1887
image of Mutual predictiveness of sound correspondences for reconstruction and language subgrouping
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper uses Gyalrongic languages, a conservative branch of Sino-Tibetan, to illustrate a new method to evaluate proto-language reconstructions in general historical linguistics and to conduct exploratory analyses in language phylogeny. It first reconstructs a proto-system of Gyalrongic preinitials and computes and compares the implicative entropies between reconstructed and modern systems. In a second step, Mutual Implicative Entropy (MIE) is used to measure genetic distances between related languages and to generate Neighbornet networks to visualize the subgrouping of Gyalrongic languages. The resulting networks are in agreement with qualitative historical linguistic analyses and allow adjustments to previous subgroupings obtained by Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Thus, this method can be used to detect nuances in lower sub-branches, which are sometimes neglected by lexicon-based methods. Using MIE in historical linguistics is therefore a quick and efficient means of checking the effectiveness of reconstructions and establishing the accurate preliminary shape of language subgrouping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23025.lai
2024-12-20
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf
    2009 Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. InJames P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
    2013 Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2013.0054
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0054 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco & Bianca Basciano
    2020 Morphology in Sino-Tibetan languages. InMark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.530
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.530 [Google Scholar]
  4. Batista, Marcus V. A., Tiago A. E. Ferreira, Antonio C. Freitas & Valdir Q. Balbino
    2011 An entropy-based approach for the identification of phylogenetically informative genomic regions of papillomavirus. Infection, Genetics and Evolution(). –. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.09.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.09.013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter, William H.
    2006 Mandarin dialect phylogeny. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale(). –. 10.1163/19606028‑03501005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-03501005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
    2014Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bodt, Timotheus A. & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Testing the predictive strength of the comparative method: An ongoing experiment on unattested words in Western Kho-Bwa languages. Papers in Historical Phonology. –. 10.2218/pihph.4.2019.3037
    https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.4.2019.3037 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2022 Reflex prediction: A case study of Western Kho-Bwa. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.20009.bod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20009.bod [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonami, Olivier & S. Beniamine
    2016 Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure(). –. 10.3366/word.2016.0092
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2016.0092 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé
    2014 De formes en thèmes. InFlorence Villoing, Sophie David & Sarah Leroy (eds.), Foisonnements morphologiques. Études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, –. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryant, David & Vincent Moulton
    2004 Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution(). –. 10.1093/molbev/msh018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh018 [Google Scholar]
  12. Criscuolo, Alexis & Simonetta Gribaldo
    2010 BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): A new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evolutionary Biology. –. 10.1186/1471‑2148‑10‑210
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-210 [Google Scholar]
  13. Czekanowski, Jan
    1927Wstęp do historii Słowian: Perspektywy antropologiczne, etnograficzne, prehistoryczne i językoznawcze [Introduction to the history of the Slavs: Anthropological and ethnographic perspectives, prehistoric and linguistic], vol.. Jakubowskij.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DeLancey, Scott
    2014 Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area(). –. 10.1075/ltba.37.1.01lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.01lan [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao, Tianjun
    2020 Reconstruction and analysis of phylogenetic network on Tibeto-Burman languages in China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/jcl.2020.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2020.0006 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gates, Jesse P.
    2021A grammar of Mazur Stau. Paris: Écoles des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong, Hwang-cherng
    1999 Xixiayu de jinyuanyin jiqi qiyuan西夏語的緊元音及其起源 [Tense vowels in Tangut and their origins]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology.. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2003 Tangut. InRandy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gong, Xun
    2017 Grade II in Tangut and Hexi Late Middle Chinese. Paper presented atRecent Advances in Tangut Studies, 24 January, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018Le rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest : Une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2020 Uvulars and uvularization in tangut phonology. Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/lali.00060.gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00060.gon [Google Scholar]
  22. 2021 Nasal preinitials in Tangut Phonology. Archiv orientální(). –. 10.47979/aror.j.89.3.443‑482
    https://doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.89.3.443-482 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gooskens, Charlotte, John Nerbonne, Nathan Vaillette
    2007 Conditional entropy measures intelligibility among related languages. LOT Occasional Series. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature. –. 10.1038/nature02029
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray, Russell D., David Bryant & Simon J. Greenhill
    2010 On the shape and fabric of human history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(). –. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0162
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0162 [Google Scholar]
  26. Greenhill, Simon J., Paul Heggarty & Russell Gray
    2020 Bayesian phylolinguistics. InRichard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph & Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, Volume II, vol., –. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118732168.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732168.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hill, Nathan W.
