1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Volume 41, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 41, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This article seeks to demonstrate how the synopsis of historiographical and lexicographical material allows for the absolute dating of sound changes even in languages with late and imperfect documentation, and how this dating relates to hypotheses concerning the long-range genealogical affiliation of these languages. The languages investigated are Ket and Yugh which belong to the Yeniseian family and have been documented since the 18th century. Two sound changes in these languages will be discussed: Proto-Yeniseian *p- > Ket -, and Proto-Yeniseian *p- > Yugh -. It will be argued that the Ket development occurred between 1596/1607 and 1723 AD, and that the Yugh development occurred between 1739 and 1846/1847 AD. The implications of these findings for the Dene-Yeniseian hypothesis linking the Yeniseian family with the Na-Dene family will be discussed. It will be argued that this hypothesis cannot be maintained, and that short-range comparisons are preferable to long-range speculations.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
2024-05-30
2024-12-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dia.23030.fri.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bonmann, Svenja, Simon Fries, Natalie Korobzow, Laura Günther & Eugen Hill
    2023 Towards a new reconstruction of the Proto-Yeniseian sound system. Part I: Word-initial consonants. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics5(1). 39–82. 10.1163/25898833‑20230037
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25898833-20230037 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouda, Karl
    1957 Die Sprache der Jenissejer: Genealogische und morphologische Untersuchungen. Anthropos521. 65–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Braune, Wilhelm
    1874 Zur Kenntnis des Fränkischen und zur hochdeutschen Lautverschiebung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur11. 1–56. 10.1515/bgsl.1874.1874.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl.1874.1874.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Braune, Wilhelm and Frank Heidermanns
    2018 Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110515114
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110515114 [Google Scholar]
  5. Büsching, Anton
    1785 Beyträge zu der Lebensgeschichte denkwürdiger Personen, vol.31. Halle, Germany: Curt.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, Lyle
    2011 The Dene-Yeniseian connection (review). International Journal of American Linguistics77(3). 445–451. 10.1086/660977
     https://doi.org/10.1086/660977 [Google Scholar]
  7. Castrén, Matthias
    1856 Reiseberichte und Briefe aus den Jahren 1845 – 1848. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 1858 Versuch einer jenissei-ostjakischen und kottischen Sprachlehre, nebst Wörterverzeichnissen aus den genannten Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dolgix, Boris
    1960 Rodovoj i plemennoj sostav narodov Sibiri v XVII v [Ethnic and tribal composition of the peoples of XVIIth century Siberia]. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dulson, Andreas [Dul’zon, A.
    ] 1959a Geografičeskie nazvanija Zapadnoj Sibiri kak istočnik eë drevnej istorii [Toponyms of Western Siberia as a source on its ancient history]. InNekotorye voprosy drevnej istorii Zapadnoj Sibiri. Tomsk: Tomskij oblastnoj kraevedčeskij muzej. 24–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ] 1959b Ketskije toponimy Zapadnoj Sibiri [Ket toponyms of Southern Siberia]. Učenye zapiski Tomskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta181. 91–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ] 1961 Slovarnye materialy XVIII v. po enisejskim narečijam [XVIIIth century dictionary materials on Yeniseian languages]. Učenye zapiski Tomskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta19(2). 152–189.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ] 1964 Očerki po grammatike ketskogo jazyka [A grammar sketch of the Ket language], vol.11. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ] 1966 Ketskie skazki [Ket fairytales]. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ] 1968 Ketskij jazyk [The Ket language]. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ] 1970 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri31. 81–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ] 1971 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri41. 119–157.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ] 1972 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri51. 104–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ėlert, Aleksandr
    1990 Ėkspedicionnye materialy G. F. Millera kak istočnik po istorii Sibiri [Expedition materials of G. F. Müller as a source on the history of Siberia]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fries, Simon & Svenja Bonmann
    2023 The development of Arin kul ‘water’ ~ Kott ûl, Ket ¹u·l’, Yugh ¹ur and its typological background. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics5(2). 183–198. 10.1163/25898833‑20230044
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25898833-20230044 [Google Scholar]
  21. Georg, Stefan
    2007 A descriptive grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak) I. Introduction, phonology, morphology. Kent: Global Oriental. 10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i‑328
     https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i-328 [Google Scholar]
