f Introduction

References

1. Auderset, Sandra
   2024 Rates of change and phylogenetic signal in Mixtec tone. Language Dynamics and Change14(1). 10.1163/22105832‑bja10031
   https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10031 [Google Scholar]
2. Auderset, Sandra
   2022 Confronting challenges in historical linguistics: Quantitative approaches to dialect area subgrouping and tone change in Mixtec. Santa Barbara: University of California Santa Barbara PhD Thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baart, Joan
   2014 Tone and stress in north-west Indo-Aryan: A survey. InCaspers (eds.), Above and beyond the segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics, 1–13. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.189.01baa
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.01baa [Google Scholar]
4. Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
   2007 Problems in Zapotec tone reconstruction. InAnnual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3–15. 10.3765/bls.v33i2.3497
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v33i2.3497 [Google Scholar]
5. Bennett, Ryan
   2016 Mayan phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass10(10). 469–514. 10.1111/lnc3.12148
   https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12148 [Google Scholar]
6. Bowern, Claire
   2018 Computational phylogenetics. Annual Review of Linguistics41. 281–296. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034142
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034142 [Google Scholar]
7. Cahill, Michael
   2011 Tonal diversity in languages of Papua New Guinea. SIL Electronic Working Papers. https://www.sil.org/resources/publications/entry/42109
   [Google Scholar]
8. Campbell, Eric W.
   2021 Why is tone change still poorly understood, and how might documentation of less-studied tone languages help?InPatience Epps, Danny Law and Na’ama Pat-El (eds.), Historical linguistics and endangered languages: Exploring diversity in language change, 15–40. New York and London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429030390‑3
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030390-3 [Google Scholar]
9. Coetzee, Andries W., Patrice Speeter Beddor, Kerby Shedden, Will Styler and Daan Wissing
   2018 Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics661. 185–216. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.009 [Google Scholar]
10. Dockum, Rikker
    2018 Phylogeny in phonology: How Tai sound systems encode their past. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Phonology. 10.3765/amp.v5i0.4238
    https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v5i0.4238 [Google Scholar]
11. Dockum, Rikker
    2019 The tonal Comparative Method: Tai tone in diachronic perspective. New Haven: Yale University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dürr, Michael
    1990 A preliminary reconstruction of the Proto-Mixtec tonal system. Indiana111. 19–61. 10.18441/ind.v11i0.19‑61
    https://doi.org/10.18441/ind.v11i0.19-61 [Google Scholar]
13. Evans, Jonathan
    2001 Contact-induced tonogenesis in Southern Qiang. Language and Linguistics2(2). 63–110.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Evans, Jonathan, Wen-Chi Yeh and Rukmini Kulkarni
    2018 Acoustics of tone in Indian Punjabi. Transactions of the Philological Society116(3). 509–528. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12135
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12135 [Google Scholar]
15. Gehrmann, Ryan
    2022 Desegmentalization: Towards a common framework for the modeling of tonogenesis and registrogenesis in Mainland Southeast Asia with case studies from Austroasiatic. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Greenhill, Simon, Paul Heggarty, and Russell D. Gray
    2020 Bayesian phylolinguistics. InJanda, Richard, Brian D. Joseph and Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, Vol.21, 226–253. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118732168.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732168.ch11 [Google Scholar]
17. Guion, Susan G., Jonathan D. Amith, Christopher S. Doty and Irina A. Shport
    2010 Word-level prosody in Balsas Nahuatl: The origin, development, and acoustic correlates of tone in a stress accent language. Journal of Phonetics38(2). 137–166. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.006 [Google Scholar]
18. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1954 De l’origine des tons en Viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique2421. 69–82. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01678018
    [Google Scholar]
19. Howe, Penelope Jane
    2017 Tonogenesis in central dialects of Malagasy: Acoustic and perceptual evidence with implications for synchronic mechanisms of sound change. Houston: Rice University PhD thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/1911/96031
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hyman, Larry
    1976 Phonologization. InAlphonse Juilland (eds.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, 407–418. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hyman, Larry
    2016 On reconstructing tone in Proto-Niger-Congo. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report121. 10.5070/P7121040722
    https://doi.org/10.5070/P7121040722 [Google Scholar]
22. Janda, Richard D. and Brian D. Joseph
    2003 On language, change, and language change — or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. InBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3–180. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch [Google Scholar]
23. Kaufman, Terrence
    2025 Comparative Oto-Mangean grammar research. InWichmann, Søren (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Mexico and Northern Central America: A comprehensive guide. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kießling, Roland
    2004 Tonogenesis in Southern Cushitic (Common West Rift). InRose-Juliet Anyanwu (eds.), Stress and tone — the African experience, 141–163. (Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 15). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kingston, John
    2005 The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. InHargus, Sharon & Karen Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 137–184. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 269). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.269.09kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.09kin [Google Scholar]
26. Kubozono, Haruo and Mikio Giriko
    2018 Tonal change and neutralization. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110567502
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567502 [Google Scholar]
27. L-Thongkum, Theraphan and Chommanad Intajamornrak
    2008 Tonal evolution induced by language contact: A case study of the T’in (Lua’) language of Nan Province, northern Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies381. 57–68.
    [Google Scholar]
28. List, Johann-Mattis, Mary Walworth, Simon J. Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi, and Robert Forkel
    2018 Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics. Journal of Language Evolution3(2). 130–144. 10.1093/jole/lzy006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy006 [Google Scholar]
29. Maddieson, I.
    2023 Tone is not prodominant: Tone is not premordial. Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (ICPhS 2023), 1925–1929.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Manaster-Ramer, Alexis
    1986 Genesis of Hopi tones. International Journal of American Linguistics52(2). 154–160. www.jstor.org/stable/1265374. 10.1086/466010
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466010 [Google Scholar]
31. Morey, Stephen
    2005 Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area28(2). 139–202. 10.32655/LTBA.28.2.05
    https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.28.2.05 [Google Scholar]
32. Ratliff, Martha
    2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. InHoneybone, Patrick & Joseph Salmons (eds.). The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rensch, Calvin R.
    1976 Comparative Otomanguean phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill, and Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(21). 10317–10322. 10.1073/pnas.1817972116
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
35. Yang, Cathryn and Yi Xu
    2019 Cross-linguistic trends in tone change: A review of tone change studies in East and Southeast Asia. Diachronica36(3). 417–459. 10.1075/dia.18002.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18002.yan [Google Scholar]
36. Yang, Cathryn, Pittayawat Pittayaporn, James Kirby, and Sujinat Jitwiriyanont
    2022 Change and stability in the tonal contours of King Rama IX of Thailand, 1959–1997. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)66–70. 10.21437/TAI.2021‑14
    https://doi.org/10.21437/TAI.2021-14 [Google Scholar]
37. Yang, Cathryn
    2022 The phonetic tone change *high 〉 rising: Evidence from the Ngwi dialect laboratory. Diachronica39(2). 226–267. 10.1075/dia.19062.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19062.yan [Google Scholar]
38. Yang, Cathryn
    2023 Tone change in Mandarin: Comparing acoustic analyses from the early 20th century to today. InR. Skarnitzl & J. Volín (eds.), The 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences1930–1934.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Yip, Moira
    2002 Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
40. Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan and Li Jin
    2019 Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature5691. 112–115. 10.1038/s41586‑019‑1153‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z [Google Scholar]