Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change

References

1. Ackerman, Farrell , James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf
   2009 Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition,54–82.
2. Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
   . Forthcoming. Implicative relations in word-based morphological systems. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albright, Adam C
   2002 The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Ph.D. diss., University of California Los Angeles.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Albright, Adam
   2005 The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,17–43.
5. Albright, Adam
   2010 Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory28. 475–537. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑010‑9107‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9107-z [Google Scholar]
6. Albright, Adam
   2011 Paradigms. In Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4: Phonological interfaces 1972–2001 Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Alderete, John R
   2001 Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology18. 201–253. doi: 10.1017/S0952675701004067
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004067 [Google Scholar]
8. Andersen, Henning
   1980 Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. New York: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Anderson, Stephen R
   1992 A-morphous morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Anderson, Stephen R
    2005 Morphological universals and diachrony. In Booij & van Marle (2005), 1–17.
11. Andersson, Erik
    1994 Swedish. In König & van der Auwera (1994), The Germanic languages,271–312.
12. Anttila, Raimo
    1989 Historical and comparative linguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.6 [Google Scholar]
13. Aronoff, Mark
    1998 Isomorphism and monotonicity: Or the disease model of morphology. In Steven G. Lapointe , Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 411–418. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Aronoff, Mark
    1994 Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Aronoff, Mark & Kirsten Fudeman
    2005 What is morphology?Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Askedal, John Ole
    1994 Norwegian. In König & van der Auwera (1994), The Germanic languages,219–270.
17. Bauer, Laurie
    2003 Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bebermeyer, Renate
    1974 Zur Volksetymologie: Wesen und Formen. In Jochen Möckelmann (ed.), Sprache und Sprachhandeln: Festschrift für Gustav Bebermeyer, 156–187. Hildesheim: Olms.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Becker, Thomas
    1990 Analogie und morphologische Theorie. München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Behaghel, Otto
    1886 Die deutsche Sprache. Leipzig: Freytag.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bierwisch, Manfred
    1987 A structural paradox in lexical knowledge. In Elke van der Meer & Joachim Hoffmann (eds.), Knowledge aided information processing, 141–172. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Blevins, James P
    2003 Stems and paradigms. Language79. 737–767. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0206
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0206 [Google Scholar]
23. Blevins, James P
    2004 Inflection classes and economy. In Gereon Müller , Lutz Gunkel & Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in nominal inflection, 41–85. New York: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197501.51
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197501.51 [Google Scholar]
24. Blevins, James P
    2006 Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics42(3). 531–5. doi: 10.1017/S0022226706004191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004191 [Google Scholar]
25. Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins
    2009a Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition,1–12.
26. Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins
    (eds.) 2009b Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Blevins, Juliette
    2004 Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486357
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486357 [Google Scholar]
28. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933 Language. New York: Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bobaljik, Jonathan David
    2002 Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53–85. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Booij, Geert
    2002 The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Booij, Geert & Jaap van Marle
    (eds.) 2005 Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Broe, Michael & Janet Pierrehumbert
    (eds.) 2000 Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Brugmann, Karl
    1876 Nasalis Sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache. In Georg Curtius & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Studien zur griechischen und lateinischen Grammatik, vol. 9, 285–338. Leipzig: Hirzel.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Burzio, Luigi
    2005 Sources of paradigm uniformity. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,65–106.
35. Bybee, Joan
    1980 Morphophonemic change from inside and outside the paradigm. Lingua50. 45–59. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(80)90079‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90079-0 [Google Scholar]
36. Bybee, Joan
    1988 Morphology as lexical organization. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 119–141. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Bybee, Joan
    1991 Natural morphology: The organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In Thom Huebner & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories, 67–91. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.2.08byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.08byb [Google Scholar]
38. Bybee, Joan
    2000 Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. In Broe & Pierrehumbert (2000), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5,250–268.
39. Bybee, Joan
    2001 Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
40. Bybee, Joan
    2015 Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Bybee, Joan L. & Carol Lynn Moder
    1983 Morphological classes as natural categories. Language59. 251–270. doi: 10.2307/413574
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413574 [Google Scholar]
42. Bybee, Joan L. & Jean E. Newman
    1995 Are stem changes as natural as affixes?Linguistics33, 633–654. doi: 10.1515/ling.1995.33.4.633
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.4.633 [Google Scholar]
43. Bybee, Joan , Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Bynon, Theodora
    1977 Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Campbell, Alistair
    1959 Old English grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Campbell, Lyle
    2004 Historical linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
    2008 System-congruity and violable constraints in German weak declension. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory26. 775–793. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9055‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9055-z [Google Scholar]
48. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
    2010 The evolution of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Chirita, Diana
    1988 Der Ausgleich des Ablauts im starken Präteritum im Frühneuhochdeutschen. New York: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
    1968 The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Christmann, Ernst
    1937 Zur Frage der Volksetymologie. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung13(1). 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Clark, Eve V
    1987 The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Coates, Richard
    1987 Pragmatic sources of analogical reformation. Journal of Linguistics23. 319–340. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011294
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011294 [Google Scholar]
54. Curtius, Georg
    1860 Das dreisilbengesetz der griechischen und lateinischen betonung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung9. 321–338.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Davies, Anna Morpurgo
    1978 Analogy, segmentation, and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society76(1). 36–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1978.tb01025.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1978.tb01025.x [Google Scholar]
56. Davis, Stuart
    2005 Capitalistic v. militaristic: The paradigm uniformity effect reconsidered. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,107–121.
