1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Volume 40, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 40, Issue 5
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper investigates the reduction of gender assignment and agreement in a nineteenth-century Romani variety in contact with genderless Hungarian. This reduction took place within two generations of native speakers. We compare the geographical and sociolinguistic situation with the majority of present-day Romani varieties, which still maintain the original two-way (masculine, feminine) gender system. By comparing these varieties with the few Romani varieties which also display reduction of their gender system, we show that the development of this particular typological change may be the outcome of the minority situation of Romani and its geographical proximity to a genderless language. However, as rural varieties do not exhibit the same kind of erosion, this is not a sufficient explanation; what also appears to play a role in the Romani case is the urban context of the change. This sociolinguistic factor might also be considered in other case studies on the loss of grammatical gender.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
2023-12-14
2024-10-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dia.22011.bal.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adamou, Evangelia
    2010 Bilingual speech and language ecology in Greek Thrace: Romani and Pomak in contact with Turkish. Language in Society39(2). 147–171. 10.1017/S0047404510000035
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000035 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamou, Evangelia & Kimmo Granqvist
    2014 Unevenly mixed Romani languages. International Journal of Bilingualism19(5). 525–547. 10.1177/1367006914524645
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914524645 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adamou, Evangelia, Quentin Feltgen & Cristian Padure
    2021 A unified approach to the study of language contact: Cross-language priming and change in adjective/noun order. International Journal of Bilingualism25(6). 1635–1654. 10.1177/13670069211033909
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211033909 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2004 Gender and noun class. InGeert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.) in collaboration withWolfgang Kesselheim, Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, 21. Halbband/Volume21, 1031–1045. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110172782.2.13.1031
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110172782.2.13.1031 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2012 Language contact in language obsolescence. InClaudine Chamoreau & Isabelle Léglise (eds.) Dynamics of contact-induced language change, Language Contact and Bilingualism 2, 77–109. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110271430.77
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271430.77 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2016 How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723752.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723752.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anon
    Anon 1913a József főherceg ismeretlen cigánynyelvü levele [Archduke Joseph’s unknown Romani language letter]. 23August. Székesfehérvár és Vidéke41(160). 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anon
    Anon 1913b Napi hírek [Daily news]. 23August. Pesti Hírlap35(199). 8–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Anon
    Anon 1938 Interjú Horváth Ferenccel, aki nem mindennapi ember! [An interview with Ferenc Horváth, who is not an everyday person!]. 3April. Magyarság19(75). 10.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Archduke Joseph, [József Főherczeg]
    1888 Czigány nyelvtan: Románo csibákero sziklaribe [Gypsy grammar]. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 1890 Eredeti czigánylevelek [Original Gypsy letters]. Egyetemes Philologiai KözlönyXIV1. 737–768.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Audring, Jenny
    2014 Gender as a complex feature. Language Sciences431. 5–17. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bakker, Peter
    1997 Athematic morphology in Romani: The borrowing of a borrowing pattern. InYaron Matras, Peter Bakker & Hristo Kyuchukov (eds.) The typology and dialectology of Romani, 1–21. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.156.03bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.156.03bak [Google Scholar]
