1887
Volume 34, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0176-4225
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of possessive inflection in the three known Zamucoan languages: Ayoreo and Chamacoco – still spoken in the Chaco area between Bolivia and Paraguay – plus †Old Zamuco, described by the Jesuit father Ignace Chomé in the first half of the 18th century. The comparison allows us to build a plausible reconstruction of Proto-Zamucoan possessive inflection. Old Zamuco appears to be the most conservative language among the three, while Chamacoco appears to be the most innovative, although it exhibits relics of special importance for reconstructive purposes. Our analysis identifies in Zamucoan a series of features of general interest for the typology of person marking.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dia.34.3.01ciu
2017-10-13
2019-09-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adam, Lucien & Victor Henry
    1880Arte y vocabulario de la lengua chiquita. Paris: Maisoneuve y Cia.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adelaar, Willem F.H. & Hélène B. Brijnen
    2014 Natterer’s linguistic heritage. Archiv für Völkerkunde (Archiv Weltmuseum Wien)63–64. 163–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2002Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Forthcoming. Disentangling a versatile prefix: The nature and development of a polysemous marker in Arawak languages. International Journal of American Linguistics84(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R.W.M. Dixon
    2011Language at large: Essays on syntax and semantics. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aronoff, Mark
    1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baerman, Matthew
    2014 Suppletive kin term paradigms in the languages of New Guinea. Linguistic Typology18(3). 423–448. doi: 10.1515/lingty‑2014‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2014-0018 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baerman, Matthew , Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett
    2005The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486234
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486234 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baldus, Herbert
    1932 Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde der Samuko-Gruppe. Anthropos27. 361–416.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrios, Armindo , Domingo Bulfe & José Zanardini
    1995Ecos de la selva. Ayoreode uruode. Asunción: CEADUC.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertinetto, Pier Marco
    2011 How the Zamuco languages dealt with verb affixes. Word Structure4(2). 215–230. doi: 10.3366/word.2011.0011
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2011.0011 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2014 [2009] Ayoreo. In Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia, Tomo 3: Oriente , 369–413. La Paz: Plural Editores. English version [Ayoreo (Zamuco). A grammatical sketch 2009] at: linguistica.sns.it/QLL/QLL09/Bertinetto_1.PDF. (28May 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Luca Ciucci
    2012 Parataxis, hypotaxis and para-hypotaxis in the Zamucoan Languages. Linguistic Discovery10(1). 89–111. doi: 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.404
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.404 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boggiani, Guido
    1894I Ciamacoco. Roma: Società Romana per l’Antropologia.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell, Lyle
    2012 Typological characteristics of South American indigenous languages. In Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 259–330. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell, Lyle & Verónica Grondona
    2012 Languages of the Chaco and Southern Cone. In Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 625–668. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110258035.625
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110258035.625 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chafe, Wallace
    1990 Use of defocusing pronominal prefixes in Caddo. Anthropological Linguistics32. 57–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chomé, Ignace
    1958 [ante 1745] Arte de la lengua zamuca. Présentation de Suzanne Lussagnet. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris47. 121–178. doi: 10.3406/jsa.1958.1154
    https://doi.org/10.3406/jsa.1958.1154 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciucci, Luca
    2010a La flessione possessiva dell’ayoreo. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica, n.s., 9(2)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2010b La flessione possessiva del chamacoco. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica, n.s., 9(2)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013 Chamacoco lexicographical supplement. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica, n.s., 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2014 Tracce di contatto tra la famiglia zamuco (ayoreo, chamacoco) e altre lingue del Chaco: prime prospezioni. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica, n.s., 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2016 [2013]Inflectional morphology in the Zamucoan languages. Asunción: CEADUC.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ciucci, Luca & Pier Marco Bertinetto
    2015 A diachronic view of the Zamucoan verb inflection. Folia Linguistica Historica36(1). 19–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. . Forthcoming. Towards the reconstruction of Proto-Zamucoan nominal suffixation.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Clark, Charles Upson
    1937 Jesuit letters to Hervás on American languages and customs. Journal de la Société des Américanistes29. 97–145. doi: 10.3406/jsa.1937.1950
    https://doi.org/10.3406/jsa.1937.1950 [Google Scholar]
  27. Combès, Isabelle
    2009Zamucos. Cochabamba: Instituto de Misionerología.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Comrie, Bernard , Lucía A. Golluscio , Hebe González & Alejandra Vidal
    2010El Chaco como área lingüística . In Zarina Estrada Férnandez & Ramón Arzápalo Marín (eds.), Estudios de lenguas amerindias 2: contribuciones al estudio de las lenguas originarias de América, 85–130. Hermosillo, Sonora (Mexico): Editorial Unison.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2013 The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 69–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110331127.69
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.69 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cysouw, Michael
    2003The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Epps, Patience
    . Forthcoming. Amazonian linguistic diversity and its sociocultural correlates. To appear in Mily Crevels , Jean – Marie Hombert & Pieter Muysken eds. Language dispersal, diversification, and contact: A global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Evans, Nicholas
    2005 Australian languages reconsidered: A review of Dixon (2002). Oceanic Linguistics44(1). 242–286. doi: 10.1353/ol.2005.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0020 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fabre, Alain
    2007aDiccionario etnolingüístico y guía bibliográfica de los pueblos indígenas sudamericanos. Edición electrónica, www.ling.fi/DICCIONARIO.htm. (24February 2017.)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2007b Morfosintaxis de los clasificadores posesivos en las lenguas del Gran Chaco (Argentina, Bolivia y Paraguay). UniverSOS4. 67–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Falkinger, Sieglinde & Roberto Tomichá
    (eds.) 2012Gramática y vocabulario de los Chiquitos (s. XVIII). Cochabamba: Instituto de Misionología – Editorial Itinerarios.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Higham, Alice , Maxine Morarie & Greta Paul
    2000Ayoré-English dictionary. 3vols.Sanford, FL: New Tribes Mission.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kelm, Heinz
    1964 Das Zamuco – eine lebende Sprache. Anthropos59. 457–516 & 770–842.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mithun, Marianne
    1991 The development of bound pronominal paradigms. In Winfred P. Lehman & Helen-Jo Jakusz Hewitt (eds.), Language typology 1988: Typological models in reconstruction, 85–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.81.07mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.81.07mit [Google Scholar]
  39. 1993 Reconstructing the unidentified. In Henk Aertsen and Robert Jeffers (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1989: 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 329–347. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.106.24mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.106.24mit [Google Scholar]
  40. Morarie, Maxine
    1980Simplified Ayoreo grammar. Cochabamba: Publicaciones Nueva Vida (mimeo).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Seifart, Frank
    2011 Bora loans in Resígaro: Massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a moribund Arawakan language. Cadernos de Etnolingüística. Série de Monografias2.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sušnik, Branislava
    1957 Estructura de la lengua chamacoco-ebitoso (con fraseario del dialecto Ebitoso). Boletín de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay y del Museo Andrés Barbero, Etnolingüística1.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 1972Familia Zamuko. Čhamakoko – Ayoweo. Asunción: Museo Etnográfico “Andrés Barbero”.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ulrich, Matthew & Rosemary Ulrich
    2000Diccionario Ɨshɨro (Chamacoco) – Español / Español – Ɨshɨro (Chamacoco). Asunción: Misión Nuevas Tribus Paraguay.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wichmann, Søren , Eric W. Holman & Cecil H. Brown
    (eds.) 2016 The ASJP Database (version 17)asjp.clld.org/ (24February 2017.)
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dia.34.3.01ciu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dia.34.3.01ciu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error