Diachrony and Diachronica

References

1. Chomsky, Noam
   1997 Generative linguistics: Development and perspectives. An interview with Noam Chomsky. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada [Journal of Documentation of Studies in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics] 131. 159–194.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Babel, Molly, Andrew Garrett, Michael J. Houser & Maziar Toosarvandani
   2013 Descent and diffusion in language diversification: A study of Western Numic dialectology. International Journal of American Linguistics79(4). 445–489. 10.1086/671772
   https://doi.org/10.1086/671772 [Google Scholar]
3. Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson
   2012 Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science337(6097). 957–960. 10.1126/science.1219669
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219669 [Google Scholar]
4. Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson
   2013 Corrections and clarifications. Science342(6165). 1446. 10.1126/science.342.6165.1446‑a
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6165.1446-a [Google Scholar]
5. Cathcart, Chundra, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich Round
   2018 Areal pressure in grammatical evolution: An Indo-European case study. Diachronica35(1). 1–34. 10.1075/dia.16035.cat
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16035.cat [Google Scholar]
6. Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
   2015 Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language91(1). 194–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24672224
   [Google Scholar]
7. van Coetsem, Frans
   1988 Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris. 10.1515/9783110884869
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884869 [Google Scholar]
8. Deo, Ashwini
   2015 The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics and Pragmatics81. 1–52. 10.3765/sp.8.14
   https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.14 [Google Scholar]
9. Eckardt, Regine
   2006 Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Fick, August
    1883 [Review of:] Friedrich Stolz, Zur lateinischen Verbalflexion. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen18831: 583–596.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. & Vjačeslav V. Ivanov
    1995 Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Translation byJohanna Nichols. 10.1515/9783110815030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110815030 [Google Scholar]
12. Garrett, Andrew
    2023 The unnaming of Kroeber Hall: Language, memory, and Indigenous California. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/15133.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15133.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Gray, R. D., A. J. Drummond & S. J. Greenhill
    2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science323(5913). 479–483. 10.1126/science.1166858
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166858 [Google Scholar]
14. Gray, Russell D. & Fiona M. Jordan
    2000 Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature4051. 1052–1055. 10.1038/35016575
    https://doi.org/10.1038/35016575 [Google Scholar]
15. Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson
    2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature4261. 435–439. 10.1038/nature02029
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029 [Google Scholar]
16. Greenhill, Simon J., Hannah J. Haynie, Robert M. Ross, Angela M. Chira, Johann-Mattis List, Lyle Campbell, Carlos A. Botero & Russell D. Gray
    2023 A recent northern origin for the Uto-Aztecan family. Language99(1). 81–107. 10.1353/lan.2023.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2023.0006 [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics37(6). 1043–1068. 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
18. Haynie, Hannah J. & Claire Bowern
    2016 Phylogenetic approach to the evolution of color term systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113(48). 13666–13671. 10.1073/pnas.1613666113
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613666113 [Google Scholar]
19. Heggarty, Paul, Cormac Anderson, Matthew Scarborough, Benedict King, Remco Bouckaert, Lechosław Jocz, Martin Joachim Kümmel, inter alia & Russell D. Gray
    2023 Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages. Science381(6656). eabg0818. 10.1126/science.abg0818
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0818 [Google Scholar]
20. Kallio, Petri
    2017 The Indo-Europeans and the non-Indo-Europeans in prehistoric northern Europe. InAdam Hyllested, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds.), Language and prehistory of the Indo-European peoples: A cross-disciplinary perspective (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 7), 187–203. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kiparsky, Paul
    2012 Grammaticalization as optimization. InDianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 15–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kretschmer, Paul
    1896 Einleitung in die Geschichte der griechischen Sprache. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kroeber, A. L.
    1919 On the principle of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion. American Anthropologist21(3). 235–263. www.jstor.org/stable/660477. 10.1525/aa.1919.21.3.02a00010
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1919.21.3.02a00010 [Google Scholar]
24. Kroeber, A. L. & C. D. Chrétien
    1937 Quantitative classification of Indo-European languages. Language13(2). 83–103. 10.2307/408715
    https://doi.org/10.2307/408715 [Google Scholar]
25. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1965 L’évolution des catégories grammaticales. Diogène13(51). 54–71. 10.1177/039219216501305105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305105 [Google Scholar]
26. Labov, William
    2007 Transmission and diffusion. Language83(2). 344–387. 10.1353/lan.2007.0082
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0082 [Google Scholar]
27. Lubotsky, Alexander
    2001 The Indo-Iranian substratum. InChristian Carpelan, Asko Parpola & Petteri Koskikallio (eds.), Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and archaeological considerations, 301–317. Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meillet, Antoine
    1921 L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza)6(12). 384–400.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meiser, Gerhard & Olav Hackstein
    (eds.) 2005 Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel: Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Michael, Lev & Natalia Chousou-Polydouri
    2019 Computational phylogenetics and the classification of South American languages. Language and Linguistics Compass13(12). e12358. 10.1111/lnc3.12358
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12358 [Google Scholar]
31. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    1996 The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica13(1). 83–134. 10.1075/dia.13.1.05muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.1.05muf [Google Scholar]
32. Nichols, Johanna
    1992 Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
33. Ross, Malcolm
    1996 Contact-induced change and the Comparative Method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. InMark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The Comparative Method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195066074.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195066074.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
34. Schrijver, Peter
    2013 Language contact and the origins of the Germanic languages. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203001912
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203001912 [Google Scholar]
35. Swadesh, Morris
    1952 Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society96(4). 452–463. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3143802
    [Google Scholar]
36. Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
37. Dockum, Rikker
    2019 The Tonal Comparative Method: Tai tone in historical perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gehrmann, Ryan
    2022 Desegmentalization: Towards a common framework for the modeling of tonogenesis and registrogenesis in Mainland Southeast Asia with case studies from Austroasiatic. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Haudricourt, André-G.
