1887
Volume 42 Number 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714

Abstract

This article discusses the rise of new tones in Baltic and Slavic languages. It draws attention to the underlying mechanisms in the rise of these new tones and adduces typological parallels for some of the sound changes involved. It is argued that two processes played a crucial role in tonogenesis in Baltic and Slavic: stress retraction and reanalysis of an earlier phonation contrast as a tonal contrast. Tone renewal as a result of stress retractions in a number of South Slavic dialects is argued to have resulted from language contact.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24031.pro
2025-09-11
2026-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dia.24031.pro.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24031.pro&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aare, Kätlin, Pärtel Lippus & Juraj Simko
    2017 Creak as a feature of lexical stress in Estonian. InFrancisco Lcerda (ed.), Proceedings Interspeech 2017, Papers from the 18th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Stockholm, Sweden, August 20–24, 2017, 1029–1033. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1155
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1155 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andruski, Jean E. & Martha Ratliff
    2000 Phonation types in production of phonological tone: The case of Green Mong. Journal of the International Phonetic Association30(1–2). 37–61. 10.1017/S0025100300006654
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300006654 [Google Scholar]
  3. Avelino, Heriberto
    2016 Phonetics in phonology: A cross-linguistic study of laryngeal contrast. InHeriberto Avelino, Matt Coler & Leo Wetzels (eds.), The phonetics and phonology of laryngeal features in Native American languages (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 12), 157–179. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004303218_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303218_007 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezzenberger, Adalbert
    1883 Grammatische Bemerkungen. Beiträge zur Kunde der Indogermanischen Sprachen71. 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bird, Sonya, Marion Caldecott, Fiona Campbell, Bryan Gick & Patricia Shaw
    2008 Oral-laryngeal timing in glottalised resonants. Journal of Phonetics361. 492–507. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradley, David
    1982 Register in Burmese. InDavid Bradley (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 8: Tonation, Pacific Linguistics Series A-62, 117–132. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Derksen, Rick
    2008Etymological dictionary of the Slavic inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 4). Leiden & Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dybo, Vladimir A.
    2009 Sistema poroždenija akcentnyx tipov proizvodnyx v balto-slavjanskom prajazyke i balto-slavjanskaja metatonija. [The system of the rise of the accentual types of derivatives in the Balto-Slavic proto-language and Balto-Slavic metatony]. Voprosy jazykovogo rodstva/Journal of Language Relationship21. 25–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dybo, Vladimir A., Sergej L. Nikolayev & Sergej A. Starostin
    1978 A tonological hypothesis on the origin of paradigmatic accent systems. Estonian Papers in Phonetics19781. 16–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekblom, Richard
    1933Die lettischen Akzentarten (nach der Aussprache J. Endzelins): Eine experimentalphonetische Untersuchung. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Endzelīns, Jānis
    1899 Über den lettischen Silbenakzent. Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen251. 259–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferlus, Michel
    2004 The origin of tones in Viet-Muong. InSomsonge Burusphat (ed.), Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2001, 297–313. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Programme for Southeast Asian Studies Monograph Series Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. García-Vega, Michelle & Benjamin V. Tucker
    2021 Acoustic properties of vowels in Upper Necaxa Totonac. Journal of the International Phonetic Association51(1). 55–74. 10.1017/S0025100318000439
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100318000439 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerfen, Chip & Kirk Baker
    2005 The production and perception of laryngealized vowels in Coatzospan Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics331. 311–334. 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Girdenis, Aleksas
    1967 Mažeikių tarmės priegaidžių fonetinės ypatybės. [The phonetic characteristics of consonants in the Mažeikiai dialect]. Kalbotyra151. 31–41. 10.15388/Knygotyra.1967.18947
    https://doi.org/10.15388/Knygotyra.1967.18947 [Google Scholar]
  16. Girdenis, Aleksas & Gertrūda Židonytė
    1994 Šiaurės panevėžiškių (Rozalimo šnektos) balsių sistema. [The vowel system of northern Panevėžys (Rozalimas dialect)]. Baltistica29(2). 115–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Greenberg, Marc L.