57. Downing, Laura J. , Tracy A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen
    2005a Introduction: The role of paradigms in phonological theory. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,1–16.
58. Downing, Laura J. , Tracy A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen
    (eds.) 2005b Paradigms in phonological theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Dresher, B. Elan
    2000 Analogical levelling of vowel length in West Germanic. In Lahiri (2000b), Analogy, levelling, markedness: Principles of change in phonology and morphology,47–70.
60. Ducháček, Otto
    1964 L’attraction lexicale. Philologica Pragensia7. 65–76.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Embick, David
    2013 Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 151–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
62. Fertig, David
    1998 Suppletion, natural morphology, and diagrammaticity. Linguistics36. 1065–1091. doi: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.6.1065
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.6.1065 [Google Scholar]
63. Fertig, David
    1999 Analogical ‘leveling’ from outside the paradigm: Stem-vowel changes in the German modals. Diachronica16. 233–260. doi: 10.1075/dia.16.2.02fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16.2.02fer [Google Scholar]
64. Fertig, David
    2000 Morphological change up close. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Fertig, David
    2013 Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Fertig, David
    2015 Two conceptions of analogical innovation/change. In Peter Auer & Robert W. Murray (eds.), Hermann Paul’s ‘Principles of language history’ revisited, 209–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Fertig, David
    2016 Staying weird: Analogical change in high-frequency forms. Talk presented at the 22nd Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference , Reykjavík, Iceland, May 20, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Flemming, Edward
    2002 Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Gaeta, Livio
    2007 Is analogy economic?In Fabio Montermini , Gilles Boyé & Nabil Hathout (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, 20–33. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Gaeta, Livio
    2010 Analogical change. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 147–160. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Garrett, Andrew
    2008 Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Good (2008b), Linguistic universals and language change,125–143.
72. Garrett, Andrew & Keith Johnson
    2013 Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C.L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
73. Gerken, LouAnn , Rachel Wilson , Rebecca Gómez & Erika Nurmsoo
    2009 The relation between linguistic analogies and lexical categories. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition,101–117.
74. Godfrey, Elizabeth & Sali Tagliamonte
    1999 Another piece for the verbal s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change11. 87–121. doi: 10.1017/S0954394599111050
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394599111050 [Google Scholar]
75. Good, Jeff
    2008a Introduction. In Good (2008b), Linguistic universals and language change,1–19.
76. Good, Jeff
    (ed.) 2008b Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Greenberg, Joseph H
    1966 Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language42. 508–517. doi: 10.2307/411706
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411706 [Google Scholar]
78. Haberland, Hartmut
    1994 Danish. In König & van der Auwera (1994), The Germanic languages,313–348.
79. Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss
    2008 The phonological enterprise. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building20, 111–171. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Harris, James W
    1973 On the order of certain phonological rules in Spanish. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 59–76. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Haspelmath, Martin
    2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics42(1). 25–70. doi: 10.1017/S0022226705003683
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003683 [Google Scholar]
83. Hempen, Ute
    1988 Die starken Verben im Deutschen und Niederländischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111358420
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111358420 [Google Scholar]
84. Hermann, Eduard
    1931 Lautgesetz und Analogie (Abhandlungen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, neue Folge 23, 3). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Hill, Eugen
    2007 Proportionale Analogie, paradigmatischer Ausgleich und Formerweiterung: ein Beitrag zur Typologie des morphologischen Wandels. Diachronica24. 81–118. doi: 10.1075/dia.24.1.05hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24.1.05hil [Google Scholar]
86. Hock, Hans Henrich
    1991 Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219135 [Google Scholar]
87. Hock, Hans H. & Brian D. Joseph
    2009 Language history, language change, and language relationship, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214307
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214307 [Google Scholar]
88. Hockett, Charles F
    1954 Two models of grammatical description. Word10. 210–234. [Reprinted in Martin Joos (ed.). 1963. Readings in linguistics, 386–399. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.]. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659524 [Google Scholar]
89. Iverson, Gregory K. & Joseph C. Salmons
    2004 The conundrum of Old Norse umlaut: Sound change versus crisis analogy. Journal of Germanic Linguistics16. 77–110. doi: 10.1017/S1470542704000364
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542704000364 [Google Scholar]
90. Jeffers, Robert J. & Ilse Lehiste
    1979 Principles and methods for historical linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Jespersen, Otto
    1887 Zur Lautgesetzfrage. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft3. 188–216.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Joseph, Brian D
    1998 Diachronic morphology. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 351–373. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
    2013 Conspiring to mean: Experimental and computational evidence for a usage-based harmonic approach to morphophonology. Language89. 110–148. doi: 10.1353/lan.2013.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0003 [Google Scholar]
94. Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth
    1977 Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Kenstowicz, Michael
    2005 Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,145–169.
