1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Evolution of differential object marking in Macedonian dialects
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

By the late Middle Ages, a part of South Slavic, including Macedonian and Bulgarian, had lost nominal case inflection, leading to the disappearance of the old Slavic differential object marking (DOM) system. In the 19th century, some southern Macedonian dialects developed a new DOM system based on the preposition ‘on, to’. This study explores the evolution of this DOM system by comparing Southern Macedonian texts from two periods — the mid-19th century and mid-20th century. The main factors conditioning DOM include animacy (humanness), definiteness, and the lexical class of the verb. We observe a general increase in the -marking and a shift from optionality toward automatization. In early texts, the -marking sporadically occurs with pronouns and definite human-referring nouns. In later texts, pronouns and human proper names are almost always marked, whereas marking of definite human-referring common nouns remains optional, albeit with increasing frequency over time. We also report negative evidence for other factors frequently mentioned in typological works on DOM, such as the disambiguating function of case within the global discourse context. Notably, this factor does not emerge as significant in Macedonian.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
2026-02-02
2026-03-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ugrinovski, Dimitar
    1962 Narodni prikazni od Egejska Makedonija posveteni za Enidževardarska okolija [Folk tales from Aegean Macedonia dedicated to Enidže Vardar region]. Skopje.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Verkoviḱ, Stefan I.
    1863 Makedonski narodni umotvorbi [Macedonian Folk Tales]. InPenušliski, Kiril (ed.) 1985 Južnomakedonski narodni prikazni [Southern Macedonian folk tales]. V.. Skopje: Makedonska kniga.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Asenova, Petya & Vassilka Aleksova
    2008 L’aspect balkanique de la nota accusative personalis. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie (). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bossong, Georg
    1985 Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bužarovska, Eleni
    2001 Accusative and dative clitics in Southern Macedonian and Northern Greek dialects. Balkanistica. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017 The contemporary use of DOM in South-Western Macedonian dialects. Rhema. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2020 The contact hypothesis revised: DOM in the South Slavic periphery. Journal of Language Contact. –. 10.1163/19552629‑bja10003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-bja10003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bužarovska, Eleni
    2021 Informaciskata struktura i sintaksata na prostata rečenica [Information structure and word order variations]. Journal of Contemporary Philology (). –. 10.37834/JCP21410041b
     https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP21410041b [Google Scholar]
  9. Comrie, Bernard
    1978 Ergativity. InWinfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, –. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 1989 Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
    2011 Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511993473
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  13. Durie, Mark
    1995 Towards an understanding of linguistic evolution and the notion ‘X has a function Y’. InWerner Abraham, Talmy Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse, grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W.M. Verhaar, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.27.21dur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.27.21dur [Google Scholar]
  14. Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
    2015 Animacy and differential object marking in Old Church Slavonic. Russian Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s11185‑015‑9148‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-015-9148-3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Givón, Talmy
    1983 Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gries, Stefan Th
    2021 Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110718256
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110718256 [Google Scholar]
  17. Groen, Ben M.
    1977 A structural description of the Macedonian dialect of Dihovo: Phonology, morphology, texts, lexicon. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Haspelmath, Martin
    2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226705003683
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003683 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2019 Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2021a Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226720000535
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2021b Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0252
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0252 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill, Peter
    1991 The dialect of Gorno Kalenik. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, & Sebastian Bank
    2025 Glottolog 5.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 10.5281/zenodo.15525265
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15525265 [Google Scholar]
  24. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2010 Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011 Towards a typological study of differential object marking and differential object indexation. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Koneski, Blaže
    1967/1986 Istorija na makedonskiot jazik [History of the Macedonian language]. Reprinted 1986. Skopje: Kultura.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1986a Makedonskiot XIX vek, jazični i kniževno-istoriski prilozi [The Macedonian 19th century, linguistic, literary, historical contributions]. Skopje: Kultura.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1986b Direktniot na-predmet vo makedonskite govori [The direct na-object in Macedonian dialects]. InKoneski, Blaže. Makedonskiot XIX vek, jazični i kniževno-istoriski prilozi, –. Skopje: Kultura.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Korhonen, Jani, Maxim Makartsev, Milica Petruševska, & Ljudmil Spasov
    2016 Ethnic and linguistic minorities in the border region of Albania, Greece, and Macedonia: An overview of legal and societal status. InMaxim Makartsev & Max Wahlström (eds.), In search of the center and periphery: Linguistic attitudes, minorities, and landscapes in the central Balkans, –. University of Helsinki.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2020 Efficient trade-offs as explanations in functional linguistics: Some problems and an alternative proposal. Revista da Abralin(). –. 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1728
