diachronic perspective. Napoli: Liguori.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cennamo, Michela
    1999 Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society97(1). 103–150. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00046 [Google Scholar]
19. Cennamo, Michela
    2020a The actualization of new voice patterns in Romance. Persistence in diversity. InBridget Drinka (ed.), Historical linguistics 2017. Selected papers from the 23rd conference on historical linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017, 109–142. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.350.06cen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.06cen [Google Scholar]
20. Cennamo, Michela
    2020b Mechanisms and paths of grammaticalization and reanalysis in Romance. InWalter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Grammaticalization scenarios: Cross-linguistic variation and universal tendencies, Vol.11, 165–248. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110563146‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563146-004 [Google Scholar]
21. Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal
    2015 Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics53(4). 677–729. 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0015 [Google Scholar]
22. Chavula, Jean
    2018 The polysemy of the neuter extension -ik in Citumbuka (N21) and Citonga (N15). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies36(3). 197–209. 10.2989/16073614.2018.1552166
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1552166 [Google Scholar]
23. Chhangte, Lalnunthangi
    1993 Mizo syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
24. Clendon, Mark
    2014 Worrorra: A language of the north-west Kimberley coast. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Comrie, Bernard
    2006 Transitivity pairs, markedness, and diachronic stability. Linguistics44(2). 303–318. 10.1515/LING.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
26. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2010 Semantic maps and mental representation. Linguistic Discovery8(1). 35–52. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.345
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.345 [Google Scholar]
27. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2019 Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals. InKarsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. De Smet, Hendrik, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde
    (eds.) 2013 On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.79
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.79 [Google Scholar]
29. Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal
    (eds.) 2014 “COME” and “GO” off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110335989
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335989 [Google Scholar]
30. Dik, Simon
    1983 The status of verbal reflexives. InLiliane Tasmowski & Dominique Willems (eds.), Problems in syntax, 231–256. New York & London: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑2727‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2727-1_10 [Google Scholar]
31. Dingemanse, Mark
    2019 ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. InKimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives, 13–33. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.16.02din
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.02din [Google Scholar]
32. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2002 Australian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486869
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486869 [Google Scholar]
33. Dom, Sebastian, Leora Bar-el, Ponsiano Sawaka Kanijo & Malin Petzell
    . Forthcoming. Middle voice in Bantu: In- and detransitivizing morphology in Kagulu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dom, Sebastian, Leonid Kulikov & Koen Bostoen
    2016 The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research. Lingua Posnaniensis58(2). 129–149. 10.1515/linpo‑2016‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0012 [Google Scholar]
35. Dom, Sebastian, Guillaume Segerer & Koen Bostoen
    2015 Antipassive/associative polysemy in Cilubà (Bantu, L31a): A plurality of relations analysis. Studies in Language39(2). 354–385. 10.1075/sl.39.2.03dom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.03dom [Google Scholar]
36. Dum-Tragut, Jasmine
    2009 Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.14 [Google Scholar]
37. Dunkel, George E.
    2014 Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Estrada Fernández, Zarina
    2005 The pronominal form -a as a middle marker in Pima Bajo. International Journal of American Linguistics71(3). 277–302. 10.1086/497873
    https://doi.org/10.1086/497873 [Google Scholar]
39. Evans, Nicholas D.
    1995 A grammar of Kayardild. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110873733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110873733 [Google Scholar]
40. Evseeva, Natalia & Iker Salaberri
    2018 Grammaticalization of nouns meaning “head” into reflexive markers: A cross-linguistic study. Linguistic Typology22(3). 385–435. 10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0014 [Google Scholar]
41. Fernández Garay, Ana
    2005 Contacto ranquel-español en la pampa argentina. InClaudine Chamoreau & Yolanda Lastra (eds.), Dinámica lingüística de las lenguas en contacto, 49–66. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Fufa Teso, Tolemariam
    2009 A typology of verbal derivation in Ethiopian Afro-Asiatic languages. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gandon, Ophelie
    2018 The verbal reciprocal suffix in Turkic languages and the development of its different values. InMehmet Ali Akıncı & Kutlay Yagmur (eds.), The Rouen Meeting: Studies on Turkic structures and language contacts, 29–43. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 10.2307/j.ctvcm4frz.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4frz.6 [Google Scholar]
