1887
Volume 42 Number 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents the Database of Tonogenetic Events (DTE), which describes 259 tonogenetic events from 104 genealogically and geographically diverse language varieties. The DTE allows us to identify the main types of reported tonogenesis triggering contexts, the types of resultant tones, and their effects on pitch. We illustrate the usefulness of the database with case studies addressing (i) the frequency of different types of tonogenesis, (ii) the diachronic pathways linking phonological triggering context and resultant tone, and (iii) areal trends. We also discuss the shortcomings of the database with respect to the diachronic typological study of tone.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24022.sae
2025-07-28
2026-03-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dia.24022.sae.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24022.sae&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arnold, Laura
    2020 Highs and lows: A previously unattested tone split from vowel height in Metnyo Ambel. Transactions of the Philological Society118(1). 141–158. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12177 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateman, Nicoleta
    2011 On the typology of palatalization. Language and Linguistics Compass5(8). 588–602. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2011.00294.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00294.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell, Alan
    1978 Language samples. InJoseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language volume 1: Method and theory, 123–156. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, Ryan
    2016 Mayan phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass10(10). 469–514. 10.1111/lnc3.12148
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12148 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, Ryan, Meg Harvey, Robert Henderson & Tomás Alberto Méndez López
    2022 The phonetics and phonology of Uspanteko (Mayan). Language and Linguistics Compass16(9). e12467. 10.1111/lnc3.12467
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12467 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunelle, Marc & James Kirby
    2016 Tone and phonation in Southeast Asian languages. Language and Linguistics Compass10(4). 191–207. 10.1111/lnc3.12182
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12182 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell, Eric W.
    2017 Otomanguean historical linguistics: Past, present, and prospects for the future. Language and Linguistics Compass11(4). e12240. 10.1111/lnc3.12240
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12240 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, Yuen-Ren
    1930 A system of tone letters. Le maître phonétique451. 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1934 The non-uniqueness of phonemic solutions of phonetic systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica4(4). 363–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dockum, Rikker
    2019The tonal comparative method: Tai tone in historical perspective: Yale University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Easterday, Shelece
    2019Highly complex syllable structure: A typological and diachronic study. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fallon, Paul
    2002The synchronic and diachronic phonology of ejectives. New York & London: London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, Jiayin & James Kirby
    2024 Laryngeal contrast and sound change: The production and perception of plosive voicing and co-intrinsic pitch. Language100(1). 124–158. 10.1353/lan.2024.a922001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2024.a922001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gehrmann, Ryan
    2022Desegmentalization: Towards a common framework for the modeling of tonogenesis and registrogenesis in Mainland Southeast Asia with case studies from Austroasiatic: The University of Edinburgh dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1966 Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language421. 508–517. 10.2307/411706
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411706 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    2023Glottolog 4.8. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  19. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1954De l’origine des tons en vietnamien. Imprimerie Nationale.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language55(1). 37–58. 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, Yaqian
    2020 Different attributes of creaky voice distinctly affect Mandarin tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America147(3). 1441–1458. 10.1121/10.0000721
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000721 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyman, Larry M.
    2006 Word-prosodic typology. Phonology23(2). 225–257. 10.1017/S0952675706000893
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000893 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009 How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences31(2–3). 213–238. 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2018 Towards a typology of tone system changes. Tonal Change and Neutralization27(7). 203–222. 10.1515/9783110567502‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567502-008 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    2009 Kurtöp tone: A tonogenetic case study. Lingua119(6). 827–845. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.012 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2022 Toward a typology of tonogenesis: Revising the model. Australian Journal of Linguistics421. 275–299. 10.1080/07268602.2022.2157675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2022.2157675 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kingston, John
    2005 The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. InS. Hargus & K. Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 137–184. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.269.09kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.09kin [Google Scholar]
  28. 2011 Tonogenesis. InM. Oostendorp, E. V. Hume & C. J. Ewen (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1–30. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kirby, James, Pittayawat Pittayaporn & Marc Brunelle
    2022 Transphonologization of onset voicing: Revisiting Northern and Eastern Kmhmu’. Phonetica79(6). 591–629. 10.1515/phon‑2022‑0029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-0029 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirby, James P.
    2018 Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics711. 326–354. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kortlandt, Frederik
    2010 Glottalization and tonogenesis in Athabaskan, Balto-Slavic and Germanic. Suvremena Lingvistika691. 37–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristoffersen, Gjert
    2000The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198237655.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198237655.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  34. Maddieson, Ian
    2018 Is phonological typology possible without (universal) categories?InLarry M. Hyman & Frans Plank (eds.), Phonological typology, 107–125. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110451931‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110451931-004 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2023 Tone is not prodominant: Tone is not premordial. InRadek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1901–1905. Guarant International.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mielke, Jeff
    2008The emergence of distinctive features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199207916.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199207916.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mithun, Marianne
    2001The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Moran, Steven
    2012Phonetics information base and lexicon: University of Washington dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    2010 On comparative concepts and descriptive categories: A reply to Haspelmath. Language86(3). 688–695. 10.1353/lan.2010.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0000 [Google Scholar]
  40. Plane, Sarah Michelle
    2016Role of place and manner in tonogenesis: A case study with Kurtöp. The University of Sydney MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InPatric Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Remijsen, Bert
    2016 Tone. InOxford research encyclopedia of linguistics, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.109
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.109 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rolle, Nicholas Revett
    2018Grammatical tone: Typology and theory. University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sagart, Laurent
    1999 The origin of chinese tones. InProceedings of the symposium/Cross-Linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena/Tonogenesis, Typology and Related Topics, 91–104. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sherman, Don & Marilyn Vihman
    1972 The language universals phonological archiving project: 1971–1972. InWorking papers on language universals, vol.91, 163–179. Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sherman, Donald
    1975 Stop and fricative systems: A discussion of paradigmatic gaps and the question of language sampling. InWorking papers on language universals, vol.171, 1–31. Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Spencer, Andrew
    2012 Identifying stems. Word Structure5(1). 88–108. 10.3366/word.2012.0021
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2012.0021 [Google Scholar]
  48. Thurgood, Graham
    2020 Tonogenesis: Register > tones > tone realignment. InRichard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph, Barbara S. Vance (eds). The handbook of historical linguisticsvol21, 47–62. Wiley Online Library. 10.1002/9781118732168.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732168.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tạ, Thành Tấn, Marc Brunelle & Trần Quỳ Nguyễn
    2022 Voicing and register in Ngãi Giao Chrau: Production and perception studies. Journal of Phonetics901. 101115. 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101115
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101115 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tạ, Tấn
    2023Register and tone developments in Vietic languages: University of Ottawa dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Hoof, Sarah & Jo Verhoeven
    2011 Intrinsic vowel f0, the size of vowel inventories and second language acquisition. Journal of Phonetics39(2). 168–177. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  52. Whalen, Douglas H. & Andrea G. Levitt
    1995 The universality of intrinsic f0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics23(3). 349–366. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(95)80165‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang, Cathryn & Yi Xu
    2019 Crosslinguistic trends in tone change: A review of tone change studies in East and Southeast Asia. Diachronica36(3). 417–459. 10.1075/dia.18002.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18002.yan [Google Scholar]
  54. Yip, Moira
    2002Tone. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24022.sae
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24022.sae
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): historical linguistics; tone; tonogenesis; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error