Diachrony and Diachronica

References

1. Aronoff, Mark
   2017 Darwinism tested by the science of language. InClaire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 443–456. Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.495467
   https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.495467 [Google Scholar]
2. Bowern, Claire & Rikker Dockum
   2024 Decolonizing historical linguistics in the classroom and beyond. InAnne H. Charity Hudley, Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholtz (eds). Decolonizing linguistics. 195–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.31235/osf.io/5rwa9
   https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5rwa9 [Google Scholar]
3. Charity Hudley, Anne, Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholz
   2020 Towards racial justice in linguistics. Language96(4), e200–e224.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dockum, Rikker & Caitlin M. Green
   2024 Toward a big tent linguistics: Inclusion and the myth of the lone genius. InAnne H. Charity Hudley, Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholtz (eds). Inclusion in linguistics, 95–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kiparsky, Paul
   2006 The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics32(2), 217–236. 10.1515/TL.2006.015
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
6. Lightfoot, David
   1979 Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Saussure, Ferdinand de
   1916/2013 Course in general linguistics. Edinburgh: A&C Black.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baker, Adam, Diana Archangeli and Jeff Mielke
   2011 Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change23(3). 347–374. 10.1017/S0954394511000135
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000135 [Google Scholar]
9. Bloomfield, Leonard
   1933 Language. New York: H. Holt.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chen, Matthew Y. and William S.-Y Wang
    1975 Sound change: Activation and implementation. Language511. 228–281. 10.2307/412854
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412854 [Google Scholar]
11. Eckert, Paul
    2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41(41). 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
12. Gubian, Michelle, Johanna Cronenberg and Jonathan Harrington
    2023 Phonetic and phonological sound changes in an agent-based model. Speech Communication1471. 93–115. 10.1016/j.specom.2023.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.01.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Harrington, Jonathan and Florian Schiel
    2017 /u/-fronting and agent-based modeling: The relationship between the origin and spread of sound change. Language93(2). 414–445. 10.1353/lan.2017.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0019 [Google Scholar]
14. Kirby, James and Morgan Sonderegger
    2013 A model of population dynamics applied to phonetic change. InProceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 776–781. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski and Naomi Nagy
    2011 Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics15(4). 431–463. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00504.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.x [Google Scholar]
16. Levon, Erez and Isabelle Buchstaller
    2015 Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effects of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change271. 319–348. 10.1017/S0954394515000149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000149 [Google Scholar]
17. Lindblom, Björn, Susan Guion, Susan Hura, Seung-Jae Moon and Raquel Willerman
    1995 Is sound change adaptive?Rivista di Linguistica71. 5–36.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mielke, Jeff, Adam Baker and Diana Archangeli
    2016 Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/Language, 92(1):101–140. 10.1353/lan.2016.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0019 [Google Scholar]
19. Ohala, John J.
    1993 The phonetics of sound change. InCharles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Osthoff, Hermann and Karl Brugmann
    1874 Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete des Indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Stevens, Mary, Jonathan Harrington and Florian Schiel
    2019 Associating the origin and spread of sound change using agent-based modelling applied to /s/- retraction in English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1). 8. 10.5334/gjgl.620
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.620 [Google Scholar]
22. Yu, Alan C. L.
    2021 Toward an individual difference perspective on phonologization. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics6(1). 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Yu, Alan C. L. and Georgia Zellou
    2019 Individual differences in language processing: phonology. Annual Review in Linguistics. 51. 131–150. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑033815
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033815 [Google Scholar]
24. Adam, Lucien
    1883 Les Idiomes négro-aryens et malayo-aryens: essai d’hybridologie linguistique. Paris: Maisonneuve.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Alleyne, Mervyn C.
    1971 Acculturation and the cultural matrix of creolization. InDell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of language, 169–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Bickerton, Derek
    1981 Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bickerton, Derek
    2008 Bastard tongues: A trailblazing linguist finds clues to our common humanity in the world’s lowliest languages. New York: Hill & Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chaudenson, Robert
    2001 Creolization of language and culture. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Corne Chris
    Corne Chris 1999 From French to Creole: The development of new vernaculars in the French colonial world. London: University of Westminster Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. DeGraff, Michel
    2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society341. 533–591. 10.1017/S0047404505050207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050207 [Google Scholar]
31. Lefebvre, Claire
    1998 Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. McWhorter, John H.
