1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Diachronica
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The results of contact
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

This paper addresses the question to what extent the large influx of French verbs effected structural changes in the expression of resultativity in earlier English. Early French and English use distinctly different lexicalization patterns to encode motion and change-of-state events. In terms of Talmy’s (2000) typology, early English is a typical satellite-framing language, encoding Result outside the verb in a satellite, while French is a verb-framing language, encoding Result in the verb. A comprehensive corpus study of the lexical semantics of verbs occurring in the Penn Parsed Corpora of Historical English reveals that French verbs establish a novel way of expressing Result: transitive state-incorporating verbs are introduced in Middle English and witness a consistent diachronic increase after that. Complementary distribution effects with satellite-framing constructions suggest that these verbs are copied with their featural properties in the mental lexicon, which we interpret in terms of Ramchand’s (2008) First Phase Syntax.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str
2026-05-11
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/dia.25024.str/dia.25024.str.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
    2010 Argument structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu
    2014 From syntax to roots: A syntactic approach to root interpretation. InArtemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
    2015 External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ausensi, Josep
    2023 The division of labor between grammar and the lexicon: An exploration of the syntax and semantics of verbal roots. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110789683
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110789683 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ausensi, Josep & Alessandro Bigolin
    2023 On the argument structure realization of result verbs: A syntactic approach. Acta Linguistica Academica(). –. 10.1556/2062.2023.00567
     https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00567 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software(). –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beavers, John, Michael Everdell, Kyle Jerro, Henri Kauhanen, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Elise LeBovidge & Stephen Nichols
    2021 States and changes of state: A crosslinguistic study of the roots of verbal meaning. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2021.0044
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0044 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
    2020 The roots of verbal meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198855781.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198855781.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
    2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
  10. Borer, Hagit
    2005 Structuring sense: The normal course of events, vol.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosworth, Joseph, T. Northcote Toller, Sean Christ & Ondřej Tichý
    2010 Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Online resource. www.bosworthtoller.com/
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1988 The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Broccias, Cristiano
    2008 Towards a history of English resultative constructions: The case of adjectival resultative constructions. English Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1360674307002493
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002493 [Google Scholar]
  14. Burnett, Heather & Michelle Troberg
    2014 On the diachronic semantics of resultative constructions in French. InChristopher Piñón (ed.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, –. Paris: Université Paris 7 Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Denison, David
    1985 The origins of completive up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dowty, David R.
    1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Durkin, Philip
    2014 Borrowed words. A history of loan words in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574995.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574995.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elenbaas, Marion
    2007 The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination (LOT 149). Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Embick, David
    2004 On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/0024389041402634
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fanego, Teresa
    2012 Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica(Historica vol.). 10.1515/flih.2012.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2012.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
    2020 A Head Movement approach to Talmy’s typology. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/ling_a_00351
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00351 [Google Scholar]
  22. García García, Luisa
    2020 The basic valency orientation of Old English and the causative ja-formation: A synchronic and diachronic approach. English Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1360674318000345
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674318000345 [Google Scholar]
  23. García García, Luisa & Richard Ingham
    2023 Language contact effects on verb semantic classes: Lability in Early English and Old French. InSara M. Pons-Sanz & Louise Sylvester (eds.), Medieval English in a multilingual context, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑30947‑2_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30947-2_12 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1991 It can’t go down the chimney up: Paths and the English resultative. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society(). . 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1614
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1614 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
    2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2004.0129
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harley, Heidi
    2008 The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, why Mary can’t exhibit John her paintings. InThaïs Cristófaro Silva & Heliana Mello (eds.), Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, –. Belo Horizonte: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiltunen, Risto
    1983 The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb: The evidence from some Old and Early Middle English texts. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Huber, Judith
    2017 Motion and the English verb: A diachronic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190657802.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190657802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ingham, Richard
    2012 The transmission of Anglo-Norman: Language history and language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Johanson, Lars
    1999 The dynamics of code copying. InB. Brendemoen, E. Lanza & Ryen E. (eds.), Language Encounters across Time and Space, –. Oslo: Novus.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2002 Contact-induced change in a code-switching framework. InMC. Jones & E. Esch (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892598.285
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.285 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kroch, Anthony S., Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs
    2004 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME).
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kroch, Anthony S., Ann Taylor & Beatrice Santorini
    2000 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2).
