Tonogenesis in the Naduhup family of northwest Amazonia

References

1. Barbosa, Jefferson F.
   2005 Descrição fonológica da língua Nadêb. [Phonological description of the Nadëb language.] Brasilia: Universidade de Brasília MA thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barboza, Lucas Cavalini
   2016 Aspectos da glotalização na língua Dâw: um estudo de fonética experimental. [Aspects of glottalization in the Dâw language: An experimental phonetic study.] Graduate qualification paper, University of São Paulo.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blevins, Juliette
   2017 Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279872.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.006 [Google Scholar]
4. Epps, Patience
   2001– Hup collection. Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America. ailla.utexas.org
   [Google Scholar]
5. Epps, Patience
   2007 The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. InAlexandra Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 267–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199207831.003.0011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199207831.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
6. Epps, Patience
   2008 A grammar of Hup. (Mouton Grammar Library 43) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199079
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199079 [Google Scholar]
7. Epps, Patience
   2018 Tonogenesis in the Naduhup family. Presentation atAmazonicas 7 conference, Baños, Ecuador; May 30.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Epps, Patience
   . Forthcoming. Exploring innovation in grammatical morphology. InNora Boneh ed. Language change: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Berlin: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Epps, Patience & Sunkulp Ananthanarayan
   2022 Stability in grammatical morphology: An Amazonian case-study. InPatience Epps, Danny Law & Na’ama Pat-El (eds.), Historical linguistics and endangered languages: Exploring diversity in language change. (Routledge Series in Historical Linguistics), 121–151. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Epps, Patience & Katherine Bolaños
    2017 Reconsidering the ‘Makú’ family of northwest Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics83(3). 467–507. 10.1086/691586
    https://doi.org/10.1086/691586 [Google Scholar]
11. Epps, Patience & Karolin Obert
    2021 Multilingual networks past and present: Insights from Naduhup languages of northwest Amazonia. Anthropological Linguistics63(4). 422–450 (2023) 10.1353/anl.2021.a915203
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2021.a915203 [Google Scholar]
12. Epps, Patience, Karolin Obert & Nian Pissolati
    2018– Nadëb collection. Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America. ailla.utexas.org
    [Google Scholar]
13. Epps, Patience, Karolin Obert & Luciana Storto
    2013– Dâw collection. Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America. ailla.utexas.org
    [Google Scholar]
14. Epps, Patience & Kristine Stenzel
    (eds.) 2013 Upper Rio Negro: Cultural and linguistic interaction in northwestern Amazonia. Rio de Janeiro: Museu do Índio-FUNAI. www.etnolinguistica.org/biblio:epps-stenzel-2013
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goddard, Ives
    1991 Algonquian linguistic change and reconstruction. InPhilip Baldi (ed.), Patterns of change — change of patterns: Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, 55–70. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871890.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871890.55 [Google Scholar]
16. Goddard, Ives
    2000 The historical origins of Cheyenne inflections. InJohn D. Nichols (ed.), Papers of the 31st Algonquian Conference, 77–129. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gordon, Matthew
    2001 A typology of contour tone restriction. Studies in Language25(3). 423–462. 10.1075/sl.25.3.03gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.3.03gor [Google Scholar]
18. Hombert, Jean-Marie
    1984 Tonogenesis revisited. Pholia11. 77–86.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language551. 37–58. 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
20. Hyman, Larry
    2012 Coda constraints on tone. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report8(8). 189–204. 10.5070/P7109680G2
    https://doi.org/10.5070/P7109680G2 [Google Scholar]
21. Hyman, Larry
    2016 Amazonia and the typology of tone systems. InHeriberto Avelino, Matt Coler & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), The phonetics and phonology of laryngeal features in Native American languages, 235–257. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004303218_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303218_010 [Google Scholar]
22. Kingston, John
    2004 Mechanisms of tone reversal. InShigeki Kaji (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Crosslinguistic Studies of Tone. (Institute of the Study of the Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA)), 57–120. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kingston, John
    2005 The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. InSharon Hargus & Keren Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 137–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.269.09kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.09kin [Google Scholar]
24. Kingston, John
    2011 Tonogenesis. InMarc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2304–2333. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097 [Google Scholar]
25. Köhnlein, Björn
    2015 The complex durational relationship of contour tones and level tones: Evidence from diachrony. Diachronica32(2). 231–267. 10.1075/dia.32.2.03koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.03koh [Google Scholar]
26. Kwon, Kyung-Keun
    2003 Prosodic change from tone to vowel length in Korean. InP. Fikkert & J. Haike (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 67–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894530.67
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894530.67 [Google Scholar]
27. Langston, Keith
    2011 Tone reversal in Kajkavian dialects of Croatian. InT. Pronk & R. Derksen (eds.), Accent matters: Papers on Balto-Slavic accentology. (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, vol. 37), 263–276. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401200325_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200325_012 [Google Scholar]
28. Lehiste, Ilse
    1976 Influence of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics41. 113–117. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31231‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31231-8 [Google Scholar]
29. Lehnert-LeHouillier, Heike
    2013 From long to short and from short to long: Perceptual motivations for changes in vocalic length. InAlan C. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change, 98–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
