Volume 33, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article presents a comparative analysis of the diachronic evolution of Romance clausal structure from Classical Latin through to the late medieval period, with particular reference to the Verb Second (V2) property. In the medieval period three distinct diachronic stages can be identified as regards V2: a C-VSO stage attested in Old Sardinian, a ‘relaxed’ V2 stage across Early Medieval Romance and maintained into 13th and 14th century Occitan and Sicilian, and a ‘strict’ V2 stage attested in 13th and 14th century French, Spanish and Venetian. The C-VSO grammar found in Old Sardinian is a retention of the syntactic system attested in late Latin textual records, itself an innovation on an ‘incipient V2’ stage found in Classical Latin, where V-to-C movement and XP-fronting receive a pragmatically or syntactically marked interpretation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albanés, Joseph
    1879La vie de Sainte Douceline. Marseille: Etienne Camoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonazzi, Giuliano
    1997Il condaghe di San Pietro di Silki: Testo logudorese inedito dei secoli XI–III. Sassari: Dessi.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunel, Clovis
    1926Les plus anciennes chartes en langue provençale: recueil de piéces originales antérieures au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Picard.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Campulu, Iohanni
    1989Libru de lu dialagu di sanctu Gregoriu. Rubbettino: Università di Catania.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cañas, Jesus
    1988Libro de Alexandre. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Curtius, Ernst
    1911Li quatre livres des Reis. Dresden: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Delfuoco, Silvana & Piergiuseppe Bernadi
    2005Sermoni subalpini. Torino: Centro Studi Piemontesi.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Levi, Ugo
    1904I monumenti del dialetto di Lio Mazor. Venezia: Visentini.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Knust, Hermann
    1909Libro de los ejemplos del conde Lucanor y de Patronio. Leipzig: Dr Seele & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Merci, Paolo
    2001Il condaghe di San Nicola di Trullas, Nuoro: Ilisso Edizioni.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1978 “Il più antico documente arborense.” Medioevo RomanzoV(II–III). 362–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pauphilet, Albert
    1919La quête du Saint Graal. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith, Colin
    1972Poema de mio Cid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Adams, James N
    1977The Vulgar Latin of the letters of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–472). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1994aWackernagel’s Law and the placement of copula esse in Classical Latin. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1994b Wackernagel’s Law and the position of unstressed pronouns in Classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society92. 103–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1994.tb00430.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1994.tb00430.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Adams, Marianne
    1987 From Old French to the theory of Pro-drop. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory5(1). 1–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00161866
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161866 [Google Scholar]
  18. Axel, Katrin
    2007Studies on Old High German syntax left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  19. Axel, Katrin & Helmut Weiss
    2011 Pro-drop in the history of German from Old High German to the modern dialects. In Peter Gallman & Melani Wratil (eds.), Null pronouns. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110238716.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238716.21 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ayres-Bennett, Wendy
    1996A history of the French language through texts. London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bauer, Brigitte
    1995The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French : Diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2009 Word order. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on Latin syntax, vol. 1: Syntax of the sentence, 241–316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bayer, Josef
    2004 Decomposing the left periphery: Dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 59–96. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Belletti, Adriana
    1990Generalised verb movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2001 “Inversion” as focalization. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, 60–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2005 Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus17. 1–35. doi: 10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2008Structures and strategies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Benincà, Paola
    1983 Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni patavini di linguistica4. 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1995 Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law. In Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 325–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2001 On the position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. London: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2004 The left periphery of medieval Romance. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online2(2). 243–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance. In Raffaella Zanuttini (ed.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2013 Caratteristiche del V2 Romanzo. Lingue Romanze Antiche, Ladino Dolomitico e Portoghese. In Ermenegildo Bidese & Federica Cognola (eds.), Introduzione alla linguistica del mòcheno, 65–84. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Benincà, Paola & C. Poletto
    2004 Topic, focus, and V2. Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. 52–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bentley, Delia
    1999 On the origin of Sardinian àere a plus infinitive. Medioevo Romanzo23(3). 321–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2007 Relazioni grammaticali e ruoli pragmatici: Siciliano e Italiano a confronto. In Delia Bentley & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), Sui dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent, 48–62. Norfolk: Biddles.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Bianchi, Valentina