    2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology51. 125–166. 10.1515/lity.2001.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001 [Google Scholar]
33. McWhorter, John H.
    2018 The creole debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108553308
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553308 [Google Scholar]
34. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    2008 Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum Press. 10.5040/9781350934078
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934078 [Google Scholar]
35. Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Enoch O. Aboh
    eds. (to appear). Uniformitarianism in language speciation: From creolistics to genetic linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1882 Kreolische Studien I: Über das Negerportugiesiesche von S. Thomé. Vienna: Buchhandler der Kais, Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1884 Slawo-Deutsches und Slawo-Italienisches. Graz: Leuschner & Lubesnky.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
39. Aboh, Enoch and DeGraff, Michel
    2017 A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. InRoberts, Ian (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, 401–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Baptista, Marlyse
    . (in press). A uniformitarian lens on creole languages: On universal creolization. InMufwene, Salikoko and Aboh, Enoch eds. Uniformitarianism in language speciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2008 Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781350934078
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934078 [Google Scholar]
42. Plag, Ingo
    2009 Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages24(2). 339–362. 10.1075/jpcl.24.2.05pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.2.05pla [Google Scholar]
43. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1883 Kreolische Studien III. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien (Philosophisch-historische Klasse)1031: 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Van Coetsem, Frans
    1988 Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110884869
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884869 [Google Scholar]
45. Winford, Donald
    2008 Processes of creole formation and related contact-induced language change. Journal of Language Contact, Thema21. 124–145. 10.1163/000000008792525228
    https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525228 [Google Scholar]
46. Winford, Donald
    2009 On the unity of contact phenomena and their underlying mechanisms: The case of borrowing. InLudmila Isurin, Donald Winford & Kees de Bot (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching, 279–305. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.41.15win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.41.15win [Google Scholar]
47. Winford, Donald
    2020 The New Spanishes in the context of contact linguistics: Toward a unified approach. InLuis Ortiz López, Rosa Guzzardo Tamargo & Melvin González-Rivera (eds.), Hispanic contact linguistics, 12–41. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.22.01win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.22.01win [Google Scholar]
48. Akerly, Samuel
    1824 Observations on the language of signs. The American Journal of Science, and Arts8(2). 348–358.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Bowern, Claire
    2024 The historical linguistics of signed languages. Diachronica41(2). 141–148. 10.1075/dia.24059.bow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24059.bow [Google Scholar]
50. Clark, William P.
    1885 The Indian Sign Language with brief explanatory notes of the gestures taught deaf-mutes in our institutions for their instruction. Philadelphia: L. R. Hamersly & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Frishberg, Nancy
    1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language51(3). 696–719.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kirby, James
    2024 Phonetics and historical linguistics: A two-way street. Diachronica41(4). 562–564. 10.1075/dia.24058.bow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24058.bow [Google Scholar]
53. Labov, William
    1981 Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language57(2). 267–308.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lauersdorf, Mark R.
    2018 Historical (standard) language development and the writing of historical identities: A plaidoyer for a data-driven approach to the investigation of the sociolinguistic history of (not only) Slovak. InStephen M. Dickey & Mark R. Lauersdorf (eds.), V zeleni drželi zeleni breg: Studies in honor of Marc L. Greenberg, 199–218. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Law, Danny, Justin M. Power & David Quinto-Pozos
    . Forthcoming. Bringing signed languages into the study of regular sound change. Language.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Meier, Richard P.
    2002 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. InRichard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 1–26. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.001 [Google Scholar]
57. Nyst, Victoria & Anique Schüller
    2024 Mother left, father right: Artificial signs and diachronic change in sign language dialects in Belgium and the Netherlands. Diachronica41(2). 251–298. 10.1075/dia.21052.nys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21052.nys [Google Scholar]