30. Martins, Silvana A.
    2004 Fonologia e gramática Dâw. [Dâw phonology and grammar.] Amsterdam: LOT Dissertations Series, Vrije Universiteit PhD dissertation.
31. Martins, Valteir
    2005 Reconstrução fonológica do protomaku oriental. [Phonological reconstruction of eastern Proto-Maku.] Amsterdam: LOT Dissertations Series, Vrije UniversiteitPhD dissertation.
32. Michailovsky, Boyd
    1975 Notes on the Kiranti verb (East Nepal). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area2(2). 183–218. 10.32655/LTBA.2.2.02
    https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.2.2.02 [Google Scholar]
33. Orjuela, Lorena
    2019 Documentation and sociophonetic description of the varieties of Yuhup spoken in Colombia. Endangered Languages Archive. hdl.handle.net/2196/00-0000-0000-0013-8C25-5
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ospina Bozzi, Ana María
    2002 Les structures élémentaires du Yuhup Maku, langue de l’Amazonie Colombienne: Morphologie et syntaxe. Paris: Université Paris 7 — Denis Diderot PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ramirez, Henri
    2006 A língua dos Hupd’äh do alto Rio Negro: Dicionário e guia de conversação. [The Hup language of the upper Rio Negro: Dictionary and conversation guide.] São Paulo: Associação Saúde Sem Limites.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InPatrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), Handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Remijsen, Bert & Vincent J. van Heuven
    2005 Stress, tone and discourse prominence in the Curaçao dialect of Papiamentu. Phonology22(2). 205–235. 10.1017/S0952675705000540
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675705000540 [Google Scholar]
38. Riad, Tomas
    1998 The origin of Scandinavian tone accents. Diachronica15(1). 63–98. 10.1075/dia.15.1.04ria
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.04ria [Google Scholar]
39. Silva, Cácio & Elisângela Silva
    2012 A língua dos Yuhupdeh: Introdução etnolínguística, dicionário yuhup–português e glossário semântico-gramatical. [The Yuhup language: Ethnolinguistic introduction, dictionary, and semantic-grammatical glossary.] São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Pró-Amazônia.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Simmons, Mark
    2021 Reconstructing Proto-Naduhup prosody. Austin: University of Texas at Austin BA honors thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thurgood, Graham
    2002 Vietnamese and tonogenesis: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica19(2). 333–363. 10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19.2.04thu [Google Scholar]
42. Waruá Community
    Waruá Community 2017 Dicionário Dâw. [Dâw dictionary.] Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Weir, Helen
    1984 A negação e outros tópicos da gramática Nadëb. [Negation and other topics of Nadëb grammar.] Campinas: Universidade de Campinas MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Weir, Helen, Rodolfo Senn & Beatrice Senn
    2011 Dicionário nadëb-português, português-nadëb. [Nadëb-Portuguese, Portuguese-Nadëb dictionary.] Unpublished manuscript, SIL.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Yip, Moira
    2002 Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
46. Yu, Alan C. L.
    2010 Tonal effects on perceived vowel duration. InCécile Fougeron, Barbara Kuehnert, Mariapaola D’Imperio & Nathalie Vallee (eds.), Laboratory phonology101, 151–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224917.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224917.2.151 [Google Scholar]
47. Zhang, Jie
    2004 The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. InBruce Hayes, Donca Steriade & Robert Kirchner (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 157–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.006 [Google Scholar]