    2006 On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua116(12). 2023–2067. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
    2015 Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence, 295–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Bleiberg, German , Maureen Ihrie & Janet Pérez
    (eds.) 1993Dictionary of the literature of the Iberian Peninsula. A–L. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bolkestein, Machtelt
    2000 Discourse organization and anaphora in Latin. In Susan C Herring , Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual Parameters in Older Languages, 107–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.195.06bol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.195.06bol [Google Scholar]
  41. Cardinaletti, Anna & Ian Roberts
    2002 Clause structure and X-Second. In Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP, 123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chomsky, Noam
    2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36(1). 1–22. doi: 10.1162/0024389052993655
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2008 On phases. In Robert Freidin , Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Clackson, James & Geoffrey C. Horrocks
    2007The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Cognola, Federica
    2013Syntactic variation and Verb Second: A German dialect in Northern Italy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.201
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.201 [Google Scholar]
  46. Cruschina, Silvio
    2006 Information focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2011 Focalization and word order in Old Italo-Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics10. 95–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2012Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759613.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759613.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Cruschina, Silvio & Adam Ledgeway
    . Forthcoming. The structure of the clause. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.) The Oxford guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0031 [Google Scholar]
  50. D’Alessandro, Roberta , Adam Ledgeway & Ian G. Roberts
    (eds.) 2010Syntactic variation: The dialects of Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Danckaert, Lieven Jozef Maria
    2012Latin embedded clauses: The left periphery. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.184
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.184 [Google Scholar]
  52. Delfuoco, Silvana
    2005Alla ricerca della lingua perduta. Sermoni subalpini, 17–35. Torino: Centro Studi Piemontesi.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Devine, A.M. & Laurence D. Stephens
    2006Latin word order: Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Donaldson, Bryan
    2012 Initial subordinate clauses in Old French: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery. Lingua122(9). 1021–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Duggan, Joseph J
    1989The cantar de mio Cid: Poetic creation in its economic and social contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511720109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720109 [Google Scholar]
  56. Ewert, Alfred
    1935 The Strasburg Oaths. Transactions of the Philological Society34(1). 16–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1935.tb01253.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1935.tb01253.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Eyþórsson, Þórhallur
    1995Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Ph.D. diss., Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Eyþorsson, Þórhallur
    2012Variation in the Syntax of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies2. 27–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Faarlund, Jan-Terje
    2010 Word order. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics, 1–38. London; New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
    2009 Orden de palabras, tópicos y focos en la prosa alfonsí. Alcanate6. 139–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1991 Discourse pragmatics and the grammar of Old French: A functional reinterpretation of “si” and the personal pronouns. Romance Philology44. 251–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Fontana, Josep
    1993Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Foulet, Lucien
    1928Petite syntaxe de ll’ancien français. Paris: H. Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Frascarelli, Mara
    2000The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. London: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9500‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1 [Google Scholar]
  65. Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
    2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In Susanne. Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.100.07fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  66. Frey, Werner
    2004 Notes on the syntax and pragmatics of German left dislocation. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 203–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110912111.203
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110912111.203 [Google Scholar]
  67. Giorgi, Alessandra
    2010About the speaker: Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Haegeman, Liliane
    1996 Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP4(2). 135–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2000 Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. Transactions of the Philological Society98(1). 121–160. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.00060
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00060 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2012Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    2013 The syntacticization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli , Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Haider, Hubert
    1982 Dependenzen und Konfigurationen: Zur deutschen V-Projektion. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik21. 1–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Hansch, Alexandra
    2014Germanic properties in the left periphery of Old French: V-to-C-Movement. Ph.D. diss., University of Ottawa.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Haumann, Dagmar
    2007Adverb licensing and clause structure in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.105
