1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Word order change in German infinitival complementation
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

The present article discusses whether processing factors might play a role in the reduction of word order variability in German infinitival complements of control verbs, connecting evidence from a diachronic corpus study to processing considerations and psycholinguistic findings. We show that intraposition, a linearization pattern that has been claimed to be costly in comprehension due to both center-embedding and temporary ambiguity, became less frequent in language use over time. Findings from language production experiments show that present-day German speakers avoid producing intraposition patterns even following repeated exposure to this pattern. Taken together, our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that processing factors can influence the distribution of word order variants. Looking at the diachronic dimension, however, reveals that the effect of processing factors can be modulated by sociolinguistic factors and the impact of language modality.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
2024-11-05
2024-12-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/dia.22037.dec/dia.22037.dec.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. [Baumbank.UP]Demske, Ulrike 2019 Referenzkorpus Frühneuhochdeutsch: Baumbank.UP. Universität Potsdam: Institut für Germanistik. https://hdl.handle.net/11022/0000-0007-EAF7-B
  2. [DTA]Deutsches Textarchiv. Grundlage für ein Referenzkorpus der neuhochdeutschen Sprache. Herausgegeben von der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 2022 https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/
  3. [DeReKo]Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus DeReKo. www.ids-mannheim.de/kl/projekte/korpora/
  4. [DWDS20]DWDS Kernkorpus 20. Textkorpus bereitgestellt durch das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. https://www.dwds.de/d/korpora/kern
  5. [DWDS21]DWDS Kernkorpus 21. Textkorpus bereitgestellt durch das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. https://www.dwds.de/d/korpora/korpus21
  6. [Twitter]Scheffler, Tatjana 2014 A German Twitter Snapshot. InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). Reykjavik. https://github.com/TScheffler/GermanTwitterApril2013
     [Google Scholar]
  7. [Am]Ralegh, Walter. Americæ achter Theil / in welchem erstlich beschrieben wirt das maechtige vnd goldtreiche Koenigreich Guiana (…) durch (…) Walthern Ralegh Rittern und Hauptmann vber jrer koen. mayest. auß Engellandt Leibs Guardi (…). Alles erstlich in engellændischer Sprach außgangen / jetzt aber auß der ollændischen Translation in die hochteutsche Sprache gebracht / durch Avgvstinum Cassiodorvm Reinivm (…) an Tag gegeben durch Dieterschen von Bryseligen hinderlassenen Erben. Frankfurt 1599.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. [Aviso]Aviso. Relation oder Zeitung hg. v. Walter Schöne, Julius Adolph von Söhne: Wolfenbüttel 1609.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. [Cont]CONTINVATIO I/II. Der Zehenjaerigen Relation/ oder Calendarii Historici decennalis. Warhafftige Beschreibung aller gedenkwuerdigen Historien/ so sich seidhero des Leipzigischen Newen Tages Marckt Anno 1609. (…) Leipzig/ in vorlegung Abraham Lambergo/ Anno 1609.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. [Fortunatus]Fortunatus. Nach der Editio Princeps von 1509 hg. v. H.-G. Roloff. Stuttgart: Reclam 1981.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. [Lalebuch]Das Lalebuch. Nach dem Druck von 1597 hg. v. S. Ertz. Stuttgart: Reclam 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. [PZ]Wochentliche Ordentliche Postzeitung 1667.
  13. [Rel09]Die Relation des Jahres 1609 hg. v Walter Schöne, Faksimiledruck. Leipzig: Harrassowitz 1940.
  14. [Rel67]Relation Aller Fürnemmen vnd gedenckwürdigen Historien. Jahrgang 1667.
  15. [Rollwagenbüchlein]Wickram, Georg. Sämtliche Werke hg. v. H.-G. Roloff. Bd. : Das Rollwagenbüchlein. Berlin: De Gruyter 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. [Tristrant und Isalde]Tristrant und Isalde. Prosaroman. Nach dem ältesten Druck aus Augsburg vom Jahre 1484, versehen mit den Lesarten des zweiten Augsburger Druckes aus dem Jahre 1498 und eines Wormser Druckes unbekannten Datums hg. v. A. Brandstetter. Tübingen: Niemeyer 1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. [Ulenspiegel]Ein kurtzweilig Lesen von Dil Ulenspiegel. Nach dem Druck von 1515 hg. v. W. Lindo, Stuttgart: Reclam 1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Axel, Katrin
    2007 Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  19. Baayen, R. Harald
    2008 Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bader, Markus & Tanja Schmid
    2009 Minimality in verb-cluster formation. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software(). –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bayer, Josef, Tanja Schmid & Markus Bader
    2005 Clause union and clausal position. InMarcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 78). –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.05bay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.05bay [Google Scholar]
  23. Bosch, Sina, Ilaria De Cesare, Claudia Felser & Ulrike Demske
    2022 A multi-methodological approach to word order variation in German infinitival complementation. InRobin Hörnig, Sophie von Wietersheim, Andreas Konietzko & Sam Featherston (eds.), Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2020: Linguistic theory enriched by experimental data. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. –. hdl.handle.net/10900/134550
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bosch, Sina, Ilaria De Cesare, Ulrike Demske & Claudia Felser
    2023 Word-order variation and coherence in German infinitival complementation. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics(). 10.1007/s10828‑023‑09140‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09140-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bosch, Sina & Claudia Felser
    2023 The role of L1 influence on L2 word order behaviour in German infinitival complementation. Ms. University of Potsdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. De Cesare, Ilaria
    2021 Word order variability and change in German infinitival complements. A multi-causal approach. Potsdam, University of Potsdam dissertation. 10.25932/publishup‑52735
     https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-52735
  27. Demske, Ulrike
    2015 Towards coherent infinitival patterns in the history of German. Journal of Historical Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jhl.5.1.01dem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.5.1.01dem [Google Scholar]
  28. 2016 Zur Komplexität des Frühneuhochdeutschen. InSarah Kwekkeboom & Sandra Waldenberger (eds.), PerspektivWechsel oder: Die Wiederentdeckung der Philologie, vol., –. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2019 Referenzkorpus Frühneuhochdeutsch: Baumbank.UP. Universität Potsdam, Institut für Germanistik. https://hdl.handle.net/11022/0000-0007-EAF7-B
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ebert, Robert Peter
    1980 Social and stylistic variation in Early New High German word order: The sentence frame (Satztrahmen). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. –. 10.1515/bgsl.1980.1980.102.357
     https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl.1980.1980.102.357 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fanselow, Gisbert & Stefan Frisch
    2006 Effects of processing difficulty on judgements of acceptability. InGisbert Fanselow, Caroline Fery & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  32. Felser, Claudia & Sina Bosch
    2024 Processing factors constrain word order variation in German: The trouble with third constructions. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1470542723000107
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542723000107 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferreira, Victor S.