  14. Baló, Márton A.
    2020 Romani phonology. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 119–153. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2021 Variation in the nominal morphology of Northern Vlax Romani. Word Structure14(1). 25–58. 10.3366/word.2021.0179
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0179 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2022 The role of the Romani language in the preservation of Romani identity in Hungary. InPatricia Ronan & Evelyn Ziegler (eds.) Language and identity in migration contexts, 141–162. Oxford: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Balogh Jancsi
    Balogh Jancsi 1850 Legelső czigány imádságok [Very first Gypsy prayers]. Esztergom: Beimel József Nyomdája.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernard, H. Russell
    1996 Language preservation and publishing. InNancy H. Hornberger (ed.) Indigenous literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up, 139–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bodnárová, Zuzana
    2017 Spontaneous bottom-up revitalization: The development of Dunajská Streda Romani. InKozhanov, Kirill, Mikhail Oslon & Dieter W. Halwachs (eds.) Das amen godi pala Lev Čerenkov: Romani historija, čhib taj kultura [Let us remember Lev Tcherenkov: Romani history, language and culture], 143–157. Graz: Grazer Linguistische Monographien.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018 Gender marking in L2 Romani in contact with Hungarian: The case of Dunajská Streda Romani. InFriedman, Victor A. (ed.) Multilingualism and language contact, 80–91. Tetovo: Southeast European University.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2020 Užívání určitého členu v předložkových frázích v jihocentrální romštině [The use of the definite article in prepositional phrases in South Central Romani]. Romano džaniben27(1). 135–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bodnárová, Zuzana & Jakob Wiedner
    2020 The impact of Hungarian on Romani. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 303–328. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  23. Boretzky, Norbert
    2000 The definite article in Romani dialects. InViktor Elšík & Yaron Matras (eds.), Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase, 31–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.211.05bor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.211.05bor [Google Scholar]
  24. 2013 Gender adaptation in loan layers of Romani. STUF – Language Typology and Universals66(4). 404–424. 10.1524/stuf.2013.0020
     https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2013.0020 [Google Scholar]
  25. Campbell, Lyle & Martha C. Muntzel
    1989 The structural consequences of language death. InNancy N. Dorian (ed.) Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620997.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620997.016 [Google Scholar]
  26. Corbett, Greville C.
    1991 Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
  27. Davis, Sacha E.
    2017 Competitive civilizing missions: Hungarian Germans, modernization, and ethnographic descriptions of the Zigeuner before World War I. Central European History50(1). 6–33. 10.1017/S0008938917000012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938917000012 [Google Scholar]
  28. Di Garbo, Francesca
    2020 The complexity of grammatical gender and language ecology. InPeter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (eds.) The complexities of morphology, 193–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Di Garbo, Francesca & Matti Miestamo
    2019 The evolving complexity of gender agreement systems. InFrancesca Di Garbo, Bruno Olsson & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.) Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity, vol. 2: World-wide comparative studies (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 27), 15–60. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Di Garbo, Francesca, Bruno Olsson & Bernhard Wälchli
    (eds.) 2019 Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity, vol. 1 & 2: World-wide comparative studies (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 27). Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Elšík, Viktor
    2000a Dialect variation in Romani personal pronouns. InViktor Elšík & Yaron Matras (eds.) Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase, 65–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.211.06els
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.211.06els [Google Scholar]
  32. 2000b Romani nominal paradigms: Their structure, diversity and development. InViktor Elšík & Yaron Matras (eds.) Grammatical relations in Romani: The noun phrase, 9–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.211.04els
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.211.04els [Google Scholar]
  33. Elšík, Viktor & Yaron Matras
    2006 Markedness and language change: The Romani sample. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197594
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197594 [Google Scholar]
  34. Elšík, Viktor, Michael Beníšek & Zuzana Bodnárová
    2014 Linguistic Atlas of Central Romani, atlasofcentralromani.ff.cuni.cz. (4 February, 2022.)
  35. Erdős, István
    2018 Még egy cseppet a jóból [One more bit of good]. Palócföld64(3). 38–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. FamilySearch
    FamilySearch 2021 https://www.familysearch.org/en/. (4 February, 2022.)
  37. Friedman, Victor A.
    2003 Romani as a minority language, as a standard language, and as a contact language: Comparative legal, sociolinguistic, and structural approaches. InKari Fraurud & Kenneth Hyltenstam (eds.) Multilingualism in global and local perspectives: Selected papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1–3, 2001, Stockholm, Rinkeby, 103–134. Stockholm: Centre for Research on Bilingualism.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 2010 Turkish grammar in Balkan Romani: Hierarchies of markedness in Balkan linguistics. Balkanistica231. 107–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2020 The impact of Turkish on Romani. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 231–260. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_8 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gblem-Poidi, Massanvi Honorine
    2007 Nominal classes and concord in Igo (Ahlon). InMary Esther Kropp Dakubu, George Akanlig-Pare, Kweku E. Osam & Kofi K. Saah (eds.) Proceedings of the Annual Colloquium of the Legon-Trondheim Linguistics Project, 10–20 January 2005, vol.41, 52–60. Legon: Linguistics Department, University of Ghana.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Granqvist, Kimmo
    2002 Finnish Romani phonology and dialect geography. SKY Journal of Linguistics151. 61–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2012 Finská romština – gramatický náčrt [Finnish Romani – a grammatical sketch]. Romano džaniben14(1). 27–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 Finnish Romani during the nineteenth century. InBarbara Schrammel & Barbara Tiefenbacher (eds.) Romani V.: Papers from the Annual Meeting of the Gypsy Lore Society, Graz 2011, 13–28. Graz: Grazer Romani-Publikationen.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Halwachs, Dieter W.