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.105 [Google Scholar]
  75. Hock, Hans Henrich
    1982 AUX-cliticization as a motivation for word order change. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences12(1). 91–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Hock, Hans Heinrich
    1986Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Holmberg, Anders
    2005 Is there a little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry36(4). 533–564. doi: 10.1162/002438905774464322
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2015 Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis, 242–283. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Horrocks, Geoffrey C
    2011 Latin syntax. In James Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 118–143. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444343397.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343397.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  80. Huang, C.-T. James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15. 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Hulk, Aafke & Ans van Kemenade
    1995 Verb-second, Pro-drop, functional projections and language change. In Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Ken Safir
    1989 The null-subject parameter and parametric theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 1–44. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_1 [Google Scholar]
  83. Jensen, Frede
    1990Old French and comparative Gallo-Romance syntax. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110938166
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110938166 [Google Scholar]
  84. Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel J
    2015 When focus goes wild: Syntactic positions for information focus. LingBaW (Linguistics Beyond and Within)1. 119–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Kaiser, Georg A
    2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110911640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911640 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kayne, Richard
    2000Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 2005Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  88. 1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Kroll, Wilhelm
    1918 Anfangstellung des Verbums im Lateinischen. Glotta9. 112–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Labelle, Marie
    2007 Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua117(1). 289–316. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  91. Labelle, Marie & Paul Hirschbühler
    2005 Changes in clausal structure and the position of clitics in Old French. In Montserrat Batllori , Maria-Lluisa Hernanz , Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 149–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. . Forthcoming. Topic and focus in Old French V1 and V2 structures. In Eric Mathieu & Robert Truswell (eds.) Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  94. Ledgeway, Adam
    2007 Old Neapolitan word order: Some initial observations. In Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds.), Histories and dictionaries of the languages of Italy, 121–49. Ravenna: Longo.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 2008 Satisfying V2 in early Romance: Merge vs. Move. Journal of Linguistics44(2). doi: 10.1017/S0022226708005173
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226708005173 [Google Scholar]
  96. 2009Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783484971288
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971288 [Google Scholar]
  97. 2010 Subject licensing in CP: The Neapolitan double-subject construction. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery, 257–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 2011 Philology and linguistics: When data meet theory. Two case studies II: the case of the Placiti cassinesi. Transactions of the Philological Society109(3). 213–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2011.01291_2.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01291_2.x [Google Scholar]
  99. 2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  100. 2015 Parallels in Romance nominal and clausal microvariation. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique60(2–3). 105–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. . Forthcoming. The verb phrase. In Giuseppe Longobardi (ed.) The syntax of Italian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. . In preparation. From Latin to Romance syntax: The great leap. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.) The Oxford handbook of diachronic and historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Ledgeway, Adam & Alessandra Lombardi
    2005 Verb movement, adverbs and clitic positions in Romance. Probus17. 79–113. doi: 10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  104. Linde, Paul
    1923 Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa. Glotta12. 153–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Lombardi, Alessandra
    2007 Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei constituenti della lingua sarda medievale. In Adam ef Ledgeway & Delia Bentley (eds.), Sui dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent, 133–148. Norfolk: Biddles.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    1980La langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles. Paris: Nathan.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 1985Dire le vrai: L’adverbe «si» en français médieval: Essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 1995L’évolution du français: Ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Marouzeau, Jules
    1938L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine, vol. 2. Paris: Geuthner.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Mathieu, Éric
    2012 The left periphery in Old French. In Deborah Arteaga (ed.), Research in Old French: The state of the art, 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Menéndez Pidal, Ramón
    1926Orígenes del Español: Estado lingüístico de la península ibérica hasta el siglo XI. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Mensching, Guido & Eva Remberger
    2010 Focus fronting and the left periphery in Sardinian. In Roberta D’Alessandro , Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, 261–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Merci, Paolo
    1978 Il più antico documente arborense. Medioevo RomanzoV(II–III). 362–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Möbitz, Otto
    1924 Die Stellung des Verbums in den Schriften des Apuleius. Glotta13. 116–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Mussafia, Alfredo
