1887
image of Review of Daniels (2020): Grammatical reconstruction: The Sogeram languages of New Guinea
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21032.bar
2021-10-12
2021-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barðdal, Jóhanna
    2013 Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. InThomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris
    2002 Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’. Journal of Linguistics38(3). 599–618. 10.1017/S0022226702001706
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001706 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, Ross
    2011 Birds. InMalcolm Ross, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, volume 4: Animals, 271–370. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniels, Don
    2010 A preliminary phonological history of the Sogeram languages of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics49(1). 163–193. 10.1353/ol.0.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0068 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2015A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017 A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language41(3). 577–614. 10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth
    2019 Subgrouping the Sogeram languages: A critical appraisal of historical glottometry. Journal of Historical Linguistics9(1). 92–127. 10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan [Google Scholar]
  8. François, Alexandre
    2014 Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    2021Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. glottolog.org
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris, Kyle
    1990 Nend grammar essentials. InJohn R. Roberts (ed.), Two grammatical studies (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 37), 73–156. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Healey, Alan
    1970 Proto-Awyu-Dumut phonology. InStephen A. Wurm & Donald C. Laycock (eds.), Pacific linguistic studies in honour of Arthur Capell, 997–1063. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François
    2018 Freeing the comparative method from the tree model: A framework for historical glottometry. InRitsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence Reid (eds.), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation, 59–89. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lightfoot, David W.
    1979Principles of diachronic syntax (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002a Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics38(1). 113–136. 10.1017/S0022226701001268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226701001268 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2002b More myths. Journal of Linguistics38(3). 619–626. 10.1017/S0022226702001718
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001718 [Google Scholar]
  17. McElhanon, Kenneth & C. L. Voorhoeve
    1970The Trans-New Guinea Phylum: Explorations in deep-level genetic relationships (Pacific Linguistics B16). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pawley, Andrew
    1998 The Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis: A reassessment. InJelle Miedema, Cecilia Odé & Rien A. C. Dam (eds.), Perspectives on the Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia: Proceedings of the conference, Leiden, 13–17 October 1997, 655–690. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012 How reconstructable is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. InHarald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages (Special Issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia), 88–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström
    2018 The Trans New Guinea family. InBill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pick, Andrew
    2020A reconstruction of Proto-Northern Adelbert phonology and lexicon. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ross, Malcolm
    2014 Proto-South-Adelbert. InSimon J. Greenhill (ed.), TransNewGuinea.org. https://transnewguinea.org/language/proto-south-adelbert
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Suter, Edgar
    2018Comparative morphology of the Huon Peninsula languages (Papua New Guinea). PhD dissertation, Universität zu Köln.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sweeney, Mike
    1994A description of the phonology of the Katiati (Mum) language. Unpublished MS, Pioneer Bible Translators.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Usher, Timothy [Google Scholar]
  26. [Google Scholar]
  27. Voorhoeve, C. L.
    2001 Proto-Awyu-Dumut phonology II. InAndrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross & Darrell Tryon (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honor of Tom Dutton, 361–381. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wade, Martha
    1989A survey of the grammatical structures and semantic functions of the Apalɨ (Emerum) language. Unpublished MS, Pioneer Bible Translators.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wester, Ruth
    2014A linguistic history of Awyu-Dumut: Morphological study and reconstruction of a Papuan language family. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wurm, Stephen A., Clemens L. Voorhoeve & Kenneth A. McElhanon
    1975 The Trans New Guinea Phylum in general. InStephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene (Pacific Linguistics C38), 299–322. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Z’graggen, John A.
    1975 The Madang-Adelbert Range Sub-Phylum. InStephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene (Pacific Linguistics C38), 569–612. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.21032.bar
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error