Some problems involving Proto-Mǐn onsets and new Old Chinese

References

1. Akitani, Hiroyuki (秋谷裕幸)
   2008 Mǐnběiqū sān xiànshì fāngyán yánjiū (閩北區三縣市方言研究) [Studies on Northern Min dialects: Shipi, Zhenqian and Dikou] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A12–2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Akitani, Hiroyuki (秋谷裕幸)
   2018 Mǐndōngqū Níngdé fāngyán yīnyùnshǐ yánjiū (閩東區寧德方言音韻史研究) [Phonological history of the Níngdé dialects of Eastern Mǐn] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 60). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Akitani, Hiroyuki (秋谷裕幸) & HÁN Zhéfū (韩哲夫 = Handel, Zev
   ) 2012 Lìshǐ bǐjiàofǎ hé céngcì fēnxīfǎ (历史比较法和层次分析法) [The role of the comparative method and stratum analysis in the reconstruction of Chinese dialect history]. Yǔyánxué Lùncóng (语言学论丛) 451. 277–335.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alves, Mark
   2020 Historical ethnolinguistic notes on proto-Austroasiatic and proto-Vietic vocabulary in Vietnamese. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society13(2). 13–45. hdl.handle.net/10524/52472
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baxter, William H.
   1992 A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857085
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
6. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
   2014 Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
   2017 Old Chinese reconstruction: A response to Schuessler. Diachronica34(4). 559–576. 10.1075/dia.17003.sag
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17003.sag [Google Scholar]
8. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
   2020 Errata for Baxter Sagart, Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. https://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu
9. Beaudouin, Mathieu, Laurent Sagart & William H. Baxter
   2021 OC onsets in the Baxter-Sagart 1.01 system: Examples with corresponding forms in Proto-Min, Vietnamese, and Hmong-Mien. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03511846
10. Benedict, Paul K.
    1972 Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus (Princeton-Cambridge Studies in Chinese Linguistics 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
11. Blust, Robert
    2006 The origin of the Kelabit voiced aspirates: A historical hypothesis revisited. Oceanic Linguistics45(2). 311–338. 10.1353/ol.2007.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2007.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Carlyle, John
    2020 Common Yue: A comparative study of Yue dialect historical phonology. Seattle: University of Washington MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Coblin, W. South
    1991 Studies in Old Northwest Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 4). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coblin, W. South
    2019 Common Neo-Hakka: A comparative reconstruction (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 63). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coblin, W. South
    2023 Alveopalatal affricate/fricative mixing in common Min cognate sets. InGang Peng, Jiangping Kong, Zhongwei Shen & Feng Wang (eds.), Inspirations from a lofty mountain: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang on his 90th Birthday, 37–58. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Douglas, Carstairs
    1873 Chinese-English dictionary of the vernacular or spoken language of Amoy, with the principal variations of the Chang-Chew and Chin-Chew dialects. London: Trübner and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ferlus, Michel
    2012 Remarques sur la pharyngalisation en chinois archaïque (Old Chinese) dans le système Baxter-Sagart. Linguistique de l’Asie Orientale251. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00978164
    [Google Scholar]
18. HÁN, Zhéfū (韩哲夫 = Handel, Zev
    ) 2015 Huíyìng Chén Zhōngmǐn duìyú “Lìshǐ bǐjiàofǎ hé céngcì fēnxīfǎ” de huíyìng (回应陈忠敏对于《历史比较法和层次分析法》的回应) [The role of the comparative method: Rejoinder to Chen Zhongmin’s rejoinder]. Yǔyánxué Lùncóng (语言学论丛) 511. 329–339.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Handel, Zev
    2003 Northern Min tone values and the reconstruction of “softened initials.”Language and Linguistics4(1). 47–84.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Handel, Zev
    2010 Old Chinese and Mǐn. Chūgoku Gogaku (中国語学) 2571. 34–68.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Harbsmeier, Christoph
    2016 Irrefutable conjectures: A review of William H. Baxter and Laurent Sagart, Old Chinese: A new reconstruction [= Baxter & Sagart 2014]. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies64(2). 445–504. 10.1080/02549948.2016.1259882
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2016.1259882 [Google Scholar]
22. Hill, Nathan W.
    2017 [Review of Baxter & Sagart 2014:] Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Archiv Oientální85(1). 135–140. 10.47979/aror.j.85.1.135‑140
    https://doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.85.1.135-140 [Google Scholar]
23. Hill, Nathan W.
    2019 The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316550939
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939 [Google Scholar]
24. Ho, Dah-an
    2016 Such errors could have been avoided: Review of Old Chinese: A new reconstruction [= Baxter & Sagart 2014]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics44(1). 175–230. 10.1353/jcl.2016.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2016.0004 [Google Scholar]
25. Jacques, Guillaume
    2017 On the status of Buyang presyllables: A response to Professor Ho Dah-an. Journal of Chinese Linguistics45(2). 451–457. 10.1353/jcl.2017.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.0019 [Google Scholar]
26. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021a Review of Hill (2019): The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Journal of Historical Linguistics11(1). 143–158. 10.1075/jhl.20001.jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20001.jac [Google Scholar]
27. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021b Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. InKatarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions, 427–446. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.130.13jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.13jac [Google Scholar]
28. Kwok, Bit-Chee
    2018 Southern Min: Comparative phonology and subgrouping. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. LǏ, Rúlóng (李如龍)
    1985 Zhōnggǔ quánzhuó shēngmǔ Mǐn fāngyán jīndú de fēnxi (中古全浊声母闽方言今读的分析) [Analysis of contemporary pronunciations of the medieval voiced obstruents in the Mǐn dialects]. Yǔyán Yánjiū (語言研究) 1985(1). 139–149.