    1888 Enclisi o proclisi del pronome personale atono quale oggeto. Romania27. 145–146. doi: 10.3406/roma.1898.5532
    https://doi.org/10.3406/roma.1898.5532 [Google Scholar]
  116. Öhl, Peter
    2010 Formal and functional constraints on constituent order and their universality. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Linguistics Today165, 231–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.165.09ohl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.165.09ohl [Google Scholar]
  117. Önnerfors, O
    1997Verb-erst-Deklarativsätze: Grammatik und Pragmatik. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Parry, Mair
    1998 The reinterpretation of the reflexive in Piedmontese: “Impersonal” SE constructions. Transactions of the Philological Society96(1). 63–116. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.00024
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00024 [Google Scholar]
  119. Petrova, Svetlana
    2011 Modeling word order variation in discourse: On the pragmatic properties of VS order in Old High German. Oslo Studies in Language3(3). 209–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 2012 Multiple XP-fronting in Middle Low German root clauses. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics15(2). 157–188. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑012‑9050‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9050-y [Google Scholar]
  121. Petrova, Svetlana & M Solf
    2008 Rhetorical relations and verb placement in early Germanic: A cross-linguistic study. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), “Subordination” vs. “coordination” in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 333–351. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.98.18pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.98.18pet [Google Scholar]
  122. Pinkster, Harm
    1990Latin syntax and semantics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Poletto, Cecilia
    1995 The diachronic development of subject clitics in North Eastern Italian dialects. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 295–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 2000The higher functional field: Evidence from Northern Italian dialects, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. 2002 The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Sjef Barbiers , Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 2005 “Si” and “e” as CP expletives in Old Italian. In Montserrat Batllori , Maria-Lluisa Hernanz , Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 206–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  127. 2006a Old Italian scrambling: The low left periphery of the clause. In Patrick T. Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds.), Form, structure, and grammar: A Festschrift presented to Günther Grewendorf on occasion of his 60th birthday, 209–229. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 2013 On V2 types. In Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to syntax, 154–164. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 2014Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  130. Poletto, Cecilia & Raffaella Zanuttini
    2003 Making imperatives: Evidence from central Rhaetoromance. In Christina Tortora (ed.), The syntax of Italian dialects, 175–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Polo, Chiara
    2005 Latin word order in generative perspective: An explanatory proposal within the sentence domain. In Katalin É Kiss (ed.), Universal grammar in the reconstruction of ancient languages, 373–428. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Pollock, Jean-Yves
    1989 Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20. 365–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Pountain, Christopher
    2011 Latin and the structure of written Romance. In Martin Maiden , John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. 1: Structures, 606–659. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Price, Glanville
    1971The French language: Past and present. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Reenen, Pieter van & Lene Schøsler
    2000 The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles ainz, apres, donc, lors, or, puis and si. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), Textual parameters in older languages, 59–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.112.11rin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.11rin [Google Scholar]
  136. Reis, Marga
    1995 Wer glaubst du hat recht? On so-called extractions from verb-second clauses and verb-first parenthetical constructions in German. Sprache und Pragmatik36. 27–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Ribeiro, Ilza
    1995 Evidence for a verb-second phase in Old Portuguese. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 110–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Rinke, Esther
    2009 Verb placement in Old Portuguese. In Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds.), Focus and background in the Romance languages, 309–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.112.11rin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.11rin [Google Scholar]
  139. Rinke, Esther & Martin Elsig
    2010 Quantitative evidence and diachronic syntax. Lingua120. 2557–2568. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.012 [Google Scholar]
  140. Rivero, María-Lluisa
    1986 Parameters in the typology of clitics in Romance and Old Spanish. Language62. 774–807. doi: 10.2307/415172
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415172 [Google Scholar]
  141. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  142. Roberts, Ian
    1993Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. 2005Principles and parameters in a VSO language: A case study in Welsh. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168211.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168211.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  144. 2007Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. 2010Agreement and head movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  146. 2012 Phases, head movement and second-position effects. In Ángel J Gallego (ed.), Phases developing the framework, 385–440. Berlin; Boston: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110264104.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110264104.385 [Google Scholar]
  147. 2014 Syntactic change. In Andrew Carnie , Yosuke Sato & Daniel Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 391–408. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2002Syntactic change: A Minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Rosenkvist, Henrik
