1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Volume 40, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper uses the tools of distributional semantics to investigate the semantic change of from a noun meaning ‘goods, possessions’ and an indefinite pronoun ‘something’ in the Medieval/Classical period of Spanish to an indefinite pronoun and degree adverb ‘a bit’ in contemporary Spanish. We compare the results of a previous corpus-based study (Amaral 2016) on the semantic change of with an analysis using word embeddings models with two goals: (i) to show how word embeddings can help identify different synchronic values of a word, and (ii) to provide measures of change through distributional semantic methods. We discuss the challenges of a study with this methodology using limited data from older periods of a language, hence putting into focus decisions that have to be made and their implications for the analysis. In this way, we hope to contribute to a fruitful integration of more traditional studies in diachronic semantics with the methodology of word embeddings.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
2022-11-08
2023-12-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amaral, Patrícia
    2016 When something becomes a bit. Diachronica33(2). 151–186.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boleda, Gemma
    2020 Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics61. 13.1–13.22. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011619‑030303
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030303 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boleda, Gemma & Aurélie Herbelot
    2016 Formal distributional semantics: Introduction to the special issue. Computational Linguistics619–635. 10.1162/COLI_a_00261
     https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00261 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bréal, Michel
    1897 Essai de semantique. Paris: Hachette.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, Lyle
    2013 Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 3rd edn.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardellino, Cristian
    2019 Spanish billion words corpus and embeddings. https://crscardellino.github.io/SBWCE/
  8. Church, Kenneth Ward & Patrick Hanks
    1990 Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics16(1). 22–29. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/J90-1003
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Stephen
    2015 Vector space models of lexical meaning. InShalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 493–522. London: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118882139.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  10. Condoravdi, Cleo & Ashwini Deo
    2014 Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan and trajectories of semantic change. InChiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, 261–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornillie, Bert
    2007 Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Corominas, Joan & José A. Pascual
    1980–1991 Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cruse, D. A.
    1986 Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies, Mark
    2001 Corpus del Español. www.corpusdelespanol.org
  15. De Cesare, Anna-Maria
    2017 Introduction: On ‘additivity’ as a multidisciplinary research field. InAnna-Maria De Cesare & Cecilia Andorno (eds.), Focus on additivity, 1–22. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.278.00dec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.278.00dec [Google Scholar]
  16. Deo, Ashwini
    2015 Diachronic semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics11. 179–197. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125100
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125100 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubossarsky, Haim, Simon Hengchen, Nina Tahmasebi & Dominik Schlechtweg
    2019 Time-out: Temporal referencing for robust modeling of lexical semantic change. InProceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 457–470. Florence, Italy. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1044. 10.18653/v1/P19‑1044
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1044 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eberenz, Rolf
    1994 Enlaces conjuntivos y adjuntos de sentido aditivo del español preclásico: otrosí, eso mismo, asimismo, demás, también, aun, etc. Iberoromania391. 1–20. 10.1515/iber.1994.1994.39.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iber.1994.1994.39.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckardt, Regine
    2006 Meaning change in grammaticalization. An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Espinoza Elorza, Rosa María
    2018 La formación de los marcadores sumativos en español. desde sobresto hasta a mayores. Estudios Humanísticos Filología401. 95–118. 10.18002/ehf.v0i40.5463
     https://doi.org/10.18002/ehf.v0i40.5463 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Ordóñez, Ines
    2016 De más (demás), demasiado: la historia de dos cuantificadores contemplada desde la dialectología. InLópez Serena, A. and Narbona Jiménez, A. and del Rey Quesada, S. (ed.), El Español a través del tiempo. Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar, 477–496. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Finkelstein, Lev, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman & Eytan Ruppin
    2001 Placing search in context: The concept revisited. InProceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, 406–414. 10.1145/371920.372094
     https://doi.org/10.1145/371920.372094 [Google Scholar]
  23. Firth, John R.
    1957 Papers in linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Frermann, Lea & Mirella Lapata
    2016 A Bayesian model of diachronic meaning change. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics41. 31–45. 10.1162/tacl_a_00081
     https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00081 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gago Jover, Francisco
    (ed.) 2011 Spanish Chronicle Texts. Digital Library of Old Spanish Texts. Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies. www.hispanicseminary/t&c/ac/index.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gergel, Remus & Jonathan Watkins
    (eds.) 2020 Quantification and scales in change. Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. GITHE, Universidad de Alcalá
    GITHE, Universidad de Alcalá 2015 Corpus de Documentos Españoles Anteriores a 1800. corpuscodea.es/
  28. Giulianelli, Mario, Marco Del Tredici & Raquel Fernández
    2020 Analysing lexical semantic change with contextualised word representations. InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3960–3973. Online. 10.18653/v1/2020.acl‑main.365. https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.365
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.365 [Google Scholar]
  29. Golub, Gene H. & Christian Reinsch
    1971 Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. InF. L. Bauer, A. S. Householder, F. W. J. Olver, H. Rutishauser, K. Samelson & E. Stiefel (eds.), Handbook for automatic computation, 134–151. Springer. VolumeII1: Linear Algebra. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑86940‑2_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86940-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamilton, William L., Jure Leskovec & Dan Jurafsky
    2016 Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. InProceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1489–1501. Berlin, Germany. 10.18653/v1/P16‑1141. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1141
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1141 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harris, Zellig
    1954 Distributional structure. Word10(2–3). 146–162. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 [Google Scholar]
  32. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hellrich, Johannes
    2019 Word embeddings: Reliability and semantic change: Jena University Language and Information Engineering Lab dissertation.