    2007 Phonetic evidence for the development of the “acute” tone in Slavic. InMate Kapović & Ranko Matasović (eds.), Tones and Theories: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Balto-Slavic Accentology, 75–87. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirt, Hermann
    1892 Vom schleifenden und gestossenen Ton in den indogermanischen Sprachen. Indogermanische Forschungen11. 1–42, 195–231. 10.1515/9783110242430.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242430.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    2022 Toward a typology of tonogenesis: Revising the model. Australian Journal of Linguistics42(3–4). 275–299. 10.1080/07268602.2022.2157675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2022.2157675 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ivić Pavle
    Ivić Pavle 1958Die serbokroatischen Dialekte : Ihre Struktur und Entwicklung. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ivšić, Stjepan
    1913 Današnji posavski govor. [The present-day Posavian dialect]. Rad JAZU1961. 124–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jakobson, Roman
    1963 Opyt fonologičeskogo podxoda k istoričeskim voprosam slavjanskoj akcentologii. Pozdnij period slavjanskoj jazykovoj praistorii. [An attempt at a phonological approach to historical issues of Slavic accentology. The late period of Slavic linguistic prehistory.] American Contributions to the Fifth International Congress of Slavists, vol. I: Linguistic Contributions, 153–178. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jasanoff, Jay
    2004 Acute vs. circumflex: Some notes on PIE and post-PIE prosodic phonology. InAdam Hyllested (eds.), Per Aspera ad Asteriscos. Studia Indogermanica in honorem Jens Elmegård Rasmussen (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 112), 247–256. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literatur der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic accent (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 17). Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill. 10.1163/9789004346109
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004346109 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kapović, Mate
    2015Povijest hrvatske akcentuacije: Fonetika. [The history of Croatian accentuation: Phonetics]. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2019 Shortening, lengthening, and reconstruction: Notes on historical Slavic accentology. Rasprave45(1). 75–133. 10.31724/rihjj.45.1.4
    https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.45.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kariņš, Arturs Krišjānis
    1996The prosodic structure of Latvian. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Yuni & Margarita Valdovinos
    2014 The interaction of laryngealized vowels, stress, and falling pitch in Mariteco Cora. InRyan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Sound Systems of Mexico and Central America. New Haven, CT: Yale Department of Linguistics. https://campuspress.yale.edu/ssmca/ssmca-proceedings/ (30 March, 2025.).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kingston, John
    2005 The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. InSharon Hargus & Keren Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 269), 137–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.269.09kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.09kin [Google Scholar]
  30. Klaić, Adolf Bratoljub
    2007Bizovačko narječje. [The Bizovac dialect]. Bizovac: Matica hrvatska.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kloekhorst, Alwin & Tijmen Pronk
    (eds.) 2025The reconstruction of Indo-European stop systems: From the traditional model to glottalic theories (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 29). Leiden: Brill. (In press).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kortlandt, Frederik
    1975Slavic accentuation: A study in relative chronology. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1985 Proto-Indo-European glottalic stops: The comparative evidence. Folia Linguistica Historica6(2). 183–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 1986 Proto-Indo-European tones?Journal of Indo-European Studies141. 153–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2008 Balto-Slavic phonological developments. Baltistica43(1). 5–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2009 Accent retraction and tonogenesis. InThomas Olander & Jenny Helena Larsson (eds.), Stressing the past: Papers on Baltic and Slavic accentology (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 35), 75–82. Amsterdam & New York, NY: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042032170_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032170_008 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010a Glottalization and tonogenesis in Athabaskan, Balto-Slavic and Germanic. Suvremena Lingvistika691. 37–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2010b Balto-Slavic accentuation revisited. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch561. 61–81. 10.1553/wsj56s61
    https://doi.org/10.1553/wsj56s61 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lisac, Josip
    1996Hrvatski dijalekti i jezična povijest. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2009Hrvatska dijalektologija 2. Čakavsko narječje. [Croatian dialectology 2. The Chakavian dialect group]. Zagreb: Golden Marketing-Tehnička Knjiga.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lubotsky, Alexander
    2018 The phonology of Proto-Indo-Iranian. InJared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative Indo-European linguistics, vol.31, 1875–1888. Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110542431‑031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110542431-031 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lukežić, Iva
    1990Čakavski ikavsko-ekavski dijalekt. [The Chakavian Ikavian-Ekavian dialect]. Rijeka: Izdavački centar Rijeka.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Macaulay, Monica & Joe Salmons
    1995 The phonology of glottalization in Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics61(1). 38–61. 10.1086/466244
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466244 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mandić, David
    2009 Akut u jugozapadnim istarskim govorima. [Acute in southwestern Istrian dialects]. Hrvatski dijalektološki zbornik151. 83–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012 Naglasak glagola s i-prezentom u govoru Medulina. [The accentuation of verbs with an i-present in the dialect of Medulin]. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje38(2). 385–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Matasović, Ranko
    2005 Toward a relative chronology of the earliest Baltic and Slavic sound changes. Baltistica40(2). 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Michaud, Alexis & Bonny Sands