96. King, Robert D
    1973 Rule insertion. Language49. 551–578. doi: 10.2307/412351
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412351 [Google Scholar]
97. Kiparsky, Paul
    1968 Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 170–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Kiparsky, Paul
    1972 Explanation in phonology. In Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of lingusitic theory, 189–227. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Kiparsky, Paul
    1978 Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory. In Braj B. Kachru (ed.), Linguistics in the seventies: Directions and prospects, 77–96. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Kiparsky, Paul
     1992 Analogy. In William Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, vol. 1, 56–61. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Kiparsky, Paul
     2000 Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review17. 351–366. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2‑4.351
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.351 [Google Scholar]
102. König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
     (eds.) 1994 The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Krahe, Hans & Wolfgang Meid
     1969 Germanische Sprachwissenschaft II: Formenlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Kruszewski, Mikołaj
     1884–1890 Prinzipien der Sprachentwickelung. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft1(1884). 295–307; 2(1885). 258–268; 3(1887). 145–187; 5(1890). 133–144, 339–360.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Lahiri, Aditi
     2000a Introduction. In Lahiri (2000b), Analogy, levelling, markedness: Principles of change in phonology and morphology,1–14.
106. Lahiri, Aditi
     (ed.) 2000b Analogy, levelling, markedness: Principles of change in phonology and morphology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Lehmann, Winfried
     1962 Historical linguistics: An introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Lieber, Rochelle
     1992 Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Linell, Per
     1979 Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Luiten, Tyler , Andrea Menz , John M. Lindner & Joseph Salmons
     2013 Beyond the handbooks: A quantitative approach to Old High German phonology and morphology. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur135(1). 2–20.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Maiden, Martin
     2005 Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Booij & van Marle (2005), Yearbook of Morphology 2004,137–175.
112. Maiden, Martin
     2008 Lexical nonsense and morphological sense: On the real importance of ‘folk etymology’ and related phenomena for historical linguists. In Þórhallur Eyþórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory, 307–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.113.12mai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.113.12mai [Google Scholar]
113. Mańczak, Witold
     1958 Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua7. 298–325, 387–420. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(57)90101‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(57)90101-8 [Google Scholar]
114. Matthews, Peter H
     1972 Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Mayerthaler, Willi
     1981 Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
     [Google Scholar]
116. McCarthy, John J
     2005 Optimal paradigms. In Downing et al. (2005b), Paradigms in phonological theory,170–210.
117. Mengden, Ferdinand von
     2011 Ablaut or transfixation? On the Old English strong verbs. In Renate Bauer & Ulrike Krischke (eds.), More than words: English lexicography and lexicology past and present, 123–139. New York: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Misteli, Franz
     1880 Lautgesetz und Analogie. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft11. 365–475.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Nübling, Damaris
     2000 Prinzipien der Irregularisierung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110915082
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110915082 [Google Scholar]
120. Nübling, Damaris
     2008 Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Deklinationsklassen und ihr Wandel im Deutschen und seinen Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik75. 282–331.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Oertel, Hanns
     1901 Lectures on the study of language. New York: Scribner’s.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Ohala, John J
     1981 The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek , Roberta A. Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Ohala, John J
     2012 The listener as a source of sound change: An update. In Solé & Recasens (2012), The initiation of sound change,21–35.
124. Olschansky, Heike
     1996 Volksetymologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Osthoff, Hermann
     1878 Kleine beiträge zur declinationslehre der indogermanischen sprachen, pt. 1. In Hermann Osthoff & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 1, 207–290. Leipzig: Hirzel.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Osthoff, Hermann
     1879a Das physiologische und psychologische Moment in der sprachlichen Formenbildung. In Rudolf Birchow & Franz von Holtzendorff (eds.), Sammlung gemeinverständlicher wissenschaftlicher Vorträge, vol. 14, no. 337, 505–552. Berlin: Habel.