  34. Hock, Hans Heinrich
    1991 Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219135 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu, Hai, Patrícia Amaral & Sandra Kübler
    2021 Word embeddings and semantic shifts in historical Spanish: Methodological considerations. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37,(2). 441–461. 10.1093/llc/fqab050
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab050 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hu, Renfen, Shen Li & Shichen Liang
    2019 Diachronic sense modeling with deep contextualized word embeddings: An ecological view. InProceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3899–3908. Florence, Italy. 10.18653/v1/P19‑1379. https://aclanthology.org/P19-1379
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1379 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin
    2019 Speech and Language Processing. 3rd edn.Online athttps://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/; retrievedApril 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Keniston, Hayward
    1937 The syntax of Castilian prose: The sixteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kutuzov, Andrey, Lilja Øvrelid, Terrence Szymanski & Erik Velldal
    2018 Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: A survey. InProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1384–1397.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Landauer, Thomas, Peter Folz & Darrell Laham
    1998 An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processing25(2&3). 259–284. 10.1080/01638539809545028
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lenci, Alessandro
    2018 Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics4(1). 151–171. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑030514‑125254
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125254 [Google Scholar]
  42. Levy, Omer, Yoav Goldberg & Ido Dagan
    2015 Improving distributional similarity with lessons learned from word embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics31. 211–225. 10.1162/tacl_a_00134
     https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00134 [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, Yiwei, Dan Jurafsky & Beth Levin
    2019 From insanely jealous to insanely delicious: Computational models for the semantic bleaching of English intensifiers. InProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change, 1–13. Florence, Italy. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-4701/. 10.18653/v1/W19‑4701
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4701 [Google Scholar]
  44. van der Maaten, Laurens & Geoffrey Hinton
    2008 Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research91. 2579–2605.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mikolov, Thomas, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado & Jeffrey Dean
    2013 Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Moretti, Franco
    2013 Distant reading. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Müller, Bodo
    1987 Diccionario del español medieval. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Pennington, Jeffrey, Richard Socher & Christopher D. Manning
    2014 GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. InProceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing EMNLP, 1532–1543. Doha, Qatar. 10.3115/v1/D14‑1162
     https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162 [Google Scholar]
  49. Poplack, Shana & Sali Tagliamonte
    2000 The grammaticization of going to in African American English. Language Variation and Change111. 315–342. 10.1017/S0954394599113048
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394599113048 [Google Scholar]
  50. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española. n.a.Corpus Diacrónico del Español. corpus.rae.es/cordenet.html
  51. Rodda, Martina, Marco Senaldi & Alessandro Lenci
    2017 Panta Rei: Tracking semantic change with distributional semantics in Ancient Greek. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics3(1). 11–24. 10.4000/ijcol.421
     https://doi.org/10.4000/ijcol.421 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
    2001 Observaciones sobre el uso de los adjetivos y los adverbios en -mente con valor de grado en español. Español Actual751. 33–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosenfeld, Alex & Katrin Erk
    2018 Deep neural models of semantic shift. InProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 474–484. New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18653/v1/N18‑1044. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N18-1044
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1044 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sagi, Eyal, Stefan Kaufmann & Brady Clark
    2012 Tracing semantic change with Latent Semantic Analysis. InKathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 161–183. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sánchez López, Cristina
    1999 Los cuantificadores: Clases de cuantificadores y estructuras cuantificativas. InIgnacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol.11, cap.16. Espasa-Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sánchez-Martínez, Felipe, Isabel Martínez-Sempere, Xavier Ivars-Ribes & Rafael C. Carrasco
    2013 An open diachronic corpus of historical Spanish. Language Resources and Evaluation47(4). 1327–1342. 10.1007/s10579‑013‑9239‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9239-y [Google Scholar]
  57. Sauerland, Uli & Penka Stateva
    2007 Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. InProceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference (SALT), 228–245. University of Connecticut. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/3091. 10.3765/salt.v17i0.3091
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v17i0.3091 [Google Scholar]
  58. Stern, Gustaf
    1921 Swift, swiftly, and their synonyms. A contribution to semantic analysis and theory. Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerber.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Tang, Xuri
    2018 A state-of-the-art of semantic change computation. Natural Language Engineering24(5). 649–676. 10.1017/S1351324918000220
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324918000220 [Google Scholar]
  60. Torres Cacoullos, Rena
    2012 Grammaticalization through inherent variability. Studies in Language36(1). 73–122. 10.1075/sl.36.1.03tor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.03tor [Google Scholar]
  61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Xu, Yang & Charles Kemp
    2015 A computational evaluation of two laws of semantic change. InProceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2703–2708.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
Loading
Tracing semantic change with distributional methods
Diachronica 40, 153 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21012.ama
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpora; semantic change; Spanish; word embeddings

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error