Late Malayo-Polynesian

References

1. Adelaar, K. Alexander
   1994 The classification of the Tamanic languages (West Kalimantan). InTom Dutton & Darrell T. Tryon (eds.), Language contact and change in the Austronesian world (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 77), 1–41. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adelaar, K. Alexander
   2005 The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. InK. Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (Routledge Language Family Series 7), 1–43. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bellwood, Peter
   1984 A hypothesis for Austronesian origins. Asian Perspectives261. 107–117.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bellwood, Peter
   2019 The earthenware pottery from the North Moluccan excavations. InPeter Bellwood (ed.), The Spice Islands in prehistory: Archaeology in the Northern Moluccas, Indonesia (Terra Australis 50), 81–106. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Billings, Blaine & Bradley McDonnell
   2024 Sumatran. Oceanic Linguistics63(1). 112–174.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blust, Robert
   1977 The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: A preliminary report. Working Papers in Linguistics9(2). 1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blust, Robert
   1978 Eastern Malayo-Polynesian: a subgrouping argument. InS. A. Wurm (ed.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, 181–234. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blust, Robert
   1985 The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives261. 45–67.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blust, Robert
   1993 Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics32(2). 241–293.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blust, Robert
    1999 Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. InElizabeth Zeitoun & Paul J. K. Li (eds.), Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica 1), 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Blust, Robert
    2000 Chamorro historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics391. 83–122.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blust, Robert
    2009 The position of the languages of Eastern Indonesia: A reply to Donohue and Grimes. Oceanic Linguistics48(1). 36–77. 10.1353/ol.0.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0034 [Google Scholar]
13. Blust, Robert
    2010 The Greater North Borneo hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics491. 44–118.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blust, Robert
    2012 The marsupials strike back: A reply to Schapper (2011). Oceanic Linguistics51(2). 261–277. 10.1353/ol.2012.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2012.0000 [Google Scholar]
15. Blust, Robert
    2013 The Austronesian languages. 2nd edn.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Blust, Robert
    2019 The resurrection of Proto-Philippines. Oceanic Linguistics58(2). 153–256.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Blust, Robert
    2020 Response to comments on “The resurrection of Proto-Philippines.” Oceanic Linguistics591. 450–479.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Blust, Robert, Stephen Trussel & Alexander D. Smith
    2023 CLDF dataset derived from Blust’s “Austronesian Comparative Dictionary” (v1.2). 10.5281/zenodo.7741197
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7741197 [Google Scholar]
19. Bostoen, Koen & Claire Grégoire
    2007 La question Bantoue: bilan et perspectives. Tradition et rupture dans les grammaires comparées de différentes familles de langues (Mémoires de La Société de Linguistique de Paris, Nouvelle Série). ParisXV1. 73–91.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bynon, Theodora
    1977 Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Chen, Victoria, Jonathan Kuo, Maria Kristina S. Gallego & Issac Stead
    2023 Is Malayo- Polynesian a primary branch of Austronesian? A view from morphosyntax. Diachronica39(4). 449–489.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dahl, Otto Chr
    1976 Proto-Austronesian (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series 15). 2nd edn.London: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Daigle, Benjamin T.
