Kra-Dai tonogenesis in Austro-Tai perspective

References

1. Baxter, William & Laurent Sagart
   2014 Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Benedict, Paul K.
   1942 Thai, Kadai, and Indonesian: A new alignment in South-Eastern Asia. American Anthropologist. –. 10.1525/aa.1942.44.4.02a00040
   https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1942.44.4.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
3. Benedict, Paul K.
   1975 Austro-Thai: Language and culture. New Haven, Conn: HRAF Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blench, Roger
   2018 Tai-Kadai and Austronesian are related at multiple levels and their archaeological interpretation. https://www.academia.edu/37593287/Tai_Kadai_and_Austronesian_are_related_at_multiple_levels_and_their_archaeological_interpretation (18 January, 2023.)
5. Blust, Robert A.
   2009 The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Australian National University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blust, Robert A. & Stephen Trussel
   2018 Austronesian comparative dictionary, web edition. https://www.trussel2.com/ACD/acd-pl_pan.htm (4 February, 2023).
7. Chang, Kun
   1972 The reconstruction of proto Miao-Yao tones. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chao, Yuen Ren
   1930 A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique. –.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ferlus, Michel
   1996 Remarques sur le consonantisme du proto kam-sui. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale(). –. 10.1163/19606028‑90000053
   https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-90000053 [Google Scholar]
10. Gedney, William J.
    1972/1989 A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. InRobert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas John Hudak, & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, –. (Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian Studies 29). Michigan: Center for South and Southeast Asian studies, the University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gedney, William J.
    1986/1989 Speculations on early Tai tones. InRobert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas John Hudak, & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, –. (Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian Studies 29). Michigan: The University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gedney, William J.
    1989a Evidence for another series of voiced initials in proto-Tai. InRobert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas John Hudak, & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, –. (Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian Studies 29). Michigan: The University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gedney, William J.
    1989b Future directions in comparative Tai linguistics. InRobert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas John Hudak, & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, –. (Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian Studies 29). Michigan: The University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gradin, Dwight
    1966 Consonantal tone in Jeh phonemics. Mon-Khmer Studies. –
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gregerson, Kenneth & Kenneth Smith
    1973 The development of Tơdrah register. Mon-Khmer Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1954 De l’origine des tons en Viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique. –. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01678018
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1972 Two-way and three-way splitting of tonal systems in some far eastern languages (translated by Christopher Court). InJimmy G. Harris & Richard B. Noss (eds.), A conference on Tai phonetics and phonology, –. Bangkok: Mahidol University.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1975 À propos du puzzle de W.J. Gedney. InJimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honour of W.J. Gedney, –. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hudak, Thomas John
    (ed.) 1993 William J. Gedney’s the Saek language: Glossary, texts, and translations. Michigan: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hyman, Larry
    2016 On reconstructing tone in Proto-Niger-Congo. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report(). –. 10.5070/P7121040722
    https://doi.org/10.5070/P7121040722 [Google Scholar]
21. Li, Fang Kuei
    1940 Lóngzhōu Tǔyǔ (龍州土語)[The Tai dialect of Lungchow]. (The Institute of History and Philology Monographs, Academia Sinica, Series A No. 16). Shanghai: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Li, Fang Kuei
    1960 A tentative classification of Tai dialects. InS. Diamond (ed.), Culture in history: Essays in honor of Paul Radin, –. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Li, Fang Kuei
    1977 A handbook of comparative Tai. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Liang, Min (梁敏) & Zhang Junru (张均如)
    1996 Dòng Tái Yǔzú Gàilùn (侗台语概论) [An introduction to the Kam-Tai languages]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liao, Hanbo
    2016a Diachronic hierarchies of Tai tonal development. Payap University Journal(). –. 10.14456/pyuj.2016.16
    https://doi.org/10.14456/pyuj.2016.16 [Google Scholar]
26. Liao, Hanbo
    2016b Tonal development of Tai languages. Chiang Mai: Payap University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Liao, Hanbo
    2023 An integrated tone box scheme for determining tones in Tai varieties beyond Southwestern Tai: Diachronic and synchronic concerns. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flin‑2022‑2048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2022-2048 [Google Scholar]
28. Liao, Hanbo & Tai Chung-pui
    2019 Northern Tai subgrouping in diachronic perspectives: Evidence from Yongnan Zhuang. Paper presented at the29th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 27–29 May.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Maspero, Henri
    1912 Etudes sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française de l’Extrême Orient. –. 10.3406/befeo.1912.2713
    https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1912.2713 [Google Scholar]
30. Matisoff, James A.
    1973 Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. InLarry M. Hyman (ed.), Southern California occasional papers in linguistics, –. LA: University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Matisoff, James A.