    2009 Referential null subjects in Germanic: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax84. 151–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Rouveret, Alain
    2004 Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en ancien français. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris99. 181–237. doi: 10.2143/BSL.99.1.541914
    https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.99.1.541914 [Google Scholar]
  151. Salvesen, Christine
    2013 Topics and the left periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In Terje Lohndal (ed.), In search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.202.10sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.202.10sal [Google Scholar]
  152. Salvesen, Christine & Kristin Bech
    2014 Postverbal subjects in Old English and Old French. Oslo Studies in Language6(1). 201–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Salvi, Giampaolo
    2000 La formazione della sistema V2 delle lingue romanze antiche. Lingua e Stile35. 665–692.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. 2002 Il problema di si e l’uso riflessivo di essere. VerbumIV(2). 377–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  155. 2004La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110945508
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945508 [Google Scholar]
  156. 2011 Morphosyntactic persistence. In Martin Maiden , John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance Languages, 155–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. 2012 On the nature of the V2 system of Medieval Romance. In Laura Brugè , Anna Cardinaletti , Giuliana Giusti , Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 7: Functional heads, 103–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Santorini, Beatrice
    1989The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of Yiddish. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Scremin, Maria Francesca
    1984La struttura della frase nella lingua poetica siciliana. Ph.D. diss., University of Padua Laurea.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Sheehan, Michelle
    2016 Subjects, null-subjects and expletives in Romance. In Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 392–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110311860‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311860-014 [Google Scholar]
  161. Shlonsky, Ur
    2009 Hebrew as a partial null subject language. Studia Linguistica63. 133–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.01156.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01156.x [Google Scholar]
  162. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
    1989The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Ph.D. diss., University of Lund.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. 1990 V1 declaratives and verb raising in Icelandic. Joan M. Maling & A. Zaenen (eds.). Syntax and Semantics24. 41–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. 1993 Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua89(2–3). 247–280. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90054‑Z
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90054-Z [Google Scholar]
  165. 2004 The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics16. 219–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. 2011 Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry42(2). 267–304. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00042
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
  167. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Joan M. Maling
    2010 The empty left edge condition. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 57–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lfab.3.04sig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.04sig [Google Scholar]
  168. Simonenko, A. & Paul Hirschbühler
    2012 Placement de clitiques dans les propositions V1 et évolution de la structure de la proposition en ancien français. In Monique Dufresne (ed.), Typologie, ordre des mots et groupe verbal en français médiéval, 11–53. Laval, Québec: Les Presses de L’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Sitaridou, Ioanna
    2005 A corpus-based study of null subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. In Claus D. Putsch , Johannes Kabatek & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Corpora and diachronic linguistics, 359–374. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. 2011 Word order and information structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics10. 159–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. 2012 A comparative study of word order in Old Romance. Anne Carlier , Béatrice Lamiroy & Walter De Mulder (eds.). Folia Linguistica46(2). 1–51. doi: 10.1515/flin.2012.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.019 [Google Scholar]
  172. Skårup, Povl
    1975Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Smith, Colin
    1972Poema de mio Cid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Somers, Katerina & Shannon Dubenion-Smith
    2014 The intersection between syntax and meter in Old Saxo. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik72(1). 83–134. doi: 10.1163/9789401211017_005.
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211017_005 [Google Scholar]
  175. Spevak, Olga
    2004 Verb-subject order in Latin: The case of existential and locative sentences. Classica et Mediaevalia: Revue Danoise de Philologie et d’Histoire55. 381–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. 2010Constituent order in Classical Latin prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.117 [Google Scholar]
  177. Steiner, B. Devan
    2014The role of information structure in the loss of verb-second in the history of French. Ph.D. diss., University of Indiana.
    [Google Scholar]
  178. Stussi, Alfredo
    1965Testi veneziani del duecento e dei primi del trecento. Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. Thurneysen, Rudolf
    1892 Die Stellung des Verbums in Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie16. 289–307. doi: 10.1515/zrph.1892.16.1‑4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1892.16.1-4.289 [Google Scholar]
  180. Tobler, Adolf
    1875 De l’ordre des mots dans Chrétien de Troyes. Vermischte Beiträge zur französischen Grammatik5. 395–414.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Vance, Barbara
    1987The evolution of Prodrop in Medieval French. MS thesis, Cornell.