44. Geniušienė, Emma Š.
    1987 The typology of reflexives. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110859119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859119 [Google Scholar]
45. Gerdts, Donna B. & Thomas E. Hukari
    2006 The Halkomelem Middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics48(1). 44–81.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
    2011 From passive to impersonal. A case study from Italian and its implications. InAndrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 189–228. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.07ram
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.07ram [Google Scholar]
47. Gianollo, Chiara
    2010 I verbi deponenti latini e l’unità della flessione in -r. Incontri triestini di filologia classica81. 23–49.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Gibert-Sotelo, Elisabeth
    2018 Deriving ablative, privative, and reversative meanings in Catalan and Spanish. Borealis7(2). 161–185. 10.7557/1.7.2.4565
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4565 [Google Scholar]
49. Gijn, Rik van
    2010 Middle voice and ideophones, a diachronic connection: The case of Yurakaré. Studies in Language34(2). 273–297. 10.1075/sl.34.2.02gij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.02gij [Google Scholar]
50. Green, Ian
    1995 The death of ‘prefixing’: Contact induced typological change in Northern Australia. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society414–425. 10.3765/bls.v21i1.1419
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v21i1.1419 [Google Scholar]
51. Grestenberger, Laura
    2016 Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European deponents. Indo-European Linguistics4(1). 98–149. 10.1163/22125892‑00401001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-00401001 [Google Scholar]
52. Grossman, Eitan
    2021 Transitivity, diachrony, and language contact. InSilvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds.), Valency over time, 13–30. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110755657‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110755657-002 [Google Scholar]
53. Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
    2018 Swimming against the typological tide or paddling along with language change? Dispreferred structures and diachronic biases in affix ordering. Journal of Historical Linguistics8(3). 388–443. 10.1075/jhl.17027.gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17027.gro [Google Scholar]
54. Guérois, Rozenn
    2015 A grammar of Cuwabo (Mozambique, Bantu P34). PhD dissertation, Université Lyon 2.
55. Guérois, Rozenn & Koen Bostoen
    2018 On the origins of passive allomorphy in Cuwabo (Bantu P34). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies36(3). 211–233. 10.2989/16073614.2018.1552167
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1552167 [Google Scholar]
56. Gunnik, Hilde
    2018 A grammar of Fwe. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
57. Haas, Mary
    1977 From auxiliary verb to inflectional suffix. InCharles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 525–537. Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑015
    https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-015 [Google Scholar]
58. Hardy, Donald E.
    1994 Middle voice in Creek. International Journal of American Linguistics60(1). 39–68. 10.1086/466217
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466217 [Google Scholar]
59. Haspelmath, Martin
    1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language14(1). 25–72. 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has [Google Scholar]
60. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995 Review of ‘The middle voice’ by Suzanne Kemmer. Language71(2). 372–374. 10.2307/416172
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416172 [Google Scholar]
61. Haspelmath, Martin
    2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison. InMichael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Haspelmath, Martin
    2019 Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change?InKarsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Müller-Bardey
    2004 Valency change. InGeert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, 1130–1145. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1130
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1130 [Google Scholar]
64. Hatcher, Anna Granville
    1942 Reflexive verbs. Latin, Old French, Modern French. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hayward, Richard
    1984 A reconstruction of some root extensions of the Eastern Cushitic verb. InJames Bynon (ed.), Current progress in Afro-Asiatic linguistics, 69–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.28.07hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.28.07hay [Google Scholar]
66. Heine, Bernd & Hiroyuki Miyashita
    2008 The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective. InEkkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 169–224. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Hieber, Daniel
    2018 Category genesis in Chitimacha. InKristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective, 15–46. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.20.02hie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.02hie [Google Scholar]
68. Holton, Gary
    2006 The relational noun marker in Tobelo (Northeast Halmaheran). InTenth international conference on Austronesian linguistics. https://sil-philippineslanguages.org/ical/papers.html. (accessed22/07/2021)
    [Google Scholar]
69. Holvoet, Axel
    2020 The middle voice in Baltic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/vargreb.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.5 [Google Scholar]
70. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2020 The Hittite middle voice: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004432307
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432307 [Google Scholar]
71. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2021 Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typologyahead of print. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑0131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-0131 [Google Scholar]
72. Inglis, Stephanie Heather
    1986 The fundamentals of Micmac word formation. MA thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Jacques, Guillaume
    2016 How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese?Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics. 9(2). 205–217. 10.1163/2405478X‑00902014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902014 [Google Scholar]
74. Jacques, Guillaume
    2020 Grammaticalization in Japhug. InWalter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Grammaticalization scenarios: Cross-linguistic variation and universal tendencies, 539–574. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110563146‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563146-012 [Google Scholar]
75. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021 Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. InKatarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions, 427–446. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.130.13jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.13jac [Google Scholar]
76. Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois & Dhan Bahadur Rai
    2016 Reflexive paradigms in Khaling. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area39(1). 33–48. 10.1075/ltba.39.1.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.02jac [Google Scholar]
77. Jaggar, Philip
    1988 Affected-subject (‘grade 7’) verbs in Hausa: What are they and where do they come from. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 387–416. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16.13jag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.13jag [Google Scholar]
78. Jaggar, Philip
    2001 Hausa. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.7 [Google Scholar]
79. Janic, Katarzyna
    2016a L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Bruxelles: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑6598‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6598-9 [Google Scholar]
80. Janic, Katarzyna
    2016b Synchronic and diachronic aspects of valency-reducing devices in Oceanic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis58(2). 151–188. 10.1515/linpo‑2016‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0013 [Google Scholar]
81. Karaj, Dawid & Andrea Sansò
    . Forthcoming. From agent-oriented verbalizer to middle marker: The diachrony of the middle voice in Malayo-Sumbawan. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Karst, Josef
    1901 Historische Grammatik des Kilikisch-Armenischen. Strassburg: Trübner. 10.1515/9783111496672
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111496672 [Google Scholar]
83. Kaufman, Terence
    1990 Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al K’iche’. InNora England & Stephen Elliott (eds.), Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, 59–114. Antigua Guatemala: CIRMA.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Kaufmann, Ingrid
    2007 Middle voice. Lingua117(10). 1677–1714. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
85. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993 The middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
86. Klaiman, M. H.
    1991 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Kondic, Ana
    2011 Middle voice in South Eastern Huastec. InHeriberto Avelino (ed.), New perspectives in Mayan linguistics, 114–143. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
88. König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
    2000 Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 41–74. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.40.03kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.40.03kon [Google Scholar]
89. König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
    2013 Intensifiers and reflexive pronouns. InMatthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://wals.info/chapter/47 (accessed on19/04/2021).
    [Google Scholar]
90. Körtvély, Erika
    2005 Verb conjugation in Tundra Nenets. Segzed: Goldpress.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Kouwenberg, N. J. C.
    2010 The Akkadian verb and its Semitic background. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Kruspe, Nicole
    2004 A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511550713
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550713 [Google Scholar]
93. Kulikov, Leonid
    2010 Voice typology. InJae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Kulikov, Leonid
    2011 Passive to anticausative through impersonalization. The case of Vedic and Indo-European. InAndrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 229–254. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.08kul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.08kul [Google Scholar]
95. Kulikov, Leonid
    2012 The Vedic -ya-present: Passives and intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401207973
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207973 [Google Scholar]
96. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
97. Kuular, Klara
    2007 Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Tuvan. InVladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 1163–1230. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.38kuu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.38kuu [Google Scholar]
98. Lahaussois, Aimée
    2016 Reflexive derivations in Thulung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area39(1). 49–66. 10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah [Google Scholar]
99. Lai, Yunfan
    . Forthcoming. The denominal origin of causative and passive derivations in Rgyalrongic languages. InMichela Cennamo ed. Voice systems in diachrony. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro
     1975 Passives and their meaning. Language51(4). 789–830. 10.2307/412694
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412694 [Google Scholar]
101. LaPolla, Randy
     1996 Middle voice marking in Tibeto-Burman. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics51. 1940–1954.
     [Google Scholar]
102. LaPolla, Randy & Yang Jiangling
     2005 Reflexive and Middle Marking in Dulong-Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics21. 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Lazzeroni, Romano
     2004 Inaccusatività indoeuropea e alternanza causativa vedica [Indo-European unaccusativeness and Vedic causative alternation]. Archivio Glottologico Italiano89(2). 139–164.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Lehmann, Christian
     2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization (3rd edn.). Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603353
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603353 [Google Scholar]
105. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
     2000 Reciprocals without reflexives. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, 32–62. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.41.03lic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.03lic [Google Scholar]
106. Liljegren, Henrik
     2016 A grammar of Palula. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_611690
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_611690 [Google Scholar]
107. Loughnane, Robyn
     2009 A grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, The University of Melbourne.
108. Lukaniec, Megan
     2018 The elaboration of verbal structure: Wendat (Huron) verb morphology. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara.