    2020 Tonogenesis. InOxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748 (30 March, 2025).
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748 [Google Scholar]
  48. Murinienė, Lina
    2007Rytinių šiaurės žemaičių fonologija: vokalizmas ir prozodija. [Northeastern Samogitian phonology: Vocalism and prosody.] Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Olander, Thomas
    2009Balto-Slavic accentual mobility. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213355
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213355 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2018 The dark past of Balto-Slavic prosody: On Jay Jasanoff’s book The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic accent. Lingua2071. 96–106. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  51. Petit, Daniel
    2010Untersuchungen zu den baltischen Sprachen (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 4). Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill. 10.1163/9789047440710
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047440710 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pronk, Tijmen
    2012 Indo-European long vowels and Balto-Slavic accentuation. Baltistica47(2). 205–247. 10.15388/Baltistica.47.2.2143
    https://doi.org/10.15388/Baltistica.47.2.2143 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2013 On Indo-European tones, accentuation, and ablaut. InGötz Keydana, Paul Widmer & Thomas Olander (eds.), Indo-European accent and ablaut, 149–176. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2017 Curonian accentuation. InBjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen (eds.), Usque ad radices. Indo-European studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 8), 659–669. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2018 Language contact and prosodic change in Slavic and Baltic. Diachronica35(4). 552–580. 10.1075/dia.16038.pro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16038.pro [Google Scholar]
  56. 2021 The early history of Western South Slavic. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie77(1). 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2022 Balto-Slavic. InThomas Olander (ed.), The Indo-European language family, 269–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108758666.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108758666.015 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InPatrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Rinkevičius, Vytautas
    2020 Prosodic marks in the Old Prussian Enchiridion revisited. InLuka Repanšek, Harald Bichlmeier, Velizar Sadovski (eds.), Vácām̐si miśrā́ kr̥ṇavāmahai: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies and IWoBA XII (Studien zur historisch-vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft 17), 705–722. Hamburg: Baar.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2021 The Žemaitian accent retraction as a typological parallel to Olander’s Mobility Law. Scando-Slavica67(2). 269–286. 10.1080/00806765.2021.1993998
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2021.1993998 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stang, Christian Schweigaard
    1957Slavonic accentuation. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 1966Vergleichende Grammatik der baltischen Sprachen. Oslo, Bergen & Tromsö: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Težak, Stjepko
    1981 Ozaljski govor. [The Ozalj dialect]. Hrvatski dijalektološki zbornik51. 203–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Trubetzkoy, N. S.
    1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Vaillant, André
    1936 Le problème des intonations balto-slaves. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique371. 109–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Vermeer, Willem
    1984–1985 Non-initial falling tones in Neo-Štokavian dialects. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku27–281. 143–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Villanueva Svensson, Miguel
    2011 Indo-European long vowels in Balto-Slavic. Baltistica46(1). 5–38. 10.15388/Baltistica.46.1.1486
    https://doi.org/10.15388/Baltistica.46.1.1486 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2023The rise of acuteness in Balto-Slavic (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 27). Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Witucki, Jeannette
    1974 The vowels of Chamorro. Papers in Philippine Linguistics61. 55–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Young, Steven
    1994 Endzelin’s law and acute tone in Latvian. Linguistica Baltica31. 101–108.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24031.pro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24031.pro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Baltic; laryngealization; Slavic; stress retraction; tone renewal; tonogenesis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error