    2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ni, Dabai (倪大白)
    1990 Dòngtáiyǔ Gàilùn (侗台语概论) [An introduction to Dong-Tai languages]. Beijing: The Press of Minzu University of China.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ni, Dabai (倪大白)
    1991 Dòngtáiyǔ shēngdiào de qǐyuán (侗台语声调的起源) [The origin of Kam-Tai languages’ tones]. Zhōng yāng mín zú xué yuàn xué bào [Journal of Central Institute for Nationalities] (). –, .
    [Google Scholar]
34. Norman, Jerry
    1988 Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Norquest, Peter
    2013 A revised inventory of Proto Austronesian consonants: Kra-Dai and Austroasiatic evidence. Mon-Khmer Studies. –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Norquest, Peter K.
    2015 A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Hlai. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004300521
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300521 [Google Scholar]
37. Ostapirat, Weera
    1999 Proto-Kra. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ostapirat, Weera
    2005 Kra–Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. InLaurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, (eds), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, –. London: Routledge Curzon. 10.4324/9780203343685_chapter_7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203343685_chapter_7 [Google Scholar]
39. Ostapirat, Weera
    2013 Austro-Tai revisited. Paper presented at the23rd Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Bangkok. May 29–31, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ostapirat, Weera
    2018 Reconstructing disyllabic Kra-Dai. Paper presented at the28th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. May 17–19, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
    2009 The phonology of Proto-Tai. New York: Cornell University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
    2018 Phonetic and systemic biases in tonal contour changes in Bangkok Thai. InH. Kubozono & M. Giriko (eds.), Tonal change and neutralization, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110567502‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567502-010 [Google Scholar]
43. Rensch, Calvin R.
    1976 Comparative Otomanguean phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sagart, Laurent
    1986 On the departing tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sagart, Laurent
    1988 Glottalized tones in China and South-East Asia. InD. Bradley, Henderson J. Eugenie & Martine Mazaudon (eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To honour R. K. Sprigg, –. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Sagart, Laurent
    2004 The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2005.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0012 [Google Scholar]
47. Sagart, Laurent
    2005 Tai-Kadai as a subgroup of Austronesian. InLaurent Sagart, Roger Blench, & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, –. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sagart, Laurent
    2019 A model of the origin of Kra-Dai tones. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale (): –. 10.1163/19606028‑04801004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04801004 [Google Scholar]
49. Sidwell, Paul & Mark Alves
    2023 Re-evaluating Shorto’s MKCD reconstructions. (JSEALS Special Publication No. 12). Papers from the Ninth and Tenth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ta, Tan
    2023 Register and tone developments in Vietic languages. Ottawa: University of Ottawa PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tsuchida, Shigeru
    1976 Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology. Tokyo: ilcaa.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Vovin, Alexander
    2018 Proto-K(r)adai ‘hand’, ‘eye’, and ‘bird’ revisited. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale. –. 10.1163/19606028‑04701003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04701003 [Google Scholar]
53. Yang, Cathryn and Yi Xu
    2019 Cross-linguistic trends in tone change: A review of tone change studies in East and Southeast Asia. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.18002.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18002.yan [Google Scholar]
54. Yip, Moira
    2002 Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
55. Zhang, Junru (张均如), Min Liang (梁敏), Ouyang Jueya (欧阳觉亚), Yiqing Zheng (郑贻青), Xulian Li (李旭练) and Jianyou Xie (谢建猷)
    1999 Zhuàngyǔ Fāngyán Yánjīu (壮语方言研究). [Zhuang dialect research]. (Chinese Minority Language Dialect Research Series). Chengdu: Sichuan Ethnic Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]