109. Luraghi, Silvia
     2012 Basic valency orientation and the middle voice in Hittite. Studies in Language36(1). 1–32. 10.1075/sl.36.1.01lur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.01lur [Google Scholar]
110. Martin, Jack B.
     2000 Creek voice: Beyond valency. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 375–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.013 [Google Scholar]
111. Matisoff, James
     2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
     2007 Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language31(4). 829–865. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
113. Mattiola, Simone
     2017 The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio16(1). 119–146.
     [Google Scholar]
114. McGregor, William
     2000 Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, 85–122. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.41.05mcg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.05mcg [Google Scholar]
115. Meira, Sérgio
     1999 A grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
116. Meira, Sérgio
     2000 The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. InSpike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, 201–230. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.43.08mei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.43.08mei [Google Scholar]
117. Meira, Sérgio, Spike Gildea & Berend Hoff
     2010 On the origin of ablaut in the Cariban family. International Journal of American Linguistics761. 474–515. 10.1086/658055
     https://doi.org/10.1086/658055 [Google Scholar]
118. Meyer, Anna-Maria
     2020 The impact of Slavic languages on Romani. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 261–302. Cham: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_9 [Google Scholar]
119. Mous, Maarten
     2001 The middle in Cushitic languages. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society75–86. 10.3765/bls.v27i2.1081
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i2.1081 [Google Scholar]
120. Mous, Maarten & Martha Qorro
     2000 The middle voice in Iraqw. InKulikoyela Kahigi, Yared M. Kihore & Maarten Mous (eds.), Lugha za Tanzania, 157–176. Leiden: CNWS.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Moyse-Faurie, Claire
     2008 Constructions expressing middle, reflexive and reciprocal situations in some Oceanic languages. InEkkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 105–168. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Moyse-Faurie, Claire
     2017 Reflexive markers in Oceanic languages. Studia Linguistica71(1–2). 107–135. 10.1111/stul.12065
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12065 [Google Scholar]
123. Mushin, Ilana
     2012 A grammar of (Western) Garrwa. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614512417
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512417 [Google Scholar]
124. Næss, Åshild
     2007 Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.72
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
125. Nater, Hank
     2015 Complex predicate-argument relations in Bella Coola. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics401. 103–120.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Nordlinger, Rachel
     1998 A grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
127. Olawsky, Knut
     2011 A grammar of Urarina. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
128. Ottosson, Kjartan G.
     2008 The Old Nordic middle voice in the pre-literary period: Questions of grammaticalisation and cliticisation. InFolke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses, 185–219. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.103.11ott
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.103.11ott [Google Scholar]
129. Pacchiarotti, Sara & Leonid Kulikov
     2022 Bribri media tantum verbs and the rise of labile syntax. Linguistics. 60(2). 617–657. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0085
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0085 [Google Scholar]
130. Palancar, Enrique L.
     2004 Middle voice in Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics70(1). 52–85. 10.1086/422266
     https://doi.org/10.1086/422266 [Google Scholar]
131. Palancar, Enrique L.
     2006 Intransitivity and the origins of middle voice in Otomi. Linguistics44(3). 613–643. 10.1515/LING.2006.020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.020 [Google Scholar]
132. Palmer, F. R.
     1995 Review of The middle voice by Suzanne Kemmer. Journal of Linguistics31(2). 478–480. 10.1017/S0022226700015802
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015802 [Google Scholar]
133. Payne, Thomas & Doris Payne
     2013 A typological grammar of Panare. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004242197
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242197 [Google Scholar]
134. Piar, Karim
     2013 Middle voice construction in Burushaski. MA thesis, University of North Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Pinkster, Harm
     2015 The Oxford Latin syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
136. Polian, Gilles
     2013 Gramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. Ciudad de Mexico: CIESAS.
     [Google Scholar]
