1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Volume 42, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 42, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There is an extensive literature on tonogenesis, yet the literature on tonoexodus is much less developed. This paper contributes to the knowledge of how tone systems can be lost through a diachronic study of tone in disyllables in Rma (also known as Qiāng), a Trans-Himalayan language spoken along the upper reaches of the Min River in Sichuan, China. There are both tonal and atonal Rma dialects. It has been argued that tonal patterns emerged from reanalysis of stress patterns as tones due to influence from Chinese. This paper argues that the tonoexodus scenario explains word-prosodic correspondences better than the alternative tonogenetic account.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
2025-05-27
2025-06-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
    2014 Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, William H. III
    1992 A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857085
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedict, Paul K.
    1983 Qiang monosyllabization: A third phase in the cycle. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area7(2). 113–114. 10.32655/LTBA.7.2.08
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.7.2.08 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Lauren Gawne, Susan Smythe Kung, Barbara F. Kelly, Tyler Heston, Gary Holton, Peter Pulsifer, … Anthony C. Woodbury
    2018 Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics56(1). 1–18. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0032
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0032 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradley, David
    2005 Why do numerals show ‘irregular’ correspondence patterns in Tibeto-Burman? Some Southeastern Tibeto-Burman examples. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale34(2). 221–238. 10.3406/clao.2005.1736
     https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2005.1736 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1968 The ordering of phonological rules. International Journal of American Linguistics34(2). 115–136. 10.1086/465004
     https://doi.org/10.1086/465004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao, Yuanren
    1930 A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique301. 24–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Connell, Bruce & D. Robert Ladd
    1990 Aspects of pitch realisation in Yoruba. Phonology7(1). 1–29. 10.2307/4420007
     https://doi.org/10.2307/4420007 [Google Scholar]
  9. Creissels, Denis
    1991 Description des langues négro-africaines et théorie syntaxique. Grenoble: ELLUG.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. van Driem, George
    2014 Review: ‘Nathan W. Hill (ed.): Mediaeval Tibeto-Burman languages IV. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies771. 618–620. 10.1017/S0041977X14000834
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X14000834 [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans, Jonathan P.
    2001a Contact-induced tonogenesis in Southern Qiang. Language & Linguistics2(2). 63–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2001b Introduction to Qiang phonology and lexicon: Synchrony and diachrony. Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 Reconstruction of the Proto-Qiang verb complex. InYing-chin Lin, Fang min Hsu, Chun chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu fang Yang & Dah an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthdayLanguage and Linguistics Monograph Series W4, 201–238. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2006a How do you analyze a three tone system, when all three tones are high?In39th International Conference On Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Seattle, University of Washington.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 2006b Origins of vowel pharyngealization in Hongyan Qiang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area29(2). 95–127. 10.32655/LTBA.29.2.04
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.29.2.04 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006c Vowel quality in Hongyan Qiang. Language & Linguistics7(4). 731–754.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2008 ‘African’ tone in the Sinosphere. Language & Linguistics9(3). 463–490.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2009 Is there a Himalayan tone typology?Senri Ethnological Studies751. 199–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018 Common tone sandhi processes across Sino-Tibetan languages. InTonal change and neutralization (Phonology and Phonetics 27), 223–248. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110567502‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567502-009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans, Jonathan P., Man-ni Chu, John A. D. Aston & Chao-yu Su
    2010 Linguistic and human effects on F0 in a tonal dialect of Qiang. Phonetica67(1–2). 82–99. 10.1159/000319380
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000319380 [Google Scholar]
  21. Evans, Jonathan P. & Jackson T.-S. Sun
    2015a Qiāng 羌 language. InRint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/2210‑7363_ecll_COM_00000347
     https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7363_ecll_COM_00000347 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015b Qiāng 羌 language. 10.1163/2210‑7363_ecll_COM_00000347. manuscript
     https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7363_ecll_COM_00000347
  23. Evans, Jonathan P., Jackson T.-S. Sun, Chenhao Chiu & Michelle Liou
    2016 Uvular approximation as an articulatory vowel feature. Journal of the International Phonetic Association46(1). 1–31. 10.1017/S0025100315000146
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100315000146 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fertig, David
    2013 Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748646234
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646234 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldsmith, John
    1984 Meeussen’s rule. InLanguage sound and structure, MIT Press. OCLC: 178236727.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gong, Hwang-cherng
    1988 Phonological alternations in Tangut. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology59.31. 783–834.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gong, Xun
    2014 Word-level prosodic structure and stress in Old Tibetan.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1954 De l’origine des tons en viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique2421. 69–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hetzron, Robert
    1976 Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua38(2). 89–108. 10.1016/0024‑3841(76)90074‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(76)90074-7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hlavac, Marek
    2022 stargazer: Well-formatted regression and summary statistics tables. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer
  31. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language55(1). 37. 10.2307/412518
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
  32. Honkasalo, Sami
    2019 A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, Bufan & Dai Qingxia
    1992 藏緬語族語言詞匯 [A Tibeto-Burman lexicon]. manuscript. stedt.berkeley.edu/search/
  34. Huang, Bufan & Facheng Zhou
    2006 Qiangyu yanjiu [Studies in Qiang] Zhongguo Qiangxue wenku. Chengdu: Sichuan Renmin Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, Chenglong
    2007 Puxi Qiangyu yanjiu [Studies in Puxi Qiang] Zhongguo shaoshu minzu yuyan fangyan yanjiu congshu. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, Chenglong, Baofeng Wang, Mingjun Mao & Xi Zhang
    2019 Sichuan Songpan Qiangyu Zhongguo binwei yuyan zhi. Shaoshu minzu yuyan xilie. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hyman, Larry M.