    [Google Scholar]
30. LǏ, Rúlóng (李如龍) & PĀN Wèishǔi (潘渭水)
    1998 Jiàn’ōu fāngyán cídiǎn (建甌方言詞典) [Dictionary of the Jiàn’ōu dialect]. Nanjing: Jiāngsū jiàoyù chūbǎnshè.
    [Google Scholar]
31. List, Johann-Mattis
    2017 Using network models to analyze Old Chinese rhyme data. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics9(2). 218–241. 10.1163/2405478X‑00902004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902004 [Google Scholar]
32. LUÓ, Jiéruì (罗杰瑞 = Norman, Jerry
    ) 2005 Mǐn fāngyán zhōng de Lái mǔ zì hé zǎoqī Hànyǔ (闽方言中的来母字和早期汉语) [Early Chinese and LÁi-onset words in Mǐn dialects]. Mǐnzú Yǔwén (民族语文) 2005(4). 1–5. 10.3969/j.issn.0257‑5779.2005.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-5779.2005.04.001 [Google Scholar]
33. Michaud, Alexis
    2012 Monosyllabicization: Patterns of evolution in Asian languages. InNicole Nau, Thomas Stolz & Cornelia Stroh (eds.), Monosyllables: From phonology to typology, 115–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050060354.115
    https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050060354.115 [Google Scholar]
34. Norman, Jerry
    1969 The Kienyang dialect of Fukien. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.
35. Norman, Jerry
    1973 Tonal development in Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics1(2). 222–238.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Norman, Jerry
    1974 The initials of Proto-Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics2(1). 27–36.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Norman, Jerry
    1981 The Proto-Min finals. In International Conference on Sinology Editorial Board (ed.), Zhōngyāng yánjiūyuàn guójì Hànxué huìyì lùnwén jí: Yǔyán wénzì zǔ (中央研究院國際漢學會議論文集： 語言文字組) [Proceedings of the Academia Sinica International Conference on Sinology: Language and writing group], 35–73. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Norman, Jerry
    1982 The classification of the Shaowu dialect. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology531. 543–583.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Norman, Jerry
    1986 The origins of the Proto-Min softened stops. InJohn McCoy & Timothy Light (eds.), Contributions to Sino-Tibetan studies, 375–384. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 10.1163/9789004655409_015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655409_015 [Google Scholar]
40. Norman, Jerry
    1988 Chinese (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Norman, Jerry
    1991 The Mǐn dialects in historical perspective. InWilliam S-Y. Wang (ed.), Languages and dialects of China (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 3), 323–358. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Norman, Jerry
    1996 Tonal development in the Jennchyan dialect. Yuen Ren Society Treasury of Chinese Dialect Data21. 7–41.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Norman, Jerry
    2000 Voiced initials in Shyrbei. InAnne O. Yue-Hashimoto & Pang-Hsin Ting (eds.), In memory of Professor Li Fang-kuei: Essays on linguistic change and the Chinese dialects, 271–280. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Norman, Jerry
    2003 The Chinese dialects: Phonology. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 72–83. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Norman, Jerry
    2014 A model for Chinese dialect evolution. InRichard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Dialect, phonology, transcription and text, 1–26. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ostapirat, Weera
    1999 Discussions on Tai and Chinese obstruent correspondences. Unpublished Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ostapirat, Weera
    2011 Linguistic interaction in South China: The case of Chinese, Tai and Miao–Yao. International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL)201.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1984 Middle Chinese: A study in historical phonology. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ratliff, Martha
    2010 Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America116(21). 10317–10322. 10.1073/pnas.1817972116
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
51. Sagart, Laurent & MA Kun
    2020 A 250-item list of Old Chinese vocabulary in the Baxter-Sagart reconstruction. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale491. 92–105. 10.1163/19606028‑bja10002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-bja10002 [Google Scholar]
52. Schuessler, Axel
    2007 ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schuessler, Axel
    2009 Minimal Old Chinese and Later Han Chinese: A Companion to Grammata Serica Recensa. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schuessler, Axel
    2015 New Old Chinese. Diachronica32(4). 571–598. 10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch [Google Scholar]
55. SHĔN, Ruìqīng (沈瑞清)
    2018 Zǎoqī Shaò–Jiāng fāngyán xiǎngyīn shēngmǔ de shēngdiào yǎnbiàn: Chóng fǎng Luó Jiéruì xiānsheng de ‘Shàowǔ jiǎshuō (早期邵将方言响音声母的声调演变——重访罗杰瑞先生的‘邵武假说) [Tonal change of sonorant onsets in early Shaojiang: Jerry Norman’s ‘Shaowu hypothesis’ revisited]. Yǔyán Yánjiū Jíkān (语言研究集刊) 21(2). 140–167.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Smith, Jonathan
    2021 On comparative Proto-Mǐn *Dʰ- and putting conjectural morphology in its place. Papers in Historical Phonology61. 1–24. 10.2218/pihph.6.2021.5515
    https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.6.2021.5515 [Google Scholar]
57. Ting, Pang-Hsin (丁邦新)
    2013 Zài lùn Mǐnyǔ báihuà yīn cóng Gǔ Hànyǔ fēnzhī de niándài (再論閩語白話音從古漢語分支的年代) [Dating the bifurcation of Min colloquial readings from Old Chinese: Another look]. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics7(1). 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Zheng, Zhijun
    2018 A new proposal for Min subgrouping based on a maximum-parsimony algorithm for generating phylogenetic trees. Lingua2061. 67–84. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.01.008 [Google Scholar]