1887
image of A diachronic account of Present Day Standard Danish stop gradation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In certain contexts, Present Day Standard Danish displays an unusual pattern of alternations between voiceless stops and semivowels often referred to as . Stop gradation is traditionally considered a synchronic phonological process, but evidence for this analysis is based almost exclusively on non-productive morphology. Here, we argue that the structural generalization captured by a synchronic analysis is better accounted for with reference to the history of Danish, and to well-understood constraints on articulation and perception which led to prosodically conditioned chain shifts and mergers through gradual, continuous changes in the realization of consonant allophones. Inspired by the model of sound change in Evolutionary Phonology, we outline the historical trajectory that led to the synchronic stop gradation patterns, and the well-known phonetic pressures underlying them; these pressures pulled the allophone distributions of stops in different prosodic contexts in very different directions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23068.pug
2024-12-20
2025-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ács, Péter, Katalin Fenyvesi & Henrik Jørgensen
    2008 Dansk fonologi og morfologi set i lyset af de såkaldte naturlighedsteorier [Danish phonology and morphology seen in the light of the so-called naturalness theories]. Nydanske Sprogstudier. –. 10.7146/nys.v36i36.13466
    https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v36i36.13466 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen
    1987Principles of dependency phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 47). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753442
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753442 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandle, Oskar, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Teleman
    (eds.) 2002–2005The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the North Germanic languages (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 22). Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Basbøll, Hans
    1975 On the phonological interpretation of the falling diphthongs in Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen. –. 10.7146/aripuc.v9i.130971
    https://doi.org/10.7146/aripuc.v9i.130971 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2005The phonology of Danish (The Phonology of the World’s Languages). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Basbøll, Hans & Johannes Wagner
    1985Kontrastive Phonologie des Deutschen und Dänischen. Segmentale Wortphonologie und -phonetik (Linguistische Arbeiten 160). Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111358345
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111358345 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan
    1895Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alternationen. Ein Capitel aus der Psychophonetik. Karl J. Trübner. 10.1515/9783111472317
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111472317 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennike, Valdemar & Marius Kristensen
    1898–1912Kort over de danske folkemål med forklaringer [Map of the Danish dialects with explanations]. Gyldendalske Boghandel.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
    2015 Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. InPatrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.014 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blevins, Juliette
    2004Evolutionary Phonology. The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486357
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486357 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2006 A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics(), –. 10.1515/TL.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Birkmann, Thomas
    2002 From Ancient Nordic to Old Nordic. Definition and delimitation of the period. InOskar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the North Germanic languages (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 22.1), vol., –. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197051‑079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197051-079 [Google Scholar]
  13. Blevins, Juliette
    2015 Evolutionary Phonology. A holistic approach to sound change typology. InPatrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology (Oxford Handbooks Online), –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blevins, Juliette, Ander Egurtzegi & Jan Ullrich
    2020 Final obstruent voicing in Lakota. Phonetic evidence and phonological implications. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2020.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0022 [Google Scholar]
  15. Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Garrett
    1998 The origins of consonant–vowel metathesis. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.1998.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Blevins, Juliette & Andrew B. Wedel
    2009 Inhibited sound change. An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.26.2.01ble
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.26.2.01ble [Google Scholar]
  17. Boeck, Simon Skovgaard
    2018 Udtale: Ældre nydansk [Pronunciation: Early Modern Danish]. InEbba Hjorth (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie 2. Ord for ord for ord [History of the Danish language 2. Word for word for word], –. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Boersma, Paul
    2006 Prototypicality judgements as inverted perception. InGisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in grammar. Generative perspectives, –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009 Cue constraints and their interactions in phonological perception and production. InPaul Boersma & Silke Hamann (eds.), Phonology in perception (Phonology and Phonetics 15), –. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219234.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219234.55 [Google Scholar]
