Diachrony and Diachronica

References

1. Itkonen, Esa
   1984 On the ‘rationalist’ conception of linguistic change. Diachronica1(2). 203–216. 10.1075/dia.1.2.04itk
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.1.2.04itk [Google Scholar]
2. King, Robert D.
   1969 Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Keller, Rudi
   1990 Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke. (English translation: On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge 1994.)
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kiparsky, Paul
   1965 Phonological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kiparsky, Paul
   2023 Word order cycle. Plenary paper given to26th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Heidelberg, September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Labov, William
   2010 Principles of linguistic change. Volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, MA, Oxford & Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444327496
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496 [Google Scholar]
7. Lass, Roger
   1997 Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620928
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928 [Google Scholar]
8. Makalela, Leketi
   2016 Ubuntu translanguaging: An alternative framework for complex multilingual encounters. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies3(3): 187–196. 10.2989/16073614.2016.1250350
   https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2016.1250350 [Google Scholar]
9. Marten, Lutz
   2023 Historical linguistics and Ubuntu translanguaging: Towards a model of multilingualism, language change and linguistic convergence in the Bantu linguistic area. Plenary paper given to26th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Heidelberg, September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Smith, John Charles
    2011 Change and continuity in form–function relationships. InMartin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.) The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. Volume 1: Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 268–317, 713–723.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds) Directions for historical linguistics, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eckert, Penelope
    2011 Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech86(1). 85–97. 10.1215/00031283‑1277528
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277528 [Google Scholar]
13. Hall-Lew, Lauren, Claire Cowie, Catherine Lai, Nina Markl, Stephen J. McNulty, Shan-Jan S. Liu, Clare Llewellyn, Beatrice Alex, Zuzana Elliott and Anita Klingler
    2022 The Lothian diary project: Sociolinguistic methods during the COVID-19 lockdown. Linguistics Vanguard8(S3): 321–330. 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0053 [Google Scholar]
14. Hilton, Nanna H. and Adrian Leeman
    2021 Editorial: Using smartphones to collect linguistic data. Linguistics Vanguard7(S1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0132
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0132 [Google Scholar]
15. Hockett, Charles F.
    1958 A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kroch, Anthony S.
    1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change11. 199–244. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
17. Labov, William
    2010 Principles of linguistic change. Volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444327496
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496 [Google Scholar]
18. Sneller, Betsy and Daniel Greeson
    2024 Distinct phonological reanalysis patterns in Michigan English TRAP. Paper presented atPenn Linguistics Conference 48.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sneller, Betsy, Suzanne E. Wagner and Yongqing Ye
    2022 MI Diaries: Ethical and practical challenges. Linguistics Vanguard8(S3). 303–306. 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0138
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0138 [Google Scholar]
20. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InW. P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 97–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan
    1895 Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alternationen: Ein Capitel aus der Psychophonetik. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111472317
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111472317 [Google Scholar]
22. Paul, Hermann
    1880 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 1st edn., Halle, Germany: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sapir, Edward
    1929 The status of linguistics as a science. Language5(4). 207–214. 10.2307/409588
    https://doi.org/10.2307/409588 [Google Scholar]
24. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin I. Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InW. P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.) Directions for historical linguistics, 97–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Whitney, William D.
    1867 Language and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. C. Scribner.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Andersen, Henning
    1973 Abductive and deductive change. Language49(4): 765–793. 10.2307/412063
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412063 [Google Scholar]
27. Bowern, Claire
    2018 Computational phylogenetics. Annual Review of Linguistics4(1). 281–296. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034142
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034142 [Google Scholar]
28. Drinka, Bridget
    2017 Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gvozdanović, Jadranka
    . To appear. Methodological considerations on linguistic reconstruction in space and time. InAditi Lahiri & Martin Maiden eds. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kiparsky, Paul
    2015 New perspectives on historical linguistics. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook on historical linguistics, 64–102. Basingstoke: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lahiri, Aditi & Sandra Kotzor
    (eds.) 2017 The speech processing lexicon: Neurocognitive and behavioural approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110422658
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110422658 [Google Scholar]
32. Nichols, Johanna
    1992 Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
33. Salmons, Joseph
    1992 Northwest Indo-European vocabulary and substrate phonology. InRoger Pearson (ed.), Perspectives on Indo-European language, culture and religion: Studies in honor of Edgar C. Polomé, Vol.21. Journal of Indo-European Studies, Monograph Series 9. 265–279.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication23 (3). 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
35. Skirgård, Hedvig, Hannah J. Haynie, Damián E. Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J. Latarche, Jakob Lesage, inter alia & Russell D. Gray
    2023 Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances9(16). eadg6175. 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6175 [Google Scholar]
36. Goldsmith, John A.
    2001 Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics27(2). 153–198. 10.1162/089120101750300490
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089120101750300490 [Google Scholar]
37. Goldsmith, John A. and Bernard Laks
    2019 Battle in the mind fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226550947.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226550947.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Harris, Zellig S.