    2020 Language policy and planning in Romani. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 429–457. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_14 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hamp, Eric P.
    1989 On signs of health and death. InNancy C. Dorian (ed.) Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language), 197–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620997.017
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620997.017 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hockett, Charles F.
    1958 A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1958.tb00870.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb00870.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Hualde, José Ignacio, Gorka Elordieta & Arantzazu Elordeta
    1994 The Basque dialect of Lekeitio. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Huber, Christian
    . To appear. Gender marking in Shumcho. InMarc Allassonnière-Tang & Marcin Kilarsky eds. Nominal classification in Asia and Oceania: Functional and diachronic perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.362.04hub
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.362.04hub [Google Scholar]
  49. Igartua, Iván
    2019 Loss of grammatical gender and language contact. Diachronica36(2). 181–221. 10.1075/dia.17004.iga
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17004.iga [Google Scholar]
  50. Karatsareas, Petros
    2009 The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society107(2). 196–230. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2009.01217.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2009.01217.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Kemény István, Béla Janky & Gabriella Lengyel
    2004 A magyarországi cigányság 1971–2003 [The Gypsies of Hungary 1971–2003]. Budapest: Gondolat – MTA Etnikai-nemzeti Kisebbségkutató Intézet.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Masica, Colin P.
    1991 The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Matras, Yaron
    2002 Romani: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486791
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486791 [Google Scholar]
  54. Meyer, Anna-Maria
    2020 The Impact of Slavic languages on Romani. InYaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of Romani language and linguistics, 261–301. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_9 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [Ministry of Social Affairs and Health]
    Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [Ministry of Social Affairs and Health] 2004 Suomen romanit – Finitiko romaseele. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön esitteitä [Finnish Roma – Finitiko romaseele. Brochures of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health]. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.
  56. Mous, Maarten
    1994 Ma’a or Mbugu. InPeter Bakker & Maarten Mous (eds.) Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining, 175–200. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    1998 A way to dusty death: The Matrix Language turnover hypothesis. InLenore A. Grenoble & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.) Endangered languages: Language loss and community response, 289–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166959.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166959.013 [Google Scholar]
  58. Newell, Heidi C.
    2005 A consideration of feminine default gender. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati MA thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Nichols, Johanna
    2003 Diversity and stability in language. InBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.) The handbook of historical linguistics, 283–310. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch5
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  60. Nurse, Derek
    1994 South Meets North: Ilwana = Bantu + Cushitic on Kenya’s Tana River. InPeter Bakker & Maarten Mous (eds.) Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining, 213–222. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Országos Magyar Királyi Statisztikai Hivatal [National Hungarian Royal Statistical Office] (ed.) 1871 Az 1870. év elején végrehajtott népszámlálás eredményei a hasznos házi állatok kimutatásával együtt [The results of the census carried out at the beginning of the year 1870, along with an account of useful domestic animals]. Pest, Hungary: Athenaeum.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Országos Magyar Királyi Statisztikai Hivatal [National Hungarian Royal Statistical Office] (ed.) 1882 A Magyar Korona országaiban az 1881. év elején végrehajtott népszámlálás főbb eredményei megyék és községek szerint részletezve, II. kötet [The main results of the census carried out at the beginning of the year 1881 in the countries of the Hungarian Crown, detailed according to counties, towns and villages, volume II]. Budapest: Pesti Könyvnyomda-Részvény-Társaság.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Országos Magyar Királyi Statisztikai Hivatal [National Hungarian Royal Statistical Office] (ed.) 1895 A Magyarországon 1893. január 31-én végrehajtott cigányösszeírás eredményei (Magyar Statisztikai Közlemények, Új folyam, IX. kötet) [The results of the Gypsy census carried out in Hungary on 31 January 1893 (Hungarian Statistical Bulletins, New series, volume IX]. Pest, Hungary: Athenaeum.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ortutay, István