    2006 Word-prosodic typology. Phonology231. 225–257. 10.1017/S0952675706000893
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000893 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007 Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. InAditi Lahiri, Tomas Riad & Carlos Gussenhoven (eds.), Tones and tunes: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody, vol.11, 1–34. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207569.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207569.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2009 The representation of tone. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report5(5). 108–132. 10.5070/P771H8P4GZ
     https://doi.org/10.5070/P771H8P4GZ [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017 Synchronic vs. diachronic naturalness: Hyman & Schuh (1974) revisited. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports131. 10.5070/P7131040754
     https://doi.org/10.5070/P7131040754 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2018 Towards a typology of tone system changes. InHaruo Kubozono & Mikio Giriko (eds.), Tonal change and neutralization, 203–222. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110567502‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567502-008 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hyman, Larry M. & Russell G. Schuh
    1974 Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry5(1). 81–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacques, Guillaume
    2010 The Tangut imperial title. Central Asiatic journal54(1). 60–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2014 Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004264854
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264854 [Google Scholar]
  45. Joo, Ian
    2020 Phonosemantic biases found in Leipzig-Jakarta lists of 66 languages. Linguistic Typology24(1). 1–12. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0030 [Google Scholar]
  46. Jäschke, Heinrich August
    1881 A Tibetan-English dictionary. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kingston, John
    2011 Tonogenesis. InMarc van Oostendorp (ed.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (Blackwell Companions to Linguistics Series), Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kiparsky, Paul
    1968 Linguistic universals and linguistic change. InEmmon Bach (ed.), Universals in linguistic theory. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston reprinted edn.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Kirby, James
    2011 A tone split in Taoping Qiang. manuscript. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~jkirby/docs/kirby2011tone.pdf
  50. Lai, Yunfan
    2017 Grammar of Wobzi Khrosyabs. Paris: Université Paris III dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. LaPolla, Randy & Chenglong Huang
    2003 A grammar of Qiang. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197273
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197273 [Google Scholar]
  52. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2017 Qiang. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 773–789. London New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group second edn.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. LaPolla, Randy J. & Dory Poa
    2003 Texts in the Qugu variety of Northern Qiang. InDescriptive and theoretical studies in minority languages of East and Southeast Asia, 77–94. Suita: Osaka Gakuin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lea, Wayne A.
    1973 Segmental and suprasegmental influences on fundamental frequency contours. InLarry M. Hyman (ed.), Consonant types and tone (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1), 15–70. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Los Angeles.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lin, You-Jing
    2012 By no means marginal: Privative tone in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong. Language & Linguistics13(4). 625–662.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, Guangkun
    1998a Lun Qiangyu shengdiao de chansheng he fazhan [On the origins and development of tones in the Qiang language]. Minzu Yuwen1998(2). 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 1998b Mawo Qiangyu yanjiu [Studies in Mawo Qiang]. Chengdu Shi: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu, Huiqiang
    1985 Qiangyu Musuhua yinxi [musu Qiang phonology]. Qiang Studies110–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Matisoff, James
    1973 Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. InLarry Hyman (ed.), Consonant types and tone, 71–96. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Matisoff, James A.
    1970 Glottal dissimilation and the Lahu high-rising tone: A tonogenetic case study. Journal of the American Oriental Society90(1). 13–44. 10.2307/598429
     https://doi.org/10.2307/598429 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman, vol. 135 University of California Publications in Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Mazaudon, Martine
    1977 Tibeto-Burman tonogenetics. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area3(2). 1–123. 10.32655/LTBA.3.2.01
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.3.2.01 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2014 Studying emergent tone-systems in Nepal: Pitch, phonation and word tone in Tamang. Language Documentation and Conservation81. 587–612.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Meeussen, Achille E.
