1887
Volume 33, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

North Saami is replacing the use of possessive suffixes on nouns with a morphologically simpler analytic construction. Our data (>2K examples culled from >.5M words) track this change through three generations, covering parameters of semantics, syntax and geography. Intense contact pressure on this minority language probably promotes morphological simplification, yielding an advantage for the innovative construction. The innovative construction is additionally advantaged because it has a wider syntactic and semantic range and is indispensable, whereas its competitor can always be replaced. The one environment where the possessive suffix is most strongly retained even in the youngest generation is in the Nominative singular case, and here we find evidence that the possessive suffix is being reinterpreted as a Vocative case marker.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.33.3.02jan
2016-11-07
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abuladze, Lia & Andreas Ludden
    2013 The vocative in Georgian. In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 25–42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikio, Ante , Laura Arola & Niina Kunnas
    2015 Variation in North Saami. In Dick Smakman & Patrick Heinrich (eds.), Globalising sociolinguistics: Challenging and expanding theory, 243–255. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen, Henning
    2012 The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica51. 122–167. doi: 10.1080/00806765.2012.669918
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2012.669918 [Google Scholar]
  4. Antonsen, Lene , Laura A. Janda & Berit Anne Bals Baal
    2012 Njealji davvisámi adposišuvnna geavahus. The use of four North Saami adpositions. Sámi dieđalaš áigečála2012(2). 7–38. Online at:site.uit.no/aigecala/sda-2-2012-antonsen-ja-janda-ja-baal/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Antonsen, Lene & Laura A. Janda
    2015 Oamastanráhkadusat davvisámi girjjálašvuođas. The use of possessive constructions in North Saami prose. Dieđut2015(2), 9–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, Harald R. , Anna Endresen , Laura A. Janda , Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset
    2013 Space and time in Russian temporal expressions, a special issue of Russian Linguistics (37)3. 253–291. doi: 10.1007/s11185‑013‑9118‑6.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter
    2013 Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change3. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bethin, Christina Y
    2012 On paradigm uniformity and contrast in Russian vowel reduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory30(2). 425–63. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑012‑9166‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9166-4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blythe, Richard A. & William Croft
    2012 S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language88. 269–304. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
  10. Collinder, Björn
    1960Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1965An introduction to the Uralic languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahl, Östen
    2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.71 [Google Scholar]
  13. Daniel, Michael & Andrew Spencer
    2009 The vocative – an outlier case. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 626–634. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Endresen, Anna , Laura A. Janda , Robert Reynolds & Francis M. Tyers
    2016 Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics. 1–30. DOI 10.1007/s11185‑016‑9160‑2.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-016-9160-2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fink, Robert O
    1972 Person in nouns: Is the vocative a case?The American Journal of Philology93(1). 61–68. doi: 10.2307/292901
    https://doi.org/10.2307/292901 [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenberg, Robert D
    1996The Balkan Slavic appellative. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Grömping, Ulrike
    2009 Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest. The American Statistician63(4). 308–391. doi: 10.1198/tast.2009.08199
    https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heine, Bernd
    1997Possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill, Virginia
    2014Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics (Empirical Approaches to Linguistics Theory 5). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoek, Karen van
    1995 Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language71. 310–340. doi: 10.2307/416165
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416165 [Google Scholar]
  21. Isačenko, Alexander
    1962Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart: Formenlehre. Munich: Hueber.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jakobson, Roman O
    1971 Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. Roman Jakobson, selected writings. Vol. II, 3–15. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Janda, Laura A
    1996Back from the brink: A study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension (LINCOM Studies in Slavic Linguistics 01). Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Janda, Laura A. , Lene Antonsen & Berit Anne Bals Baal
    2014 A Radial Category Profiling Analysis of North Sámi Ambipositions. In Benjamin Anible , Keiko Beers , Laura Hirrel & Deborah Wager (eds.), High Desert Linguistics Society Proceedings, 10. Online at:linggraduate.unm.edu/HDLS10Proceedings.html
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Julien, Marit
    2014 Vokativar i norsk. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift32. 130–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaškin, E.V
    2008 Posessivnoe sklonenie v muževskom govore užemskogo dialekta komi-zyrjanskogo jazyka. Naučnyj vestnik Jamalo-Neneckogo avtonomnogo okruga, vyp. 6 (58). 33–46. Salexard: Krasnyj Sever.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Keskitalo, Pigga , Kaarina Määttä & Satu Uusiautti
    2013Sámi education. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01975‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01975-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kilgarriff, Adam
    2005 Language is never, ever, ever, random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory1/2. 263–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiparsky, Valentin
    1967Russische historische Grammatik, vol. 2. Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Langacker, Ronald W
    2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lass, Roger
    1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Linguistics26. 79–102. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700014432
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
  32. McWhorter, John H
    2007Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2011Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress?Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9781934078402
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078402 [Google Scholar]
  34. Michael, Lev
    2013 Possession in Nanti. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Possession and ownership, 149–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mühlhäusler, Peter
    1977Pidginisation and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda
    2010 Paradigm structure: Evidence from Russian suffix shift. Cognitive Linguistics21. 699–725. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nickel, Klaus Peter & Pekka Sammallahti
    2011Nordsamisk grammatikk. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nielsen, Konrad
    1979 [1926–1929]Lærebok i lappisk (samisk). Bind I: Grammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2003 Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology and Udmurt State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Polinsky, Maria
    2006 Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics14. 191–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. R Development Core Team
    (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Online at:www.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sammallahti, Pekka
    1998The Saami languages: An introduction. Karasjok, Norway: Davvi Girji.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sonnenhauser, Barbara & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna
    2013 Introduction: Vocative!In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 1–23. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110304176.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304176.1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stassen, Leon
    2013 Predicative possession. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Online at:wals.info/chapter/117, Accessed on2016-06-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Strobl, Carolin , James Malley , & Gerhard Tutz
    2009 An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods14. 323–348. doi: 10.1037/a0016973
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973 [Google Scholar]
  46. Trudgill, Peter
    2002Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2011Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1980Lingua mentalis: The semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ylikoski, Jussi
    2009Non-finites in North Saami. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2014 Davvisámegiela -ráigge – substantiiva, advearba, postposišuvdna vai kásus?. North Saami -ráigge-noun, adv, adverb, postposition or case?. Sámi dieđalaš áigeála2014 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zwicky, Arnold M
    1985 Clitics and particles. Language61(2). 283–305. doi: 10.2307/414146
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414146 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.33.3.02jan
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error