    1915 József főherceg élete [The life of Archduke Joseph]. Szeged, Hungary: Engel Lajos Könyvnyomdája.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Otsuji, Emi & Alastair Pennycook
    2010 Metrolingualism: fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism7(3). 240–254. 10.1080/14790710903414331
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903414331 [Google Scholar]
  66. Pennycook, Alistair & Emi Otsuji
    2015 Metrolingualism: Language in the city. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724225
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724225 [Google Scholar]
  67. Pintér, Tibor
    2010 Nyelvhasználati sajátosságok a dunaszerdahelyi romani közösségben [Peculiarities of language use in the Romani community in Dunaszerdahely]. Fórum Társadalomtudományi Szemle12(1). 61–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rézműves, Melinda
    (ed.) 2003 Rromane Lila – Cigány Levelek – Rromani Letters. Budapest: Fővárosi Önkormányzat Cigány Ház – Romano Kher.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Ringe, Don & Joseph F. Eska
    2013 Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511980183
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rodina, Yulia & Marit Westergaard
    2021 Grammatical gender and declension class in language change: A study of the loss of feminine gender in Norwegian. Journal of Germanic Linguistics33(3). 235–263. 10.1017/S1470542719000217
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542719000217 [Google Scholar]
  71. Rózsa, Mária
    2012 „Közfényt gyarapítni”. Beimel József és Kozma Vazul pesti nyomdájának története és nyomtatványai [“To increase public awareness”. The history and prints of József Beimel and Kozma Vazul’s printing house in Pest], 1830–1864. Budapest: OSZK–Gondolat.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Soós, István
    2000 József főherceg cigány levelezése [Gypsy correspondence of Archduke Joseph]. Szekszárd, Hungary: Romológiai Kutatóintézet.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Stolz, Thomas
    2012 Survival in a niche. On gender-copy in Chamorro (and sundry languages). InMartine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka (eds.) Morphologies in contact, 93–140. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050057699.91
     https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050057699.91 [Google Scholar]
  74. Szuhay, Péter
    2005 The self-definitions of Roma ethnic groups and their perceptions of other Roma groups. InKemény István (ed.) Roma of Hungary, 237–246. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Tóth József. Egy vén muzsikus [An old musician] 1873 Fővárosi Lapok10(128): 556–557.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Trask, Robert L.
    2003 The Noun Phrase: Nouns, determiners and modifiers; Pronouns and names. InJosé Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.) A grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Tröster-Mutz, Stefan
    2011 The old minority languages of Europe. InBernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) The languages and linguistics of Europe, 455–466. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220261.455
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220261.455 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wälchli, Bernhard
    2017 The incomplete story of feminine gender loss in Northwestern Latvian dialects. Baltic Linguistics81. 143–214. 10.32798/bl.380
     https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.380 [Google Scholar]
  79. 2018 The rise of gender in Nalca (Mek, Tanah Papua): The drift towards the canonical gender attractor. InSebastian Fedden, Jenny Audring & Greville G. Corbett (eds.) Non-canonical gender systems, 68–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Zahova, Sofiya
    2021 Introduction. InRaluca Bianca Roman, Sofiya Zahova & Alexandar G. Marinov (eds.) Roma writings. Romani literature and press in Central, South-Eastern and Eastern Europe from the Nineteenth Century until World War II, 3–22. Leiden: Brill. 10.30965/9783657705207_003
     https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657705207_003 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
Loading
Gender reduction in contact
Diachronica 40, 578 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22011.bal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contact-induced language change; gender loss; gender reduction; language attrition; language contact; language obsolescence; metrolingualism; Romani; Romani dialects

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error