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb08443.0001.001
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 Lexicalized scales and verbs of scalar change. Paper presented at46th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 2019 Lexicalization patterns. InRobert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.18
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.18 [Google Scholar]
  38. Los, Bettelou, Corrien Blom, Geert Booij, Marion Elenbaas & Ans van Kemenade
    2012 Morphosyntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511998447
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998447 [Google Scholar]
  39. McArthur, Tom
    (ed.) 1992 The Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. McFadden, Thomas
    2015 Preverbal ge- in Old and Middle English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics. –. 10.21248/zaspil.58.2015.427
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.58.2015.427 [Google Scholar]
  41. McSparran, Frances, Paul Schaffner, John Latta, Amy Pagliere, Charles Powell & Matt Stoeffler
    2001 Middle English Dictionary. Online resource. quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
    2004 Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2004.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
  43. Percillier, Michael, Yela Schauwecker, Achim Stein & Carola Trips
    2024 Carrying verbs across the channel: Modelling change in bilingual Medieval England. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50806‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50806-6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Piccione, Mariapaola & Thomas Rainsford
    2024 New insights into the typology of motion in the history of french: Evidence from the manner verb lexicon. InSHS web of conferences, vol. (9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2024), 03005. EDP Sciences. 10.1051/shsconf/202419103005
     https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419103005 [Google Scholar]
  45. Proffitt, Michael
    2015 Oxford English Dictionary. www.oed.com
     [Google Scholar]
  46. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ramchand, Gillian C.
    2008 Verb meaning and the lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2018 Situations and syntactic structures: Rethinking auxiliaries and order in english. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2014 Building scalar changes. InArtemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2017 Grammatically relevant ontological categories underlie Manner/Result complementarity. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
    1998 Building verb meanings. InMiriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, –. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 2010 Reflections on Manner/Result complementarity. InMalka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
    2019 The English phrasal verb, 1650-present: History, stylistic drifts, and lexicalization Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316182147
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316182147 [Google Scholar]
  54. Slobin, Dan
    2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. InSven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol., –. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, Ryan Walter, Ausensi, Josep, & Yu, Jianrong
    (2026) Strong and weak resultatives with result roots in English and Spanish. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, (), –. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.631
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.631 [Google Scholar]
  56. Struik, Tara, Lena Kaltenbach & Susanne Lang
    2025 Roots & Results (RoRe): A diachronic database of English verbal lexical semantics. https://osf.io/6hc93. Version 1.0.0. 10.17605/OSF.IO/6HC93
     https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6HC93
  57. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalisation patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk, Frank Beths, Anna Cichosz, Piotr Pęzik & Maciej Grabski
    2024 The Lemmatised York-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose, Beta version 10.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Thim, Stefan
    2012 Phrasal verbs: The English verb-particle construction and its history. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Trips, Carola & Michael Percillier
    2020 Lemmatising verbs in Middle English corpora: The benefit of enriching the Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English 2 (PPCME2), the parsed corpus of Middle English poetry (PCMEP), and a parsed linguistic atlas of early Middle English (PLAEME). InNicoletta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Hélène Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth language resources and evaluation conference, –. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Troberg, Michelle & Heather Burnett
    2017 From Latin to Modern French: A punctuated shift. InEric Mathieu & Robert Truswell (eds.), Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Troberg, Michelle & Justin Leung
    2021 On the unified change of directional/aspectual verb particles in French. Journal of Historical Syntax–. 10.18148/HS/2021.V5I40.104
     https://doi.org/10.18148/HS/2021.V5I40.104 [Google Scholar]
  64. Truswell, Robert, Rhona Alcorn, E. Jamieson Donaldson & Joel Wallenberg
    2018 A Parsed Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English. 10.7488/ds/2310
     https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2310 [Google Scholar]
  65. Van Gelderen, Elly
    2018 The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180335
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180335 [Google Scholar]
  66. van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los
    2003 Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English. InGeert Booij & Ans van Kemenade (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2003, –. New York: Kluwer Academic. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑1513‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  67. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review(). . 10.2307/2182371
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  68. Washio, Ryuichi
    1997 Resultatives, compositionality, and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. –. 10.1023/A:1008257704110
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110 [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu, Jianrong, Josep Ausensi & Ryan Walter Smith
    2023 States and changes-of-state in the semantics of result roots: Evidence from resultative constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. –. 10.1007/s11049‑023‑09570‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-023-09570-9 [Google Scholar]
  70. Zimmermann, Richard
    2018 The Parsed Corpus of Middle English Poetry (PCMEP). pcmep.net/
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str
Loading
The results of contact
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.25024.str
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.25024.str
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Old English ; Middle English ; language contact ; Early Modern English ; lexical semantics ; syntax-semantics interface ; event structure ; resultativity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error