    2019The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316550939
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939 [Google Scholar]
  28. Holland, Barbara R., Katharina T. Huber, Andreas Dress & Vincent Moulton
    2002 δ plots: A tool for analyzing phylogenetic distance data. Molecular Biology and Evolution(). –. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004030 [Google Scholar]
  29. Honkasalo, Sami
    2019A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, Bufan & Qingxia Dai
    (eds.) 1992 Zangmian yuzu yuyan cihui藏缅语族语言词 汇 [Vocabulary of Tibeto-Burman languages]. Zhongyang Minzu Daxue 中央民族大 学 Minzu University of China.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, Liangrong & Hongkai Sun
    2002 Han-Jiarong cidian汉嘉戎词典 [Chinese-Gyalrong dictionary]. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe 民族出版社 Publishing House of Minority Nationalities.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant
    2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution(). –. 10.1093/molbev/msj030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacques, Guillaume
    2004Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). Paris: Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012 Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics.. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004264854
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264854 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2021A grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.4548232
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4548232 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jacques, Guillaume & Zhen Chen
    2004 Chapuhua de chongdie xingshi茶堡话的重叠 形式 [Reduplication in Japhug]. Minzu Yuwen民族语文Minority languages of China. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jacques, Guillaume & Jade d’Alpoim Guedes
    2023 Sichuan peppercorn and the birth of numbing spices in East Asia. Ethnobiology Letters(). –. 10.14237/ebl.14.1.2023.1842. https://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/1842
    https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.14.1.2023.1842 [Google Scholar]
  39. Juola, Patrick
    1998 Cross-entropy and linguistic typology. InD. M. W. Powers (ed.), New methods in language processing and computational natural language learning, –. 10.3115/1603899.1603923
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1603899.1603923 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroeber, Alfred L. & C Douglas Chrétien
    1937 Quantitative classification of Indo-European languages. Language(). –. 10.2307/408715
    https://doi.org/10.2307/408715 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lai, Yunfan
    2013 Erehua de fuyin chongdie俄热话的辅音重叠 [The consonantal reduplication in Wobzi]. Minzu Yuwen民族语文Minority languages of China 2013(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2017 Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (Paris 3) dissertation.
  43. 2021 The complexity and history of verb-stem ablauting patterns in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Folia Linguistica(). –. 10.1515/flin‑2020‑2071
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2071 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2022a On the origins of Tangut long vowels, Invited talk at theHong Kong Polytechnic University, 28 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2022b On the origins of Tangut “long vowels”, Invited talk atTrinity College Dublin, 23 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2022c When internal reconstruction goes further: Proposing the vowel system of Pre-Khroskyabs through examining bound state apophony. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flin‑2022‑2015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2022-2015 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2023a Lenition alternation in West Gyalrongic and its implication for Sino-Tibetan sound change typology. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.21016.lai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21016.lai [Google Scholar]
  48. 2023b On plosive-nasal correspondences and alternations in Gyalrongic and their possible solutions. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale(). –. 10.1163/19606028‑bja10027
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-bja10027 [Google Scholar]
  49. . forthcoming-a. Xixiayu de shengmu ruanhua yu Xibu Jiarongyuzu de bijiao西夏语的 声母软化与西部嘉绒语组的比较A comparison between initial lenition between Tangut and West Gyalrongic. Xixiaxue西夏学 [Xixia Studies] ().
