1887
Volume 42 Number 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the phonetic realization of tones and onsets in Cao Bằng Tai. Previous studies of this language indicate that historically voiced plosives remain redundantly cued by closure voicing and/or breathy voice. Our age- and gender-stratified sample of 19 speakers reveals a linguistically homogeneous speech community in which historically voiced plosives are realized as voiceless and lightly aspirated, potentially merging with the aspirated plosive series. Our data show no intrinsic covariation of pitch in syllables with historically voiced onsets, but syllables with historically voiceless aspirated onsets show significantly increased pitch compared to unaspirated onsets. These findings suggest that while historical sonorant devoicing may well have conditioned the initial split, the phonetic precursors involved in the onset merger implicate raising, rather than lowering, of pitch. Our study of Cao Bằng Tai thus provides new insights into the internal chronology of tonogenetic processes in Tai languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24030.kir
2025-07-28
2026-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akharawatthanakun, Phinnarat
    2002 Tonal variations and changes in a language mixture area: A case study of northeastern Thailand (Isan). Manusya: Journal of Humanities5(2). 30–51. 10.1163/26659077‑00502004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-00502004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkson, Kelly Harper
    2019 Acoustic correlates of breathy sonorants in Marathi. Journal of Phonetics731. 70–90. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, J. Marvin
    1975 The great tone split: Did it work in two opposite ways?InJimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney33–48. Bangkok: Central Institute of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chamberlain, James R.
    1975 A new look at the history and classification of the Tai languages. InJimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney, 49–66. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Matthew Y.
    1992 Competing sound changes: Evidence from Kam-Tai, Miao-Yao and Tibeto-Burman. Journal of Chinese Linguistics20(2). 193–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Yiya
    2011 How does phonology guide phonetics in segment–f0 interaction?Journal of Phonetics39(4). 612–625. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi, Jiyoun, Sahyang Kim & Taehong Cho
    2020 An apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic account. PLOS One15(10). e0240682. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240682
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240682 [Google Scholar]
  8. Court, Christopher
    1998 The Gedney Boxes for SW Tai: The need for a Dʔ (Dead, ʔ-final) column. Handout presented at theFirst International Conference on Tai Studies, organized by the Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University, at Royal River Hotel, Bangkok, July 29–31, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cun, Xi
    2009A phonetic study on implosives in China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology PhD dissertation. 10.14711/thesis‑b1044466
    https://doi.org/10.14711/thesis-b1044466 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dantsuji, Masatake
    1984 A study on voiceless nasals in Burmese. Linguistics7(6). 59–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Demolin, Didier
    1995 The phonetics and phonology of glottalized consonants in Lendu. InBruce Connell & Amalia Arvaniti (eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence (Papers in Laboratory Phonology 4), 368–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554315.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554315.026 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dmitrieva, Olga & Indranil Dutta
    2019 Acoustic correlates of the four-way laryngeal contrast in Marathi. Phonetica771. 209–237. 10.1159/000501673
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000501673 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dutta, Indranil
    2007Four-way stop contrasts in Hindi: an acoustic study of voicing, fundamental frequency and spectral tilt. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Esposito, Christina M. & Sameer Ud Dowla Khan
    2020 The cross-linguistic patterns of phonation types. Language and Linguistics Compass14(12). e12392. 10.1111/lnc3.12392
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12392 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferlus, Michel
    1979 Formation des registres et mutations consonantiques dans les langues mon-khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies81. 1–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Garellek, Marc
    2019 The phonetics of voice. InWilliam F. Katz & Peter F. Assmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics, 75–106, 1st edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429056253‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056253-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gedney, William J.
    1972 A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. InM. Estellie Smith (ed.), Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager, 191–205. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon, Matthew & Peter Ladefoged
    2001 Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics291. 383–406. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0147
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanson, Helen M.
    2009 Effects of obstruent consonants on fundamental frequency at vowel onset in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America125(1). 425–441. 10.1121/1.3021306
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3021306 [Google Scholar]