     [Google Scholar]
127. Osthoff, Hermann
     1879b Kleine beiträge zur declinationslehre der indogermanischen sprachen II. In Hermann Osthoff & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 2, 1–147. Leipzig: Hirzel.
     [Google Scholar]
128. Panagl, Oswald
     1982 Aspekte der Volksetymologie (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Vorträge und Kleinere Schriften 30). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Paul, Hermann
     1877 Die Vocale der Flexions- und Ableitungs-Silben in den aeltesten germanischen Dialecten. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur4. 315–475.
     [Google Scholar]
130. Paul, Hermann
     1886 Principien der Sprachgeschichte, 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Paul, Hermann
     1917 Deutsche Grammatik, vol. 2. Halle: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Paul, Hermann
     1920 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
133. Paul, Hermann
     1989 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn., ed. by Peter Wiehl & Siegfried Grosse . Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Pinker, Steven
     1999 Words and rules. New York: HarperCollins.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Prokosch, Edward
     1939 A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
     [Google Scholar]
136. Ringe, Don
     2006 A linguistic history of English, vol. 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
137. Robins, Robert H
     1959 In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society58. 116–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1959.tb00301.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1959.tb00301.x [Google Scholar]
138. Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
     2002 Volksetymologie und Paronomasie als lautnachahmende Wortschöpfung. In Mechthild Habermann , Peter O. Müller & Horst Haider Munske (eds.), Historische Wortbildung des Deutschen, 105–127. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110940756.105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940756.105 [Google Scholar]
139. Rundblad, Gabriella & David B. Kronenfeld
     2003 The inevitability of folk etymology: A case of collective reality and invisible hands. Journal of Pragmatics35. 119–138. doi: 10.1515/9783110940756.105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940756.105 [Google Scholar]
140. Salmons, Joseph
     2012 A history of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
141. Samuels, M.L
     1972 Linguistic evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139086707
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086707 [Google Scholar]
142. Sapir, Edward
     1921 Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Saussure, Ferdinand de
     1995 [1916] Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye . Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
144. Schirmunski, V.M
     1962 Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
145. Schuchardt, Hugo
     1885 Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Robert Oppenheim. [Reprinted in Vennemann & Wilbur (1972), 1–38; English translation 41–72.].
     [Google Scholar]
146. Solé, Maria-Josep & Daniel Recasens
     (eds.) 2012 The initiation of sound change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.323
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.323 [Google Scholar]
147. Steriade, Donca
     2000 Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics–phonology boundary. In Broe & Pierrehumbert (2000), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5,313–334.
148. Stump, Gregory T
     2001 Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
149. Stump, Gregory T
     2016 Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316105290
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105290 [Google Scholar]
150. Sturtevant, Edgar H
     1917 Linguistic change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
151. Thomason, Sarah G
     1974 On the analysis of inflectional change. Papers in Linguistics7. 351–379. doi: 10.1080/08351817409370378
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351817409370378 [Google Scholar]
152. Trask, R.L
     1996 Historical linguistics. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
153. Trommer, Jochen
     2012 Constraints on multiple-feature mutation. Lingua122. 1182–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.007 [Google Scholar]
154. Ullmann, Stephen
     1957 The principles of semantics, 2nd edn. New York: Barnes and Noble.
     [Google Scholar]
155. Vennemann, Theo
     1974 Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Anthony Bruck , Robert A. Fox & Michael W. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, 346–374. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
     [Google Scholar]
156. Vennemann, Theo
     1999 Volksetymologie und Ortsnamenforschung. Beiträge zur Namenforschung34(3). 269–322.
     [Google Scholar]
157. Vennemann, Theo & Terence H. Wilbur
     (eds.) 1972 Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
     [Google Scholar]
158. Wheeler, Benjamin Ide
     1887 Analogy and the scope of its application in language. Ithaca, NY: John Wilson and Son University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
159. Wolf, Matthew
     2007 For an autosegmental theory of mutation. In Leah Bateman , Adam Werle , Michael O’Keefe & Ehren Reilly (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics32, 315–404. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
160. Wundt, Wilhelm
     1900 Völkerpsychologie, vol. 1: Die Sprache, part 1. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
     [Google Scholar]
161. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
     1984 Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
162. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
     1989a Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Boston: Kluwer [Translation of Wurzel 1984].
     [Google Scholar]
163. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
     1989b Von der Inadäquatheit einer Affixmorphologie. Linguistische Studien, Reihe A194. 277–298.
     [Google Scholar]
164. Zager, David
     1980 A real time process model of morphological change. Ph.D. diss., University at Buffalo (SUNY).
     [Google Scholar]
165. Zwicky, Arnold M
     1990 Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar. In Wolfgang U. Dressler , Hans C. Luschützky , Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary morphology, 217–236. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]