f Diachrony and Diachronica

References

1. Aronoff, Mark
   2017 Darwinism tested by the science of language. InClaire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 4431. Language Science Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31328CitetononCRdoi:10.5281/zenodo.495459
   https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.5281/zenodo.495459 [Google Scholar]
2. Hale, Mark
   1998  Diachronic syntax. Syntax1(1). 1–18. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00001
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00001 [Google Scholar]
3. Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda
   1998 The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization. InHammond, Michael & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 193–210. Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/23299. (17 October, 2023).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kiparsky, Paul
   2006 The amphichronic program vs. evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics32(2). 217–236. 10.1515/TL.2006.015
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
5. Boas, Hans C., & Marc Pierce
   (eds.) 2020 New directions for historical linguistics. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004414075
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414075 [Google Scholar]
6. Labov, William
   2001 Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Labov, William
   2010 Principles of linguistic change. Volume III: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444327496
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496 [Google Scholar]
8. Labov, William
   2020 The regularity of regular sound change. Language961:42–59. 10.1353/lan.2020.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin Herzog
   1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 97–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, Joan
    2015 Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139096768
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096768 [Google Scholar]
11. Eckert, Penelope
    2000 Language variation as social practice. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Joseph, Brian D.
    2020 Historial linguistics in the 50 years since Weinreich, Labov, and Herzog (1968). InBoas, Hans C. & Marc Pierce (Eds.), New directions in historical linguistics. Leiden: Brill. 153–173.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Labov, William
    1969 Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language45(4): 715–762. 10.2307/412333
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412333 [Google Scholar]
15. Labov, William
    1982 Building on empirical foundations. InLehmann, Winfred P. & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–92. 10.1075/cilt.24.06lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.06lab [Google Scholar]
16. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Tannen, Deborah
    1984 Conversational style. New Jersey: Annex Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Traugott, Elizabeth & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fertig, David
    2013 Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748646234
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646234 [Google Scholar]
21. Gabelentz, Georg von der
    1891 Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel Nachfolger.
    [Google Scholar]
22. King, Robert D.
    1969 Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Maiden, Martin
    . In press. Folk etymology and contamination. InLedgeway, Adam, Edith Aldridge, Anne Breitbarth, Katalin É Kiss, Joseph Salmons & Alexandra Simonenko eds. The Wiley Blackwell companion to diachronic linguistics. Oxford: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Meillet, Antoine
    1912 L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia121. 384–400.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Paul, Hermann
    1886 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sims-Williams, Helen
    2022 Token frequency as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics58(4). 571–607. 10.1017/S0022226721000438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000438 [Google Scholar]
27. Wolpert, Lewis
    1992 The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber & Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Byrd, Andrew Miles
    2015 The Indo-European syllable. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004293021
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004293021 [Google Scholar]
29. Cooper, Adam I.
    2015 Reconciling Indo-European syllabification. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004281950
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004281950 [Google Scholar]
30. King, Robert D.
    1969 Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kodner, Jordan
    2020 Language acquisition in the past. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
32. Kroch, Anthony
    1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change11:199–244. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
33. Noyer, Rolf
    1997 Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Richter, Caitlin
    2021 Alternation-sensitive phoneme learning. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
35. Ringe, Don
    2016 Phonological rules and dialect geography in Ancient Greek. InGunkel, Dieter, Joshua T. Katz, Brent Vine & Michael Weiss (eds.), Sahasram ati srajas: Indo-Iranian and Indo-European Studies in Honor of Stephanie W. Jamison, 378–84. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Walkden, George
    2014 Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712299.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712299.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
37. Wilson, David
    2020 A concatenative analysis of diachronic Afro-Asiatic morphology. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
38. Yang, Charles D.
    2016 The price of productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. José, Brian & Margherita Berti
    2017 The increasingly collaborative nature of linguistic scholarship. Journal of English Linguistics451. 88–94. 10.1177/0075424216685848
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216685848 [Google Scholar]
40. Joseph, Brian D.
    2005 The editor’s department, Language in the 21st century: An assessment and a reply. Language81(3). 5–8.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Salmons, Joseph
    . Forthcoming. Diachronic linguistics: An overview. InLedgeway, Adam, Edith Aldridge, Anne Breitbarth, Katalin É Kiss, Joseph Salmons & Alexandra Simonenko eds. The Wiley Blackwell companion to diachronic linguistics. Oxford: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]