    1951 Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ruwet, Nicolas
    1991 Syntax and human experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ross, John Robert
    1972 A fake NP squish. InCharles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 96–140. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Smolensky, Paul & Matthew Goldrick
    2016 Gradient symbolic representations in grammar: The case of French liaison. Rutgers Optimality Archive 1286.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Blevins, Juliette
    2008 Phonetic explanation without compromise: The evolution of Mussau syncope. Diachronica25(1). 1–19. 10.1075/dia.25.1.02ble
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.25.1.02ble [Google Scholar]
43. Blevins, Juliette
    . To appear. Linguistically motivated sound change: Revisiting some of the world’s rarest wonders. InNatalia Kuznetsova, Cormac Anderson & Shelece Easterday eds. Rarities in phonetics and phonology: Structural, typological, evolutionary and social dimensions. Topics in Phonological Diversity. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Wedel
    2009 Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica26(2). 143–183. 10.1075/dia.26.2.01ble
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.26.2.01ble [Google Scholar]
45. Blust, Robert
    2005 Must sound change be linguistically motivated?Diachronica22(2). 219–269. 10.1075/dia.22.2.02blu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22.2.02blu [Google Scholar]
46. Boretzky, Norbert
    1984 The Indo-Europeanist model of sound change and genetic affinity, and change in exotic languages. Diachronica1(1). 1–51. 10.1075/dia.1.1.03bor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.1.1.03bor [Google Scholar]
47. Brunelle, Marc & Pittayawat Pittayaporn
    2012 Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in Mainland Southeast Asia. Diachronica29(4). 411–433. 10.1075/dia.29.4.01bru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.01bru [Google Scholar]
48. Egurtzegi, Ander & Gorka Elordieta
    2023 A history of the Basque prosodic systems. Diachronica40(1). 30–72. 10.1075/dia.20066.egu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20066.egu [Google Scholar]
49. Ehala, Martin
    1996 Self-organization and language change. Diachronica13(1). 1–28. 10.1075/dia.13.1.02eha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.1.02eha [Google Scholar]
50. Fagan, David S.
    1988 Notes on diachronic nasalization in Portuguese. Diachronica5(1/2). 141–157. 10.1075/dia.5.1‑2.07fag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.5.1-2.07fag [Google Scholar]
51. Ferlus, Michel
    1998 Les systèmes de tons dans les langues Viet-Muong. Diachronica15(1). 1–27. 10.1075/dia.15.1.02fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.02fer [Google Scholar]
52. Flynn, Darin & Sean Fulop
    2014 Acoustic phonetic features in Athabaskan sound change. Diachronica31(2). 192–222. 10.1075/dia.31.2.02fly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.02fly [Google Scholar]
53. Goddard, Ives
    2002 Explaining the double reflexes of word-initial high short vowels in Fox. Diachronica19(1). 43–80. 10.1075/dia.19.1.03god
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19.1.03god [Google Scholar]
54. Hualde, José Ignacio
    1993 On the historical origin of Basque accentuation. Diachronica10(1). 13–50. 10.1075/dia.10.1.03hua
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.10.1.03hua [Google Scholar]
55. Köhnlein, Björn
    2015 The complex durational relationship of contour tones and level tones: Evidence from diachrony. Diachronica32(2). 231–267. 10.1075/dia.32.2.03koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.03koh [Google Scholar]
56. Macken, Marlys A. & Joseph C. Salmons
    1997 Prosodic templates in sound change. Diachronica14(1). 31–66. 10.1075/dia.14.1.03mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.14.1.03mac [Google Scholar]
57. Malkiel, Yakov
    1984 Spanish diphthongization and accentual structure in diachronic perspective. Diachronica1(2). 217–242. 10.1075/dia.1.2.05mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.1.2.05mal [Google Scholar]
58. Martinet, André
    1984 De la synchronie dynamique à la diachronie. Diachronica1(1). 53–64. 10.1075/dia.1.1.04mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.1.1.04mar [Google Scholar]
59. Mortensen, David R.
    2012 The emergence of obstruents after high vowels. Diachronica29(4). 434–470. 10.1075/dia.29.4.02mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.02mor [Google Scholar]
60. Recasens, Daniel
    2004 A production account of sound changes affecting diphthongs and triphthongs in Romance. Diachronica21(1). 161–197. 10.1075/dia.21.1.07rec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21.1.07rec [Google Scholar]
61. Riad, Tomas
    1998 The origin of Scandanavian tone accents. Diachronica15(1). 63–98. 10.1075/dia.15.1.04ria
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.04ria [Google Scholar]
62. Thurgood, Graham
    2002 Vietnamese tonogenesis: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica19(2). 333–363. 10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu [Google Scholar]
63. Uchihara, Hiroto
    2016 Tone and registrogenesis in Quiaviní Zapotec. Diachronica33(2). 220–254. 10.1075/dia.33.2.03uch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.2.03uch [Google Scholar]