58. Peet, Harvey P.
    1853 Elements of the language of signs. American Annals of the Deaf5(2). 83–95.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Power, Justin M. & Keiko Sagara
    . Forthcoming. Approaches to the comparative linguistics of sign languages. InAdam Ledgeway, Edith Aldridge, Anne Breitbarth, Katalin É. Kiss, Joseph Salmons & Alexandra Simonenko eds. The Wiley Blackwell companion to diachronic and historical linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Power, Justin M. & Richard P. Meier
    2023 Demographics in the formation of language communities and in the emergence of languages: The early years of ASL in New England. Language99(2). 275–316. 10.1353/lan.2023.a900088
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2023.a900088 [Google Scholar]
61. Power, Justin M. & Richard P. Meier
    2024 The historical demography of the Martha’s Vineyard signing community. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education29(3). 295–321. 10.1093/deafed/enad058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad058 [Google Scholar]
62. Power, Justin M. & Richard P. Meier
    2025 Historical name signs at the Pennsylvania School for the Deaf. (Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia, 9–12 January 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
63. Shaw, Emily & Yves Delaporte
    2015 A Historical and Etymological Dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh2938
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2938 [Google Scholar]
64. Supalla, Ted & Patricia Clark
    2015 Sign language archaeology: Understanding the historical roots of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rcng45
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rcng45 [Google Scholar]
65. Woodward, James
    1978 Historical bases of American Sign Language. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 333–348. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Adamou, Evangelia & Yaron Matras
    (eds.) 2021 The Routledge handbook of language contact. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Biber, Douglas & Randi Reppen
    2015 The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139764377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377 [Google Scholar]
68. Bickel, Balthasar
    2020 Large and ancient linguistic areas. InM. Crevels, J.-M. Hombert & P. Muysken (eds.). Language dispersal, diversification, and contact: A global perspective, 78–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198723813.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198723813.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
69. Bowern, Claire
    2018 Computational phylogenetics. Annual Review of Linguistics4(1). 281–296. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034142
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034142 [Google Scholar]
70. Dahl, Östen
    (ed.) 2000 Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197099
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099 [Google Scholar]
71. Dahl, Östen
    2020 Indo-European perfects in typological perspective. InJügel, Thomas, and Robert Crellin. Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond, 636–667. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.352.19dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.19dah [Google Scholar]
72. Dahl, Östen
    2021 “Universal” readings of perfects and iamitives in typological perspective. InKristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds.) The perfect volume: Papers on the perfect, 43–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.217.02dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.217.02dah [Google Scholar]
73. Darquennes, Jeroen, Joseph C. Salmons & Wim Vandenbussche
    2019 Language contact: An international handbook. Vol.11. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Drinka, Bridget
    2017 Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath
    (eds.) 2013 The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info,)
    [Google Scholar]
76. Dunn, Michael
    2015 Language phylogenies. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 190–211. Oxford, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
77. Friedman, Victor A. & Brian D. Joseph
    2017 Reassessing Sprachbunds: A view from the Balkans. InRaymond Hickey (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 55–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279872.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.005 [Google Scholar]
78. Friedman, Victor A. & Brian D. Joseph
    2021 Eastern and Western Romance in the Balkans — The contrasting but revealing positions of the Danubian Romance languages and Judezmo. Journal of Language Contact14(1). 127–146. 10.1163/19552629‑14010005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-14010005 [Google Scholar]
79. Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
    (eds.) 1995 Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884463 [Google Scholar]
80. Kerswill, Paul & Heike Wiese
    (eds.) 2022 Urban contact dialects and language change: Insights from the global north and south. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429487958
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487958 [Google Scholar]
81. Meillet, Antoine
    1908 Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indoeuropéennes. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Mesthrie, Rajend
    2022 Migrants and urban contact sociolinguistics in Africa and Europe. InPaul Kerswill & Heike Wiese (eds.). Urban contact dialects and language change, 337–343. 10.4324/9780429487958‑24
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487958-24 [Google Scholar]
83. Milroy, James
    1997 Internal vs. external motivations for linguistic change. Multilingua161. 311–23. 10.1515/mult.1997.16.4.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.4.311 [Google Scholar]
84. Mithun, Marianne
    2021 Language contact in North America. InEvangelia Adamou & Yaron Matras (eds.). The Routledge handbook of language contact, 503–527. Abingdon / New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2001 The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
86. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2021 Linguistic diversity, formal education, and economic development: The Sub-Saharan African Chicken-and-Egg Dilemma?InPhilip Harding-Esch & Hywel Coleman (eds.). Language and the sustainable development goals, 153–164. London:
    [Google Scholar]
87. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2020 Using large corpora to study language change. InBarbara S. Vance, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.). The handbook of historical linguistics. Vol.21, 272–290. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118732168.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732168.ch13 [Google Scholar]
88. Nichols, Johanna
    2016 Complex edges, transparent frontiers: Grammatical complexity and language spreads. InRaffaela Baechler & Guido Seiler (eds.). Complexity, isolation, and variation, 117–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110348965‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110348965-006 [Google Scholar]
89. Nichols, Johanna
    2020 Dispersal patterns shape areal typology. InMily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.). Language dispersal, diversification, and contact: A global perspective, 25–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198723813.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198723813.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
90. Petré, Peter & Freek Van de Velde
    2018 The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language94(4). 867–901. 10.1353/lan.2018.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0056 [Google Scholar]
91. Schmidt, Johannes
    1872 Die Verwandtschaftverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1882–1883 Kreolische Studien I-VI. Sitzungberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. 101–103; 105.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Tallman, Adam & Patience Epps
    2020 Morphological complexity, autonomy, and areality in western Amazonia. InFrancesco Gardani and Peter Arkadiev (eds.), The complexities of morphology, 230–264. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
94. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
95. Brown, Penelope
    1999 Repetition. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology9(1/2). 223–226. 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1‑2.223
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.223 [Google Scholar]
96. Haiman, John
    1994 Ritualization and the development of language. In: William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.109.07hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109.07hai [Google Scholar]
97. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    1998 Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics361. 161–195. 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161 [Google Scholar]
98. Ong, Walter
    1982/2002 Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Abner, Natasha, Grégoire Clarté, Carlo Geraci, Robin J. Ryder, Justine Mertz, Anah Salgat & Shi Yu
    2024 Computational phylogenetics reveal histories of sign languages. Science383(6682). 519–523. 10.1126/science.add7766
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add7766 [Google Scholar]
100. Auderset, Sandra
     2024 Rates of change and phylogenetic signal in Mixtec tone. Language Dynamics and Change14(1). 1–41. 10.1163/22105832‑bja10031
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10031 [Google Scholar]
101. Barbieri, Chiara, Damián E. Blasi, Epifanı́a Arango-Isaza, Alexandros G. Sotiropoulos, Harald Hammarström, Søren Wichmann, Simon J. Greenhill,
     2022 A global analysis of matches and mismatches between human genetic and linguistic histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(47). e2122084119. 10.1073/pnas.2122084119
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122084119 [Google Scholar]
102. Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kamal K. Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
     2015 The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. plos One10(8). e0132819. 10.1371/journal.pone.0132819
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132819 [Google Scholar]
103. Brochhagen, Thomas, Gemma Boleda, Eleonora Gualdoni & Yang Xu
     2023 From language development to language evolution: A unified view of human lexical creativity. Science381(6656). 431–436. 10.1126/science.ade7981
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade7981 [Google Scholar]
104. Calude, Andreea Simona, Steven Miller & Mark Pagel
     2020 Modelling loanword success — a sociolinguistic quantitative study of Māori loanwords in New Zealand English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory16(1). 29–66. 10.1515/cllt‑2017‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0010 [Google Scholar]
105. Canby, Marc E., Steven N. Evans, Donald Ringe & Tandy Warnow
     2024 Addressing polymorphism in linguistic phylogenetics. Transactions of the Philological Society122(2). 191–222. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12289
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12289 [Google Scholar]
106. Cathcart, Chundra, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich Round
     2022 Areal pressure in grammatical evolution: An Indo-European case study. Diachronica1–34. 10.1075/dia.16035.cat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16035.cat [Google Scholar]
107. Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
     2015 Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language91(1). 194–244. 10.1353/lan.2015.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
108. Conneau, Alexis, Min Ma, Simran Khanuja, Yu Zhang, Vera Axelrod, Siddharth Dalmia, Jason Riesa, Clara Rivera & Ankur Bapna
     2022 FLEURS: Few-shot learning evaluation of universal representations of speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12446. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12446
     [Google Scholar]
109. Douglas, Jordan, Remco Bouckaert, Simon C. Harris, Charles W. Carter & Peter R. Wills
     2024 Evolution is coupled with branching across many granularities of life. 10.1101/2024.09.08.611933
     https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.08.611933 [Google Scholar]
110. Duchene, Sebastian, Remco Bouckaert, David A. Duchene, Tanja Stadler & Alexei J. Drummond
     2018 Phylodynamic model adequacy using posterior predictive simulations. Systematic Biology68(2). 358–364. 10.1093/sysbio/syy048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy048 [Google Scholar]
111. Elgh, Erik & Harald Hammarström
     2024 The dialect chain tree. Diachronica41(3). 307–329. 10.1075/dia.23014.elg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23014.elg [Google Scholar]