    2015 A grammar sketch of Batuley: An Austronesian language of Aru, eastern Indonesia. Master’s Thesis, Leiden University. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/55432
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dalby, David
    1976 The prehistorical implications of Guthrie’s comparative Bantu. Part II: Interpretation of cultural vocabulary. The Journal of African History. Cambridge University Press17(1). 1–27. 10.1017/S0021853700014742
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700014742 [Google Scholar]
25. Diamond, Jared & Peter Bellwood
    2003 Farmers and their languages: The first expansions. Science300(5619). 597–603. 10.1126/science.1078208
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078208 [Google Scholar]
26. Donohue, Mark & Charles E. Grimes
    2008 Yet more on the position of the languages of Eastern Indonesia and East Timor. Oceanic Linguistics47(1). 114–158. 10.1353/ol.0.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0008 [Google Scholar]
27. Dyen, Isidore
    1965a The position of the Malayopolynesian languages of Formosa. Asian Perspectives7(1–2). 261–271.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dyen, Isidore
    1965b A lexicostatistical classification of the Austronesian languages (Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, and Memoir 19 of the International Journal of American Linguistics). Baltimore: The Waverly Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dyen, Isidore
    1990 Homomeric lexical classification. InPhilip Baldi (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs), 211–230. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Edwards, Owen
    2015 The position of Enggano within Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics54(1). 54–109.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Edwards, Owen
    2021 Rote-Meto comparative dictionary. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. François, Alexandre
    2014 Trees, waves, and linkages: Models of language diversification. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gray, Russell D., A. J. Drummond & Simon J. Greenhill
    2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science3231. 479–483.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Grimes, Charles E. & Owen Edwards
    . to appear. The Austronesian languages of eastern Indonesia and Timor-Leste: Unravelling their prehistory and classification. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    2023 Glottolog 4.7. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 10.5281/zenodo.7398962
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7398962 [Google Scholar]
36. Harvey, Mark
    1982 Subgroups in Austronesian. InAmran Halim, Louis Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Tracking the travelers, vol.21, 47–99. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire & April McMahon
    2010 Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences3651. 3829–3843.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Herman, József
    2000 Vulgar Latin. (Trans.) Roger Wright. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hock, Hans Henrich
    2021 Principles of historical linguistics (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 34). 3rd edn.Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jacques, Guillaume & Johan-Mattis List
    2019 Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics9(1). 128–166. 10.1075/jhl.17008.mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17008.mat [Google Scholar]
41. Kamholz, David Christopher
    2014 Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea. Department of Linguistics, University of California, BerkeleyPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kirch, Patrick
    2002 On the road of the winds: An archaeological history of the Pacific islands. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Klamer, Marian
    2019 The dispersal of Austronesian languages in Island South East Asia: Current findings and debates. Lang Linguist Compass131. e12325. 10.1111/lnc3.12325
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12325 [Google Scholar]
44. Larish, Michael D.
    1999 The position of Moken and Moklen within the Austronesian language family. University of Hawai`iPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Li, Fang-kuei
    1973 Languages and dialects of China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics1(1). 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Liao, Hsiu-chuan
    2020 A reply to Blust 2019 “The resurrection of Proto-Philippines.” Oceanic Linguistics591. 426–449.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mead, David
    2003 Evidence for a Celebic supergroup. InJohn Lynch (ed.), Issues in Austronesian historical phonology, 115–141. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mills, Roger
    1975 Proto-South Sulawesi and Proto-Austronesian phonology. University of Michigan, Ann ArborPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
    1985 Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics12(2). 339–384.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Norman, Jerry
    1988 Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Pawley, Andrew & Roger C. Green
    1984 The Proto-Oceanic language community. Journal of Pacific History191. 123–146.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Pawley, Andrew & Malcolm Ross
    1993 Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history. Annual Review of Anthropology221. 425–459. 10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.002233
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.002233 [Google Scholar]
53. Posner, Rebecca
    1996 The Romance languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Prentice, D. J.
    1971 The Murut languages of Sabah. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Reid, Lawrence A.
    1982 The demise of Proto-Philippines. InAmran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, vol.21, 201–216. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Reid, Lawrence A.
    2018 Modeling the linguistic situation in the Philippines. Senri Ethnological Studies981. 91–105. 10.15021/0000
    https://doi.org/10.15021/0000 [Google Scholar]