     https://doi.org/10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1728 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lunt, Horace Gray
    2001 Old Church Slavonic grammar. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110876888
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876888 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazon, André & André Vaillant
    1938 L’Évangéliaire de Kulakia. Un parle se slave du Bas-Vardar. Paris: Librairie Droz.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Melis, Chantal
    1995 El objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio Cid. Estudio sintàctico-pragmàtico. InCarmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, –. Madrid: Visor Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Minova-Gjurkova, Liljana
    1994 Sintaksa na makedonskiot standarden jazik [Syntax of Standard Macedonian]. Skopje: Rading.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mitkovska, Liljana & Eleni Bužarovska
    2023 Contrasting a phenomenon at the syntax-discourse interface: Subject-verb inversion in English and in Macedonian. Jezikoslovlje(). –. 10.29162/jez.2023.3
     https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2023.3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nichols, Johanna
    1986 Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.1986.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0014 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pensado, Carmen
    1995 La creación del objeto directo preposicional y la flexion de los pronombres personales en las lenguas románicas. InCarmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, –. Madrid: Visor Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Penušliski, Kiril
    (ed.) 1985 Južnomakedonski narodni prikazni [Southern Macedonian folk tales]. V.. Skopje: Makedonska kniga.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten & Natalia Levshina
    2019 Reassessing scale effects on differential case marking: Methodological, conceptual and theoretical issues in the quest for a universal. InIlja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), The diachronic typology of differential argument marking, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Seržant, Ilja
    2019 Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems. InKarsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, –. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.2583816
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583816 [Google Scholar]
  42. Seržant, Ilja A., Sergey Say, Andreas Hölzl, Aigul Zakirova, Xinyi Gao & Andreas Pregla
    2025 A typology of positional differential argument marking. Linguistic Typology. 10.1515/lingty‑2024‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2024-0021 [Google Scholar]
  43. Siewierska, Anna & Ludmila Uhliřová
    1998 An overview of word order in Slavic languages. InAnna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, –. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110812206.105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812206.105 [Google Scholar]
  44. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. InR. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, –. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sinnemäki, Kaius
    2014 A typological perspective on differential object marking. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0063
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0063 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobolev, Andrej
    2009 From synthetic to analytic case: Variation in South Slavic dialects. InAndrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The Oxford handbook of case, –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0050
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0050 [Google Scholar]
  47. Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz
    2009 An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods(). –. 10.1037/a0016973
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Harald R. Baayen
    2012 Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change(). –. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomić, Olga M.
    2008 Towards grammaticalization of clitic doubling: Clitic doubling in Macedonian and neighbouring languages. InDalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.130.06mis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.130.06mis [Google Scholar]
  50. Topolińska, Zuzanna
    1995 Convergent evolution, creolization and referentiality. InEva Hajičová, Miroslav Červenka, Oldřich Leška & Petr Sgall (eds.), Prague Linguistic Circle papers, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/plcp.1.21top
     https://doi.org/10.1075/plcp.1.21top [Google Scholar]
  51. Tošev, Krum
    1970 Nekoi inovacii vo gradskiot struški govor [Some innovations in the urban speech of Struga]. Prilozi(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Vidoeski, Božidar
    1989 Govorot na seloto Nestram (Kostursko) [The dialect of the Nestram village]. Prilozi(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 1998 Dijalektite na makedonskiot jazik [The dialects of the Macedonian language]. Tom. Skopje: Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. von Heusinger, Klaus
    2008 Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish. Probus. –. 10.1515/PROBUS.2008.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2008.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2018 The diachronic development of Differential Object Marking in Spanish ditransitive constructions. InIlja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, –Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.1228263
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228263 [Google Scholar]
  56. von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg A. Kaiser
    2007 Differential object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. InGeorg A. Kaiser & Manuel Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages”, –. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wahlström, Max
    2015 Loss of case inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. PhD dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ilja A. Seržant
    2018 Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. InIlja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, –. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.1228243
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228243 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
Loading
Evolution of differential object marking in Macedonian dialects
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: South Slavic ; differential object marking ; Macedonian ; indexing ; flagging

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error