112. Greenhill, Simon J.
     2021 Do languages and genes share cultural evolutionary history?Science Advances7(41). eabm2472. 10.1126/sciadv.abm2472
     https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm2472 [Google Scholar]
113. Greenhill, Simon J., Thomas E. Currie & Russell D. Gray
     2009 Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences276(1665). 2299–306. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1944
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1944 [Google Scholar]
114. Greenhill, Simon J., Alexei J. Drummond & Russell D. Gray
     2010 How accurate and robust are the phylogenetic estimates of Austronesian language relationships?PLOS One5(3). e9573. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009573
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009573 [Google Scholar]
115. Greenhill, Simon J., Paul Heggarty & Russell D. Gray
     2020 Bayesian phylolinguistics. InRichard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph & Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 226–253. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118732168.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732168.ch11 [Google Scholar]
116. Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
     2017 Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(42). E8822–E8829. 10.1073/pnas.1700388114
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700388114 [Google Scholar]
117. Hartmann, Frederik
     2024 An agent-based modelling approach to wave-like diversification of language families. Diachronica41(3). 330–354. 10.1075/dia.23010.har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23010.har [Google Scholar]
118. Hartmann, Frederik & George Walkden
     2024 The strength of the phylogenetic signal in syntactic data. Glossa9(1). 10.16995/glossa.10598
     https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10598 [Google Scholar]
119. Häuser, Luise, Gerhard Jäger, Johann-Mattis List, Taraka Rama & Alexandros Stamatakis
     2024 Are sounds sound for phylogenetic reconstruction?InMichael Hahn, Alexey Sorokin, Ritesh Kumar, Andreas Shcherbakov, Yulia Otmakhova, Jinrui Yang, Oleg Serikov, (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th workshop on research in computational linguistic typology and multilingual NLP, 78–87. St. Julian’s, Malta: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2024.sigtyp-1.11
     [Google Scholar]
120. Haynie, Hannah J., Damián Blasi, Hedvig Skirgård, Simon J. Greenhill, Quentin D. Atkinson & Russell D. Gray
     2023 Grambank’s typological advances support computational research on diverse languages. InProceedings of the 5th workshop on research in computational linguistic typology and multilingual NLP, 147–149. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigtyp-1.17. 10.18653/v1/2023.sigtyp‑1.17
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sigtyp-1.17 [Google Scholar]
121. Heled, Joseph & Alexei J. Drummond
     2008 Bayesian inference of population size history from multiple loci. BMC Evolutionary Biology8(1). 289. 10.1186/1471‑2148‑8‑289
     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-289 [Google Scholar]
122. Jacques, Guillaume & Johann-Mattis List
     2019 Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics9(1). 128–167. 10.1075/jhl.17008.mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17008.mat [Google Scholar]
123. Jäger, Gerhard & Johannes Wahle
     2021 Phylogenetic typology. Frontiers in Psychology121. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682132
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682132 [Google Scholar]
124. Kühnert, Denise, Tanja Stadler, Timothy G. Vaughan & Alexei J. Drummond
     2016 Phylodynamics with migration: A computational framework to quantify population structure from genomic data. Molecular Biology and Evolution33(8). 2102–2116. 10.1093/molbev/msw064
     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw064 [Google Scholar]
