1887
image of Ancient languages and algorithms

Abstract

Abstract

Historical linguistics has experienced an upsurge in methodological innovation. However, owing to the constraints of contemporary publication, these innovations often appear in print in a format which is technical, dense and less than fully accessible. Moreover, because these innovations are still young and have often arisen in other fields before being translated to historical linguistics, our own discipline has yet to accumulate a stock of trusted explanations of them, presented lucidly and addressed specifically to our field and to its scientific concerns. This special issue is dedicated to promoting the accessibility of new methods. Despite their technical details, most new methods in historical linguistics rest upon a rationale and an essential logic that are perfectly comprehensible to interested historical linguists, so long as they are communicated in a fashion that is sympathetic and respectful to a linguistic audience. This introduction contextualizes the five papers of the special issue.

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24016.rou
2024-08-05
2024-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/dia.24016.rou/dia.24016.rou.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24016.rou&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahern, Christopher & Robin Clark
    2017 Conflict, cheap talk, and Jespersen’s cycle. Semantics and Pragmatics(). 10.3765/sp.10.11
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.11 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aston, John A. D., Dorothy Buck, John Coleman, Colin Cotter, Nick S. Jones, Vincent Macaulay, Norman MacLeod, John M. Moriarty & Andrew Nevins
    2012 Phylogenetic inference for function-valued traits: Speech sound evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution(). –. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaumont, Mark A.
    2018 Approximate Bayesian computation. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. –. 10.1146/annurev‑statistics‑030718‑105212
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105212 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blasi, Damián E., Steven Moran, Scott R. Moisik, Paul Widmer, Dan Dediu & Balthasar Bickel
    2019 Human sound systems are shaped by post-Neolithic changes in bite configuration. Science. eaav3219. 10.1126/science.aav3218
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3218 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blythe, Richard A. & William Croft
    2012 S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouchard-Côté, Alexandre, David Hall, Thomas L. Griffiths & Dan Klein
    2013 Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1204678110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204678110 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2012 Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science(). –. 10.1126/science.1219669
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219669 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
    2021 Reconstructing the evolution of Indo-European grammar. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2021.0047
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0047 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carr, Jon W., Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson & Simon Kirby
    2020 Simplicity and informativeness in semantic category systems. Cognition.104289. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104289
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104289 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cathcart, Chundra, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich Round
    2018 Areal pressure in grammatical evolution: An Indo-European case study. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.16035.cat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16035.cat [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
    2015 Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culbertson, Jennifer, Hanna Jarvinen, Frances Haggarty & Kenny Smith
    2019 Children’s sensitivity to phonological and semantic cues during noun class learning: Evidence for a phonological bias. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0031 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
    2011 Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature. –. 10.1038/nature09923
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09923 [Google Scholar]
  14. Everett, Caleb, Damián E. Blasi & Seán G. Roberts
    2015 Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1417413112
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417413112 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartmann, Frederik, Seán Roberts, Paul Valdes & Rebecca Grollemund
    2023 Investigating environmental effects on phonology using diachronic models. Evolutionary Human Sciences. e8. 10.1017/ehs.2023.33
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.33 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelly, Luke J. & Geoff K. Nicholls
    2017 Lateral transfer in Stochastic Dollo models. The Annals of Applied Statistics(). –. 10.1214/17‑AOAS1040
    https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1040 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirby, Simon, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith
    2008 Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (). –. 10.1073/pnas.0707835105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105 [Google Scholar]
  18. List, Johann-Mattis, Mary Walworth, Simon J. Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi & Robert Forkel
    2018 Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics. Journal of Language Evolution(). –. 10.1093/jole/lzy006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy006 [Google Scholar]
  19. Macklin-Cordes, Jayden L., Claire Bowern & Erich R. Round
    2021 Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.20004.mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20004.mac [Google Scholar]
  20. Marin, Jean-Michel, Pierre Pudlo, Christian P. Robert & Robin J. Ryder
    2012 Approximate Bayesian computational methods. Statistics and Computing. –. 10.1007/s11222‑011‑9288‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-011-9288-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Meakins, Felicity, Xia Hua, Cassandra Algy & Lindell Bromham
    2019 Birth of a contact language did not favor simplification. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0032 [Google Scholar]
  22. Moran, Steven, Eitan Grossman & Annemarie Verkerk
    2021 Investigating diachronic trends in phonological inventories using BDPROTO. Language Resources and Evaluation. –. 10.1007/s10579‑019‑09483‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-019-09483-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Neureiter, Nico, Peter Ranacher, Nour Efrat-Kowalsky, Gereon A. Kaiping, Robert Weibel, Paul Widmer & Remco R. Bouckaert
    2022 Detecting contact in language trees: A Bayesian phylogenetic model with horizontal transfer. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. . 10.1057/s41599‑022‑01211‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01211-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pacheco Coelho, Marco Túlio, Elisa Barreto Pereira, Hannah J. Haynie, Thiago F. Rangel, Patrick Kavanagh, Kathryn R. Kirby, Simon J. Greenhill, inter alia & Michael C. Gavin
    2019 Drivers of geographical patterns of North American language diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 20190242. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0242
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0242 [Google Scholar]
  25. Roberts, Seán G.
    2018 Robust, causal, and incremental approaches to investigating linguistic adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166 [Google Scholar]
  26. Roberts, Seán G., Anton Killin, Angarika Deb, Catherine Sheard, Simon J. Greenhill, Kaius Sinnemäki, José Segovia-Martín, inter alia & Fiona Jordan
    2020 CHIELD: The causal hypotheses in evolutionary linguistics database. Journal of Language Evolution(). –. 10.1093/jole/lzaa001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzaa001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ross, Malcolm D.
    1988Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia (Pacific Linguistics Series C 98). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1997 Social networks and kinds of speech-community event. InRoger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language I: Theoretical and methodological orientations, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203205839
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203205839 [Google Scholar]
  29. Round, Erich R., Sacha Beniamine & Louise Esher
    2021 The role of attraction-repulsion dynamics in simulating the emergence of inflectional class systems. International Symposium of Morphology (ISMo). 10.48550/arXiv.2111.08465
    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.08465 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sims-Williams, Helen
    2022 Token frequency as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226721000438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000438 [Google Scholar]
  31. Verkerk, Annemarie
    2019 Detecting non-tree-like signal using multiple tree topologies. Journal of Historical Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jhl.17009.ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17009.ver [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24016.rou
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error