  22. Helimski, Eugen [Xelimskij, E.
    ] 1982 Keto-Uralica. InE. Alekseenko (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, ėtnografija, mifologija, lingvistika, 238–250. Leningrad: Nauka.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ] 1986 Arxivnye materialy XVIII v. po enisejskim jazykam [XVIIIth century archival materials on Yeniseian languages]. InP. Skorik (ed.), Paleo-aziatskie jazyki, 179–213. Leningrad: Nauka.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Helimski, Eugen
    1997 Die matorische Sprache. Wörterverzeichnis, Grundzüge der Grammatik, Sprachgeschichte. Szeged: [n. p.].
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Helimski, Eugen [Xelimskij, E.
    ] 2000 Komparativisika, uralistika. Lekcii i stat’i [Comparative studies, Uralic studies. Lectures and papers]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hill, Eugen
    2008 Lautgesetze und Dialektvariation in den Jenissej-Sprachen: Entwicklung der Labiale im Ketischen und Jugischen. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher221. 60–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson, Kenneth
    1953 Language and history in early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, 1st to 12th c. A.D. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Janhunen, Juha
    1977 Samojedischer Wortschatz. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Khabtagaeva, Bayarma
    2019 Language contact in Siberia: Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic loanwords in Yeniseian. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004390768
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390768 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kibrik, Andrej A.
    1993 Transitivity increase in Athabaskan languages. InBernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity (Studies in Language Comparison Series 23), 47–68. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23.03kib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.03kib [Google Scholar]
  31. 1996 Transitivity decrease in Navajo and Athabaskan: Actor-affecting propositional derivations. InEloise Jelinek, Sally Midgette, Keren Rice, & Leslie Saxon (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, 259–304. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2010 Transitivity indicators, historical scenarios, and sundry Dene-Yeniseian notes. InJames Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 319–322. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Ronald
    1999 Observations on the absolute and relative chronology of Tocharian loanwords and sound changes. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies81. 111–138.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kotorova, Elizaveta & Andrej Nefedov
    2015 Comprehensive dictionary of Ket with Russian, German, and English translations. 21vols.Munich: Lincom Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Krauss, Michael E.
    1964 Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene I: The phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics30(2). 118–31. 10.1086/464766
     https://doi.org/10.1086/464766 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1965 Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene II: Morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics31(1). 18–28. 10.1086/464810
     https://doi.org/10.1086/464810 [Google Scholar]
  37. Krauss, Michael E. & Jeff Leer
    1981 Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit sonorants (Alaska Native Language Center research papers 5). Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kümmel, Martin
    2007 Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Leer, Jeff
    1996 Comparative Athabaskan lexicon. Item CA965L1996a. Ms., Alaska Native Language Archive. Online: https://www.uaf.edu/anla/record.php?identifier=CA965L1996a (Accessed on18.06.2023).