  20. Boersma, Paul, Titia Benders & Klaas Seinhorst
    2020 Neural network models for phonology and phonetics. Journal of Language Modeling(). –. 10.15398/jlm.v8i1.224
    https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v8i1.224 [Google Scholar]
  21. Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann
    2008 The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology(). –. 10.1017/S0952675708001474
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675708001474 [Google Scholar]
  22. Botma, Bert & Marijn van ’t Veer
    2013 A fraction too much friction. The phonological status of voiced fricatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands. –. 10.1075/avt.30.04bot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.30.04bot [Google Scholar]
  23. Braun, Angelika
    1996 Zur regionalen Distribution von VOT im Deutschen. InAngelika Braun (ed.), Untersuchungen zu Stimme und Sprache (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Lingvistik), –. Franz Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Brink, Lars & Jørn Lund
    1975Dansk rigsmål. Lydudviklingen siden 1840 med særligt henblik på sociolekterne i København [The Danish standard language. Sound change since 1840 with special attention to the sociolects in Copenhagen]. Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018 Udtale: Yngre nydansk [Pronunciation: Early Modern Danish]. InEbba Hjorth (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie 2. Ord for ord for ord [History of the Danish language 2. Word for word for word], –. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Brink, Lars, Jørn Lund, Steffen Heger & Jens Normann Jørgensen
    1991Den store danske udtaleordbog [The great Danish pronunciation dictionary] (Munksgaards Ordbøger). Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Brøndum-Nielsen, Johs
    1928–1973Gammeldansk grammatik i sproghistorisk fremstilling [Old Danish grammar in a historical linguistic perspective]. Schultz.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Brotherton, Chloe & Aleese Block
    2020 Soft d in Danish. Acoustic characteristics and issues in transcription. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America. –. 10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4739
    https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4739 [Google Scholar]
  29. Brown, Jason
    2006 An evolutionary perspective on stop inventories. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/TL.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bybee, Joan L.
    2001Phonology and language use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 From usage to grammar. The mind’s response to repetition. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  32. Chládková, Kateřina
    2014 Finding phonological features in perception. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  33. Cohen, A., C. L. Ebeling, K. Fokkema & A. G. F. van Holk
    1959Fonologie van het Nederlands en het Fries. Inleiding tot de moderne klankleer [Phonology of Dutch and Frisian. Introduction to modern phonology]. Nijhoff. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑9085‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9085-5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Davidson, Lisa
    2016 Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics. –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Espy-Wilson, Carol Y., Suzanne Boyce, Michel Jackson, Shrikanth Narayanan & Abeer Alwan
    2000 Acoustic modeling of American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.429469
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429469 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fant, C. Gunnar M.
    1960Acoustic theory of speech production with calculations based on x-ray studies of Russian articulations. Mouton. 10.1515/9783110873429
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110873429 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli
    1954 Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. Le Maître Phonetique(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Flege, James Emil
    1982 Laryngeal timing and phonation onset in utterance-initial English stops. Journal of Phonetics(). –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30956‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30956-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Flemming, Edward S.
    1995 Auditory representations in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. 10.4324/9781315054803
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315054803
  40. Foster, Michael K.
    1982 Alternating weak and strong syllables in Cayuga words. International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/465713
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465713 [Google Scholar]
  41. Frederiksen, Britta Olrik
    2018 Udtale: Gammeldansk [Pronunciation: Old Danish]. InEbba Hjorth (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie 2. Ord for ord for ord [History of the Danish language 2. Word for word for word], –. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Garde, Paul
    1961 Réflexions sur les différences phonétiques entre les langues slaves. Word(). –. 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659746
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659746 [Google Scholar]
  43. Goldinger, Stephen D.
    1996 Words and voices. Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition(). –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.22.5.1166
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1166 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gordon, Matthew J.