  20. Haudricourt, André-G.
    1954 De l’origine des tons en viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique2421. 69–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1961 Bipartition et tripartition dans les systèmes de tons. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris56(1). 163–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1965 Les mutations consonantiques des occlusives initiales en mon-khmer. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris60(1). 160–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1972 Two-way and three-way splitting of tonal systems in some Far-Eastern languages. InJimmy G. Harris & Richard B. Noss (eds.), trans.Christopher Court, A conference on Tai phonetics and phonology, 58–86. Bangkok: Mahidol University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillenbrand, James & Robert A. Houde
    1996 Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: Dysphonic voices and continuous speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research39(2). 311–321. 10.1044/jshr.3902.311
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3902.311 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoàng Văn Ma
    Hoàng Văn Ma 1997 The sound system of the Tày language of Cao Bằng province, Vietnam. InJerold A. Edmondson & David B. Solnit (eds.), Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch, 221–231. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hombert, Jean-Marie
    1978 Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. InVictoria Fromkin (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey77–111. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language55(1). 37–58. 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
  28. Houben, Gerard B., Romain Buekers & Herman Kingma
    1992 Characterization of the electroglottographic waveform: A primary study to investigate vocal fold functioning. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica44(6). 269–281. 10.1159/000266161
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000266161 [Google Scholar]
  29. House, Arthur S. & Grant Fairbanks
    1953 The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustic characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America25(1). 105–113. 10.1121/1.1906982
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kagaya, Ryohei & Hajime Hirose
    1975Fiberoptic, electromyographic, and acoustic analyses of Hindi stop consonants. Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics: University of Tokyo.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kingston, John
    2011 Tonogenesis. InMarc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewan, Elisabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonologyvol.41, 2304–2333. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kirby, James
    2018 Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics711. 326–354. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2022 Effects of voiceless and preglottalized nasals on f0 in Eastern Khmu (Kmhmu’ Am). Papers from the 30th Conference of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (2021), 318–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kirby, James & D. Robert Ladd
    2016 Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel F0: Evidence from ‘true voicing’ languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America140(4). 2400–2411. 10.1121/1.4962445
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4962445 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirby, James & Maryann Tan
    2023 Analyzing variability in closure voicing and co-intrinsic F0 in Central Standard Swedish. InRadek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2244–2248. Guarant: Prague.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Klatt, Dennis H. & Laura C. Klatt
    1990 Analysis, synthesis, and voice quality variations among female and male talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America87(2). 820–857. 10.1121/1.398894
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398894 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehiste, Ilse & Gordon E. Peterson
    1961 Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America33(4). 419–425. 10.1121/1.1908681
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908681 [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, Fang-kuei
    1943 The hypothesis of a pre-glottalized series of consonants in primitive Tai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica11. 177–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1977A handbook of comparative Tai (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication no. 15). Honolulu: University Press of Hawai'i.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Liao, Hanbo
    2016 Tonal development of Tai languages. Chiang Mai: Payap University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Löfqvist, Anders, Thomas Baer, Nancy S. McGarr & Robin Seider Story
    1989 The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America851. 1314–1321. 10.1121/1.397462
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397462 [Google Scholar]
  42. L-Thongkum, Theraphan
    1997 Implications of the retention of proto-voiced plosives and fricatives in the Dai Tho language of Yunnan province for a theory of tonal development and Tai language classification. InJerold A. Edmondson & David B. Solnit (eds.), Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch, 191–219. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Maddieson, Ian
    1984 The effects on F0 of a voicing distinction in sonorants and their implications for a theory of tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics121. 9–15. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30845‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30845-9 [Google Scholar]
  44. Marasek, Krzysztof
    1997EGG & voice quality. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Matisoff, James A.
    1973 Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. InLarry M. Hyman (ed.), Consonant types and tone (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics), 73–95. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Meyer, Ernst A.
    1897 Zur Tonbewegung des Vokals im gesprochenen und gesungenen Einzelwort. Phonetische Studien (Beiblatt zu der Zeitschrift die neuren Sprachen)101. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ohala, John J.
    1975 A mathematical model of speech aerodynamics. InGunnar Fant (ed.), Speech Communication: Proceedings of the Speech Communication Seminar, Stockholm, 1–3 August 1974, Vol. 2: Speech production and synthesis by rule, 65–72. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1975 Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. InC. A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman & John J. Ohala (eds.), Nasalfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, 289–316. Stanford: Language Universals Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2011 Accommodation to the aerodynamic voicing constraint and its phonological relevance. InWai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 64–67. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Painter, Colin
    1978 Implosives, inherent pitch, tonogenesis and laryngeal mechanisms. Journal of Phonetics61. 249–274. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31159‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31159-3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pinget, Anne-France & Hugo Quené
    2023 Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel fundamental frequency in Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America154(4). 2124–2136. 10.1121/10.0021070
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0021070 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
    2009The phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat & James Kirby
    2017 Laryngeal contrasts in the Tai dialect of Cao Bằng. Journal of the International Phonetic Association47(1). 65–85. 10.1017/S0025100316000293
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100316000293 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1978 The nature of Middle Chinese tones and their development. Journal of Chinese Linguistics6(2). 173–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rischel, Jørgen
    1986 Can “the great tone split” in Thai be phonetically explained?Annual report of the Institute of Phonetics University of Copenhagen201. 79–98. 10.7146/aripuc.v20i.131872
    https://doi.org/10.7146/aripuc.v20i.131872 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schertz, Jessamyn & Sarah Khan
    2020 Acoustic cues in production and perception of the four-way stop laryngeal contrast in Hindi and Urdu. Journal of Phonetics811. 100979. 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100979
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100979 [Google Scholar]
  57. Shimizu, Katsumasa
    1994 F0 in phonation types of initial-stops. InRoberto Togneri (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, vol.21, 650–655. Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Silverman, Kim E. A.
    1986 F0 segmental cues depend on intonation: the case of the rise after voiced stops. Phonetica431. 76–91. 10.1159/000261762
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261762 [Google Scholar]
  59. Thurgood, Graham
    2002 Vietnamese tone: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica19(2). 333–363. 10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu [Google Scholar]
  60. Ting, Connie, Meghan Clayards, Morgan Sonderegger & Michael McAuliffe
    2025 The crosslinguistic distribution of vowel and consonant intrinsic F0 effects. Language101(1). 1–36. 10.1353/lan.2025.a954227
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2025.a954227 [Google Scholar]
  61. Westbury, John R.
    1983 Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America73(4). 1322–1336. 10.1121/1.389236
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389236 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wright, Richard & Aaron Shryock
    1993 The effects of implosives on pitch in SiSwati. Journal of the International Phonetic Association23(01). 16–23. 10.1017/S0025100300004734
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004734 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24030.kir
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24030.kir
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustics; phonation; register split; sound change; Tai languages; tone; tonogenesis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error