  40. 2010 The palatal series in Athabascan-Eyak-Tlingit, with an overview of the basic correspondences. InJames Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 168–193. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Maloletko, Aleksej
    1992 Paleotoponimika [Paleotoponymics]. Tomsk: Tomskij gos. universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2000 Drevnije narody Sibiri II. Kety. [Ancient peoples of Siberia II. Kets.] Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Messerschmidt, Daniel
    1964 Forschungsreise durch Sibirien 1720 – 1727 II. Tagebuchaufzeichnungen Januar 1723 – Mai 1724. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mikola, Tobor
    1995 Morphologisches Wörterbuch des Enzischen. Szeged, Hungary: Attila József University.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
    ] 1750 Opisanie Sibirskago carstva [A description of the Siberian realm ruled by the tsar]. St. Petersburg: Akademija Nauk.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
    1760 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 3/5–6. Nachrichten von der Handlung in Sibirien. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1762 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 6/6. Sibirische Geschichte 5. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 1763 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 8/1. Sibirische Geschichte 6. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
    ] 1937–2005 Istorija Sibiri [History of Siberia]. 31vols.Moscow/Leningrad: Akademija Nauk/Vostočnaja literatura.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
    2003 Nachrichten über Völker Sibiriens (1736–1742). Ed. byEugen Helimski & Hartmut Katz. Hamburg: Institut für Finnougristik/Uralistik der Universität Hamburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
    ] 2009 Opisanie sibirskix narodov [A description of the Siberian peoples]. Moskva: Pamjatniki Istoričeskoj mysli.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
    2010–2018 Ethnographische Schriften. 21vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Rice, Keren
    2000 Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663659
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663659 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ruhlen, Merritt
    1998 The origin of the Na-Dene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences951. 13994–13996. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13994
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13994 [Google Scholar]
  55. Seebold, Elmar
    2009 Chronologisches Wörterbuch des deutschen Wortschatzes II. Der Wortschatz des 9. Jahrhunderts. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Siegel, Florian
    2013 Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Starostin, George
    2010 Dene-Yeniseian and Dene-Caucasian: Pronouns and other thoughts. InSiri Tuttle & Justin Spence (eds.), Working papers in Dene languages81, 107–117. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 2012 Dene-Yeniseian: A critical assessment. Journal of Linguistic Relationship81. 117–152. 10.31826/jlr‑2012‑080109
     https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2012-080109 [Google Scholar]
  59. Starostin, Sergej
    1982 Praenisejskaja rekonstrukcija i vnešnie svjazi enisejskix jazykov [Proto-Yeniseian reconstruction and outer relationships of the Yeniseian languages]. InE. Alekseenko (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, ėtnografija, mifologija, lingvistika, 144–237. Leningrad: Nauka.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 1983 Gipoteza o genetičeskix svjazjax sinotibetskix jazykov s enisejskimi i severokavkazskimi jazykami [A hypothesis concerning the genetic relationship of Sino-Tibetan languages with Yeniseian and Northern Caucasian languages]. InI. F. Vardu (ed.), Lingvističeskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejšaja istorija Vostoka, 19–38. Moscow: Akademija nauk, Institut vostokovedenija.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 1995 Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ enisejskix jazykov [A comparative dictionary of Yeniseian languages]. InS. Starostin (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Lingvistika, 176–315. Moskva: Vostočnaja literatura.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Vajda, Edward
    2000 Ket prosodic phonology. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 2004 Ket. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 2009 Loanwords in Ket. InMartin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook, 471–497. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218442.471
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.471 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2010 A Siberian link with Na-Dene languages. InJames Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 33–99. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2018 Dene-Yeniseian: Progress and unanswered questions. Diachronica35(2). 277–295. 10.1075/dia.18001.vaj
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18001.vaj [Google Scholar]
  67. 2022 The Dene-Yeniseian Hypothesis. InMichael Fortescue & Edward Vajda, Mid-Holocene language connections between Asia and North America, 235–480. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Vajda, Edward & Heinrich Werner
    2022 Comparative-historical Yeniseian dictionary. München: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
    2019 A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Werner, Heinrich
    1972 Die Tonität der gegenwärtigen jenisseischen Dialekte. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung271. 379–386. 10.1524/stuf.1972.25.16.111
     https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.1972.25.16.111 [Google Scholar]
  71. 1974 Die Akzentuation der mehrsilbigen Wörter in den gegenwärtigen Jenissej-Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung321. 181–185.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 1994 Das Klassensystem in den Jenissej-Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 1996 Vergleichende Akzentologie der Jenissej-Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 1997a Das Jugische (Sym-Ketische). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 1997b Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 2002 Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. 31vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2003 M. A. Castrén und die Jenissejistik. Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 19. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2004 Zur jenissejisch-indianischen Urverwandtschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 2005 Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Waxenberger, Gaby
    2019 Absolute chronology of early sound changes reflected in Pre-Old English runic inscriptions. North-Western European Language Evolution72(1). 60–77. 10.1075/nowele.00020.wax
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00020.wax [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
Loading
On the dating of sound changes and its implications for language relationship
Diachronica 41, 525 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): chronology; Comparative Method; dating; Dene-Yeniseian; language relationship; long-range comparison; Na-Dene; sound change; Yeniseian

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error