    [Google Scholar]
  182. 1988 L’évolution de pro-drop en français médiéval. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée7. 85–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. 1993 Verb-first declaratives introduced by et and the position of Pro in Old and Middle French. Lingua89(2–3). 281–314. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90055‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90055-2 [Google Scholar]
  184. 1995 On the decline of verb movement to Comp in Old and Middle French. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 173–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. 1997Syntactic change in Medieval French: Verb-second and null subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8843‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8843-0 [Google Scholar]
  186. Vance, Barbara , Bryan Donaldson & B. Devan Steiner
    2009 V2 loss in Old French and Old Occitan: The role of fronted clauses. In Sonia Colina , Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Romance linguistics 2009. Selected papers from the 39th linguistic symposium on Romance languages (LSRL), Tuscon, Arizona, 301–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.315.18van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.315.18van [Google Scholar]
  187. Vanelli, Laura
    1987 I pronomi soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali dal Medio Evo ad oggi. Medioevo Romanzo12(1). 173–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Vanelli, Laura , Lorenzo Renzi & Paola Benincà
    1986 Tipologia dei pronomi soggetto nelle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica5. 49–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. Van Gelderen, Elly
    2008 Where did Late Merge go? Grammaticalization as feature economy. Studia Linguistica62(3). 287–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.00150.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.00150.x [Google Scholar]
  190. 2009 Feature economy in the linguistic cycle. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory, 93–109. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  191. Vincent, Nigel
    2014 Similarity and diversity in the evolution of Italo-Romance morphosyntax. In Paola Benincà , Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Diachrony and dialects, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  192. Virdis, Maurizio
    2004 Le prime manifestazioni della scrittura nel cagliaritano. In Barbara Fois (ed.), Judicalia: Atti di Seminario (Cagliari, 14 dicembre 2003), 45–54. Cagliari: CUEC.
    [Google Scholar]
  193. Wackernagel, Jacob
    1892 Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen1. 333–436. doi: 10.1515/9783110242430.333
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242430.333 [Google Scholar]
  194. Walkden, George
    2013 Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change25(2). 155–178. doi: 10.1017/S0954394513000070
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000070 [Google Scholar]
  195. 2014Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. 2015 Verb-third in early West Germanic: A comparative perspective. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time, 236–248. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  197. Wanner, Dieter
    1987The development of Romance clitic pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110893069
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110893069 [Google Scholar]
  198. Westergaard, Marit
    2009The acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.145 [Google Scholar]
  199. Wolfe, Sam
    2015a Medieval Sardinian: New evidence for syntactic change from Latin to Romance. In Dag T.T. Haug (ed.), Historical Linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013, 303–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.145 [Google Scholar]
  200. 2015b The nature of Old Spanish verb second reconsidered. Lingua164, part A. 132–155. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.007.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  201. 2015c The Old Sardinian condaghes: A syntactic study. Transactions of the Philological Society113(2). 177–205. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.12046.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12046 [Google Scholar]
  202. 2015d Verb-initial orders in Old Romance: A comparative Account. Revue Roumaine de LinguistiqueLX(2–3). 148–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. 2020 Forthcoming. On the left periphery of V2 languages. Rivista di grammatica generativa: Selected papers from the 41st incontro di drammatica generativa.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Wright, Roger
    1991Latin and the Romance languages in the early Middle Ages. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1997Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. Zeijlstra, Hedde H
    2004Sentential negation and negative concord. Utrecht: Ph.D. diss., University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Zimmerman, Michael
    2014Expletive and referential subject pronouns in Medieval French. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110367478
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110367478 [Google Scholar]
  208. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
    1998Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  209. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
    1997Morphosyntax of verb movement: A Minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5880‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5880-0 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Latin; left periphery; Medieval Romance; verb movement; Verb Second
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error