    1954 De l’origine des tons en viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique2421. 69–82.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language55(1). 37–58. 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
41. Koch, Harold, Robert Mailhammer, Robert A. Blust, Claire Bowern, Don Daniels, Alexandre François, Simon J. Greenhill, inter alia & Paul J. Sidwell
    2014 Research priorities in historical-comparative linguistics: A view from Asia, Australia and the Pacific. Diachronica31(2). 267–278. 10.1075/dia.31.2.04koc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.04koc [Google Scholar]
42. Labov, William
    1981 Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language57(2). 267–308. 10.2307/413692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413692 [Google Scholar]
43. Michaud, Alexis & Bonny Sands
    2020 Tonogenesis. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.748 [Google Scholar]
44. Ohala, John J.
    2003 Phonetics and historical phonology. InBrain D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 669–686. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch22 [Google Scholar]
45. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InPatrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Sidwell, Paul & Felix Rau
    2015 Austroasiatic comparative-historical reconstruction: An overview. InMathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, 221–363. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tạ, Thành Tấn, Marc Brunelle & Trần Quý Nguyễn
    2022 Voicing and register in Ngãi Giao Chrau: Production and perception studies. Journal of Phonetics901. 101115. 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101115
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101115 [Google Scholar]
48. Bancu, Ariana, Joy P. G. Peltier, Felicia Bisnath, Danielle Burgess, Sophia Eakins, Wilkinson Daniel Wong Gonzales, Moira Saltzman, inter alia & Marlyse Baptista
    2023 Revitalizing attitudes toward creole languages. InAnne H. Charity Hudley, Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Decolonizing linguistics, 293–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Dickson, Greg & Gautier Durantin
    2019 Variation in the reflexive in Australian Kriol. Asia-Pacific Language Variation5(2): 171–207. 10.1075/aplv.00005.dic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.00005.dic [Google Scholar]
50. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
    2024 Mixed language in flux? The various impacts of multilingual contact on Lánnang-uè’s wh-question system. International Journal of Bilingualism10.1177/13670069231201865
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231201865 [Google Scholar]
51. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong, Mie Hiramoto, Jakob R. E. Leimgruber & Jun Jie Lim
    2022 Is it in colloquial Singapore English: What variation can tell us about its conventions and development. English Today39(4). 243–256. 10.1017/S0266078422000141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078422000141 [Google Scholar]
52. Lee, Nala Huiying
    2014 A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Thompson, Roger Mark
    2003 Filipino English and Taglish: Language switching from multiple perspectives (Varieties of English around the World General Series, G 31). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g31 [Google Scholar]
54. Wan, Tsung-Lun Alan
    2022 Individual variation in performing reading-aloud speech among deaf speakers. Linguistics Vanguard8(1). 291–303. 10.1515/lingvan‑2022‑0076
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0076 [Google Scholar]
55. Blust, Robert
    2018 Historical linguistics in the raw. InHannah Sarvasy & Diana Forker (eds.), Word hunters: Field linguists on fieldwork (Studies in Language Companion Series 194), 29–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.194.03blu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.194.03blu [Google Scholar]
56. Bowern, Claire & Rikker Dockum
    2024 Decolonizing historical linguistics in the classroom and beyond. InAnne H. Charity Hudley, Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Decolonizing linguistics, 194–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197755259.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
57. Campbell, Lyle
    2016 Language documentation and historical linguistics. InAndrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz & Carmen Jany (eds.), Language contact and change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun (Studies in Language Companion Series 173), 249–271. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.173.11cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.173.11cam [Google Scholar]
58. Charity Hudley, Anne H., Christine Mallinson, & Mary Bucholtz
    2024 Decolonizing linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
59. Ciucci, Luca
    2021 From fieldwork to reconstruction: Historical issues in hotspots of linguistic diversity. Studia Linguistica75(2). 165–174. 10.1111/stul.12160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12160 [Google Scholar]
60. Czaykowska-Higgins, Eva
    2009 Research models, community engagement, and linguistic fieldwork: Reflections on working within Canadian Indigenous communities. Language Documentation & Conservation3(1). 182–215. 10125/4423
    https://doi.org/10125/4423 [Google Scholar]
61. Koerner, Konrad
    1983 Holger Pedersen: A sketch of his life and work. InKonrad Koerner (ed.) & Caroline C. Henrikson (translator), Holger Pederson: A glance at the history of linguistics, with particular regard to the historical study of phonology (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 7), IX–XXII. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rosés Labrada, Jorge & Justin Spence