    [Google Scholar]
  50. . forthcoming-b. Long vowels and the origin of stem alternation in Khroskyabs. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics (A collection of essays by 2022 Outstanding Young Scholars of the Li Fang-Kuei Society).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lai, Yunfan, Xun Gong, Jesse P. Gates & Guillaume Jacques
    2020 Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flih‑2020‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2020-0006 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lai, Yunfan & Johann-Mattis List
    2020 Phylogeny of Gyalrongic languages: How to do and what to expect. Paper presented at the53rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan languages and linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Leskien, August
    1876Die Declination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: Hirzel.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, Fanwen
    1997 Xia-Han zidian夏漢字典 [Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, Fanwen & Xiangrong Lin
    1983 Shilun Jiarongyu yu daofuyu de guanxi — Jianlun Xixiayu yu Daofuyu, Jiarongyu, Zangyu de guanxi試論嘉戎語與道孚語的關係 — 兼論西夏語與道孚語、嘉戎語、藏語的關係 [An exploration of the relationship between Gyalrong and Stau Languages — Along with a discussion on the relationship between Tangut, Stau, Gyalrong, and Tibetan]. InXixia yanjiu lunji西夏研究論集 [Collection of Tangut Studies], –. Ningxia Renmin Chubanshe 宁夏人民出版 社 Ningxia people’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. List, Johann-Mattis
    2019 Automatic inference of sound correspondence patterns across multiple languages. Computational Linguistics(). –. 10.1162/coli_a_00344
    https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00344 [Google Scholar]
  57. Macklin-Cordes, Jayden L., Claire Bowern & Erich R. Round
    2021 Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.20004.mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20004.mac [Google Scholar]
  58. Miyake, Marc Hideo
    2012 Complexity from compression: A sketch of Pre-Tangut. InIrina Popova (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: Сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: a collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov], Moscow: Oriental Literature.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Morrison, David A.
    2010 Using data-display networks for exploratory data analysis in phylogenetic studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution(). –. 10.1093/molbev/msp309
    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp309 [Google Scholar]
  60. Osthoff, Hermann & Karl Brugmann
    1878Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipizg: S. Hirzel.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Pellegrini, Matteo
    2020 Patterns of interpredictability and principal parts in Latin verb paradigms: An entropy-based approach. Journal of Latin Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/joll‑2020‑2014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2020-2014 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sagart, Laurent
    2011Classifying Chinese dialects/Sinitic languages on shared innovations. Séminaire Sino-Tibétain du CRLAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1817972116
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
  64. Shannon, Claude Elwood
    1948 A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal(). –. 10.1002/j.1538‑7305.1948.tb01338.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [Google Scholar]
  65. Stein, Rolf A.
    1966 Nouveaux documents tibétains sur le Mi-Ñag/Si-Hia. InMélanges de sinologie offerts à Monsieur Paul Demiéville i, –. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Blogros Bstan’dzin
    2019Tshobdun Rgyalrong spoken texts with a grammatical introduction. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Swadesh, Morris
    1952 Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contact. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ulrich
    1989Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, Chih-Fan
    2021The morpho-syntax of tense, aspect, evidentiality and modality in Bawang Horpa: National Taiwan Normal Univeristy dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
    2019a Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature(). –. 10.1038/s41586‑019‑1153‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, Shuya
    2020Le rgyalrong situ de brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l’expression des relations spatiales: L’orientation et le mouvement associé . Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 2023 Towards a new generalisation of the tri-axial orientation system in Situ Rgyalrong. Transactions of the Philogical Society(). –. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12264
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12264 [Google Scholar]
  73. . forthcoming. Xixiayu quxiangqianzhui yu dongci de quxiang keyixing西夏語趨向前綴與動詞的趨向可易性 [Directional prefixes and verbal orientability in Tangut]. Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang, Shuya, Guillaume Jacques & Yunfan Lai
    2019b A study of cognates between Gyalrong languages and Old Chinese. Journal of Language Relationship(). –. 10.31826/jlr‑2019‑171‑210
    https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2019-171-210 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou, Kevin & Claire Bowern
    2015 Quantifying uncertainty in the phylogenetics of Australian numeral systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(). 20151278. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1278
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1278 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23025.lai
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23025.lai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error