    2019 A mechanistic framework for explaining audience design in language production. Annual Review of Psychology(). –. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011653
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011653 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferreira, Victor S. & Gary S. Dell
    2000 Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology. –. 10.1006/cogp.1999.0730
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0730 [Google Scholar]
  35. Frazier, Lyn
    1979 On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation (reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club).
  36. 1985 Syntactic complexity. InDavid R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Natural language parsing, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597855.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597855.005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Frazier, Lyn & Keith Rayner
    1982 Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology. –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(82)90008‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gambi, Chiara & Martin J. Pickering
    2017 Models linking production and comprehension. InEva M. Fernández & Helen Smith Cairns (eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118829516.ch7
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gibson, Edward
    1998 Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2000 The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. InAlec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project Symposium, –. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3654.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3654.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Haider, Hubert
    2010 The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845314
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845314 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hawkins, John A.
    1994 A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Haywood, Sarah L., Martin J. Pickering & Holly P. Branigan
    2005 Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?Psychological Science(). –. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2005.01541.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01541.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Jaeger, T. Florian & Neal E. Snider
    2013 Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  45. Labov, William
    1972 Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404500006576
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lötscher, Andreas
    1995 Syntaktische Prestigesignale in der literarischen Prosa des 16. Jahrhunderts. Daphnis(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. von Polenz, Peter
    2000 Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart (vol.), 2nd edn.Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110824889
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110824889 [Google Scholar]
  48. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Sapp, Christopher D.
    2014 Extraposition in Middle and New High German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s10828‑014‑9066‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-014-9066-6 [Google Scholar]
  50. Scheffler, Tatjana
    2014 A German Twitter snapshot. InNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, inter alia & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Schildt, Joachim
    1976 Zur Ausbildung des Satzrahmens. InGerhard Kettmann & Joachim Schildt (eds.), Zur Ausbildung der Norm der deutschen Literatursprache auf der syntaktischen Ebene (1470–1730): Der Einfachsatz (Bausteine zur Sprachgeschichte des Neuhochdeutschen 56), –. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmid, Tanja, Markus Bader & Josef Bayer
    2005 Coherence: An experimental approach. InStephan v. Kepser & Marga Reis (eds.), Linguistic Evidence. Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives (Studies in Generative Grammar 85), –. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197549.435
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.435 [Google Scholar]
  53. Scontras, Gregory, William Badecker, Lisa Shank, Eunice Lim & Evelina Fedorenko
    2015 Syntactic complexity effects in sentence production. Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1111/cogs.12168
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12168 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sternefeld, Wolfgang
    2006 Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 1st edn. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Trudgill, Peter
    2020 Millennia of language change: Sociolinguistic studies in deep historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108769754
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769754 [Google Scholar]
  56. Voigtmann, Sophia & Augustin Speyer
    2021 Information density and the extraposition of German relative clauses. Frontiers of Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650969
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650969 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wallenberg, Joel C., Rachael Bailes, Christine Cuskley & Anton Karl Ingason
    2021 Smooth signals and syntactic change. Languages(). . 10.3390/languages6020060
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020060 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wasow, Thomas
    2015 Ambiguity avoidance is overrated. InSusanne Winkler (ed.), Ambiguity: Language and communication, –. Berlin, Munich, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110403589‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110403589-003 [Google Scholar]
  59. Weiß, Helmut
    2005 Von den vier Lebensaltern einer Standardsprache: Zur Rolle von Spracherwerb und Medialität. Deutsche Sprache. –. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2005.04.02
     https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2005.04.02 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wurmbrand, Susi
    2001 Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure (Studies in Generative Grammar 55). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110908329
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908329 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yadav, Himanshu, Samar Husain & Richard Futrell
    2021 Do dependency lengths explain constraints on crossing dependencies?Linguistics Vanguard(). 20190070. 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0070
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0070 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
Loading
Word order change in German infinitival complementation
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.22037.dec
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Early New High German ; language change ; temporary ambiguity ; word order change ; German ; center-embedding ; language processing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error