57. Reid, Lawrence A.
    2020 Response to Blust “The resurrection of Proto-Philippines.” Oceanic Linguistics591. 374–393.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ross, Malcolm
    1988 Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ross, Malcolm
    1995 Some current issues in Austronesian linguistics. InDarrell T. Tryon (ed.), Comparative Austronesian dictionary: An introduction to Austronesian studies, 45–120. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Ross, Malcolm
    1997 Social networks and kinds of speech-community event. InRoger M. Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 209–261. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Ross, Malcolm
    2005 The Batanic languages in relation to the early history of the Malayo-Polynesian subgroup of Austronesian. Journal of Austronesian Studies1(2). 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Ross, Malcolm
    2009 Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. InK. Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust, 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ross, Malcolm
    2012 In defense of nuclear Austronesian (and against Tsouic). Language and Linguistics13(6). 1253–1330.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ross, Malcolm
    2020 Comment on Blust “The resurrection of Proto-Philippines.” Oceanic Linguistics591. 366–373.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Schapper, Antoinette
    2011 Phalanger facts: Notes on Blust’s marsupial reconstructions. Oceanic Linguistics50(1). 258–272. 10.1353/ol.2011.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2011.0004 [Google Scholar]
66. Schapper, Antoinette
    2015 Wallacea, a linguistic area. Archipel901. 99–151.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Schleicher, August
    1853a Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur31. 786–787.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Schleicher, August
    1853b O jazyku litevském, zvlástě ohledem na slovanský června [On the Lithuanian language, especially with regard to the Slavonic June]. Časopis Českého Museum271. 320–334.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Schmidt, Johannes
    1872 Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1900 Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten: Probe-Vorlesung, gehalten zu Leipzig am 30 April 1870. Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Smith, Alexander D.
    2017a The Western Malayo-Polynesian problem. Oceanic Linguistics56(2). 435–490. 10.1353/ol.2017.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0021 [Google Scholar]
72. Smith, Alexander D.
    2017b The languages of Borneo: A comprehensive classification. Department of Linguistics, University of HawaiiPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Smith, Alexander D.
    2018 Kayanic comparative vocabularies. Kaipuleohone Digital Language Archive. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/102350
74. Smith, Alexander D.
    2020 Nasalization in Enggano historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics59(1/2). 347–365. 10.1353/ol.2020.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2020.0015 [Google Scholar]
75. Smith, Alexander D.
    2023 Evidence and models of linguistic relations: Subgroups, linkages, lexical innovations, and Borneo. Oceanic Linguistics62(2). 324–365. 10.1353/ol.2023.a913564
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2023.a913564 [Google Scholar]
76. Smith, Alexander D.
    2024 Internal classification of Malayo-Polynesian. InK. Alexander Adelaar & Antoinette Schapper (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Malayo-Polynesian languages of Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Smith, Alexander. D.
    2025 Supporting datasets for Late Malayo-Polynesian Hypothesis [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.15136817
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15136817 [Google Scholar]
78. Starosta, Stanley
    1995 A grammatical subgrouping of Formosan languages. InPaul Jen-kuei Li, Cheng-hwa Tsang, Ying-kuei Huang, Dah-an Ho & Chiu-yu Tseng (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan (Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology 3), 683–726. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Thurgood, Graham
    1999 From ancient Cham to modern dialects: Two thousand years of language contact and change: With an appendix of Chamic reconstructions and loanwords (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 28). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Ting, Pang-hsin
    1982 Hanyu fangyan qufen de tiaojian. [Qinghua Journal of Chinese Studies] 141. 263–291.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Wang, Li
    1936 Zhongguo yinyun xue. [Zhongguo phonology]. Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Ward, J. V., J. S. Athens & C. Hotton
    1998 Holocene pollen records from Babeldaob island, Palau, Western Caroline islands. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Society of American Archaeology, Seattle, March 29 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Stacy F. Teng
    2016 Reassessing the position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics55(1). 162–198. 10.1353/ol.2016.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0001 [Google Scholar]
84. Zorc, David
    2020 Reactions to Blust’s “The resurrection of Proto-Philippines.” Oceanic Linguistics591. 394–425.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Zorc, David
    2021 Axis relationships in the Philippines: When subgrouping fails. Paper presented atthe 14th Philippine Linguistics Congress. https://zorc.net/RDZorc/AXIS-relationships[Zorc-Presentation-revised].pdf
    [Google Scholar]