    2019 Historical linguistics for language revitalization: Connecting communities past and present. International Conference on Language Documentation and Conversation (ICLDC) 61. hdl.handle.net/10125/44776, accessed on2024-03-12.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sajnovics, Joannis [János]
    1770 Demonstratio idioma Ungarorum et Lapponum idem esse [A demonstration that the language of the Hungarians and the Lapps is the same]. Copenhagen: Typis Collegi societatis Iesu.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Speas, Margaret
    2009 Someone else’s language: On the role of linguists in language revitalization. InJon Rehner & Louise Lockard (eds.), Indigenous language revitalization: Encouragement, guidance & lessons learned, 23–36. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Tsikewa, Adrienne
    2021 Reimagining the current praxis of field linguistics training: Decolonial considerations. Language97(4). e293–e319. 10.1353/lan.2021.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0072 [Google Scholar]
66. Vajda, Edward
    2021 Eliciting evidence of relatedness and change: Fieldwork-based historical linguistics. InRichard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph & Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguisticsvol.21, 254 — 271. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Bergs, Alexander
    2005 Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503) (Topics in English Linguistics 51). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110923223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923223 [Google Scholar]
68. Crystal, David
    2009 On anniversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Labov, William
    1994 Principles of linguistic change, vol.11: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Romaine, Suzanne
    1982 Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511720130
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720130 [Google Scholar]
71. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2002 Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Blasi, Damián E., Steven Moran, Scott R. Moisik, Paul Widmer, Dan Dediu & Balthasar Bickel
    2019 Human sound systems are shaped by post-Neolithic changes in bite configuration. Science363(6432). eaav3218. 10.1126/science.aav3218
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3218 [Google Scholar]
73. Bowern, Claire, Patience Epps, Russell Gray, Jane Hill, Keith Hunley, Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz
    2011 Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?PLoS ONE6(9). e25195. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025195
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025195 [Google Scholar]
74. Comrie, Bernard
    2000 Language contact, lexical borrowing, and semantic fields. InDicky Gilbers, John Nerbonne & Jos Schaeken (eds.), Languages in contact, 73–86. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004488472_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488472_008 [Google Scholar]
75. Ellison, T. Mark & Luisa Miceli
    2017 Language monitoring in bilinguals as a mechanism for rapid lexical divergence. Language93(2). 255–287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26630311
    [Google Scholar]
76. Epps, Patience
    . Forthcoming. Exploring innovation in grammatical morphology. InNora Boneh ed. Language change: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Epps, Patience, Danny Law & Na’ama Pat-El
    (eds.) 2022 Historical linguistics and endangered languages: Exploring diversity in language change (Routledge Series in Historical Linguistics). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
    2000 In the mind’s ear: Semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language76(3). 546–592. 10.2307/417135
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417135 [Google Scholar]
79. Janda, Richard & Brian D. Joseph
    2003 On language, change, and language change — Or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. InBrian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3–180. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch [Google Scholar]
80. Ross, Malcolm
    2007 Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact — THEMA1(1). 116–143. 10.1163/000000007792548341
    https://doi.org/10.1163/000000007792548341 [Google Scholar]
81. Tallman, Adam J. R. & Patience Epps
    2020 Morphological complexity, autonomy, and areality in Amazonia. InPeter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (eds.), The complexities of morphology, 230–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
82. Koch, Harold, Robert Mailhammer, Robert A. Blust, Claire Bowern, Don Daniels, Alexandre François, Simon J. Greenhill, inter alia & Paul J. Sidwell
    2014 Research priorities in historical-comparative linguistics: A view from Asia, Australia and the Pacific. Diachronica31(2). 267–278. 10.1075/dia.31.2.04koc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.04koc [Google Scholar]
83. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 1998 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.11 — Material culture (Pacific Linguistics C 152). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2003 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.21 — The physical environment (Pacific Linguistics 545). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2008 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.31 — Plants (Pacific Linguistics 599). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2011 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.41 — Animals (Pacific Linguistics 621). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2016 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.51 — People: Body and mind. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2023 The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, vol.61 — People: Society. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]