Diachrony of verb morphology: Japanese and the Transeurasian languages

References

1. Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés
   2014 Written Manchu ferguwecuke ‘astonishing’ and the oldest causative formations in Tungusic. In Agata Bareja-Starzyńska , Jan Rogala & Filip Majkowski (eds.), A window onto the other: Contributions on the study of the Mongolian, Turkic, and Manchu-Tungusic peoples, languages and cultures dedicated to Jerzy Tulisow on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 105–123. Warsaw: Elipsa.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bisang, Walter
   1998 Structural similarities of clause combining in Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu-Tungusic and Japanese: A typological alternative to the hypothesis of a genetic relationship. In Lars Johanson (ed.), The Mainz Meeting. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 199–223. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boldyrev, Boris V
   1987 Slovoobrazovanie imen suščestvitel’nyx v tunguso-man’čžurskix jazykax v sravnitel’no-istoričeskom osveščenii. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boller, Anton
   1857 Nachweis, daß das Japanische zum ural-altaischen Stamme gehört. Wien: K.K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cincius, Vera I
   (ed.) 1975–1977 Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ tunguso-man’čžurskix jazykov, vols. 1–2. Leningrad: Nauka.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Finch, Roger
   1988 Verb classes in the Altaic languages. Sophia Linguistica. Working Papers in Linguistics26. 41–61.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Finch, Roger
   1989 Verb classes in the Altaic languages. Sophia Linguistica. Working Papers in Linguistics27. 115–135.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Finch, Roger
   1999 Verb classes in the Altaic languages (2). Sophia Linguistica. Working Papers in Linguistics 44–45. 63–90.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Georg, Stefan
   2008 Review of M.I. Robbeets 2005 Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic?Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung32. 247–278.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gorelova, Liliya M
    2002 Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jì, Yǒnghǎi
    1993 «Shīyǔ gùshì» zài Mǎnzú zhōng de liúchuán. Mínzú wénxué yánjiū1993: 4. 15–23.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lebedeva, Elena P. & Lilija M. Gorelova
    1994 Sidi Kur. Sibinskaja versija ‘Volšebnogo mertveca’. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lie, Hiu
    1972 Die Mandschu-Sprachkunde in Korea (Uralic and Altaic Series, 114.) Bloomington: Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Miller, Roy Andrew
    2007 Review of M.I. Robbeets (2005): Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic?Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher (N.F.)18. 274–279.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Norman, Jerry
    . 2004–2005. Notes on Manchu pronunciation. Saksaha9. 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ramstedt, Gustaf J
    1952 Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, vol. 2: Formenlehre. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sadock, Jerry M
    1999 The nominalist theory of Eskimo: A case study in scientific self-deception. International Journal of American Linguistics65(4). 383–406. doi: 10.1086/466400
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466400 [Google Scholar]
18. Schwarz, Kenji
    2003 Review of Gorelova (2002). Saksaha8. 53–59.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sunik, Orest P
    1962 Glagol v tunguso-man’čžurskix jazykax. Morfologičeskaja struktura i sistema form glagol’nogo slova. Moskva & Leningrad: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Yin, Tiechao & Xuejuan Wu
    2012 The study of the sixth vowel ū in Manchu language. Saksaha11. 49–59.
    [Google Scholar]