    2013 Investigating chain shifts and mergers. InJ. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), –. 2nd edn.Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118335598.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335598.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Grønnum, Nina
    2005Fonetik og fonologi. Almen og dansk [Phonetics and phonology. General and Danish]. 3rd edn.Akademisk Forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Guion, Susan Guignard
    1998 The role of perception in sound change of velar palatalization. Phonetica(). –. 10.1159/000028423
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000028423 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gurevich, Naomi
    2004Lenition and contrast. The functional consequences of certain phonetically conditioned sound changes. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203505052
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505052 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hansen, Aage
    1962–1971Den lydlige udvikling i dansk [Development of the Danish sound system]. G.E.C. Gad.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Harris, John
    1994English sound structure. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hayes, Bruce
    2009Introductory phonology (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hayes, Bruce & Donca Steriade
    2004 Introduction. The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. InBruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Helgason, Pétur & Catherine Ringen
    2008 Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics(). –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hjelmslev, Louis
    1951 Grundtræk af det danske udtrykssystem med særligt henblik på stødet [Basic features of the Danish sound system with special attention to stød]. Selskab for Nordisk Filologi. Årsberetning for1948/49/50. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hjorth, Ebba
    (ed.) 2016–2022Dansk sproghistorie [History of the Danish language]. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hock, Hans Henrich
    1991Principles of historical linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 34). 2nd edn.Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219135 [Google Scholar]
  56. Honeybone, Patrick
    2002 Germanic obstruent lenition. Some mutual implications of theoretical and historical phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
  57. 2008 Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength. Tracing concepts through the history of phonology. InJoaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and fortition (Studies in Generative Grammar 99), –. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211443.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211443.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  58. Horslund, Camilla Søballe, Rasmus Puggaard-Rode & Henrik Jørgensen
    2022 A phonetically-based phoneme analysis of the Danish consonant system. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia(). –. 10.1080/03740463.2021.2022866
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.2022866 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hutters, Birgit
    1985 Vocal fold adjustments in aspirated and unaspirated stops in Danish. Phonetica(). –. 10.1159/000261734
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261734 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hyman, Larry M.
    1976 Phonologization. InAlphonse Juilland, A. M. Devine & Laurence D. Stephens (eds.), Linguistics studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his 60th birthday (Studia Linguistica et Philologica 4), –. Anma Libri.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Iosad, Pavel
    . Forthcoming. Phonological drift and language contact. The northwest European phonological area. (Book manuscript).
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Iverson, Gregory K. & Joseph C. Salmons
    1995 Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology(). –. 10.1017/S0952675700002566
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700002566 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2003a Laryngeal enhancement in early Germanic. Phonology(). –. 10.1017/S0952675703004469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675703004469 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2003b Legacy specification in the laryngeal phonology of Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1470542703000242
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542703000242 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2006 On the typology of final laryngeal neutralization. Evolutionary Phonology and laryngeal realism. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/TL.2006.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.014 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2011 Final devoicing and final laryngeal neutralization. InMarc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (Blackwell Companions to Linguistics), vol., –. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0069
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0069 [Google Scholar]
  67. Jørgensen, Bent
    2016 Sproghistoriske perioder [Historical language periods]. InEbba Hjorth (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie 1. Dansk tager form [History of the Danish language 1. Danish takes shape], –. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Jørgensen, Henrik
    2021 Konsekvens i renæssancens retskrivning? [Consequence in Renaissance spelling?] InJens Bjerring-Hansen, Simon Skovgaard Boeck & Eva Skafte Jensen (eds.), Nogle betænkninger om dansk sprog og litteratur. Festskrift til Marita Akhøj Nielsen [Some thoughts about Danish language and literature. Festschrift for Marita Akhøj Nielsen] (Universitets-Jubilæets Danske Samfund), –. University Press of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Karsten, Gustaf E.
    1894 The psychological basis of phonetic law and analogy. Publications of the Modern Language Association(). –. 10.2307/456363
    https://doi.org/10.2307/456363 [Google Scholar]
  70. Keating, Patricia A., Taehong Cho, Cécile Fougeron & Chai-Shune Hsu
    2004 Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. InJohn Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple (eds.), Phonetic interpretation (Papers in Laboratory Phonology 4), –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486425.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486425.009 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kijak, Artur
    2017Labial–dorsal interactions. A phonologically based approach (Językoznawstwo Neofilologiczne). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kiparsky, Paul
    2006 The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/TL.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2008 Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. InJeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2015 New perspectives in historical linguistics. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics), –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315794013
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794013 [Google Scholar]
  75. Kirby, James P. & Maryann Tan
    2023 Analyzing variability in closure voicing and co-intrinsic F0 in Central Standard Swedish. InRadek Skartnizl & Jan Volín (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, –. Guarant.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Kraehenmann, Astrid
    2001 Swiss German stops. Geminates all over the word. Phonology(). –. 10.1017/S0952675701004031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004031 [Google Scholar]
  77. Labov, William
    1994Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors (Language in Society 20). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
    1996The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Lawson, Eleanor, James M. Scobbie & Jane Stuart-Smith
    2013 Bunched /r/ promotes vowel merger to schwar. An ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish sociophonetic variation. Journal of Phonetics(). –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lindblom, Björn
    1986 Phonetic universals in vowel systems. InJohn J. Ohala & Jeri J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental phonology, –. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 1990 Explaining phonetic variation. A sketch of the H&H theory. InWilliam J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (Nato Science Series D 55), –. Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2037‑8_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lindsey, Geoff
    2019English after RP. Standard British pronunciation today. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04357‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04357-5 [Google Scholar]
  83. Linell, Per
    1979Psychological reality in phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 25). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Lyngby, K. J.