137. Portilla, Mario Chaves
     2007 Diacronía de las construcciones con pronombres reflexivos en español. Filología y lingüística131–149.
     [Google Scholar]
138. Post, Mark & Yankee Modi
     2022 Subject autonomy marking in Macro-Tani and the typology of middle voice. Linguistics. 60(1). 215–238. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0218
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0218 [Google Scholar]
139. Puddu, Nicoletta
     2007 Typology and historical linguistics: Some remarks on reflexives in ancient IE languages. InMatti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology, 249–270. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
140. Rice, Keren
     2000 Voice and valency in the Athapaskan family. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 173–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.007 [Google Scholar]
141. Romagno, Domenica
     2010 Anticausativi, passivi, riflessivi: Considerazioni sul medio oppositivo. InIgnazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, 430–441. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
     [Google Scholar]
142. Sakel, Jeanette
     2007 The verbness markers of Mosetén from a typological perspective. InMatti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology, 315–335. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Sansò, Andrea
     2016 Agent-defocusing constructions from nominalized VPs: A cross-linguistic type?Studies in Language40(4). 894–954. 10.1075/sl.40.4.05san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.4.05san [Google Scholar]
144. Sansò, Andrea
     2017 Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica34(2). 175–218. 10.1075/dia.34.2.02san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.34.2.02san [Google Scholar]
145. Sansò, Andrea
     2018 Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Language and Linguistics Compass12(6). e12277. 10.1111/lnc3.12277
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12277 [Google Scholar]
146. Schackow, Diana
     2015 A grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603340
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603340 [Google Scholar]
147. Schadeberg, Thilo
     1982 Les suffixes verbaux séparatifs en bantou. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika41. 55–66.
     [Google Scholar]
148. Schadeberg, Thilo & Koen Bostoen
     2019 Word formation. InMark van de Velde, Koen Bostoen, Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages (2nd edn.), 172–203. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315755946‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946-6 [Google Scholar]
149. Schladt, Mathias
     2000 The typology and grammaticalization of reflexives. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 103–124. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.40.05sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.40.05sch [Google Scholar]
150. Segerer, Guillaume
     2002 La langue bijogo de Bubaque (Guinée Bissau). Louvain: Peeters.
     [Google Scholar]
151. Seidel, Frank
     2008 A grammar of Yeyi: A Bantu language of Southern Africa. Köln: Köppe.
     [Google Scholar]
152. Smeets, Ineke
     2008 A grammar of Mapuche. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
153. So-Hartmann, Helga
     2009 A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: Center for Southeast Asia Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
154. Terrill, Angela
     1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics17(1). 71–88. 10.1080/07268609708599545
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609708599545 [Google Scholar]
155. Thompson, Chad
     1996 The Na-Dene middle voice: An impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics62(4). 351–378. 10.1086/466304
     https://doi.org/10.1086/466304 [Google Scholar]
156. Tsunoda, Tasaku
     2006 Reflexive and middle constructions of Warrungu (Australia). InTasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations, 299–334. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.65.16tsu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.65.16tsu [Google Scholar]
157. Wagner, Peter
     2012 A grammar of North West Lovari Romani. PhD dissertation, Univerzita Karlova.
158. Whitehead, Carl
     2004 A reference grammar of Menya, an Angan language of Papua New Guinea. Ann Arbor: UMI.
     [Google Scholar]
159. Widmer, Manuel
     2018 A grammar of Bunan. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110766295
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110766295 [Google Scholar]
160. Wiemer, Bjorn
     2011 The grammaticalization of passives. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 536–546. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0043
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0043 [Google Scholar]
161. Wimbish, Sandra
     1991 An introduction to Pagu through the analysis of narrative discourse. Ann Arbor: UMI.
     [Google Scholar]
162. Wise, Mari R.
     1990 Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. InDoris L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian linguistics, 89–116. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
163. Wit, Gerrit de
     2015 Liko phonology and grammar. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
164. Wolfsgruber, Anne
     2019 Impersonal interpretations of Medieval Romance se – tracing initial contexts. InPeter Herbeck, Bernhard Pöll, Anne Wolfsgruber (eds.), Semantic and syntactic aspects of impersonality, 125–148. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
165. Zaslansky, Matthew
     . Forthcoming. The Turkic middle voice system: Deponency and paradigm reorganization. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
     [Google Scholar]
166. Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
     2019 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316671399
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]