    1963 Morphotonology of the Tonga verb. Journal of African Languages1(2). 72–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Michaud, Alexis
    2009 Monosyllabicization: Patterns of evolution in Asian languages. InMonosyllables: From phonology to typology, Bremen: Institut für Allgemeine und Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Bremen.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2012 Monosyllabicization: Patterns of evolution in Asian languages. InMonosyllables: From phonology to typology, 115–130. Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050060354.115
     https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050060354.115 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2017 Tone in Yongning Na. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Michaud, Alexis & Bonny Sands
    2020 Tonogenesis. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748 [Google Scholar]
  69. Millar, Robert McColl & R. L. Trask
    (eds.) 2015 Trask’s historical linguistics. New York: Routledge 3rd edn. 10.4324/9781315728056
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728056 [Google Scholar]
  70. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  71. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InThe Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.021
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.021 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sims, Nathaniel A.
    2014 A phonology and lexicon of the Yonghe variety of Qiang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(1). 34–74. 10.1075/ltba.37.1.02sim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.02sim [Google Scholar]
  73. 2016 Towards a more comprehensive understanding of Qiang dialectology. Language and Linguistics17(3). 351–381. 10.1177/1606822X15586685
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X15586685 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2020 Reconsidering the diachrony of tone in Rma. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society13(1). 53–85. http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52460
     https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52460 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2021a Tonogenesis in Northeastern Trans-Himalayan. Transactions of the Philological Society119(3). 281–288. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12204
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12204 [Google Scholar]
  76. 2021b The verbal morphology of Yonghe Qiang: an Eastern Himalayan language. Santa Barbara California: University of California Santa BarbaraPh.D. dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sims, Nathaniel A. & Carol Genetti
    2017 The grammatical encoding of space in Yonghe Qiang. Himalayan Linguistics16(1). 10.5070/H916130636
     https://doi.org/10.5070/H916130636 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sims, Nathaniel A.
    2022 Tone and vowel uvularity in Rma. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale51(2). 209–222. 10.1163/19606028‑bja10026
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-bja10026 [Google Scholar]
  79. Stanford, James N. & Jonathan P. Evans
    2012 The influence of Mandarin Chinese on minority languages in rural southwest China: A sociolinguistic study of tones in contact. International Journal of the Sociology of Language2012(215). 10.1515/ijsl‑2012‑0030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0030 [Google Scholar]
  80. Sun, Hongkai
    1962 Qiangyu gaikuang [A survey of the Qiang language]. Zhongguo Yuwen561–511.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 1981 Qiangyu jianzhi [A brief description of the Qiang language). Beijing: Nationalities Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 1988 Lun Qiangzu shuangyuzhi-jiantan Hanyu dui Qiangyu de yingxiang [A discussion of bilingualism among the Qiang people-with comments on the influence of the Chinese language on the Qiang language]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 41. 55–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 1991a Body parts questionaire (Mawo). manuscript. stedt.berkeley.edu/search/
  84. 1991b 藏缅语语音和词汇 [Tibeto-Burman phonology and lexicon]. manuscript. stedt.berkeley.edu/search/
  85. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2003a Issues in Mawo Qiang phonology. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature1(1). 227–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Jonathan P. Evans
    2013 麻窝羌語元音音系再探 [The vocalic system of Mawo Qiang revisited]. In大江京去一王士元教授八十蕨贺壽文集 [Eastward flows the Great River: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang on his 80th birthday], ed. byFeng Shi & Gang Peng, 131–151. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Sun, Jackson T. S.
    1986 Qiang Mawo. manuscript. stedt.berkeley.edu/search/
  88. 2003b Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and Linguistics4.41. 769–836.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang, Baofeng
    2017 Luobozhai Qiangyu yanjiu [Studies in Luobozhai Qiang]: Central University for Nationalities of China Doctoral Dissertation.
  90. Wei, Jiuqiao & Chenglong Huang
    2018 The phonological system of Xiaoxing Qiang. The Journal of Aba Teachers College98(3). 18–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Wen, Yu
    1950 An abridged Ch’iang vocabulary (Chiu Tzu Ying dialect). Studia Serica9(2). 17–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Whalen, D. H. & Andrea G. Levitt
    1995 The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics23(3). 349–366. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(95)80165‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0 [Google Scholar]
  93. Wickham, Hadley
    2016 ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis Use R!Cham: Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer2nd edn. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  94. Wylie, Turrell
    1959 A standard system of Tibetan transcription. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies221. 261. 10.2307/2718544
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2718544 [Google Scholar]
  95. Zheng, Wuxi
    2017 A grammar of Longxi Qiang (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 86). Muenchen: LINCOM.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
Loading
Tonoexodus in Rma
Diachronica 42, 198 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22017.sim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Qiang; Qiangic; Rma; Tibeto-Burman; Tonoexodus; Trans-Himalayan/Sino-Tibetan

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error