    1863Udsagnsordenes böjning i jyske lov og i den jyske sprogart [The inflection of verbs in the Code of Jutland and in the Jutlandic dialect]. Thieles.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Maddieson, Ian
    1984Patterns of sounds (Cambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753459 [Google Scholar]
  86. Magnuson, James S., James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin
    2007 The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1080/03640210709336987
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336987 [Google Scholar]
  87. Marsløv, Erik Olsen
    1678/1919 Nogle Betænkninger og Regle om Skrive-Rictigheden udi ded Danske sprog [Some thoughts and correspondences about spelling accuracy in the Danish language]. Published 1919 inHenrik Bertelsen (ed.), Danske Grammatikere fra Midten af det syttende til Midten af det attende Aarhundrede [Danish grammarians from the mid-17th until the mid-18th century], vol., –. Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Mazzaro, Natalia
    2010 Changing perceptions. The sociophonetic motivations of the labial velar alternation in Spanish. InMarta Ortega-Llebaria (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, –. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Mielke, Jeff
    2015 An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.4919346
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4919346 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mielke, Jeff & Steve Parker
    2023 Bora’s high vowels involve a two-way dental contrast, not a three-way backness contrast. Laboratory Phonology. 10.16995/labphon.8956
    https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.8956 [Google Scholar]
  91. Nielsen, Michael Lerche & Marie Stoklund
    2018 Udtale: Runetiden [Pronunciation: Runic Danish]. InEbba Hjorth (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie 2. Ord for ord for ord [History of the Danish language 2. Word for word for word], –. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Ohala, John J.
    1981 The listener as a source of sound change. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 1983 The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. InPeter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech, –. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  94. 1989 Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. InLeiv E. Breivik & Ernst Håkon Jahr (eds.), Language change. Contributions to the study of its causes (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 43), –. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110853063.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853063.173 [Google Scholar]
  95. 1990 The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. InJohn Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Between the grammar and physics of speech (Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1), –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.014 [Google Scholar]
  96. 1992 What’s cognitive, what’s not, in sound change. InGünter Kellerman & Michael D. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony. Language history and cognition (Duisburg Papers on Research in Language and Culture 14), –. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 1996 Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.414696
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414696 [Google Scholar]
  98. Ohala, John J. & Carol J. Riordan
    1979 Passive vocal tract enlargement during voiced stops. InJared J. Wolf & Dennis H. Klatt (eds.), Speech communication papers presented at the 97th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, –. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Ouni, Slim
    2014 Tongue control and its implication in pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning(). –. 10.1080/09588221.2012.761637
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.761637 [Google Scholar]
  100. Page, B. Richard
    1997 On the origin of preaspiration in Scandinavian. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures(). –. 10.1017/S1040820700002857
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1040820700002857 [Google Scholar]
  101. Pedersen, Inge Lise
    2003 Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. –. 10.1515/ijsl.2003.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    2001 Exemplar dynamics. Word frequency, lenition and contrast. InJoan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45), –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.08pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie [Google Scholar]
  103. 2016 Phonological representation. Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics. –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑030514‑125050
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050 [Google Scholar]
  104. Podesva, Robert J., Penelope Eckert, Julia Fine, Katherine Hilton, Sunwoo Jeong, Sharese King & Teresa Pratt
    2015 Social influences on the degree of stop voicing in inland California. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics().
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Puggaard-Rode, Rasmus
    2023 Stop! Hey, what’s that sound? The representation and realization of Danish stops (LOT Dissertation Series 631). Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. 10.48273/LOT0631
    https://doi.org/10.48273/LOT0631
  106. 2024 Variation in fine phonetic detail can modulate the outcome of sound change. The case of stop gradation and laryngeal contrast implementation in Jutland Danish. Journal of Phonetics. 10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101354
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101354 [Google Scholar]
  107. Puggaard-Rode, Rasmus & Francesco Burroni
    2024 Articulation of the Danish soft d. A pilot study using electromagnetic articulography. (Paper presented atFonologi i Norden 9, Stockholm University).