125. Labov, William D.
     2007 Transmission and diffusion. Language83(2). 344–387. 10.1353/lan.2007.0082
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0082 [Google Scholar]
126. List, Johann-Mattis
     2023 EDICTOR. A web-based interactive tool for creating and editing etymological datasets. https://digling.org/edictor/
127. List, Johann-Mattis, Robert Forkel, Simon J. Greenhill, Christoph Rzymski, Johannes Englisch & Russell D. Gray
     2022 Lexibank, a public repository of standardized wordlists with computed phonological and lexical features. Scientific Data9(1). 316. 10.1038/s41597‑022‑01432‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01432-0 [Google Scholar]
128. List, Johann-Mattis, Simon J. Greenhill & Russell D. Gray
     2017 The Potential of Automatic Word Comparison for Historical Linguistics. PLOS One12(1). e0170046. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170046
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170046 [Google Scholar]
129. Macklin-Cordes, Jayden L., Claire Bowern & Erich R. Round
     2021 Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics. Diachronica38(2). 210–258. 10.1075/dia.20004.mac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20004.mac [Google Scholar]
130. Meakins, Felicity
     2022 The word wide web: A mycelial turn in the conceptualisation and modelling of language evolution. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages37(2). 395–415. 10.1075/jpcl.00099.mea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00099.mea [Google Scholar]
131. Mendes, Fábio K., Remco Bouckaert, Luiz M. Carvalho & Alexei J. Drummond
     2024 How to validate a Bayesian evolutionary model. Systematic Biologysyae064. 10.1093/sysbio/syae064
     https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae064 [Google Scholar]
132. Meyerhoff, Miriam & James A. Walker
     2013 An existential problem: The sociolinguistic monitor and variation in existential constructions on Bequia (St. Vincent and the Grenadines). Language in Society42(4). 407–428. 10.1017/S0047404513000456
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000456 [Google Scholar]
133. Milroy, Lesley & James Milroy
     1992 Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society21(1). 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Neureiter, Nico, Peter Ranacher, Nour Efrat-Kowalsky, Gereon A. Kaiping, Robert Weibel, Paul Widmer & Remco R. Bouckaert
     2022 Detecting contact in language trees: A Bayesian phylogenetic model with horizontal transfer. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications9(1)205. 10.1057/s41599‑022‑01211‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01211-7 [Google Scholar]
135. Penny, David, B. J. McComish, M. A. Charleston & Michael D. Hendy
     2001 Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: The covarion model of molecular evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution53(6). 711–723. 10.1007/s002390010258
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s002390010258 [Google Scholar]
136. Rama, Taraka
     2018 Three tree priors and five datasets: A study of Indo-European phylogenetics. Language Dynamics and Change8(2). 182–218. 10.1163/22105832‑00802005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802005 [Google Scholar]
137. Ritchie, Andrew M. & Simon Y. W. Ho
     2019 Influence of the tree prior and sampling scale on Bayesian phylogenetic estimates of the origin times of language families. Journal of Language Evolution4(2). 108–123. 10.1093/jole/lzz005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzz005 [Google Scholar]
138. Rönchen, Philipp, Tilo Wiklund & Harald Hammarström
     2024 Likelihood calculation in a multistate model of vocabulary evolution for linguistic dating. Language Dynamics and Change14(1). 1–41. 10.1163/22105832‑bja10032
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10032 [Google Scholar]
139. Ross, Malcolm
     1997 Social networks and kinds of speech-community event. InRoger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.). Archaeology and language I: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 209–61. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
140. Ross, Malcolm
     2013 Diagnosing contact processes from their outcomes: The importance of life stages. Journal of Language Contact6(1). 5–47. 10.1163/19552629‑006001002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-006001002 [Google Scholar]
141. Skirgård, Hedvig
     2024 Disentangling ancestral state reconstruction in historical linguistics: Comparing classic approaches and new methods using Oceanic grammar. Diachronica41(1). 46–98. 10.1075/dia.22022.ski
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22022.ski [Google Scholar]
142. Skirgård, Hedvig, Hannah J. Haynie, Damián E. Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J. Latarche, Jakob Lesage,
     2023 Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances9(16). sciadv.adg6175. 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175
     https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6175 [Google Scholar]
143. Takahashi, Takuya, Ayaka Onohara & Yasuo Ihara
     2024 Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of pitch-accent systems based on accentual class merger: A new method applied to Japanese dialects. Journal of Language Evolutionlzae004. 10.1093/jole/lzae004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzae004 [Google Scholar]
144. Vaughan, Jill & Ruth Singer
     2018 Indigenous multilingualisms past and present. Language & Communication621. 83–90. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.06.003 [Google Scholar]