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Puggaard-Rode, Rasmus, Camilla Søballe Horslund & Henrik Jørgensen
    2022 The rarity of intervocalic voicing of stops in Danish spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology(). 10.16995/labphon.6449
    https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6449 [Google Scholar]
  109. Ramsammy, Michael
    2015 The life cycle of phonological processes. Accounting for dialectal microtypologies. Language and Linguistics Compass(). –. 10.1111/lnc3.12102
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12102 [Google Scholar]
  110. Ringgaard, Kristian
    1960Vestjysk stød [West Jutland stød]. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Ringen, Catherine O. & Kari Suomi
    2012 The voicing contrast in Fenno-Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics(). –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.010 [Google Scholar]
  112. Ringen, Catherine O. & Wim A. van Dommelen
    2013 Quantity and laryngeal contrasts in Norwegian. Journal of Phonetics(). –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  113. Rischel, Jørgen
    1969 Notes on the Danish vowel pattern. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen, –. 10.7146/aripuc.v3i.130764
    https://doi.org/10.7146/aripuc.v3i.130764 [Google Scholar]
  114. 1970 Consonant gradation. A problem in Danish phonology and morphology. InHreinn Benediktsson (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, –. Vísindafélag Íslendinga.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Schachtenhaufen, Ruben
    2010a Schwa-assimilation og stavelsesgrænser [Schwa assimilation and syllable boundaries]. Nydanske Sprogstudier. –. 10.7146/nys.v39i39.13532
    https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v39i39.13532 [Google Scholar]
  116. 2010b Looking for lost syllables in Danish spontaneous speech. InPeter Juel Henrichsen (ed.), Linguistic theory and raw sound (Copenhagen Studies in Language 40), –. Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 2023 Utilpasset IPA [Non-adapted IPA]. Danske Studier 2023 –.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Schachtenhaufen, Ruben, Michael Bach Ipsen & Mikael Fabrin
    2024Dansk udtaleordbog. Contemporary Danish pronunciation. Modersmål-Selskabet.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Siem, Andrea Brink
    2019 An articulatory account of the Danish soft d. Master’s thesis, Aarhus University.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Skautrup, Peter
    1944–1970Det danske sprogs historie [History of the Danish language]. Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Sørensen, Viggo
    2012 Lyd og prosodi i de danske dialekter [Sound and prosody in the Danish dialects]. (Unpublished manuscript).
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Stevens, Kenneth N.
    1998Acoustic phonetics. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  123. Trudgill, Peter, Daniel Schreier, Daniel Long & Jeffrey P. Williams
    2003 On the reversibility of mergers. /w/, /v/ and evidence from lesser-known Englishes. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flih.2003.24.1‑2.23
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2003.24.1-2.23 [Google Scholar]
  124. Uldall, Hans Jörgen
    1936 The phonematics of Danish. InDaniel Jones & Dennis Butler Fry (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, –. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Walker, Abby
    2020 Voiced stops in the command performance of Southern US English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/10.0000552
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000552 [Google Scholar]
  126. Wedel, Andrew B.
    2006 Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review(). –. 10.1515/TLR.2006.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.010 [Google Scholar]
  127. Wedel, Andrew B., Adam Ussishkin & Adam King
    2019 Crosslinguistic evidence for a strong statistical universal. Phonological neutralization targets word-ends over beginnings. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0082
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0082 [Google Scholar]
  128. Westbury, John R.
    1983 Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.389236
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389236 [Google Scholar]
  129. Westbury, John R. & Patricia A. Keating
    1986 On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700010598
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010598 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wyld, Henry Cecil
    1920A history of modern colloquial English. E.P. Dutton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Yao, Yao & Charles B. Chang
    2016 On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change. Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2016.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0031 [Google Scholar]
  132. Yu, Alan C. L.
    2004 Explaining final obstruent voicing in Lezgian. Phonetics and history. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2004.0049
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0049 [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhou, Xinhui, Carol Y. Espy-Wilson, Suzanne Boyce, Mark K. Tiede, Christy Holland & Ann Choe
    2008 A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of “retroflex” and “bunched” American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.2902168
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902168 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23068.pug
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.23068.pug
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error